I have a table of postcodes and I want to update each postcode with its 3 nearest neighbours. Ie to fill in the blanks in this table:
我有一個郵政編碼表,我想用3個最近的鄰居更新每個郵政編碼。即填寫此表中的空白:
postcode nearestPostcode1 nearestPostcode2 nearestPostcode3
_______________________________________________________________
KY6 1DA - - -
KY6 1DG - - -
KY6 2DT - - -
KY6 1RG - - -
....
I've figured out a SELECT query to find the nearest postcodes and here is one clumsy way the first row could be updated:
我已經找到了一個SELECT查詢來查找最近的郵政編碼,這是第一行可以更新的一種笨拙的方式:
update table1 set
nearestPostcode1 = (select query for returning the first nearest postcode),
nearestPostcode2 = (select query for returning the second nearest postcode),
nearestPostcode3 = (select query for returning the third nearest postcode)
where postcode = 'KY6 1DA';
However this will result in 3 select queries being run for each row update. It would be more efficient if there was some way to do what is expressed by this pseudo code:
但是,這將導致為每個行更新運行3個選擇查詢。如果有一些方法來執行這個偽代碼所表達的內容,那將會更有效:
update table1 set
(nearestPostcode1, nearestPostcode2, nearestPostcode3) =
(select query to return the 3 nearest postcodes)
where postcode = 'KY6 1DA';
The 'select query' in the above looks like this:
上面的“選擇查詢”如下所示:
select postcode from postcodeTable
order by ASC
limit 3
Is there anyway for the rows returned from the select to be put into a form that they can be used to update multiple fields? Thanks.
無論如何,從select返回的行被放入一個可以用來更新多個字段的表單中嗎?謝謝。
4 个解决方案
#1
11
Update Table1
Cross Join (
Select Min( Case When Z1.Num = 1 Then Z1.postcode End ) As PostCode1
, Min( Case When Z1.Num = 2 Then Z1.postcode End ) As PostCode2
, Min( Case When Z1.Num = 3 Then Z1.postcode End ) As PostCode3
From (
Select postcode
, @num := @num + 1 As Num
From postcodeTable
Where postcode = 'KY6 IDA'
Order By ASC
Limit 3
) As Z1
) As Z
Set nearestPostCode1 = Z.PostCode1
, nearestPostCode2 = Z.PostCode2
, nearestPostCode3 = Z.PostCode3
Where Table1.postcode = 'KY6 IDA'
#2
1
You can do something similar to this:
你可以做類似的事情:
UPDATE table1
SET
nearestPostcode1 = pc1,
nearestPostcode2 = pc2,
nearestPostcode3 = pc3
FROM
(SELECT pc1, pc2, pc3 FROM ....) t
WHERE
postcode = 'KY6 1DA';
I found this related question on Stackoverflow on how to transform columns to rows:
我在Stackoverflow上找到了關於如何將列轉換為行的相關問題:
In your case, you can do something like
在你的情況下,你可以做類似的事情
SELECT
IF(@rownum=1,postcode,'') ) AS pc1,
IF(@rownum=2,postcode,'') ) AS pc2,
IF(@rownum=3,postcode,'') ) AS pc2,
FROM
(SELECT postcode
FROM postcodeTable
ORDER BY ASC
LIMIT 3)
Here is a hack to simulate the ROW_NUMBER() functionality in MySQL [1]:
這是一個模擬MySQL [1]中的ROW_NUMBER()功能的hack:
SELECT @rownum:=@rownum+1 rownum, t.*
FROM (SELECT @rownum:=0) r, mytable t;
#3
0
I think you could do this with the pseudo-code:
我想你可以用偽代碼做到這一點:
REPLACE INTO table1 (postcode, nearestPostcode1, nearestPostcode2, nearestPostcode3)
SELECT "KY6 1DA", col1, col2, col3 FROM myTable WHERE ...;
it'd be easier to specify it seeing the real SQL.
看到它真正的SQL就更容易了。
Note the first column is specified as a constant in quotes. For this to work postcode must be a UNIQUE or PRIMARY index.
請注意,第一列被指定為引號中的常量。為此,郵政編碼必須是UNIQUE或PRIMARY索引。
#4
-1
Anytime I see a table with columns that have 1-up counters after their names, I get concerned.
任何時候我看到一個表格,其列名在他們的名字后面有一個計數器,我很擔心。
In general, it is a Bad Idea (TM) to store data that can be calculated from data that is already stored. What happens if your application all of a sudden needs the 4 closest postal codes? What if the postal code boundaries change?
通常,存儲可以從已經存儲的數據計算的數據是壞想法(TM)。如果您的應用程序突然需要4個最接近的郵政編碼,會發生什么?如果郵政編碼邊界發生變化怎么辦?
Assuming the distance calculation isn't very complex, you'll be better off in the long run not explicitly storing this data.
假設距離計算不是很復雜,從長遠來看,你最好不要明確地存儲這些數據。