尝试覆盖子类中的属性时,我对此行为有点困惑.
第一个示例设置两个类,Parent和Child. Parent继承自object,而Child继承自Parent.属性a使用属性装饰器定义.调用child.a的setter方法时,会引发AttributeError.
在第二个例子中,通过使用property()函数而不是装饰器,一切都按预期工作.
谁能解释为什么行为不同?此外,是的,我知道不需要Child中的__init__定义.
示例1 – 使用@property
class Parent(object):
def __init__(self):
self._a = 'a'
@property
def a(self):
return self._a
@a.setter
def a(self, val):
self._a = val
class Child(Parent):
def __init__(self):
super(Child, self).__init__()
@property
def a(self):
return super(Child, self).a
@a.setter
def a(self, val):
val += 'Child'
super(Child, self).a = val
p = Parent()
c = Child()
print p.a, c.a
p.a = 'b'
c.a = 'b'
print p.a, c.a
示例1 return – 引发属性错误
a a
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "testsuper.py", line 26, in
c.a = 'b'
File "testsuper.py", line 20, in a
super(Child, self).a = val
AttributeError: 'super' object has no attribute 'a'
示例2 – 使用property()
class Parent(object):
def __init__(self):
self._a = 'a'
def _get_a(self):
return self._a
def _set_a(self, val):
self._a = val
a = property(_get_a, _set_a)
class Child(Parent):
def __init__(self):
super(Child, self).__init__()
def _get_a(self):
return super(Child, self)._get_a()
def _set_a(self, val):
val = val+'Child'
super(Child, self)._set_a(val)
a = property(_get_a, _set_a)
p = Parent()
c = Child()
print p.a, c.a
p.a = 'b'
c.a = 'b'
print p.a, c.a
示例2返回 – 正确工作
a a
b bChild