【Leetcode】Two Sum II - Input array is sorted

最新推荐文章于 2020-07-24 22:12:11 发布

wuezs

最新推荐文章于 2020-07-24 22:12:11 发布

阅读量1.3k

点赞数

分类专栏： leetcode Leetcode题解java版

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/yeqiuzs/article/details/52396250

版权

Leetcode题解java版同时被 2 个专栏收录

289 篇文章 362 订阅

订阅专栏

leetcode

283 篇文章 0 订阅

订阅专栏

题目链接：https://leetcode.com/problems/two-sum-ii-input-array-is-sorted/

题目：

Given an array of integers that is already sorted in ascending order, find two numbers such that they add up to a specific target number.

The function twoSum should return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to the target, where index1 must be less than index2. Please note that your returned answers (both index1 and index2) are not zero-based.

You may assume that each input would have exactly one solution.

Input: numbers={2, 7, 11, 15}, target=9
Output: index1=1, index2=2

思路：

easy。。看代码就好了 O(n)时间复杂度

有个坑要注意，tag有binary search 不代表有O(logn)的解法，不必去尝试设计一个O(logn)的解法。。因为根本木有

维基百科给的 3sum （无论有序无序，无序可以对数组预处理在O(nlogn)复杂度下变为有序）的最优解时间复杂度为 $O(n^{2}/({\log n}/{\log \log n})^{2/3})$ 如果2sum如果能被O(logn)解决，3sum就能在O(nlogn)复杂度下解决（对每一个数num 都用2sum的算法查找target-num）

但上式等于 nlogn*(n*(loglogn^(2/3))/logn^(5/3))，很明显当lim n->无穷大，n*(loglogn^(2/3))/logn^(5/3)>1，即3sum最优解时间复杂度大于O(nlogn)，所以2sum最优解不可能达到O(logn)。

算法：

    public int[] twoSum(int[] numbers, int target) {
        int res[] = new int[2];
        int left = 0,right = numbers.length-1;
        while(left<right){
            int sum = numbers[left]+numbers[right];
            
            if(sum>target){
                right--;
            }else if(sum<target){
                left++;
            }else{
                res[0] = left+1;
                res[1]=right+1;
                break;
            }
        }
        return res;
    }