linux c open的库文件,為進程linux (C代碼)找到打開的文件描述符?

23

Here's some code I used to use, I didn't know about /proc/self (thx Donal!), but this way is probably more generic anyway. I've included the required includes for all the functions at the top.

這里有一些我曾經使用過的代碼，我不知道/proc/self (thx Donal!)，但是這種方法可能更通用。我已經包括了所需的包括在頂部的所有功能。

#include

#include

#include

#include

#include

#include

#include

#ifndef FALSE

#define FALSE (0)

#endif

#ifndef TRUE

#define TRUE (!FALSE)

#endif

/* implementation of Donal Fellows method */

int get_num_fds()

{

int fd_count;

char buf[64];

struct dirent *dp;

snprintf(buf, 64, "/proc/%i/fd/", getpid());

fd_count = 0;

DIR *dir = opendir(buf);

while ((dp = readdir(dir)) != NULL) {

fd_count++;

}

closedir(dir);

return fd_count;

}

I went through a very bad problem with leaking file handles once, and it turns out I actually coded the solution Tom H. suggested:

我曾經遇到過一個非常糟糕的問題，文件處理程序有一次泄漏，結果我實際上編寫了這個解決方案，Tom h建議:

/* check whether a file-descriptor is valid */

int pth_util_fd_valid(int fd)

{

if (fd < 3 || fd >= FD_SETSIZE)

return FALSE;

if (fcntl(fd, F_GETFL) == -1 && errno == EBADF)

return FALSE;

return TRUE;

}

/* check first 1024 (usual size of FD_SESIZE) file handles */

int test_fds()

{

int i;

int fd_dup;

char errst[64];

for (i = 0; i < FD_SETSIZE; i++) {

*errst = 0;

fd_dup = dup(i);

if (fd_dup == -1) {

strcpy(errst, strerror(errno));

// EBADF oldfd isn’t an open file descriptor, or newfd is out of the allowed range for file descriptors.

// EBUSY (Linux only) This may be returned by dup2() during a race condition with open(2) and dup().

// EINTR The dup2() call was interrupted by a signal; see signal(7).

// EMFILE The process already has the maximum number of file descriptors open and tried to open a new one.

} else {

close(fd_dup);

strcpy(errst, "dup() ok");

}

printf("%4i: %5i %24s %s\n", i, fcntl(i, F_GETOWN), fd_info(i), errst);

}

return 0;

}

You'll probably want these too, to satisfy the last printf above...

您可能還需要這些，以滿足上面最后的printf…

char *fcntl_flags(int flags)

{

static char output[128];

*output = 0;

if (flags & O_RDONLY)

strcat(output, "O_RDONLY ");

if (flags & O_WRONLY)

strcat(output, "O_WRONLY ");

if (flags & O_RDWR)

strcat(output, "O_RDWR ");

if (flags & O_CREAT)

strcat(output, "O_CREAT ");

if (flags & O_EXCL)

strcat(output, "O_EXCL ");

if (flags & O_NOCTTY)

strcat(output, "O_NOCTTY ");

if (flags & O_TRUNC)

strcat(output, "O_TRUNC ");

if (flags & O_APPEND)

strcat(output, "O_APPEND ");

if (flags & O_NONBLOCK)

strcat(output, "O_NONBLOCK ");

if (flags & O_SYNC)

strcat(output, "O_SYNC ");

if (flags & O_ASYNC)

strcat(output, "O_ASYNC ");

return output;

}

char *fd_info(int fd)

{

if (fd < 0 || fd >= FD_SETSIZE)

return FALSE;

// if (fcntl(fd, F_GETFL) == -1 && errno == EBADF)

int rv = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);

return (rv == -1) ? strerror(errno) : fcntl_flags(rv);

}

FD_SETSIZE is usually 1024, and the maximum files per process is usually 1024. If you want to be sure, you can replace it with a call to this function, as described by TomH.

FD_SETSIZE通常是1024，每個進程的最大文件通常是1024。如果您想確定，可以用TomH所描述的對這個函數的調用來替換它。

#include

#include

rlim_t get_rlimit_files()

{

struct rlimit rlim;

getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, &rlim);

return rlim.rlim_cur;

}

If you put all of that together into a single file (which I did, just to check it), you can produce an output similar to this to confirm it works as advertised:

如果您將所有這些合並到一個文件中(我確實這樣做了，只是為了檢查它)，您可以生成類似於此的輸出，以確認其工作如下所示:

0: 0 O_RDWR dup() ok

1: 0 O_WRONLY dup() ok

2: 0 O_RDWR dup() ok

3: 0 O_NONBLOCK dup() ok

4: 0 O_WRONLY O_NONBLOCK dup() ok

5: -1 Bad file descriptor Bad file descriptor

6: -1 Bad file descriptor Bad file descriptor

7: -1 Bad file descriptor Bad file descriptor

8: -1 Bad file descriptor Bad file descriptor

9: -1 Bad file descriptor Bad file descriptor

I hope that answers any questions you have, and in case you were wondering, I actually came here looking for the answer to the question the OP asked, and upon reading the answered, remember I had already written the code years ago. Enjoy.

我希望這能回答你的任何問題，如果你想知道，我其實是來這里尋找問題的答案，在閱讀答案的時候，記住我已經在幾年前寫過代碼了。享受。