java hashmap同步问题_java – 同步不经常更新的hashmap的最佳方法

At the point where I do myMap = myLocalMap, is there a possibility

that some other thread that is reading data from myMap get an empty or

unexpected result?

不,那里没有.为参考变量读取和写入are atomic,这意味着整个操作一次全部发生,并且在整个操作完成之前,结果对其他线程不可见.因此,从’myMap’读取的任何线程都将获得旧的myMap或新的myMap,但永远不会得到空的或不一致的结果.此外,在’myMap’上使用volatile关键字意味着所有线程始终都会知道新数据：如果myMap已更新,则在更新操作启动后启动的任何读取操作都将使用该更新值.

来自Oracle Java教程的支持文档：

Reads and writes are atomic for reference variables and for most primitive variables (all types except long and double).

any write to a volatile variable establishes a happens-before relationship with subsequent reads of that same variable

If a variable is declared with the volatile keyword then it is

guaranteed that any thread that reads the field will see the most

recently written value.

同样来自Vogella的同一篇文章：

The Java language specification guarantees that reading or writing a

variable is an atomic operation

另请参阅this参考,特别是“清单3.使用volatile变量进行安全的一次性发布”,其中描述了与您的非常类似的场景.

顺便说一下,我同意Giovanni关于ConcurrentHashMap的观点.但在您的情况下,您不需要使用ConcurrentHashMap,因为所有更新都发生在单个事务中,而您只是将Map调整为指向新数据.