php for 循环 try_for与IntStream.forEach

发现了JAVA8新出的循环方式后, 我觉得我终于可以摆脱掉老掉牙的for了~

但是每个类都有自己的应用场景, 不要为了让代码看起来炫酷而丧失编码的本质~

一切都要为了性能~

下段代码对 [ for, IntStream.forEach, IntStream.parallel.forEach ]进行了性能对比.

 public void executeTime() {
        StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch("ExecuteTime");

        stopWatch.start("ExecuteTimeByFor");
        //普通for循环
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            try {
                System.out.println(i);
                Thread.sleep(1);
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }
        stopWatch.stop();

        stopWatch.start("ExecuteTimeByIntStream");
        //stream串行流
        IntStream.range(0, 100).forEach(
                i -> {
                    try {
                        System.out.println(i);
                        Thread.sleep(1);
                    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                        e.printStackTrace();
                    }
                }
        );
        stopWatch.stop();

        stopWatch.start("ExecuteTimeByIntStreamParallel");
        //stream并行流
        IntStream.range(0, 100).parallel().forEach(
                i -> {
                    try {
                        System.out.println(i);
                        Thread.sleep(1);
                    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                        e.printStackTrace();
                    }
                }
        );
        stopWatch.stop();

        System.out.println(stopWatch.prettyPrint());
    }

打印输出:

• ExecuteTimeByFor:0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15...95.96.97.98.99.^[1]
• ExecuteTimeByIntStream:0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15...95.96.97.98.99.^[2]
• ExecuteTimeByIntStreamParallel:65.66.67.32.90.33.63.91.92.31.64.62.35.88.36.89...53.51.54.52.55.^[3]

耗时输出:

StopWatch 'ExecuteTime': running time (millis) = 360
-----------------------------------------
ms     %     Task name
-----------------------------------------
00153  042%  ExecuteTimeByFor
00176  049%  ExecuteTimeByIntStream
00031  009%  ExecuteTimeByIntStreamParallel

总结:

可见for与IntStream.forEach性能方面并没有什么区别,并且是按序输出.

而IntStream.parallel.forEach由于并行执行,性能提升数倍,但是是乱序输出,并不适合按序执行的场景.

参考

1. ^有序
2. ^有序
3. ^无序