python字典值求平均值_在python字典中求非零值的平均值

因为你要求的是最快的，这里有一些时间安排。请注意，我在windows8上使用IPython和python3.3，运行i7-3770。另外，在python2.x上，不应该像使用整数除法一样使用/进行除法。请改用float(a)/b，或者在文件顶部添加一个from __future__ import division。在d = {"a": {"pen": 12, "table": 23},

"b": {"pen": 12, "table": 0},

"c": {"pen": 16, "table": 54}}

def method0(): # Your method

count = sum(1 for inner_dict in d if d[inner_dict]["table"] > 0)

total = sum([d[inner_dict]["table"] for inner_dict in d if d[inner_dict]["table"] > 0])

average = total/count

def method1():

count = 0

total = 0

for a in d.values():

val = a['table']

if val > 0:

count += 1

total += val

average = total/ count

def method2(): # user3684792's/Padraic Cunningham's method

filtered = [d[i]["table"] for i in d if d[i]["table"] > 0]

average = sum(filtered)/len(filtered)

# from functools import reduce # If using Python 3

def method3(): # Sylvain Leroux's method

n, s = reduce(lambda acc,v: (acc[0]+1,acc[1]+v["table"]) if v["table"] else acc,

d.values(),

(0, 0))

average = s/n

%timeit method0()

# 10000 loops, best of 3: 23.9 us per loop

%timeit method1()

# 1000000 loops, best of 3: 756 ns per loop

%timeit method2()

# 10000 loops, best of 3: 22.5 us per loop

%timeit method3()

# 1000000 loops, best of 3: 1.29 us per loop

初步结论：使用for循环和简单加法(method1)比本例中的任何列表理解方法都快得多。在

这和你所期望的差不多。请注意，方法1和方法3只迭代一次数据，并在执行过程中收集所有数据。方法0和2迭代更多，因为它们通过一个过程筛选出所需的条目，然后通过另一个过程来求和。在