TCM vs IRAM

https://community.arm.com/thread/3104


TCMs are connected directly to the processor, not through the bus.  So you don't have bus arbitration or the overhead of the bus protocol when you speak to them.

IRAM is an Internal RAM. In most of the SOC, we usually have IRAM of size 128KB or 64KB etc... This is usually termed little faster than the SRAM access.
So need to know how this IRAM is different from TCM memory interms of connection and access. System on Chip,縮寫:SoC


So TCMs are memories connected directly to the processor.  They also typically (but not always) fast - that is the same or near processor frequency,
IRAMs in your case are just means on SoC memory.  It'll still be connected through the bus.  In terms of speed, typically much quicker than the bulk off-chip memories.  But probably still lower frequency than the processor itself.  As the bus usually runs at a lower frequency than the processor.
IRAM vs TCM
The main difference between them then is how the connect to the processor.  TCMs directly to the processor, and IRAMs through the bus interface.  What benefit this gives is system specific.  Typically its going to be that with TCMs there can be contention with other masters.

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值