Java 比较StringBuilder和Stringbuffer 线程安全性

直接上代码：
1.StringBuffer

package com.thread;

import javax.annotation.concurrent.ThreadSafe;
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;

@ThreadSafe
public class SafeCountExample {

    //请求总数
    private static int clientTotal = 5000;
    //线程数量
    private static int threadTotal = 200;
    private static StringBuffer stringBuffer =  new StringBuffer();
    //private static StringBuilder stringBuilder =  new StringBuilder();

    public static void main(String[] args) throws  Exception{

        ExecutorService exec = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
        final Semaphore semaphore = new Semaphore(threadTotal);
        //每次固定数量的线程获取许可
        final CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(clientTotal);
        for (int i = 0; i < clientTotal ; i++) {
            exec.execute(()->{
                try {
                    semaphore.acquire();
                    add();
                    semaphore.release();
                }catch (Exception e){
                    e.printStackTrace();
                }
                countDownLatch.countDown();
            });
        }
        countDownLatch.await();
        exec.shutdown();
        System.out.println(stringBuffer.length());
       // System.out.println(stringBuilder .length());

    }
    private static void add(){
        stringBuffer.append("1");
       // stringBuilder .append("1");
    }
}

1.1 多次运行，发现是线程安全的，结果都一样如下，：

2.StringBuilder.我们放开红色被注释的代码，多次运行，发现线程是不安全的，结果都不一样：