Syntax Diagrams

A programming language is a set of rules, symbols, and special words used to construct a program. There are rules for both syntax (grammar) and semantics (meaning).

Syntax : The formal rules governing how one writes valid instructions in a language
Semantics : The set of rules that gives the meaning of instructions written in a programming language.

A useful tool for accurately describing syntax rule is the syntax diagram . The following is an example to explain how syntax diagrams work.

This syntax diagram shows how to form a piece of gibberish. By following the arrows from entry to exit, we can construct a syntactically correct piece of gibberish such as:

  • moy, toy, zick, zong, mick

There is no pattern for using the diagram other than beginning at the left and obeying the direction of the arrows. At a branching point you may go either way. At the first branch you could take an "m", 't', or 'z'. Then add 'ick', 'ong', or 'oy'. You could stop there, or you could add a ',' and then go back to the beginning and start again.

Another way of writing this diagram is as follows:

Syntax diagrams are one way of writing algorithms. If you look closely at the gibberish diagrams, you will see all four of the basic structures of algorithms represented. There are sequences of instructions (first write and 'm', 't', or 'z', then write 'ick', 'ong', or 'oy'); there are selections (places where you can branch to different choices); and there are loops (writing a comma and going back to the start). The second way of writing gibberish diagrams involves subprograms (called Comma, First, and Second) and references to them. The two ways of writing the syntax diagrams demonstrate, once again, that there is more than one way to write any algorithm.

Recursion is employed in syntax diagrams. For example, in the C++ language an Identifier is defined as

Algebraic Expressions
Here is an incorrect expression where the right and left parentheses are equal in number, but something else is wrong.

  • a + ( b - c ) + d ) - e + ( x + ( -z )

What principle could we use to reject this string of symbols?

In addition to problems with parentheses, there may be problems with the operators +, -, *, / as in the following expressions:

  • a + * b
  • a + ( * b + c )

It might be possible to make a complete list or errors that make the syntax of an algebraic expression incorrect. However a "Syntax diagram" is more useful.

In Algebraic expressions, a term is any numerical value such as 4, 5.7, or -0.0005 or a variable name standing for the same, then


  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值