作为Java集合框架下的一个重要的类,ArrayList类继承了AbstractList类,并扩展了List, RandomAccess, Cloneable, java.io.Serializable等接口。ArrayList的成员变量主要有三个数组:
private static final Object[] EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA = {};
private static final Object[] DEFAULTCAPACITY_EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA = {};
transient Object[] elementData; // non-private to simplify nested class access
elementData肯定是用来存储元素的,那前两个static数组是做什么的呢?我们来看下ArrayList的构造方法:
public ArrayList(int initialCapacity) {
if (initialCapacity > 0) {
this.elementData = new Object[initialCapacity];
} else if (initialCapacity == 0) {
this.elementData = EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA;
} else {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Illegal Capacity: "+
initialCapacity);
}
}
public ArrayList() {
this.elementData = DEFAULTCAPACITY_EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA;
}
public ArrayList(Collection<? extends E> c) {
elementData = c.toArray();
if ((size = elementData.length) != 0) {
// c.toArray might (incorrectly) not return Object[] (see 6260652)
if (elementData.getClass() != Object[].class)
elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, size, Object[].class);
} else {
// replace with empty array.
this.elementData = EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA;
}
}
ArrayList有三种构造方法,默认构造方法将DEFAULTCAPACITY_EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA数组赋值给elementData;int initialCapacity作为参数的构造方法创建一个大小为initialCapacity的数组,若initialCapacity == 0,则将EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA赋值给elementData;以Collection c作为参数的构造方法判断c.toArray的长度是否为0,是则将EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA赋值给elementData,否则根据情况将c.toArray赋给elementData,或者使用Arrays.copyOf创建一个新数组
get和set方法首先对传入的index参数进行检查是否越界,再对数组的index位置取值或赋值:
public E get(int index) {
rangeCheck(index);
return elementData(index);
}
public E set(int index, E element) {
rangeCheck(index);
E oldValue = elementData(index);
elementData[index] = element;
return oldValue;
}
add方法进行了重载,向数组末尾加入一个元素,或是向指定位置加入一个元素:
public boolean add(E e) {
ensureCapacityInternal(size + 1); // Increments modCount!!
elementData[size++] = e;
return true;
}
public void add(int index, E element) {
rangeCheckForAdd(index);
ensureCapacityInternal(size + 1); // Increments modCount!!
System.arraycopy(elementData, index, elementData, index + 1,
size - index);
elementData[index] = element;
size++;
}
其中System.arraycopy的原型是public static void arraycopy(Object src, int srcPos, Object dest, int destPos, int length) ,将src从srcPos起始的length位复制到dest的destPos位之后的连续空间
remove方法同样进行了重载,以int index作为参数时,调用System.arraycopy将index之后的元素向前挪一位;以Object o为参数时,利用o.equals找到跟o相等的第一个元素,调用private方法fastRemove(int index),原理与第一种remove相同
public E remove(int index) {
rangeCheck(index);
modCount++;
E oldValue = elementData(index);
int numMoved = size - index - 1;
if (numMoved > 0)
System.arraycopy(elementData, index+1, elementData, index,
numMoved);
elementData[--size] = null; // clear to let GC do its work
return oldValue;
}
public boolean remove(Object o) {
if (o == null) {
for (int index = 0; index < size; index++)
if (elementData[index] == null) {
fastRemove(index);
return true;
}
} else {
for (int index = 0; index < size; index++)
if (o.equals(elementData[index])) {
fastRemove(index);
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
private void fastRemove(int index) {
modCount++;
int numMoved = size - index - 1;
if (numMoved > 0)
System.arraycopy(elementData, index+1, elementData, index,
numMoved);
elementData[--size] = null; // clear to let GC do its work
}
这里产生了一个疑惑:既然fastRemove的代码和remove(int index)的大部分代码相同,为何在remove中不直接调用fastRemove?是否是为了提高效率而减少方法的调用?那为何在第二种remove中不直接把代码展开?