为什么我不能拥有“public static const string S =”stuff“；在我的班级？

本文翻译自：Why can't I have “public static const string S = ”stuff"; in my Class?

When trying to compile my class I get an error: 在尝试编译我的类时，我收到一个错误：

The constant 'NamespaceName.ClassName.CONST_NAME' cannot be marked static. 常量'NamespaceName.ClassName.CONST_NAME'不能标记为静态。

at the line: 在线：

public static const string CONST_NAME = "blah";

I could do this all of the time in Java. 我可以用Java一直这样做。 What am I doing wrong? 我究竟做错了什么？ And why doesn't it let me do this? 为什么不让我这样做？

---

#1楼

参考：https://stackoom.com/question/1IbK/为什么我不能拥有-public-static-const-string-S-stuff-在我的班级

---

#2楼

C#'s const is the exact same thing as Java's final , except it's absolutely always static . C＃的const与Java的final是完全相同的，除了它绝对是static 。 In my opinion, it's not really necessary for a const variable to be non- static , but if you need to access a const variable non- static -ly, you can do: 在我看来， const变量不是非static ，但如果你需要非static地访问const变量，你可以这样做：

class MyClass
{    
    private const int myLowercase_Private_Const_Int = 0;
    public const int MyUppercase_Public_Const_Int = 0;

    /*        
      You can have the `private const int` lowercase 
      and the `public int` Uppercase:
    */
    public int MyLowercase_Private_Const_Int
    {
        get
        {
            return MyClass.myLowercase_Private_Const_Int;
        }
    }  

    /*
      Or you can have the `public const int` uppercase 
      and the `public int` slighly altered
      (i.e. an underscore preceding the name):
    */
    public int _MyUppercase_Public_Const_Int
    {
        get
        {
            return MyClass.MyUppercase_Public_Const_Int;
        }
    } 

    /*
      Or you can have the `public const int` uppercase 
      and get the `public int` with a 'Get' method:
    */
    public int Get_MyUppercase_Public_Const_Int()
    {
        return MyClass.MyUppercase_Public_Const_Int;
    }    
}

Well, now I realize this question was asked 4 years ago, but since I put around 2 hours of work, consisting of trying all sorts of different ways of answering and code formatting, into this answer, I'm still posting it. 嗯，现在我意识到这个问题是在4年前被问到的，但是由于我花了大约2个小时的工作，包括尝试各种不同的回答方式和代码格式化，在这个答案中，我仍然发布它。 :) :)

But, for the record, I still feel kinda silly. 但是，为了记录，我仍然觉得有点傻。

---

#3楼

const类似于static我们可以访问带有类名的两个变量，但是diff是可以修改的静态变量而const不能。

---

#4楼

From MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/acdd6hb7.aspx 来自MSDN： http ： //msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/acdd6hb7.aspx

... Also, while a const field is a compile-time constant , the readonly field can be used for runtime constants... ...此外，虽然const字段是编译时常量 ，但readonly字段可用于运行时常量...

So using static in const fields is like trying to make a defined (with #define) static in C/C++... Since it is replaced with its value in compile-time of course it is initiated once for all instances (=static). 因此在const字段中使用static就像尝试在C / C ++中创建一个已定义的（带#define）静态...因为它在编译时被替换为它的值，当然它会为所有实例启动一次（= static） 。

---

#5楼

const对象始终是static 。

---

#6楼

From the C# language specification (PDF page 287 - or 300th page of the PDF): 从C＃语言规范 （PDF第287页 - 或PDF的第300页）：

Even though constants are considered static members, a constant declaration neither requires nor allows a static modifier. 尽管常量被认为是静态成员，但常量声明既不需要也不允许使用静态修饰符。