fastjson转jackson的一些比较

前言

以前项目一直在用fastjson作为json的转换，但是最近发现FASTJSON的bug比较多：https://github.com/alibaba/fastjson/issues/3073

哎，这个简单说一下fastjson和jackson的一些不同。

 

1：如果缺少定义，fastjson可以转换部分数据，而jackson则会报错

有个类：

public class User {  
    private String name;  
    private Integer age;  
    private Date birthday;  
    //private String email;  
      
    public String getName() {  
        return name;  
    }  
    public void setName(String name) {  
        this.name = name;  
    }  
      
    public Integer getAge() {  
        return age;  
    }  
    public void setAge(Integer age) {  
        this.age = age;  
    }  
      
    public Date getBirthday() {  
        return birthday;  
    }  
    public void setBirthday(Date birthday) {  
        this.birthday = birthday;  
    }  
      
    //public String getEmail() {  
    //    return email;  
    //}  
    //public void setEmail(String email) {  
    //    this.email = email;  
    //}  
}  

数据：

String json = "{\"name\":\"小民\",\"age\":20,\"birthday\":844099200000,\"email\":\"xiaomin@sina.com\"}";  

用fastjson能够成功解析，

 

而用jackson解析会报错：

解决1：

添加注释：

@JsonIgnoreProperties(ignoreUnknown = true)

解决2：补全email属性

 

2：泛型转换

public class HttpResponse<T>  implements Serializable {
    private static final long serialVersionUID = -1066414629201553447L;

    private Integer code;

    private String message;

    private T data;

    public Integer getCode() {
        return code;
    }

    public void setCode(Integer code) {
        this.code = code;
    }

    public String getMessage() {
        return message;
    }

    public void setMessage(String message) {
        this.message = message;
    }

    public T getData() {
        return data;
    }

    public void setData(T data) {
        this.data = data;
    }
}


public class VersionId {
    private Long id;

    public VersionId(Long id) {
        this.id = id;
    }

    public Long getId() {
        return id;
    }

    public void setId(Long id) {
        this.id = id;
    }
}

数据：

String response = "{"code":200,"message":"OK","data":{"id":36}}"

fastjson解析正常

HttpResponse<VersionId> res = JSON.parseObject(response, new TypeReference<HttpResponse<VersionId>>(){});

jackson解析报错

ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper(); HttpResponse<VersionId> res = mapper.readValue(response, new TypeReference<HttpResponse<VersionId>>(){});

解析报错：

com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.MismatchedInputException: Cannot construct instance of `com.zcy.VersionId` (although at least one Creator exists): cannot deserialize from Object value (no delegate- or property-based Creator)
 at [Source: (String)"{"code":200,"message":"OK","data":{"id":36}}"; line: 1, column: 36] (through reference chain: com.zcy.HttpResponse["data"])
 

解决：在VersionId内部添加一个构造函数：

VersionId() {};

 

结论

1：虽然fastjson的bug比较多，但是修复还是比较及时，而且使用起来比较方便

2：jackson注释比较多，sprintboot内部也在使用

用哪个json库看自己吧。