java 多层异常_Java中多层异常包裹时候获取最底层的最真实异常-分析Java异常栈...

示例代码：

import java.util.concurrent.Callable;

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;

import java.util.concurrent.Executors;

import java.util.concurrent.Future;

class AudienceLimitExcption extends Exception {

public AudienceLimitExcption(String message, Throwable cause) {

super(message, cause);

}

}

class Task implements Callable {

@Override

public Object call() throws Exception {

try {

System.out.println(1 / 0);

} catch (Exception e) {

throw new AudienceLimitExcption("limit error", e);

}

return 1;

}

}

代码异常1：

public class Main {

public static void main(String[] args) {

Object r = null;

ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);

try {

Future f = es.submit(new Task());

r = f.get();

System.out.println();

} catch (Throwable e) {

System.out.println(e.getClass());

}

}

}

输出结果：class java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException  不是最真实的底层抛出去的异常。

分析异常栈：

会发现当cause==当前异常时候就是最真实异常，于是代码如下：

public class Main {

public static void main(String[] args) {

Object r = null;

ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);

try {

Future f = es.submit(new Task());

r = f.get();

System.out.println();

} catch (Throwable e) {

while (e != null) {

Throwable cause = e.getCause();

if (e.equals(cause)) {

System.out.println(e);

}

e = cause;

}

}

}

}

运行发现没有输出，debug发现当e为真实异常时候，e.getCause方法返回值为null。因此if分支无法为true，所以没有输出。与上图异常栈分析结论相悖，只能查看一下getCause方法实现：

public synchronized Throwable getCause() {

return (cause==this ? null : cause);

}

JDK实现时候，当cause等于当前异常e时候直接返回null，因此正确方案如下：

public class Main {

public static void main(String[] args) {

Object r = null;

ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4);

try {

Future f = es.submit(new Task());

r = f.get();

System.out.println();

} catch (Throwable e) {

while (e != null) {

Throwable cause = e.getCause();

if (cause == null) {

System.out.println(e.getClass());

}

e = cause;

}

}

}

}

输出结果也就是1/0最真实的异常类型：class java.lang.ArithmeticException