SimpleDateFormat多线程不安全测试与ThreadLocal解决SimpleDateFormat多线程问题

源代码：

import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;

public class ThreadLocalTest {
	private static final ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat> sdf1 = new ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat>() {
		@Override
		protected SimpleDateFormat initialValue() {
			return new SimpleDateFormat("yy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss");
		}
	};
	private static final SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss");
	public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
		finalTest();
		System.out.println(sdf.format(new Date()));
		Thread.sleep(1000);
		System.out.println("--------------------------------------");
		threadLocalTest();
		System.out.println(sdf1.get().format(new Date()));
	}
	private static void finalTest() {
		Thread thread1 = new Thread(new Runnable() {
			@Override
			public void run() {
				System.out.println(sdf.format(new Date(new Date().getTime() - 1000000000)));
			}
		}); 
		thread1.start();
		Thread thread2 = new Thread(new Runnable() {
			@Override
			public void run() {
				System.out.println(sdf.format(new Date(new Date().getTime() + 1000000000)));
			}
		}); 
		thread2.start();
	}
	private static void threadLocalTest() {
		Thread thread1 = new Thread(new Runnable() {
			@Override
			public void run() {
				System.out.println(sdf1.get().format(new Date(new Date().getTime() - 1000000000)));
			}
		}); 
		thread1.start();
		Thread thread2 = new Thread(new Runnable() {
			@Override
			public void run() {
				System.out.println(sdf1.get().format(new Date(new Date().getTime() + 1000000000)));
			}
		}); 
		thread2.start();
	}

}

测试结果：

18-07-31 16:53:09
18-08-12 06:39:49
18-07-31 16:53:09
--------------------------------------
18-07-20 03:06:30
18-07-31 16:53:10
18-08-12 06:39:50

使用static SimpleDateFormat，输出的日期有两个是相同的，可以看出线程不安全；

使用ThreadLocal的每一个时间都是正确的。

如果是jdk是8及以上的，直接使用java.time下的LocalDateTime即可