db2中null和空值的区别,与SQL中的NULL比较

ANSI-92 SQL mandates that comparisons with NULL evaluate to "falsy," eg:

SELECT * FROM table WHERE field = NULL

SELECT * FROM table WHERE field != NULL

Will both return no rows because NULL can't be compared like that. Instead, the predicates IS NULL and IS NOT NULL have to be used instead:

SELECT * FROM table WHERE field IS NULL

SELECT * FROM table WHERE field IS NOT NULL

Research has shown me that Oracle 1, PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite all support the ANSI syntax. Add to that list DB2 and Firebird.

Aside from SQL Server with ANSI_NULLS turned off, what other RDBMS support the non-ANSI syntax?

1 The whole empty string = NULL mess notwithstanding.

解决方案

Here is a nice comparison of null handling in SQLite, PostgreSQL, Oracle, Informix, DB2, MS-SQL, OCELOT, MySQL 3.23.41, MySQL 4.0.16, Firebird, SQL Anywhere, and Borland Interbase

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值