ansi mysql_MySQL的ANSI和Unicode驱动程序之间的区别

最新推荐文章于 2024-01-26 23:30:37 发布

weixin_39554891

最新推荐文章于 2024-01-26 23:30:37 发布

阅读量832

点赞数

文章标签： ansi mysql

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_39554891/article/details/113140631

版权

在Windows上选择ODBC（64位）的数据源时，有两个可用的MySQL数据库选项：MySQL ODBC 5.3 ANSI驱动和MySQL ODBC 5.3 Unicode驱动。这两者有何不同？主要区别在于字符编码处理。ANSI驱动适用于ASCII字符，而Unicode驱动支持更广泛的Unicode字符集，包括UTF-8编码的数据。使用Unicode驱动不会导致速度下降，并且对于存储和处理Unicode数据是必需的。建议避免使用ANSI驱动，因为现代应用通常需要处理更广泛的字符集。

摘要生成于 C知道，由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持，前往体验 >

On choosing Data Source under ODBC (64-Bit) on Windows, i get two available options of MySQL Database:

MySQL ODBC 5.3 ANSI Driver

MySQL ODBC 5.3 Unicode Driver

What are the difference between these two?

解决方案

Firstly I should say that I don't use MySQL but I do know about ODBC Drivers. In ODBC there are different APIs for unicode and ansi. The ansi APIs end in A and the unicode APIs end in W (e.g., SQLPrepareA and SQLPrepareW). The ansi APIs accept bytes/octets for character strings and hence can only handle chrs 0-255. The unicode APIs accept SQLWCHARs which are 2 byte UCS-2 encoded unicode codepoints (newer MS SQL Server versions can handle UTF16 encoded strings) and so can handle approximately the first 65000 codepoints in unicode.

So if you need to store unicode data you have no choice which driver to use.

I would not let the comments on speed from Carnangel put you off using the unicode driver and in any case his comments do not include any facts. He may be referring to:

If you store unicode data in MySQL it will be UTF-8 encoded and transferred over your network as UTF-8. At the client end the ODBC driver will have to convert the UTF-8 encoded data into UCS-2 as this is what ODBC needs. Obviously the reverse applies.

If you write an ANSI ODBC application (that is one which uses the ansi ODBC apis) with a unicode ODBC driver then the ODBC Driver manager will have to convert the UCS-2 the driver returns to 8 bit (lossy) and convert the 8 bit data you pass to the driver to UCS-2. So don't do that.

These days I'd be surprised if anyone is still using ANSI ODBC drivers.