cuda与matlab,使用matlab和cuda比较

使用matlab和cuda比较

(2011-12-13 08:27:30)

标签：

it

Implementing Algprithms for Signal

and Image Reconstruction on Graphical Processing Units

Our main point of comparison is between

the runtime for the Matlab implementation running on the CPU of the

host

machine (which we refer to hereafter as the \CPU implementation"),

and

the runtime for the CUDA-based GPU implementation.

A second dierence between the implementations is the use of Matlab

code for

the CPU implementation vs. CUDA code (an extension of C++) for the

GPU imple-

mentation. We believe however that a CPU implementation via C++ and

mex les

would show little if any improvement over the Matlab

implementation. The major

computational operations are DFT, DCT, and Level 1 BLAS operations,

all of which

are implemented with high eciency in Matlab. In fact, we could

speed up the GPU

implementation further by using C++ calling code in place of the

Matlab and mex

software. Multiple data transfer requests on page-locked host

memory could be made

without having to wait for the completion of the previous requests,

making room for

other jobs in the host or GPUs. In our current Matlab / mex

interface, data are

stored in the Matlab memory, which is not page-locked, so

overlapped data transfers

require extra copies to page-locked host memory. Such transfers

only degrade the

performance, so we avoid them.

分享：

喜欢

0

赠金笔

加载中，请稍候......

评论加载中，请稍候...

发评论

登录名： 密码： 找回密码 注册记住登录状态

昵   称：

评论并转载此博文

发评论

以上网友发言只代表其个人观点，不代表新浪网的观点或立场。