java 遍历list性能_java list三种遍历方法性能比较

从c/c++语言转向java开发，学习java语言list遍历的三种方法，顺便测试各种遍历方法的性能，测试方法为在ArrayList中插入1千万条记录，然后遍历ArrayList，发现了一个奇怪的现象，测试代码如下：

package com.hisense.tiger.list;

import java.util.ArrayList;

import java.util.Iterator;

import java.util.List;

public class ListTest {

public static void main(String[] args)

{

List list = new ArrayList();

long t1,t2;

for(int j = 0; j < 10000000; j++)

{

list.add("aaaaaa" + j);

}

System.out.println("List first visit method:");

t1=System.currentTimeMillis();

for(String tmp:list)

{

//System.out.println(tmp);

}

t2=System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("Run Time:" + (t2 -t1) + "(ms)");

System.out.println("List second visit method:");

t1=System.currentTimeMillis();

for(int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++)

{

list.get(i);

//System.out.println(list.get(i));

}

t2=System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("Run Time:" + (t2 -t1) + "(ms)");

System.out.println("List Third visit method:");

Iterator iter = list.iterator();

t1=System.currentTimeMillis();

while(iter.hasNext())

{

iter.next();

//System.out.println(iter.next());

}

t2=System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println("Run Time:" + (t2 -t1) + "(ms)");

System.out.println("Finished!!!!!!!!");

}

}

测试结果如下：

List first visit method:

Run Time:170(ms)

List second visit method:

Run Time:10(ms)

List Third visit method:

Run Time:34(ms)

Finished!!!!!!!!

测试的结论很奇怪，第一种方法是java语言支持的新语法，代码最简洁，但是在三种方法中，性能确是最差的，取size进行遍历性能是最高的，求牛人解释？