科研大牛们怎么读文献？_authors怎么读(1)，2024年最新开源至上

最新推荐文章于 2024-10-08 15:50:04 发布

2401_84254011

最新推荐文章于 2024-10-08 15:50:04 发布

阅读量774

点赞数 26

分类专栏： 2024年程序员学习文章标签：开源

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/2401_84254011/article/details/137997329

版权

2024年程序员学习专栏收录该内容

110 篇文章 0 订阅

订阅专栏

本文介绍了一位技术专家分享的针对Golang编程的学习资源，包括从零基础到进阶的全面体系，旨在帮助程序员高效提升技能，避免自学的低效和瓶颈。作者还邀请加入技术交流社区，共同学习成长。

摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

先自我介绍一下，小编浙江大学毕业，去过华为、字节跳动等大厂，目前阿里P7

深知大多数程序员，想要提升技能，往往是自己摸索成长，但自己不成体系的自学效果低效又漫长，而且极易碰到天花板技术停滞不前！

因此收集整理了一份《2024年最新Golang全套学习资料》，初衷也很简单，就是希望能够帮助到想自学提升又不知道该从何学起的朋友。

既有适合小白学习的零基础资料，也有适合3年以上经验的小伙伴深入学习提升的进阶课程，涵盖了95%以上Go语言开发知识点，真正体系化！

由于文件比较多，这里只是将部分目录截图出来，全套包含大厂面经、学习笔记、源码讲义、实战项目、大纲路线、讲解视频，并且后续会持续更新

如果你需要这些资料，可以添加V获取：vip1024b （备注go）

正文

几种不同的作者顺序[1]供参考。
Relative contribution. As mentioned above, the most common way authors are listed is by relative contribution. The author who most substantially worked on the draft article and the underlying research becomes the first author. The others are ranked in descending order of contribution. However, in many disciplines, such as the life sciences, the last author in a group is the principle investigator—the person who supervised the work.
Alphabetical list. Certain fields, particularly those involving large group projects, employ other methods. For example, high-energy particle physics teams list authors alphabetically.
Multiple “first” authors. Additional “first” authors can be noted by an asterisk or other symbol accompanied by an explanatory note. This practice is common in interdisciplinary studies; however, as we shall explain further below, the first name listed on a paper will still enjoy more visibility than any other “first” author.
Multiple “last” authors. Similar to recognizing several first authors, multiple last authors can be recognized via typographical symbols and footnotes. This practice arose as some journals wanted to increase accountability by requiring senior lab members to review all data and interpretations produced in their labs.
Negotiated order. If you were thinking you could avoid politics by drowning yourself in research, you’re sorely mistaken. While there are clearer practices for designating first and last authors, there’s no overriding convention for the middle authors. The list can be decided by negotiation, so sharpen those persuasive argument skills!