mysql gtid setup_MySQL GTID详解

MySQL在5.6版本推出了GTID复制,相比传统的复制,GTID复制对于运维更加友好,这个事物是谁产生,产生多少事物,非常直接的标识出来。

今天将讨论一下 关于从库show slave status 中的Retrieved_Gtid_Set 和 Executed_Gtid_Set.

Retrieved_Gtid_Set : 从库已经接收到主库的事务编号

Executed_Gtid_Set : 从库自身已经执行的事务编号

下面将解释这两列的含义:

首先看看master和slave的server-uuid

Master:

[root@localhost][db1]> show variables like '%uuid%';

+---------------+--------------------------------------+

| Variable_name | Value |

+---------------+--------------------------------------+

| server_uuid | 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb |

+---------------+--------------------------------------+

1 row in set (0.00 sec)

Slave

[root@localhost][(none)]> show variables like '%uuid%';

+---------------+--------------------------------------+

| Variable_name | Value |

+---------------+--------------------------------------+

| server_uuid | 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab |

+---------------+--------------------------------------+

1 row in set (0.01 sec)

其中主库的server-id是10,从库的server-id是20.

搭建好主从以后,如果没有数据写入,那么show slave status是下面这样的:

Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:

Master_Server_Id: 10

Master_UUID: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb

Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info

SQL_Delay: 0

SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL

Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates

Master_Retry_Count: 86400

Master_Bind:

Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:

Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:

Master_SSL_Crl:

Master_SSL_Crlpath:

Retrieved_Gtid_Set:

Executed_Gtid_Set:

Auto_Position: 1

Replicate_Rewrite_DB:

Channel_Name:

Master_TLS_Version:

如果在主库创建表,并且写入2条数据,是下面这样的:

[root@localhost][db1]> create table t2 ( id int);

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.07 sec)

[root@localhost][db1]> insert into t2 select 1;

Query OK, 1 row affected (0.07 sec)

Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

[root@localhost][db1]> insert into t2 select 2;

Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)

Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

这里auto_commit=1,可以看到创建表加插入2条数据,一共执行了3个事务.

从库:show slave status\G

Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:

Master_Server_Id: 10

Master_UUID: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb

Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info

SQL_Delay: 0

SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL

Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates

Master_Retry_Count: 86400

Master_Bind:

Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:

Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:

Master_SSL_Crl:

Master_SSL_Crlpath:

Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3

Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3

Auto_Position: 1

主库:show master status

+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+

| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | Executed_Gtid_Set |

+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+

| mysql-bin.000001 | 912 | | | 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3 |

+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+

1 row in set (0.00 sec)

其中主库的 Executed_Gtid_Set为:2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3

看到从库的Retrieved_Gtid_Set为:   2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3

Executed_Gtid_Set为: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3

也就是说主库产生了3个事务,从库接收到了主库的3个事务,且都已全部执行。

其中 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb 是主库的server-uuid. 可以从从库解析binlog看出:

# at 154

#170823 0:38:38 server id 10 end_log_pos 219 CRC32 0x6268641f GTID last_committed=0 sequence_number=1

SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1'/*!*/;

# at 219

#170823 0:38:38 server id 10 end_log_pos 316 CRC32 0x6c837618 Query thread_id=103 exec_time=0 error_code=0

use `db1`/*!*/;

SET TIMESTAMP=1503419918/*!*/;

SET @@session.pseudo_thread_id=103/*!*/;

SET @@session.foreign_key_checks=1, @@session.sql_auto_is_null=0, @@session.unique_checks=1, @@session.autocommit=1/*!*/;

SET @@session.sql_mode=1436549152/*!*/;

SET @@session.auto_increment_increment=1, @@session.auto_increment_offset=1/*!*/;

/*!\C utf8 *//*!*/;

SET @@session.character_set_client=33,@@session.collation_connection=33,@@session.collation_server=33/*!*/;

SET @@session.lc_time_names=0/*!*/;

SET @@session.collation_database=DEFAULT/*!*/;

create table t2 ( id int)

/*!*/;

可以看见server-id为10,gtid-next为2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1,执行了建表,剩下的

2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:2 与 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:3 执行的查询我没有写出来。

这里也体现了文章开始提到的:这个事物由谁产生,产生多少事物,非常直接的标识了出来。

那么对于文章开头那个诡异的gtid是怎么出来的呢?先说说已经执行的事务:

Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-33,

8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1

这里的2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-33好理解,就是已经执行主库的1-33的事务,那么8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1呢?其实也简单,有两种情况:

NO.1  从库有数据写入(即从库插入数据)

[root@localhost][db1]> insert into t2 select 1;

Query OK, 1 row affected (0.03 sec)

Records: 1 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0

show slave status\G;

Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:

Master_Server_Id: 10

Master_UUID: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb

Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info

SQL_Delay: 0

SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL

Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates

Master_Retry_Count: 86400

Master_Bind:

Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:

Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:

Master_SSL_Crl:

Master_SSL_Crlpath:

Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3

Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,

8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1

Auto_Position: 1

Replicate_Rewrite_DB:

可以看到已经执行的事务有来自主库的2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,也有从库自己写入的数据:8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1。我们可以解析binlog看看

mysqlbinlog -vv mysql-bin.000001 --include-gtids='8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1'

# at 896

#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 961 CRC32 0x0492528a GTID last_committed=3 sequence_number=4

SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1'/*!*/;

# at 961

#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1032 CRC32 0xbf545cca Query thread_id=25 exec_time=0 error_code=0

SET TIMESTAMP=1503421159/*!*/;

SET @@session.pseudo_thread_id=25/*!*/;

SET @@session.foreign_key_checks=1, @@session.sql_auto_is_null=0, @@session.unique_checks=1, @@session.autocommit=1/*!*/;

SET @@session.sql_mode=1436549152/*!*/;

SET @@session.auto_increment_increment=1, @@session.auto_increment_offset=1/*!*/;

/*!\C utf8 *//*!*/;

SET @@session.character_set_client=33,@@session.collation_connection=33,@@session.collation_server=33/*!*/;

SET @@session.lc_time_names=0/*!*/;

SET @@session.collation_database=DEFAULT/*!*/;

BEGIN

/*!*/;

# at 1032

#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1079 CRC32 0x2f2de3ec Rows_query

# insert into t2 select 1

# at 1079

#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1123 CRC32 0x18fe1c5c Table_map: `db1`.`t2` mapped to number 109

# at 1123

#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1163 CRC32 0x163a708e Write_rows: table id 109 flags: STMT_END_F

BINLOG '

52KcWR0UAAAALwAAADcEAACAABdpbnNlcnQgaW50byB0MiBzZWxlY3QgMezjLS8=

52KcWRMUAAAALAAAAGMEAAAAAG0AAAAAAAEAA2RiMQACdDIAAQMAAVwc/hg=

52KcWR4UAAAAKAAAAIsEAAAAAG0AAAAAAAEAAgAB//4BAAAAjnA6Fg==

'/*!*/;

### INSERT INTO `db1`.`t2`

### SET

### @1=1 /* INT meta=0 nullable=1 is_null=0 */

# at 1163

#170823 0:59:19 server id 20 end_log_pos 1194 CRC32 0xe3347ac1 Xid = 68

COMMIT/*!*/;

SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= 'AUTOMATIC' /* added by mysqlbinlog */ /*!*/;

从binlog中可以清楚看到是从库进行了写入。

NO.2 主从切换(这里使用的是MHA切换主从)

Master_Server_Id: 20

Master_UUID: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab

Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info

SQL_Delay: 0

SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL

Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates

Master_Retry_Count: 86400

Master_Bind:

Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:

Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:

Master_SSL_Crl:

Master_SSL_Crlpath:

Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1

Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,

8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1

Auto_Position: 1

可以看到主从切换以后主库的server-id是20。这里的意思是接收到主库8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1,并已经执行了这个事物,这个事物其实就是之前从库写入的那条数据。对于2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3就是之前主库执行的3个事务,如果此时在主库再插入一条数据,那么变化如下:

Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-2

Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,

8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-2

下面说说GTID不连续问题,类似 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:37-45 ,这个是由于binlog被清理后导致的,我们可以测试一下,然后查看gtid_purge变量。

binlog不可能永远驻留在服务上,需要定期进行清理(通过expire_logs_days可以控制定期清理间隔),否则迟早它会把磁盘用尽。gtid_purged用于记录已经被清除了的binlog事务集合,它是gtid_executed的子集。只有gtid_executed为空时才能手动设置该变量,此时会同时更新gtid_executed为和gtid_purged相同的值。gtid_executed为空意味着要么之前没有启动过基于GTID的复制,要么执行过RESET MASTER。执行RESET MASTER时同样也会把gtid_purged置空,即始终保持gtid_purged是gtid_executed的子集。

[root@localhost][db1]> show master logs;

+------------------+-----------+

| Log_name | File_size |

+------------------+-----------+

| mysql-bin.000001 | 3530 |

+------------------+-----------+

1 row in set (0.00 sec)

[root@localhost][db1]> flush logs;

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec)

[root@localhost][db1]> show master logs;

+------------------+-----------+

| Log_name | File_size |

+------------------+-----------+

| mysql-bin.000001 | 3577 |

| mysql-bin.000002 | 234 |

+------------------+-----------+

2 rows in set (0.00 sec)

[root@localhost][db1]> PURGE BINARY LOGS TO 'mysql-bin.000002';

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)

[root@localhost][db1]> show master logs;

+------------------+-----------+

| Log_name | File_size |

+------------------+-----------+

| mysql-bin.000002 | 234 |

+------------------+-----------+

1 row in set (0.00 sec)

然后只要从库有重新启动,才会读取。MySQL服务器启动时,通过读binlog文件,初始化gtid_executed和gtid_purged,使它们的值能和上次MySQL运行时一致。

gtid_executed  本机被执行并写入日志的gtid

gtid_purged      该变量中记录的是本机上已经执行过,但是已经被purge binary logs to命令清理的gtid_set

没启动前:

Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-9

Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,

8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-9

重启并插入数据:

Master_Server_Id: 20

Master_UUID: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab

Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info

SQL_Delay: 0

SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL

Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates

Master_Retry_Count: 86400

Master_Bind:

Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:

Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp:

Master_SSL_Crl:

Master_SSL_Crlpath:

Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:10

Executed_Gtid_Set: 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,

8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-10

Auto_Position: 1

[root@localhost][(none)]> show variables like 'gtid_purged';

+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

| Variable_name | Value |

+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

| gtid_purged | 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3,

8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-9 |

+---------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

1 row in set (0.01 sec)

可以看到 2a09ee6e-645d-11e7-a96c-000c2953a1cb:1-3 与 8ce853fc-6f8a-11e7-8940-000c29e3f5ab:1-9 都在mysql-bin.000001里,已经被清除了。

下面的两个实验,将会告诉我们如果主日志被清除,但从还没获得这些日志,该怎么处理:

实验一:如果slave所需要事务对应的GTID在master上已经被purge了

根据show global variables like '%gtid%'的命令结果我们可以看到,和GTID相关的变量中有一个gtid_purged。从字面意思以及 官方文档可以知道该变量中记录的是本机上已经执行过,但是已经被purge binary logs to命令清理的gtid_set。

本节中我们就要试验下,如果master上把某些slave还没有fetch到的gtid event purge后会有什么样的结果。

以下指令在master上执行

master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show global variables like '%gtid%';

+---------------------------------+----------------------------------------+

| Variable_name | Value |

+---------------------------------+----------------------------------------+

| binlog_gtid_simple_recovery | OFF |

| enforce_gtid_consistency | ON |

| gtid_executed | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1 |

| gtid_mode | ON |

| gtid_owned | |

| gtid_purged | |

| simplified_binlog_gtid_recovery | OFF |

+---------------------------------+----------------------------------------+

7 rows in set (0.01 sec)

master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > flush logs;create table gtid_test2 (ID int) engine=innodb;

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)

master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > flush logs;create table gtid_test3 (ID int) engine=innodb;

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec)

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec)

master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show master status;

+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+

| File | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB | Executed_Gtid_Set |

+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+

| mysql-bin.000005 | 359 | | | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 |

+------------------+----------+--------------+------------------+------------------------------------------+

1 row in set (0.00 sec)

master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > purge binary logs to 'mysql-bin.000004';

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec)

master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show global variables like '%gtid%';

+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+

| Variable_name | Value |

+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+

| binlog_gtid_simple_recovery | OFF |

| enforce_gtid_consistency | ON |

| gtid_executed | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 |

| gtid_mode | ON |

| gtid_owned | |

| gtid_purged | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1 |

| simplified_binlog_gtid_recovery | OFF |

+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+

7 rows in set (0.00 sec)

在slave2上重新做一次主从,以下命令在slave2上执行

slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > change master to master_host='127.0.0.1',master_port =21288,master_user='rsandbox',master_password='rsandbox',master_auto_position=1;

Query OK, 0 rows affected, 2 warnings (0.04 sec)

slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > start slave;

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)

slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > show slave status\G

*************************** 1. row ***************************

......

Slave_IO_Running: No

Slave_SQL_Running: Yes

......

Last_Errno: 0

Last_Error:

Skip_Counter: 0

Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 0

Relay_Log_Space: 151

......

Last_IO_Errno: 1236

Last_IO_Error: Got fatal error 1236 from master when reading data from binary log: 'The slave is connecting using CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_AUTO_POSITION = 1, but the master has purged binary logs containing GTIDs that the slave requires.'

Last_SQL_Errno: 0

Last_SQL_Error:

......

Auto_Position: 1

1 row in set (0.00 sec)

实验二:忽略purged的部分,强行同步

那么实际生产应用当中,偶尔会遇到这样的情况:某个slave从备份恢复后(或者load data infile)后,DBA可以人为保证该slave数据和master一致;或者即使不一致,这些差异也不会导致今后的主从异常(例如:所有master上只有insert没有update)。这样的前提下,我们又想使slave通过replication从master进行数据复制。此时我们就需要跳过master已经被purge的部分,那么实际该如何操作呢?

我们还是以实验一的情况为例:

先确认master上已经purge的部分。从下面的命令结果可以知道master上已经缺失24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1这一条事务的相关日志

master [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > show global variables like '%gtid%';

+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+

| Variable_name | Value |

+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+

| binlog_gtid_simple_recovery | OFF |

| enforce_gtid_consistency | ON |

| gtid_executed | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3 |

| gtid_mode | ON |

| gtid_owned | |

| gtid_purged | 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1 |

| simplified_binlog_gtid_recovery | OFF |

+---------------------------------+------------------------------------------+

7 rows in set (0.00 sec)

在slave上通过set global gtid_purged='xxxx'的方式,跳过已经purge的部分

slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > stop slave;

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.04 sec)

slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > set global gtid_purged = '24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1';

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec)

slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > start slave;

Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)

slave2 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > show slave status\G

*************************** 1. row ***************************

Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event

......

Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005

Read_Master_Log_Pos: 359

Relay_Log_File: mysql_sandbox21290-relay-bin.000004

Relay_Log_Pos: 569

Relay_Master_Log_File: mysql-bin.000005

Slave_IO_Running: Yes

Slave_SQL_Running: Yes

......

Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 359

Relay_Log_Space: 873

......

Master_Server_Id: 1

Master_UUID: 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b

Master_Info_File: /data/mysql/rsandbox_mysql-5_6_23/node2/data/master.info

SQL_Delay: 0

SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL

Slave_SQL_Running_State: Slave has read all relay log; waiting for the slave I/O thread to update it

......

Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:2-3

Executed_Gtid_Set: 24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:1-3

Auto_Position: 1

1 row in set (0.00 sec)

可以看到此时slave已经可以正常同步,并补齐了24024e52-bd95-11e4-9c6d-926853670d0b:2-3范围的binlog日志。

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值