上一篇分析OKHTTP的整体流程,OKHTTP深入浅出(三)----源码流程_王胖子总叫我减肥的博客-CSDN博客
我们了解到OK的网络请求真正是通过拦截器链关联的各个拦截器进行处理的,先回顾一下RealCall的getResponseWithInterceptorChain()方法。
Response getResponseWithInterceptorChain() throws IOException {
// Build a full stack of interceptors.
List<Interceptor> interceptors = new ArrayList<>();
interceptors.addAll(client.interceptors());
interceptors.add(new RetryAndFollowUpInterceptor(client));
interceptors.add(new BridgeInterceptor(client.cookieJar()));
interceptors.add(new CacheInterceptor(client.internalCache()));
interceptors.add(new ConnectInterceptor(client));
if (!forWebSocket) {
interceptors.addAll(client.networkInterceptors());
}
interceptors.add(new CallServerInterceptor(forWebSocket));
Interceptor.Chain chain = new RealInterceptorChain(interceptors, transmitter, null, 0,
originalRequest, this, client.connectTimeoutMillis(),
client.readTimeoutMillis(), client.writeTimeoutMillis());
boolean calledNoMoreExchanges = false;
try {
Response response = chain.proceed(originalRequest);
if (transmitter.isCanceled()) {
closeQuietly(response);
throw new IOException("Canceled");
}
return response;
} catch (IOException e) {
calledNoMoreExchanges = true;
throw transmitter.noMoreExchanges(e);
} finally {
if (!calledNoMoreExchanges) {
transmitter.noMoreExchanges(null);
}
}
}
首先构建了一个ArrayList集合,然后将client.interceptors()(自定义的拦截器)、RetryAndFollowUpInterceptor(重试和跟进拦截器)、BridgeInterceptor(桥拦截器)、CacheInterceptor(缓存拦截器)、ConnectInterceptor(连接拦截器)、CallServerInterceptor(请求拦截器)加入到集合中。
然后构建一个新的拦截器链,参入刚才构建的拦截器集合、发射器、index、请求等
Interceptor.Chain chain = new RealInterceptorChain(interceptors, transmitter, null, 0,
originalRequest, this, client.connectTimeoutMillis(),
client.readTimeoutMillis(), client.writeTimeoutMillis());
核心是调用构建的拦截器链RealInterceptorChain的proceed方法,并将返回结果Response返回,再回顾一下这个proceed方法。
这个方法一开始在Interceptor拦截器接口定义
在RealInterceptorChain中实现了Interceptor拦截器接口中的proceed()方法
@Override public Response proceed(Request request) throws IOException {
return proceed(request, transmitter, exchange);
}
深入看一下proceed()方法做了什么?
public Response proceed(Request request, Transmitter transmitter, @Nullable Exchange exchange)
throws IOException {
if (index >= interceptors.size()) throw new AssertionError();
calls++;
// If we already have a stream, confirm that the incoming request will use it.
if (this.exchange != null && !this.exchange.connection().supportsUrl(request.url())) {
throw new IllegalStateException("network interceptor " + interceptors.get(index - 1)
+ " must retain the same host and port");
}
// If we already have a stream, confirm that this is the only call to chain.proceed().
if (this.exchange != null && calls > 1) {
throw new IllegalStateException("network interceptor " + interceptors.get(index - 1)
+ " must call proceed() exactly once");
}
// Call the next interceptor in the chain.
RealInterceptorChain next = new RealInterceptorChain(interceptors, transmitter, exchange,
index + 1, request, call, connectTimeout, readTimeout, writeTimeout);
Interceptor interceptor = interceptors.get(index);
Response response = interceptor.intercept(next);
// Confirm that the next interceptor made its required call to chain.proceed().
if (exchange != null && index + 1 < interceptors.size() && next.calls != 1) {
throw new IllegalStateException("network interceptor " + interceptor
+ " must call proceed() exactly once");
}
// Confirm that the intercepted response isn't null.
if (response == null) {
throw new NullPointerException("interceptor " + interceptor + " returned null");
}
if (response.body() == null) {
throw new IllegalStateException(
"interceptor " + interceptor + " returned a response with no body");
}
return response;
}
首先判断 index >= interceptors.size(),这个上篇文章已经详细介绍过,意思大概就是我们下面要在拦截器链中取具体拦截器的时候,要保证index不越界,就说要取的拦截器要在拦截器链中。
下面看一下proceed的核心方法。
// Call the next interceptor in the chain.
RealInterceptorChain next = new RealInterceptorChain(interceptors, transmitter, exchange,
index + 1, request, call, connectTimeout, readTimeout, writeTimeout);
Interceptor interceptor = interceptors.get(index);
Response response = interceptor.intercept(next);
又新建了一个新的拦截器链,和上个拦截器链相比,构造方法中的参数只有一个发生了变化index变成了index + 1,也就是说新建的拦截器链比上个拦截器链少了一个拦截器,为什么要这么做呢?肯定是要这个少的拦截器,之后,可以看到,从之前的拦截器集合中,取出了第一个拦截器,并且调用了该拦截器的intercept(next)方法,参数next就是我们刚刚新构建的拦截器链。
再深入看一下interceptor.intercept(next) 方法,发现这个intercept()方法又是定义在Interceptor接口中的抽象方法。看看哪些类实现了这个抽象方法?
很明显实现了 intercept()抽象方法就是我们在一开始看到加入到拦截器集合的各个拦截器。
那我们就一个个的看一下,在具体的拦截器中,intercept方法都做了什么?
1、RetryAndFollowUpInterceptor 重试和跟进拦截器
此拦截器从故障中恢复并根据需要遵循重定向。 如果调用被取消,它可能会抛出一个 IOException。
@Override public Response intercept(Chain chain) throws IOException {
Request request = chain.request();
RealInterceptorChain realChain = (RealInterceptorChain) chain;
Transmitter transmitter = realChain.transmitter();
int followUpCount = 0;
Response priorResponse = null;
while (true) {
// 1
// 准备连接请求
// 主机、端口、协议都相同时,连接可复用
transmitter.prepareToConnect(request);
if (transmitter.isCanceled()) {
throw new IOException("Canceled");
}
Response response;
boolean success = false;
try {
// 2
// 执行其他(下一个->下一个->...)拦截器的功能,获取Response;
response = realChain.proceed(request, transmitter, null);
success = true;
} catch (RouteException e) {
// 3
// 连接路由异常,此时请求还未发送。尝试恢复
// 返回true,continue,继续下一个while循环
// The attempt to connect via a route failed. The request will not have been sent.
if (!recover(e.getLastConnectException(), transmitter, false, request)) {
throw e.getFirstConnectException();
}
continue;
} catch (IOException e) {
// 4
// IO异常,请求可能已经发出。尝试恢复
// An attempt to communicate with a server failed. The request may have been sent.
boolean requestSendStarted = !(e instanceof ConnectionShutdownException);
if (!recover(e, transmitter, requestSendStarted, request)) throw e;
continue;
} finally {
// 5
// 请求没成功,释放资源
// The network call threw an exception. Release any resources.
if (!success) {
transmitter.exchangeDoneDueToException();
}
}
// Attach the prior response if it exists. Such responses never have a body.
if (priorResponse != null) {
response = response.newBuilder()
.priorResponse(priorResponse.newBuilder()
.body(null)
.build())
.build();
}
Exchange exchange = Internal.instance.exchange(response);
Route route = exchange != null ? exchange.connection().route() : null;
// 6
// 后面的拦截器执行完了,拿到Response
// 解析看下是否需要重试或重定向,需要则返回新的Request
Request followUp = followUpRequest(response, route);
if (followUp == null) {
if (exchange != null && exchange.isDuplex()) {
transmitter.timeoutEarlyExit();
}
// 如果followUpRequest返回的Request为空,那边就表示不需要执行重试或者重定向,直接返回数据
return response;
}
RequestBody followUpBody = followUp.body();
if (followUpBody != null && followUpBody.isOneShot()) {
// 如果followUp不为null,请求体不为空,但只需要请求一次时,那么就返回response;
return response;
}
closeQuietly(response.body());
if (transmitter.hasExchange()) {
exchange.detachWithViolence();
}
// 判断重试或者重定向的次数是否超过最大的次数20,是的话则抛出异常
if (++followUpCount > MAX_FOLLOW_UPS) {
throw new ProtocolException("Too many follow-up requests: " + followUpCount);
}
// 将需要重试或者重定向的请求赋值给新的请求
// 继续执行新请求
request = followUp;
priorResponse = response;
}
}
先是获取请求、发射器,然后进入While循环,循环的意义在于如果是重试或者重定向,就执行一遍这个过程,否则的话,就通过return返回或者throw跳出循环。
注释1,transmitter.prepareToConnect(request),开始准备连接。transmitter(发射器)是应用层和网络层的桥梁,在真正进行连接、请求、获取响应的时候起重要作用。
深入看一下,是怎么进行准备连接的,大致就是新建一个新的ExchangeFinder赋值给transmitter(如果transmitter不存在ExchangeFinder)。
public void prepareToConnect(Request request) {
if (this.request != null) {
if (sameConnection(this.request.url(), request.url()) && exchangeFinder.hasRouteToTry()) {
return; // Already ready.
}
if (exchange != null) throw new IllegalStateException();
if (exchangeFinder != null) {
maybeReleaseConnection(null, true);
exchangeFinder = null;
}
}
this.request = request;
//connectionPool是在OkHttpClient.Build->new ConnectionPool->new RealConnectionPool创建的
//createAddress方法返回的Address
this.exchangeFinder = new ExchangeFinder(this, connectionPool, createAddress(request.url()),
call, eventListener);
}
首先看看是否有相同的已存在的transmitter,没有就新创建一个ExchangeFinder,目的是为了获取连接做准备,ExchangeFinder是交换查找器,作用是获取请求的连接。
回到主流程,注释2,response = realChain.proceed(request, transmitter, null); 调用拦截器的proceed()方法,获取Response。这个方法是不是特别熟悉?没错就是:
Public Response proceed(Request request, Transmitter transmitter, @Nullable Exchange exchange)
....
// Call the next interceptor in the chain.
RealInterceptorChain next = new RealInterceptorChain(interceptors, transmitter, exchange,
index + 1, request, call, connectTimeout, readTimeout, writeTimeout);
Interceptor interceptor = interceptors.get(index);
Response response = interceptor.intercept(next);
。。。。。
return response;
}
这就是责任链模式。总结一下,就是注释2,主要的作用就是调用拦截器链的proceed方法,将请求传递给下一个拦截器,尝试从下一个拦截器中获取Response。
如果注释2处的过程,发生了连接路由异常、IO异常,就由注释3和4处的recover()方法判断是否需要进行重试,看一下recover()方法怎么判断的?
private boolean recover(IOException e, Transmitter transmitter,
boolean requestSendStarted, Request userRequest) {
// The application layer has forbidden retries.
if (!client.retryOnConnectionFailure()) return false;
// We can't send the request body again.
if (requestSendStarted && requestIsOneShot(e, userRequest)) return false;
// This exception is fatal.
if (!isRecoverable(e, requestSendStarted)) return false;
// No more routes to attempt.
if (!transmitter.canRetry()) return false;
// For failure recovery, use the same route selector with a new connection.
return true;
}
上面的条件1、应用层不准重试 ;2、不能再次发送请求,也不重试;3、如果是致命的异常;
4、没有路由可以重试 也不重试。如果recover()返回的是true,那就会进入下一次循环,重新请求。
回到主流程,注释5,请求没有成功,就释放资源,
注释6,如果请求成功了,Request followUp = followUpRequest(response, route);解析一下Response看是否需要重试或者重定向,需要就返回新的request。如果followUpRequest返回的Request为空,那边就表示不需要执行重试或者重定向,直接返回数据。如果followUp不为null,请求体不为空,但只需要请求一次时,那么就返回response。
在深入看一下followUpRequest ()方法。
private Request followUpRequest(Response userResponse, @Nullable Route route) throws IOException {
if (userResponse == null) throw new IllegalStateException();
int responseCode = userResponse.code();
final String method = userResponse.request().method();
switch (responseCode) {
case HTTP_PROXY_AUTH:
Proxy selectedProxy = route != null
? route.proxy()
: client.proxy();
if (selectedProxy.type() != Proxy.Type.HTTP) {
throw new ProtocolException("Received HTTP_PROXY_AUTH (407) code while not using proxy");
}
return client.proxyAuthenticator().authenticate(route, userResponse);
case HTTP_UNAUTHORIZED:
return client.authenticator().authenticate(route, userResponse);
case HTTP_PERM_REDIRECT:
case HTTP_TEMP_REDIRECT:
// "If the 307 or 308 status code is received in response to a request other than GET
// or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the request"
if (!method.equals("GET") && !method.equals("HEAD")) {
return null;
}
// fall-through
case HTTP_MULT_CHOICE:
case HTTP_MOVED_PERM:
case HTTP_MOVED_TEMP:
case HTTP_SEE_OTHER:
// Does the client allow redirects?
if (!client.followRedirects()) return null;
String location = userResponse.header("Location");
if (location == null) return null;
HttpUrl url = userResponse.request().url().resolve(location);
// Don't follow redirects to unsupported protocols.
if (url == null) return null;
// If configured, don't follow redirects between SSL and non-SSL.
boolean sameScheme = url.scheme().equals(userResponse.request().url().scheme());
if (!sameScheme && !client.followSslRedirects()) return null;
// Most redirects don't include a request body.
Request.Builder requestBuilder = userResponse.request().newBuilder();
if (HttpMethod.permitsRequestBody(method)) {
final boolean maintainBody = HttpMethod.redirectsWithBody(method);
if (HttpMethod.redirectsToGet(method)) {
requestBuilder.method("GET", null);
} else {
RequestBody requestBody = maintainBody ? userResponse.request().body() : null;
requestBuilder.method(method, requestBody);
}
if (!maintainBody) {
requestBuilder.removeHeader("Transfer-Encoding");
requestBuilder.removeHeader("Content-Length");
requestBuilder.removeHeader("Content-Type");
}
}
// When redirecting across hosts, drop all authentication headers. This
// is potentially annoying to the application layer since they have no
// way to retain them.
if (!sameConnection(userResponse.request().url(), url)) {
requestBuilder.removeHeader("Authorization");
}
return requestBuilder.url(url).build();
case HTTP_CLIENT_TIMEOUT:
// 408's are rare in practice, but some servers like HAProxy use this response code. The
// spec says that we may repeat the request without modifications. Modern browsers also
// repeat the request (even non-idempotent ones.)
if (!client.retryOnConnectionFailure()) {
// The application layer has directed us not to retry the request.
return null;
}
RequestBody requestBody = userResponse.request().body();
if (requestBody != null && requestBody.isOneShot()) {
return null;
}
if (userResponse.priorResponse() != null
&& userResponse.priorResponse().code() == HTTP_CLIENT_TIMEOUT) {
// We attempted to retry and got another timeout. Give up.
return null;
}
if (retryAfter(userResponse, 0) > 0) {
return null;
}
return userResponse.request();
case HTTP_UNAVAILABLE:
if (userResponse.priorResponse() != null
&& userResponse.priorResponse().code() == HTTP_UNAVAILABLE) {
// We attempted to retry and got another timeout. Give up.
return null;
}
if (retryAfter(userResponse, Integer.MAX_VALUE) == 0) {
// specifically received an instruction to retry without delay
return userResponse.request();
}
return null;
default:
return null;
}
}
主要根据响应码判断是否需要重定向,如果需要就取出重定向的URL并构建新的Request返回。
总结: RetryAndFollowUpInterceptor 拦截器主要用于连接失败重试和跟进处理重定向。