投期刊写大修的response 的时候，怎么做到不需要二修直接接收？

所有的回复目的只有一个：说服Editor,必须解决所有审稿人的疑虑，突出文章的贡献。

具体而言，有三点，**第一：**每一个问题都得有数据作为支撑，有现成实验数据放实验数据，没有实验数据尽量补充实验数据。**第二：**实在没有办法加的实验，可以换个类似的数据集，总之花再多的精力和钱去做实验都得去做。**第三：**再不行，就放参考文献，最好要有benchmark对比。一定要有理有据，就算说服不了审稿人，一定要说服editor.接下来我列出一些responsel的回复套路。首先得把comments和question分隔开来。然后每个问题单拎出来，一条一条回答。

对于同意接受的审稿人：We appreciate the reviewer’s insightful and constructivecomments and advice,and we have carefully addressed these concerns and made a proper revision of the manuscript.These comments and suggestions have not only enabled us to provide a highly improved manuscript but also inspired us to conduct more in-depth studies on.in future works…作为对于comments的回复。

接下来对每个question都要一回复，开头首先Thanks for the kind and insightful commentsand suggestions. We tested the.(说你的I作)或者，We appreciate the reviewer’s suggestive andinsightfulcomments.We…;Thanks for the meaningful comments.This
work… 这样一回复即可。
重要的是，修改的地方一定要在原文标出，并在response进行说明，比如：We have added corresponding discussions(paragraph 2,page5;paragraph 1,page 6), figure (Figure R1 as Figure S2),and table (Table R1 as Table S1). 罗列，一条一条回答。

对于拒稿的审稿人，一定要在对他的comments做一个整体性的回复，第一感谢他仔细阅读文章，以及优秀的评论，对于我们改进论文有极大的帮助。第二要说虽然你的评论很nice,但对文章的判断有误，我们不接受这个的拒稿申请。第三，表明自己文章的亮点，以理拒之，请求他重新考虑。具体有一些样式：
We appreciate the reviewer for carefully reading our manuscript and makingtheir insightful,critical,and constructive feedbacks.We appreciate that their comments have enabled us to prepare a greatly improved manuscript. (However we respectfully disagree with the assessment of this reviewer regarding our innovativeness,analysis,and conclusions that the (自己的东西is a common and unconvincing architecture.(We apologize for the previous poor formatting and some disputed descriptions of our manuscript,which may have made some of this evidence unclear.（对自己文章不足进行道歉）For this reason,we have revised the statements in our introduction and discussion to better highlight the novelty and advancement of our work…（改进并指明亮点）随后对自己的亮点进行总结说明，包括那几点。 随后1.2…3.4.5.列出具体的说明文章的亮点所在，这里包括更细节的东西）。
最后再对他提的问题进行解答即可。
最后我想说的，一定要对editor说一些好话，这要在整体回复审稿人意见之前写上去。

We would like to thank the reviewers for their insightful and constructive feedback.We feel that the referees input has enabled us to produce a greatly improved manuscript, whose novelty and impact are now more readily apparent in the introduction and discussion. Based on the reviewers’comments,we have made extensive alterations to the structure,format,presentation,and analysis of our findings.（先说明审稿人的优秀）。 The reviewer specifically raised some concerns regarding the novelty and significance of our work.In response,we have reformatted the introduction to more clearlyaddress a broader swath of the novelty of our work within the appropriate context in both the introduction and discussion sections.In addition,the reviewers also expressed concern about several technical issues.In response,we have addressed all of the reviewer’s technical concerns with a substantial amount of new data,supported by additional detailed explanations(the majority of the figures in both the text and supporting information have been revised as requested).(说明审稿人的担忧，我f们均已解决)Moreover, we have described the overwhelming evidence that…We believe the general public and electronics community would be overwhelmingly fascinated by…

这样写，一定能惊艳编辑和审稿人。祝大家Accept!