从源码看StringBuilder和StringBuffer

StringBuilder和StringBuffer

结论：StringBuilder是线程不安全的、StringBuffer是线程安全的

StringBuilder和StringBuffer是比String高效的应为他是在原来的字符上进行增加的

public class StringBufferAndBuilder {


    static StringBuffer stringBuffer = new StringBuffer();

    static StringBuilder stringBuilder = new StringBuilder();


    public static void main(String[] args) {


        StringBufferAndBuilder main = new StringBufferAndBuilder();

        ThreadStringTest threadStringTest =  main.new ThreadStringTest();

        //创建3个线程加数据
        new Thread(threadStringTest).start();
        new Thread(threadStringTest).start();
        new Thread(threadStringTest).start();

        try {
            //等待4秒三个线程全部运行完
            Thread.sleep(4);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }


        System.out.println("stringBuffer的长度"+stringBuffer.length());
        System.out.println("============");
        System.out.println("stringBuffer的长度"+stringBuilder.length());

    }

    class ThreadStringTest implements Runnable{

        @Override
        public void run() {
            for (int i = 0; i < 500; i++) {
                stringBuffer.append(i/10);
                //线程不安全的加上同步锁线程就安全了
//                synchronized (this){
                    stringBuilder.append(i/10);
//                }
            }
        }
    }
}


结果
stringBuffer的长度2700
============
stringBuffer的长度2386

查看源代码

StringBuffer的append方法是使用了synchronized修饰

    @Override
    public synchronized StringBuffer append(int i) {
        toStringCache = null;
        super.append(i);
        return this;
    }

StringBuilder的append方法没有同步代码块所以线程不安全

    @Override
    public StringBuilder append(int i) {
        super.append(i);
        return this;
    }