java synchronized atomic_synchronized与atomic性能对比

写了两个例子，对这两种机制进行对比，发现性能差距在6倍以上。

synchronized的例子：

public class SyncInc {

public static void main(String[] args) {

CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(10);

long begin = System.nanoTime();

for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

new Thread() {

@Override

public void run() {

while (Number.get() < 100_000_000) {

Number.inc();

}

latch.countDown();

}

}.start();

}

try {

latch.await();

System.out.println("took " + (System.nanoTime() - begin) / 1_000_000 + " ms");

} catch (InterruptedException e) {

e.printStackTrace();

}

}

}

class Number {

public static volatile int value = 0;

public static synchronized void inc() {

value++;

}

public static int get() {

return value;

}

Atomic的例子：

public class AtomicInc {

public static void main(String[] args) {

CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(10);

long begin = System.nanoTime();

for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {

new Thread() {

@Override

public void run() {

while (AtomicNumber.get() < 100_000_000) {

AtomicNumber.inc();

}

latch.countDown();

}

}.start();

}

try {

latch.await();

System.out.println("took " + (System.nanoTime() - begin) / 1_000_000 + " ms");

} catch (InterruptedException e) {

e.printStackTrace();

}

}

}

class AtomicNumber {

public static AtomicInteger value = new AtomicInteger(0);

public static void inc() {

value.incrementAndGet();

}

public static int get() {

return value.get();

}

}