mysql游标 效率_PL/SQL中三种游标循环效率对比

这里主要对比以下三种格式的游标循环:

1.单条处理

open 游标;

LOOP

FETCH 游标 INTO 变量;

EXIT WHEN  条件;

END LOOP;

CLOSE 游标;

2.批量处理

open 游标;

FETCH 游标 BULK COLLECT INTO 集合变量;

CLOSE 游标;

3.隐式游标

for x in (sql语句) loop

...--逻辑处理

end loop;

以上为工作中常见的几种游标处理方式,一般来说批量处理的速度要最好,隐式游标的次之,单条处理的最差,但是在我的实际工作中发现大部分使用的还是第一种游标处理。

归其原因竟是对集合变量及批量处理的效率等问题不了解所致。

推荐阅读：

这里简单的测试一下以上三种游标的效率,并分析trace文件来查看这3种处理方式的本质。

--创建测试大表

00:09:54 SCOTT@orcl> create table big_data as select 'Cc'||mod(level,8) a,'Dd'||

mod(level,13) b from dual connect by level<1000000;

Table created.

Elapsed: 00:00:05.87

00:11:17 SCOTT@orcl> select count(*) from big_data;

COUNT(*)

----------

999999

1 row selected.

Elapsed: 00:00:00.07

--分别执行以上三种方式的游标处理的plsql块

00:11:21 SCOTT@orcl> declare

00:17:54  2    cursor c_a is

00:17:54  3      select a from big_data;

00:17:54  4

00:17:54  5    v_a big_data.a%type;

00:17:54  6  begin

00:17:54  7    open c_a;

00:17:54  8    loop

00:17:54  9      fetch c_a into v_a;

00:17:54  10      exit when c_a%notfound;

00:17:54  11    end loop;

00:17:54  12    close c_a;

00:17:54  13  end;

00:17:56  14  /

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

Elapsed: 00:00:07.42

00:18:05 SCOTT@orcl> declare

00:19:56  2    cursor c_a is

00:19:56  3      select a from big_data;

00:19:56  4

00:19:56  5  type t_a is table of c_a%rowtype;

00:19:56  6    v_a t_a;

00:19:56  7  begin

00:19:56  8    open c_a;

00:19:56  9    --批量处理

00:19:56  10      fetch c_a bulk collect into v_a;

00:19:56  11    close c_a;

00:19:56  12  end;

00:19:57  13  /

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

Elapsed: 00:00:00.64

00:22:55 SCOTT@orcl> declare

00:23:18  2    v_a big_data.a%type;

00:23:18  3    begin

00:23:18  4    --批量处理

00:23:18  5    for x in (select a from big_data) loop

00:23:18  6      v_a:=x.a;

00:23:18  7    end loop;

00:23:18  8  end;

00:23:18  9  /

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

Elapsed: 00:00:00.79

注:请保证plsql_optimize_level的参数为2,如果不为2,可能测试结果会不一样.

注意对比消耗时间,1为7.42s, 2为0.64s, 3为0.79s