逻辑结构学派二（九个应用理论）

逻辑结构学派二（九个应用理论）

作者：刘海东，中国广东技术师范大学

摘要

本篇论文通过《逻辑空间理论》、《逻辑场理论》、《逻辑网络理论》、《生命通讯理论》、《生命推理活动理论》、《生命周期理论》、《生命数据理论》、《生命编程理论》、 《生命学习策略》九个领域的研究提出《逻辑时空》（包括逻辑时空和逻辑数理）、《逻辑场》、《逻辑网络》、《生命通讯》、《生命推理活动》、《生命周期》、《生命数据》、《生命编程》、《生命学习策略》九个应用经典理论，以一个学派的力量描述了人工智能、机器人、智能社会三个主体的科技发展全景。

关键词：宗旨；逻辑主体；赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图；仿生逻辑

作为开篇我对“逻辑结构学派”做一个介绍。事情越来越清楚了，对于未来的人类，一切事业的领导力量就是智能科技，决定任何国家发展水平的就是智能科技，智能科技将创造人类新的革命，智能科技革命，彻底改变人类生存发展的所有基础。在这场智能科技革命中，我提出了“逻辑结构学派”这一自成体系的学术思想，“逻辑结构学派”有这样一些理想：

1.发明了“赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图”以及一整套理论。

这是智能科技革命的第一个科技革命工具，有着极为重要的意义，可以这么说，智能科技改变人类会从赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图改变人类开始。

2.作为新一代软件操作平台的基本形式。

3.作为新一代网络软件操作平台的基本形式。

4.作为新一代网络组织形式。

5.作为新一代集成电路芯片的组织形式。

根据冯若依曼原则设计的中央处理器结构人类用了大半个世纪，我有一个新的设想：①用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图发展软件操作平台的同时也用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图重新设计中央处理器；②软件操作平台的逻辑方程结构图形式的方程单位生成器、时钟体系、邮局、地址体系、寄存器以及其他必要的附属设施都放到中央处理器，用方程单位生成器、时钟器、通讯器、地址管理器、寄存器代替控制器和运算器，附属设施做成结构图的形式，让软硬件合作实现赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图；③其中方程生成器代替运算器，重新设计运算方法，用方程单位生成器的方程分析、方程推理、生成新方程等功能创造智能运算代替传统运算；④用时钟器发出时钟变量控制所有方程和硬件设备创造智能控制代替传统控制，方程单位生成器控制时钟器，方程单位生成器生成或消灭时钟方程；⑤通讯器仍然用发出通讯变量的方法控制所有结构图的邮局，方程单位生成器用生成或消灭通讯方程的方法控制通讯器；⑥地址管理器仍然通过地址方程发出地址变量安排新的方程单位和新的变量集存储，方程单位生成器通过生成或消灭斗地址方程控制地址管理器，地址管理器还控制中央处理器的寄存器管理；⑦附属设施用逻辑方程的形式存在，仍然由方程单位生成器管理。

我还会继续完善这个研究！如果可行，用方程结构图变革软件、硬件、网络的序幕就拉开了，用方程结构图联合量子计算、生物计算变革冯若依曼原则的序幕就拉开了。

6.用方程结构图形式的芯片组织智能机器的硬件设施和智能网络硬件设施。

7.用方程结构图实现智能分析、智能信息推理和智能结构推理，用方程结构图的推理创造人工智能和机器人，用方程结构图的智能网络分析、智能网络信息推理、智能网络结构推理创造智能社会。

8.改造传统数学，将数学研究工具变革成方程结构图，传统数学成果用于构造逻辑方程的数与数的关系，新的数学研究用方程结构图作为工作语言和成果的描述语言。

9.改造传统物理学，将现有物理学研究成果用方程结构图描述，新的物理研究用方程结构图作为工作语言和成果的描述语言。

10.变革人类所有学术研究。

方程结构图改造数学形成逻辑数学，改造物理形成逻辑物理，逻辑数学和逻辑物理创造逻辑时空，逻辑时空与传统时空的区别在于逻辑时空以方程结构图的形式存在。

以方程结构图、仿生逻辑、逻辑数学、逻辑物理、逻辑时空变革人类所有学术研究，这里有6个要点：①现有研究成果用方程结构图描述，保证逻辑结构学派继承已有真理，让研究走科学道路，不走伪科学道路；②新的学术研究用方程结构图作为工作语言和成果的描述语言；③用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图对所有研究对象建模；④创造广泛的学科交叉和大综合研究；⑤创造智能社会共同研究学术对象的新型研究方法；⑥广泛运用方程结构图形式的智能机器和智能网络开展学术研究。

11.改变人类所有工农业。

有5个要点：①用方程结构图形式的智能社会从事工农业生产；②广泛建立方程结构图形式的工业模型和农业模型；③用智能社会控制、智能社会研究、工农业智能模型、智能网络发展分布式生产单位、逻辑网络形式的物流作为生产形式；④工农业研究用方程结构图变革后的学术研究形式；⑤广泛使用智能机器和智能网络开展生产，智能机器和智能网络的逻辑结构都是方程结构图。

12. 逻辑结构学派提出方程结构图工具的同时还提出民权、人权、法治的智能社会秩序，以此遏制智能战争和智能统治可能造成的灾难。

以上大部分已经在第一篇论文和第二篇论文中完成了，剩下的准备在我创作的第三篇论文中完成。

第一篇论文提出《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》、《主观能动性结构》、《主观能动性结构工程》、《赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图》、《仿生逻辑》五个基础经典理论，让人工智能、机器人、智能社会三个主体的基础研究有了方向、方法和判断标准。

第二篇论文提出《逻辑时空》（包括逻辑时空和逻辑数理）、《逻辑场》、《逻辑网络》、《生命通讯》、《生命推理活动》、《生命周期》、《生命数据》、《生命编程》、《生命学习策略》九个应用经典理论，以一个学派的力量描述了人工智能、机器人、智能社会三个主体的科技发展全景，第二篇论文的九个应用经典理论是以第一篇论文的五个基础经典理论为工具构造出来的。

第三篇论文《逻辑结构学派三（五个工作步骤）》计划在第一篇论文五个基础经典理论和第二篇论文九个应用经典理论的基础上，提出①诠释学②发展学③规范学④交叉学⑤基础学，这五个智能时代的工作方法，抛砖引玉，其中诠释学重点研究逻辑方程结构图的智能分析，发展学研究逻辑结构学派实现理想的路径，规范学研究“民权、人权、法治”的智能社会秩序怎么实现，交叉学研究学术交叉、工业交叉、农业交叉，基础学研究逻辑结构学派的理论怎么变成实践。

♣本研究的缘起

♣.1对全部研究的说明

人类根据主观规律规定主观秩序，比如用政治规定社会秩序，人类还用客观规律规定客观秩序，比如古代的农耕根据作物生长规律规定农时的秩序，古代的畜牧根据牲畜生长规律规定逐水草而居的秩序，进入工业文明，前期有牛顿力学这个客观规律规定的工业文明的工业秩序，包括机器的秩序、工厂的生产秩序、国家和人类的科技秩序和工农业秩序，后期有相对论这个客观规律规定的原子能科技和工业的秩序，当人类发明了计算机以后，冯·诺依曼提出了冯·诺依曼原则这个计算机组成的客观规律且以此确定了计算机组成的客观秩序，人类即将进入智能时代，但我们对智能时代的客观规律和客观秩序一无所知，现在的智能科技只是用工业文明的旧科技探索新的智能时代的皮毛，不懂得智能时代的客观规律，不能探索智能时代的新秩序，我们就找不到建立人工智能、机器人和智能社会的正确道路，不知道智能社会的正确发展道路，就不知道怎么规避邪恶和风险，有鉴于此，逻辑结构学派决定首开风气探索智能时代的客观规律和客观秩序。

逻辑结构学派在已经出版的论文《人工智能的基础理论——《逻辑结构与逻辑工程学》》中探索了智能时代的客观规律作为第一期研究，第二期研究以《逻辑结构学派》的论文研究为载体，将第一期的泛泛研究改为以主观能动性结构为研究对象，探索智能时代的客观规律和客观秩序，因为规模巨大而分成三篇论文阐述。第一篇论文《逻辑结构学派一（五个基础理论）》用于探索智能时代的客观规律，这次探索以主观能动性结构为研究对象，提出①逻辑结构学派的宗旨②逻辑结构学③逻辑工程学④逻辑方程结构图理论⑤仿生逻辑理论，这五个智能时代的基础研究的载体，抛砖引玉，对理论和事例进行初步的探索。第二篇论文《逻辑结构学派二（九个应用理论）》用于探索智能时代的客观秩序，提出①逻辑空间理论②逻辑场理论③逻辑网络理论④生命通讯理论⑤生命推理活动理论⑥生命周期理论⑦生命数据理论⑧生命编程理论⑨生命学习策略，这九个智能时代的应用研究的载体，抛砖引玉，对理论和事例进行初步的探索。第三篇论文《逻辑结构学派三（五个工作步骤和需要说明的几个问题）》，提出①诠释学②发展学③规范学④交叉学⑤基础学，这五个智能时代的工作方法，抛砖引玉，对理论和事例进行初步的探索，另外对几个问题作出说明。以这三篇论文作为智能时代智能研究的开路先锋！

♣.2对本篇论文研究的说明

本篇论文的任务是提出智能时代智能应用研究的全景，分成九个部分：①《逻辑时空》（包括逻辑时空和逻辑数理）、②《逻辑场》、③《逻辑网络》、④《生命通讯》、⑤《生命推理活动》、⑥《生命周期》、⑦《生命数据》、⑧《生命编程》、⑨《生命学习策略》。

1.逻辑空间理论

1.1《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》与逻辑空间理论

《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》提出“新的主观逻辑”，新的主观逻辑简而言之，用客观逻辑研究问题，用主观逻辑解决问题，用新的客观逻辑世界代替客观物质世界，用新的客观逻辑的宇宙观、新的客观逻辑的人生观、新的客观逻辑的方法论代替传统的宇宙观、人生观、方法论，这里的主观逻辑也不是传统的信仰和宗教，不是个人主义，是智能社会应该具备的民权信仰、人权信仰和法治信仰构建的主观逻辑，其最大的作用在于排斥危害智能社会的个人主义以及个人主义造成的智能战争和智能统治产生的罪恶。

这里研究问题的客观逻辑和解决问题的主观逻辑都要求宇宙是逻辑的，用逻辑宇宙代替物质宇宙，逻辑结构学派认为智能时代的时空是逻辑时空而不是物质时空，以此建立逻辑空间理论，用逻辑空间理论满足智能时代三大主体（人工智能、机器人、智能社会）发展的需要。

逻辑空间理论需要人类在认识上建立一种逻辑数理的新型数理理论，建立这样的常识：所有的物质认识变成逻辑认识，即物质实际是一种逻辑主体，所有的物质现象变成逻辑现象，即物质现象实际是一种逻辑现象，所有的物质之间的关系实际是一种逻辑关系，逻辑现象和逻辑关系也是逻辑主体，以此建立表示物质的逻辑主体概念，进而发展这种逻辑主体概念让其还能表示时间和空间，则时空和物质都能用逻辑主体这一个概念，同时建立逻辑现象和逻辑关系的概念，以逻辑时空、逻辑、逻辑现象、逻辑关系、逻辑宇宙改造和发展现有的数理理论，就像相对论要在牛顿力学不能解释的地方发展一样，逻辑数理理论就要在现有自然科学不能解释的地方发展自己，智能时代发展人工智能、机器人、智能社会三大主体需要逻辑数理理论，需要逻辑数理创造的逻辑时空和逻辑宇宙。

1.2《主观能动性结构》与逻辑空间理论

主观能动性结构是逻辑结构，主观能动性结构要求存在于逻辑时空和逻辑宇宙中。主观能动性结构的对外通讯需要逻辑网络传递逻辑，逻辑网络需要存在于逻辑环境即逻辑场中，而逻辑场的存在需要逻辑时空和逻辑宇宙作为逻辑场的环境。

所以，主观能动性结构的存在或者生产使用需要逻辑时空，而逻辑时空需要建立在逻辑数理（即逻辑数学和逻辑物理）理论上，逻辑数理理论首先要求创建一批常识概念，如时间、空间、物质皆是逻辑主体，宇宙是逻辑主体，物质现象皆是逻辑现象，物质间的关系皆是逻辑关系，普遍联系是普遍逻辑关系，逻辑现象和逻辑关系也是逻辑主体，用逻辑方程结构图描述宇宙中的一切，用逻辑方程结构图研究“宇宙外面是什么”、“宇宙是怎么产生的”、“宇宙产生之前是什么”这些玄奥问题，用仿生逻辑和逻辑数理构造逻辑宇宙的赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，其次，牛顿力学不够用则用相对论，相对论不够用的地方就是建立逻辑数理理论的地方，建立逻辑数理理论的工具是赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图和仿生逻辑，最后，用成熟的逻辑数理构造逻辑宇宙。

1.3《主观能动性结构工程》与逻辑空间理论

    主观能动性结构工程是逻辑工程，逻辑工程有两个要求：①逻辑工程产品是逻辑结构，逻辑结构需要存在于逻辑环境中，逻辑环境需要存在于逻辑时空，②逻辑工程过程是逻辑结构发展的过程，同样需要存在于逻辑时空。这样，主观能动性结构工程和主观能动性结构一样，都要求存在于逻辑时空。

1.4《仿生逻辑》与逻辑空间理论

    构造逻辑时空的工具是赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，构造赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的工具是仿生逻辑，这里的仿生不仅仅模拟生命，仿生指用逻辑方程单位模拟宇宙中的一切逻辑主体、逻辑现象和逻辑关系。将恒星看成有时钟周期这个生命，用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图模拟恒星完整的时钟周期也是仿生逻辑。

1.5事例研究

有几个问题，“宇宙的外面是什么”，“宇宙是怎么产生的”，“宇宙产生之前是什么”，对于这些玄之又玄的问题现在的人类往往用猜想作为回答，但这些猜想跟神话没有区别，所以这些猜想没有实际的意义，现在的人类还认为玄奥的问题解决不了是现有的科技不够用并且观测技术不够用，但随着人类的认识继续前进，人类会发现，沿着现有的科技发展道路前进，人类会永远得不到弄明白玄奥问题的科技，甚至不能再发展人类其他的需要的科技，问题出在哪里？

要对人类工业社会奉若神明的自然科学产生怀疑，用自然科学认识宇宙有问题，用自然科学发展智能主体自然科学不够用！而且，随着人类科技进入智能时代，人类会发现寻找宇宙玄奥问题的答案关乎人类的命运，同时必须发明新的科技理论代替现有的自然科学发展智能，怎么办？逻辑结构学派提出了自己的观点“新的主观逻辑”，简而言之，用客观逻辑研究问题，用主观逻辑解决问题，用新的客观逻辑世界代替客观物质世界，宇宙是逻辑的而不是物质的，牛顿力学还适用的范围继续用牛顿力学，牛顿力学不够用的时候用相对论，相对论再不够用就需要发明逻辑时空理论继续人类的发展，用宇宙是逻辑的理论改造和发展现有的数理理论（数学理论和物理理论），得出逻辑数理理论这个新的学识帮助人类在智能时代继续前进，帮助人类获得发展智能时代主体必须的学识，研究逻辑时空的玄奥问题的工具是赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，现在人类自然科学的停滞不前就是在等待逻辑数理理论的诞生！

另一个问题，原有的数理研究成果包括发明了多维空间的理论，但一个原点加一簇坐标的多维空间人类怎么利用，人类越来越清楚，这种多维空间理论只能让神仙进入高级空间，人类利用多维空间的理想永远是不可能实现的神话！怎么办？逻辑结构学派提出，人类先创造高维度智能，再利用高维度智能与高维度空间对映的理论，通过高维度智能进入高维度空间，认识和利用高维度空间，但这条道路仍然有一个前提，仍然要认为宇宙是逻辑的。

1.6提出第一个应用经典理论

逻辑结构学派提出第一个应用经典理论《逻辑时空》，《逻辑时空》包括逻辑时空和逻辑数理两个基础应用理论。

对于逻辑时空理论有这样几个要点：

①逻辑时空建立的常识为：时间、空间、物质都是逻辑主体，物质现象是逻辑现象，物质普遍联系是逻辑关系，逻辑现象和逻辑关系也是逻辑主体；

②逻辑主体用描述集、属性集、功能集三个集合说明，这三个集合可以归于一个赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，只要输出变量集合包涵三个集合的合集，识别逻辑主体的方法是主体能否表示成赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，同时这个赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的输出变量集合是否包含描述集、属性集、功能集的合集；

③用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图表述逻辑主体时需要三个工具配合工作，这三个工具是仿生逻辑、赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图、逻辑数理。

仿生逻辑通过仿生构造赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，仿生指找出逻辑主体的结构、活动、周期，赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图根据逻辑主体仿生的结果构造，这里的生命指逻辑主体的活动周期，包括没有生命的逻辑主体和生命，暂时无法仿生的用人工设计，这其中最重要的工作是方程单位生成器配合时钟方程体系构造逻辑主体的活动和周期。

逻辑数理包括逻辑数学和逻辑物理，逻辑数学是建立赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的方程的工具，逻辑物理是帮助仿生逻辑寻找赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的结构的工具。

④后面的逻辑场、逻辑网络都用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图描述，这里的生命指时钟周期，逻辑单位的诞生和消失用方程单位生成器描述。

对于逻辑数学理论有这样几个要点：

①逻辑数学对传统数学的改造体现在这两点：一个将传统数学对数的研究改变成逻辑数学对逻辑方程的研究，一个将传统数学的研究成果、研究方法和研究方向归于逻辑方程构造二元和多元关系的领域；

②逻辑数学的第一个任务是将仿生逻辑得出的宇宙的万事万物的逻辑方程表达出来，逻辑数学的第二个任务是研究怎么提高赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的方程单位生成器的能力，怎么将输入输出之间已知的逻辑路径概括成逻辑方程单位，怎么在已知输入值和输出值以后创造逻辑方程单位实现输入到输出的逻辑关系，逻辑数学的第三个任务是将传统数学归入逻辑关系的研究领域，将传统数学用于构造逻辑方程结构图的二元关系和多元关系。

对于逻辑物理理论有这样几个要点：

①逻辑物理对传统物理的改造体现在：将物理定义和理论都变成逻辑主体，画出赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图；以后逻辑物理的研究成果都用逻辑主体和逻辑主体的赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图表述；

②逻辑物理的表述和研究工具有三个：仿生逻辑、赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图、逻辑数学，仿生逻辑模仿宇宙的时空和时空里的万事万物，赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图将仿生逻辑进一步表述成结构图，万事万物的诞生、活动、消亡用方程单位生成器实现，生命是模拟万事万物的时钟周期，逻辑方程用逻辑数学具体构造，传统数学用于构造方程的二元和多元关系；

③利用变成逻辑主体的传统物理和新创造的逻辑物理的逻辑主体帮助仿生逻辑寻找赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的结构；

④创造逻辑物理的几个基本概念：时间、空间、物质都是逻辑主体，物质现象是逻辑现象，广泛的联系是逻辑关系，逻辑现象和逻辑关系都是逻辑主体，用逻辑物理建立逻辑时空；

⑤通过逻辑物理的逻辑主体理论的赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图研究逻辑时空和逻辑时空里的逻辑主体、逻辑现象主体、逻辑关系主体的规律，帮助仿生，逻辑主体的描述集、属性集、功能集可以用一个赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图表述。

这样，逻辑结构学派用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图研究继承了传统的数学研究、传统的物理研究、传统的逻辑研究，逻辑结构学派创造和发展逻辑时空和逻辑数理都拒绝伪科学的发展道路，但逻辑时空和逻辑数理都是新生事物，都需要进一步丰富和发展，都不应该被武断否定，发展智能时代一定需要逻辑时空和逻辑数理这两个基础应用理论。

2.逻辑场理论

2.1《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》与逻辑场理论

《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》提出“新的主观逻辑”，新的主观逻辑简而言之，用客观逻辑研究问题，用主观逻辑解决问题，根据宗旨的要求逻辑结构学派提出了逻辑时空和逻辑数理两个基础应用理论。逻辑数理是逻辑时空的基础，逻辑数理包括逻辑数学和逻辑物理。

逻辑结构学派创造了逻辑时空和逻辑数理这两个基础应用理论后，逻辑结构学派又提出了逻辑环境这个新的基础应用理论，逻辑结构学派将逻辑环境称为逻辑场。

2.2事例研究

为什么用逻辑场代替场景？逻辑场可以包括所有物理场和市场这样的社会场，可以包括一切自然环境和社会环境，其概念能力远超场景，之所以称为逻辑场是因为这个场产生的作用是逻辑作用，各种影响因素的合力是一种逻辑力。逻辑意义的需求，逻辑意义的控制，逻辑意义的环境作用，场景显然没有这种概念能力。

2.3提出第二个应用经典理论

这里逻辑结构学派提出第二个应用经典理论《逻辑场》，逻辑场指逻辑环境，主观能动性结构作为智能研究最重要的逻辑主体，主观能动性结构要求存在于逻辑环境中，与逻辑环境产生互塑作用，逻辑环境也要求存在于逻辑时空中，与逻辑时空产生互塑作用，逻辑时空是逻辑环境的环境，逻辑环境与逻辑时空同一个时空，为此，逻辑结构学派先创造了逻辑时空的理论，包括逻辑时空和逻辑数理，接着逻辑结构学派创造了逻辑环境的理论，逻辑结构学派将逻辑环境称为逻辑场。

2.3.1什么是逻辑场

逻辑场是逻辑结构组成的环境，逻辑结构就是逻辑主体，逻辑结构之间存在相互作用，各种相互作用交织在一起形成场，逻辑场有自然场和社会场，还有自然与社会综合在一起的综合场，逻辑场对逻辑结构即逻辑主体产生逻辑环境的作用，产生逻辑结构与逻辑场互相塑造的现象，逻辑结构通过感知逻辑传递与逻辑场互塑，逻辑传递在逻辑结构外部通过逻辑网络传递，在逻辑结构内部通过逻辑总线传递，逻辑结构感知的逻辑是一种数据逻辑，逻辑场可以做成赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，构造逻辑场的结构图有这样的要点：①构造工具有仿生逻辑、赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图、逻辑数理，这三个工具的作用与一般结构图的三个工具一样；②首先做出逻辑场中逻辑主体的赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，逻辑主体的选择确定根据研究对象的要求定；③将逻辑场中逻辑主体的方程单位的传递路向用有向路径标示出来，标示后，逻辑场中各个逻辑主体的结构图形成一个整图，这个整图就是逻辑场的结构图；④赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的时钟方程体系和方程单位生成器分布在各个逻辑主体的结构图中，这两个部分在逻辑场的结构图中是分布式的；⑤研究对象是逻辑场中一个或几个逻辑主体，研究对象与逻辑场的互塑就是研究对象与其他逻辑主体的方程单位来往有向路径，即研究对象与逻辑场共用一个结构图；⑥这里的方程单位指常量、变量、方程、方程组、不同规模的结构图，各个逻辑主体可以彼此传递各种方程单位，有向传递路径可以标出权重以示次序。

2.3.2修改传递

方程单位由一个逻辑主体传递给另一个逻辑主体后，接受方程单位的逻辑主体发出的方程单位会修改传递上一个逻辑主体发给自己的方程单位，例如太阳对地球有引力，地球对月球有引力，当太阳对地球的引力改变时，地球因为自己轨道或其他状态的变化改变对月球的引力，这里引力即引力场的承载作用的逻辑方程结构图，地球出现修改传递将太阳传给自己的方程单位修改后传给月球，物理场的相互作用普遍存在逻辑网络和修改传递，社会场也一样，假设中国的法律对A国的影响是法律数据逻辑承载的法律逻辑结构图，A国对B国的法律影响即传递法律逻辑方程单位受中国传递给A国的法律逻辑方程单位变化的影响，A国修改传递中国的法律逻辑方程单位，综合场也可以这样研究。修改传递的过程是这样，一个逻辑主体将方程单位传递给第二个逻辑主体，改变了第二个逻辑主体的结构图，第二个逻辑主体因为自己结构图的改变而改变了传给第三个逻辑主体的方程单位，第二对第三的改变因为第一对第二的改变，第二传给第三的是对第一传给第二的修改传递。

2.3.3自然逻辑场

自然逻辑场是传统物理学所说的场论，归根结底自然逻辑场由物质组成，场的作用是物质间的相互作用，但这里的物质变成逻辑主体，研究工具由物理变成逻辑物理。

2.3.4社会逻辑场

社会逻辑场是人类社会的另一种研究，归根结底社会逻辑场由人组成，场的作用是人与人之间的相互作用，这里的人仍然是逻辑主体或者主观能动性结构。

2.3.5感知产生的逻辑场

逻辑主体要与逻辑场互相塑造就得先感知逻辑场，这种感知有自然逻辑场物质的逻辑主体的感知，也有社会逻辑场人的逻辑主体的感知，还有逻辑主体对自然逻辑场和社会逻辑场的综合感知，比如人感觉冷是感知自然逻辑场，人感觉领导对自己不好是感知社会逻辑场，如果一个人既感到冷又感到领导对自己不好产生闷闷不乐是对自然逻辑场和社会逻辑场的综合感知。

逻辑主体感知逻辑场用方程单位有向传递实现。

2.3.6逻辑场的环境作用

逻辑主体与逻辑场存在互相塑造，逻辑场通过支持或反对逻辑主体的生命活动或生命周期决定逻辑主体，比如消化逻辑主体的垃圾同时提供逻辑主体需要的食物，产生环境作用，而逻辑主体反过来通过生命活动或生命周期影响逻辑场，产生塑造环境的作用，比如人类为了生存破坏森林，又比如现在人类减少温室气体排放。

2.3.7逻辑场的需求和控制

①逻辑场需求

逻辑主体与逻辑场存在互相塑造，互相塑造通过逻辑主体与逻辑场互相传递方程单位实现，逻辑场对逻辑主体的塑造就包括需求，这种需求用方程单位表达，比如天气冷让人产生多穿衣服的需求，考大学让人产生用功的需求。

②怎么获得逻辑场需求

获得逻辑场需求有这样几个步骤，首先通过方程单位传递获得有关方程单位，然后获得的方程单位改变了原来的结构图，新的结构图有了新的输入变量，新的输入变量形成新的需求，最后这个逻辑主体用自己新的生命活动规律实现新的需求。

③逻辑场控制

逻辑主体与逻辑场的互相塑造就包括逻辑场对逻辑主体的控制，这种控制用方程单位的传递改变研究对象结构图实现，比如地球引力和人类的法律等等，逻辑场的控制通过传递方程单位表达，比如人体重量可以用引力相互作用传递，人类法律可以通过教育传递。

④怎么获得逻辑场控制

逻辑主体处于一个逻辑场中，这个逻辑场就可以控制这个逻辑主体，控制以方程单位的形式在逻辑场传递，逻辑场的功能是传递方程单位，如引力网传递引力，政府的网络传递法律，逻辑主体获得逻辑场控制的前提为处于这个逻辑场中，逻辑场因为互相塑造规律控制逻辑主体，控制的表达用方程单位的传递并改变研究对象的结构图实现，用控制影响逻辑主体的生命活动和生命周期，逻辑主体受到控制后可以在自己的结构图中传递控制。

这里逻辑结构学派重点说明一个问题，逻辑场互传的是逻辑，逻辑主体内部互传的仍然是逻辑，只是为了认识和研究的方便，逻辑结构学派将这种传递的逻辑表示成方程单位，用常量、变量、方程、方程组或大小规模的结构图这些方程单位表示逻辑，比如太阳照在地球上，逻辑是阳光，为了认识和研究的方便，可以将阳光表示成方程单位。

3.逻辑网络理论

3.1《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》与逻辑网络理论

    逻辑结构学派根据自己的宗旨创造了逻辑时空，再以逻辑时空为环境创造了逻辑场，又以逻辑场作为环境创造了逻辑网络，描述和研究逻辑网络的工具是仿生逻辑、赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图、逻辑数理。

3.2《主观能动性结构》与逻辑网络理论

    逻辑网络是主观能动性结构重要的组成部分，主观能动性结构外部的逻辑网络称为外网，主观能动性结构内部的逻辑网络称为内网，主观能动性结构通过外网和内网实现内外的逻辑通讯，根据仿生逻辑，主观能动性结构的内网也称为神经。

3.3《主观能动性结构工程》与逻辑网络理论

主观能动性结构工程是生产主观能动性结构的工程，这就包括生产主观能动性结构的内部逻辑网络，以及主观能动性结构与外部逻辑网络的收发机构，比如各个组织的邮局。

构造主观能动性结构的内外逻辑网络功能是主观能动性结构工程的重要任务，是主观能动性结构通讯功能的重要基础。

3.4《赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图》与逻辑网络理论

    描述和研究逻辑网络的工具包括仿生逻辑、赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图、逻辑数理，逻辑场的赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的网络图就是外网图，这种网络图的节点是一个个逻辑主体，连接节点的加权有向路径是方程单位传播路径，加权标明次序，逻辑主体的赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的网络图就是这个逻辑主体的内网图，这种网络图的节点是方程或大小规模的方程结构图，连接节点的加权有向路径是方程单位传播路径，方程单位包括常量、变量、方程和大小规模的方程结构图，加权标明次序。

3.5《仿生逻辑》与逻辑网络理论

    仿生逻辑配合逻辑物理构造赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，逻辑数学构造逻辑方程，逻辑网络的内网和外网都要依附于赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，所以仿生逻辑对描述和研究逻辑网络意义重大，仿生逻辑根据实际的逻辑网络构造主观能动性结构逻辑通讯需要的内外逻辑网络。

3.6事例研究

    逻辑网络现阶段传递的是方程单位，比如计算机互联网就是这样，逻辑网络的高级阶段可以传递逻辑主体，比如时光穿梭机，但这是个玄而又玄的玄奥问题，其技术发展路线图逻辑结构学派还没有搞明白，逻辑结构学派只能肯定时光穿梭机的幻想与逻辑网络传递逻辑主体的理想有关。

3.7提出第三个应用经典理论

这里逻辑结构学派提出第三个应用经典理论《逻辑网络》，有以下要点：

3.7.1逻辑网络

指传递逻辑主体相互作用的网络，不是常说的互联网或5G，包括互联网或5G，但范围更广，这种逻辑网络的自然网传递逻辑主体，相互作用是一种逻辑主体，人工网现在传递方程单位，高级发展阶段也需要传递逻辑主体，方程单位包括常量、变量、方程和大小规模的方程结构图。

3.7.2宇宙中的自然网络

宇宙中的自然网络很多很多，比如地球上的水网，风的吹动，洋流，地壳动力的传送，地心变化向地表的传送，微观粒子的相互作用和传送相互作用，宏观太空的引力网、光和无线电波的传送、时间网、空间网等等。自然网络还包括人类社会网络，社会网络也很多，首先有互联网和5G，公路、铁路、水路、飞机等交通网，城市网和乡村网，这些称为硬件网，还有软件网，政治网，法律网，文化网，教育网，宗教网，等等。

一句话，只要存在逻辑传播现象就存在逻辑网络。

3.7.3什么是逻辑网络

①逻辑网络是逻辑场的属性，逻辑场由逻辑结构和逻辑结构的相互作用组成，这就存在逻辑传播和逻辑传播现象组成的网络，这个网络就称为逻辑网络。

②逻辑网络传播逻辑。前面提出了很多网络都是逻辑网络，无线电波的传播网，微观粒子的相互作用网，地表的水网和地壳内部的力传播网，人类的公路网和法律网，这些都是逻辑网络，传播的无线电波、微观相互作用、水能、地壳动能、公路运输的货物、法律的约束都叫逻辑，在这个意义上，逻辑网络是传播逻辑的。

注意，逻辑的表现形式是逻辑主体，即逻辑主体之间互传表现形式也是逻辑主体的逻辑。

③传播逻辑的载体是逻辑主体，逻辑主体包括常量、变量、方程、大小规模的结构图，也就是方程单位，逻辑主体是传播的形式，可以是一辆货车，也可以是一座法院，甚至可以是一个邮包，但注意，逻辑是传播的本质，一种对接受传播的逻辑主体产生影响的逻辑，影响的是逻辑主体的方程结构图。

④逻辑传播是修改传递，过程是这样的，一个逻辑主体接受了逻辑传播，逻辑对该逻辑主体的方程结构图产生影响和改变，改变后的逻辑主体根据自己的生命活动规律向新的逻辑主体发出自己的逻辑。

3.7.4逻辑网络的作用

①逻辑网络是逻辑场重要的属性，要建设逻辑场就需要建设逻辑网络，逻辑网络的优劣反映逻辑场的优劣，逻辑网络的功能是传递逻辑，传递形式是逻辑主体，包括各种方程单位。

②发展智能时代必须研究和建设逻辑网络，这不仅是互联网和5G这么简单，人类面对和建设的逻辑网络，自然的和人工的，智能机器都同样需要，比如智能机器一样要面对宇宙的引力网，智能机器社会的监管一样要法律网。

3.7.5怎么建设和运用逻辑网络

发展人类和发展智能两个领域都需要建设和运用逻辑网络，逻辑网络传播逻辑的性质让逻辑网络建设和运用包括了人类一切网络工程建设和运用，包括航天工程和深海工程，包括法律工程和教育工程，包括智能发展的市场工程和智能监管的法律工程。

3.7.6逻辑网络理论

①逻辑网络的环境是逻辑场，逻辑场的环境是逻辑时空，逻辑网络的表述和研究工具是仿生逻辑、赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图、数理逻辑，仿生逻辑和逻辑物理配合仿生逻辑构造赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，逻辑数学用于构造方程和方程单位生成器；

②逻辑网络就是赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的方程单位的加权有向路径，加权标明次序，方程单位包括常量、变量、方程和不同规模的方程结构图，逻辑网络是加权有向路径和节点组成的结构图，加权标明次序，对于一个逻辑主体，其外部网络称为外网网络，外网网络的节点是一个个逻辑主体，其内部网络称为内网网络，内网网络的节点是一个个方程或大小规模的方程单位；

③逻辑网络的传递路径包括加权有向路径和节点称为逻辑信道，加权标明次序，逻辑信道包括自然信道和人工信道，自然信道传递逻辑主体，比如太阳的光照在地球上，或者比如火车将旅客由一个城市运到另一个城市，现在的人工信道传递方程单位，比如计算机互联网和计算机内部的信号线，主观能动性结构的内网网络需要模拟人的神经，人工信道的高级发展阶段也需要传递逻辑主体。

4.生命通讯理论

4.1《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》与生命通讯理论

逻辑结构学派根据自己的宗旨提出生命通讯理论，生命通讯以逻辑场和逻辑网络为逻辑环境，逻辑场提供外网通讯结构图的节点，逻辑网络提供外网通讯结构图的有向路径，生命通讯的内网通讯结构图和外网通讯结构图都是有向图，都可以用离散数学图论研究。

4.2《赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图》与生命通讯理论

赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图是描述和激活逻辑场、逻辑网络、逻辑主体的工具，赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图也是描述和激活生命通讯过程的工具。

赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图由方程、方程组、大小规模的结构图、时钟方程体系、方程单位生成器、邮局组成，邮局既是内网通讯结构图的一个个节点，一个逻辑主体向外网发出方程单位的邮局还是逻辑网络通讯结构图的节点，内网通讯结构图和外网通讯结构图都符合离散数学图论有向图的规律，都可以用离散数学图论研究。

逻辑结构学派特别说明，三层逻辑结构的初级结构元素的信箱、中级结构器官的邮局、高级结构脑组织的感官和神经都与方程结构图的邮局对映。

4.3《仿生逻辑》与生命通讯理论

仿生逻辑既是构造赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的工具又是描述生命通讯的工具，仿生逻辑包括模拟生命和逻辑数理，研究逻辑主体内网通讯要模拟人，研究逻辑网络外网通讯要模拟人类社会、地球、星系甚至整个宇宙，逻辑数学用于构造通讯结构图，逻辑物理帮助仿生。

4.4事例研究

逻辑结构学派提出一个生命通讯发展路线图，现在人工信道只传递信息即方程单位，将来人工信道可以同时传递信息和逻辑体即混合传递，最后实现人工信道直接传递逻辑主体像现在的自然信道。比如快递这个行业，现在是自然信道，将来城际运输用高铁和飞机，投递用无人机，快递速度会大大提高，再将来全程用高速无人机，速度会更快，再将来用高速全能机器人，机器人海、天和陆地全能运输投递，速度会进一步提高，无限提高机器人速度，自然信道的速度会无限接近人工信道的速度，当自然信道的速度和人工信道的速度一样，自然信道就变成了人工信道，人工信道传递逻辑主体的理想就实现了。

4.5提出第四个应用经典理论

    这里逻辑结构学派提出第四个应用经典理论《生命通讯》，有以下要点：

4.5.1通讯原理

①逻辑结构学派创立了逻辑网络理论，逻辑网络提供了逻辑信道，逻辑结构学派以逻辑信道为基础建立生命通讯理论。逻辑信道分为自然信道和人工信道，自然信道的生命通讯传递逻辑主体，人工信道的生命通讯现在只能传递信息即方程单位，人工信道的高级目标仍然是传递逻辑主体，但高级目标的人工信道的技术发展路线图逻辑结构学派现在还没有搞清楚。本文只研究人工信道的信息生命通讯，只研究方程单位的生命通讯，以人的生命通讯为仿生逻辑研究人工智能、机器人、智能社会三大智能主体的生命通讯。

②这里传递的信息即方程单位仍然是赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，可以是一个常量或变量，可以是方程，也可以是大小规模的结构图，根据需要可以配备时钟方程体系和方程单位生成器，还可以根据需要自带结构图邮局，即时钟方程体系、方程单位生成器、结构图邮局是传递方程单位的可选项。

③逻辑结构学派用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图描述逻辑场、逻辑网络、逻辑主体，如果我们激活赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，我们就得到了真实的逻辑场、真实的逻辑网络、真实的逻辑主体，我们就可以仿生人的逻辑实现真实的生命通讯，激活指将自然语言描述的结构图变成机器认识的目标语言描述的结构图，例子有两个，一个是传统软件工程的将源程序编译成目标程序，一个是人脑的意识为自然语言，处理人脑意识的却是生物语言，逻辑结构学派认为激活赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图需要创造一套崭新的方法，既要继承传统软件工程的经验又要通过对人脑的仿生逻辑进行创新。

4.5.2通讯地址

生命通讯活动需要逻辑场、逻辑网络、逻辑体都建立充分的通讯地址体系，好比现实生活中的邮政，城镇有邮编，城镇内部有街道小区名称，住宅有门牌号码，邮递建立在这种充分的邮政体系之上，逻辑结构学派在研究方程结构图组织方法时指出：

“赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图是用来描述生命的，生命的产生以数量巨大的细胞、细胞组织、组织器官支撑，如果一个细胞就需要一个逻辑方程结构图著作描述，一个细胞组织就是一个学科的著作的集合，一个组织器官就是所有学科的著作的集合，方程、方程组、结构图、文件、著作、学科著作集、学术体系著作集的数量各个都是海量，怎么组织他们，先确定他们一个个的真实的名字，再建立单字编码本，将真实名字译成编码，组织方程的方法仿造中国身份证编码的方法，将编码分成各种编码段，右到左的编码段分别标示方程、方程组、结构图、文件、著作、学科著作集、学术体系著作集，形成每个方程都有固定的地址，通过方程固定地址通讯传递变量值。”

发展这个理论，逻辑结构学派建立起通讯地址体系：

①建立通讯地址体系的指导思想是继承传统计算机科技和计算机网络通讯技术的经验，还要从事仿生逻辑，模拟人类的邮政快递，模拟人的大脑和体内通讯的生命规律。

②建立外网通讯体系，逻辑场的所有逻辑主体都要有主体名称，主体名称反映其意义和其在逻辑场的位置，逻辑网络所有的人工信道要有起点逻辑主体、终点逻辑主体、路径加权（加权标明次序）、路径描述。

③建立内网通讯体系，内网指一个逻辑主体内部的人工信道，逻辑主体内部所有方程单位都要有地址，方程单位里面所有的组成都要有地址，直到每个方程都有地址，逻辑主体内部的人工信道就是所有方程单位里面的有向路径和方程单位之间的有向路径，每段路径标明起点方程、终点方程、加权（加权标明次序）、路径说明。

④一个需传递的方程单位仿生自然信道邮政快递的方法，由“发送逻辑主体内网地址+逻辑网络路径图+接收逻辑主体内网地址”组成通讯地址体系，对自然语言的通讯地址编码并且激活。

4.5.3通讯过程

    生命通讯过程与人们发快递的过程一样，分三个阶段，发送逻辑主体内网发信，逻辑网络传递信息即方程单位，接收逻辑主体内网投递。

①外网通讯

外网通讯指逻辑网络传递方程单位，逻辑网络是路径结构图，节点是逻辑主体，路径是加权（加权标明次序）有向路径，规律符合离散数学图论的有向图，可以用离散数学图论研究逻辑网络外网通讯。

②内网通讯

内网通讯分两个部分，一个是发送逻辑主体内网发信，一个是接收逻辑主体内网投递，内网路径结构图是逻辑主体的赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图提供的，节点是方程结构图的邮局，路径是加权（加权标明次序）有向路径，研究方法有两个，一个是继承计算机科技和计算机网络通讯技术的经验，一个是对人脑和人体通讯体系的仿生，对人的神经体系的仿生。

4.5.4初级结构通讯

在生命理论中，细胞有记忆和通讯能力，这里引用过来，给元素都设置存储集和收发信息的信箱。每个元素的存储集都有或多或少的逻辑方程结构图，元素描述集、属性集、功能集也有各种必要的逻辑方程结构图，元素有求解逻辑方程的能力，逻辑方程需要的变量值由其他元素信箱输入到本元素信箱，再转给存储集对应的逻辑方程或元素类的对应逻辑方程，本元素解方程产生的变量值用于本元素、本元素其他方程或传递给其他元素，变量值引起逻辑方程和逻辑方程结构图变化，这种变化产生逻辑结构变化，这即为信息推理，信息推理造成的变量值可以控制结构的状态，结构状态的变化或连续变化产生结构推理。

4.5.5中级结构通讯

生命的组织器官也有记忆和通讯能力，模拟生命理论的组织器官设立中级逻辑结构各组织器官的邮局，这样，每个元素有或多或少的逻辑方程结构图，组织或器官的存储器也有或多或少的逻辑方程结构图，中级结构有初级结构解方程和逻辑传递的规律，还有组织或器官层级解方程和传递逻辑的规律，即外组织器官的邮局将信息传递给本组织器官邮局，再自邮局传给组织器官的存储器中的逻辑方程结构图，组织器官也有解方程能力，求出的变量值发给自己的对应元素或其他组织器官邮局，其他组织器官邮局再转发给自己的元素信箱，产生信息推理和结构推理。

4.5.6高级结构通讯

①模拟生命理论的神经设立邮政通路，仍然叫神经，神经是主观能动性组织控制的一个组织或器官，初级结构的主观能动性用物理规律，中级结构的主观能动性用环境规律，高级结构的主观能动性用脑指挥，高级结构有神经，中级结构有邮局，初级结构有信箱。

高级结构有三层逻辑方程结构图，元素里的逻辑方程结构图，组织器官里的逻辑方程结构图，大脑记忆的逻辑方程结构图，内部初级或中级输入脑记忆的变量值，在脑记忆中由主观能动性功能求解脑记忆中的方程，求出的变量用神经发给组织器官邮局，组织器官邮局再发给元素邮箱，产生信息推理和结构推理，脑记忆的逻辑方程结构图也可以通过高级逻辑结构的输出器官输出给外界。

②逻辑主体内网用于信息推理

非生命推理用信箱推理，即元素解方程，信箱收发变量值引发逻辑变化和结构变化，即有关科学方程的变化，植物推理用邮局推理，即组织器官解方程，中级结构的组织器官邮局收发变量值，组织器官邮局再将变量值转给元素信箱产生逻辑变化和结构变化，即有关植物方程的变化，动物和人类推理用大脑推理和神经传递变量值，即脑组织解方程，神经传递变量值，组织器官邮局收发，元素信箱收发，引发逻辑变化和结构变化，即生命方程的变化。

③逻辑主体内网用于信息推理控制结构

    信息推理引发逻辑变化，即引起逻辑方程结构图的变化，造成其他变量值的变化，造成的新变量值和其他变量值的变化会让控制结构的数据发生变化，产生控制结构。比如一个人走路，心急了，加快了迈步频次这个变量值，频次这个变量值造成人体相关逻辑方程结构图的变化，人体逻辑方程结构图的变化造成人体结构的变化，这个人加快了行进的速度。

④逻辑主体内网用于结构推理

    根据生命理论，逻辑方程的变量值控制逻辑方程，逻辑方程控制结构，产生结构推理。比如一个人渴了，喝水的逻辑方程中新的喝水需求变量产生变化，这造成同一方程的喝水动作变量值也加大，人有了喝很多水的大脑主观能动性的新逻辑方程，这个逻辑方程通过神经、组织器官邮局、元素信箱层层传递，最终的一个变量组指挥人体喝了很多水，产生结构推理。信息推理是产生目标，结构推理是产生手段和过程。

4.5.7人工智能通讯

    人工智能通讯与计算机通讯以及人脑通讯性质类似，要通过研究人脑通讯仿生发展人工智能通讯，这是逻辑主体的内网通讯和逻辑主体通过逻辑网络外网通讯，人工智能通讯的研究对象是主观能动性结构通讯，是高级逻辑结构的生命通讯过程。

4.5.8机器人通讯

机器人通讯也是逻辑主体通讯，但不是人脑的仿生，是对人整体的仿生，是主观能动性结构与各种受控机器组成的逻辑主体的内网和外网的通讯，这种生命通讯是人类第一次尝试构造，需要想象力和创新的勇气。

4.5.9智能社会通讯

智能社会通讯研究的就是智能社会的人工信道和外网通讯，研究的是逻辑网络。

①逻辑网络通讯

逻辑网络是逻辑场的属性，这种属性产生的原因是逻辑场中逻辑结构的广泛的相互作用和广泛的修改传递。

②只有初级结构的逻辑网络通讯

只有初级结构的逻辑主体是一种客观结构，没有生命，这种结构的逻辑网络通讯是相互作用和修改传递对元素信箱起作用传递逻辑方程，传递之后再内部传递，内部传递逻辑方程造成结构变化后再对外发出修改传递，这里的信息指方程单位。

③有中级结构的逻辑网络通讯

中级结构的逻辑网络通讯分两个层次，一个是前面说的初级结构逻辑网络通讯，一个是用环境变量造成的组织器官的邮局通讯，通讯的仍然是相互作用和修改传递发出的方程单位，邮局收到方程单位后再内部向元素信箱传递，如前面说的内网，两个层次的通讯完成后，逻辑主体用邮局和信箱两个层次向外修改传递方程单位。

④有高级结构的逻辑网络通讯

高级结构的逻辑网络通讯分三个层次，既有中级结构的两个层次通讯，又有大脑、神经、感官组成的通讯，中级结构以下的通讯如前面所说，第三层通讯用感官接收各种方程单位，大脑处理方程单位，神经输出修改传递。

5.生命推理活动理论

5.1《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》与生命推理活动理论

逻辑结构学派的宗旨是“用客观逻辑研究问题，用主观逻辑解决问题”，这样，逻辑结构学派用客观逻辑构造逻辑主体的客观结构，用主观逻辑构造逻辑主体的主观结构，逻辑主体的主观结构就是意识，逻辑结构学派在这一章和后面四章（《生命推理活动理论》、《生命周期理论》、《生命数据理论》、《生命编程理论》、《生命学习策略》）用五章研究逻辑主体的意识，研究主观能动性结构的意识，研究人工智能、机器人、智能社会三大主体的意识。

传统的计算机科技，客观结构是硬件，主观结构是软件，人通过用软件控制硬件实现人的意识控制计算机，对人体仿生会知道，人将人脑的意识变成生物语言就可以用生物语言控制人体这个客观结构，逻辑结构学派用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图描述逻辑主体的主观结构，这种主观结构的目标有三个：人通过逻辑主体的主观结构产生人要求的逻辑主体的意识、逻辑主体通过主观结构产生必要的自主意识、用人加给逻辑主体的意识或逻辑主体的自主意识控制逻辑主体，不管人加给逻辑主体的意识还是逻辑主体的自主意识，逻辑主体的意识都必须有能力控制逻辑主体，这是智能的需要，本章研究赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图怎么表达逻辑主体的意识以及赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图表达的意识怎么控制逻辑主体。

5.2《主观能动性结构》与生命推理活动理论

智能研究的对象是主观能动性结构，主观能动性结构是逻辑主体，人工智能是单个主观能动性结构，机器人是主观能动性结构配备一套机器，智能社会是一群主观能动性结构加上他们的通讯，主观能动性结构需要用意识控制客观结构，这个意识可以是人加给的意识，也可以是自主的意识，表达意识的工具是赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，激活结构图则这个结构图就是主观能动性结构的意识，就可以控制主观能动性结构的客观结构。

用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图控制逻辑主体，具体由结构图的变量值控制，实现生命活动，用变量值推理实现生命活动。

5.3《主观能动性结构工程》与生命推理活动理论

主观能动性结构工程包括三种过程，生产人工智能的过程，生产机器人的过程，生产智能社会的过程，这些过程都包括生产客观结构和主观结构，生产主观结构就是构造和激活赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图表达主观能动性结构的意识，包括人加的意识和自主意识，用意识控制客观结构。

5.4《赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图》与生命推理活动理论

研究和发展逻辑主体主观结构的工具就是赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，激活的赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图就是逻辑主体、逻辑网络、逻辑场的主观结构，逻辑主体因此可以产生人加给的意识或自主意识，研究智能机器的意识和客观结构控制就是研究这个智能机器的方程结构图，发展这个方程结构图。

5.5《仿生逻辑》与生命推理活动理论

研究主观能动性结构意识的完整工具是三个：仿生逻辑、赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图、逻辑数理，逻辑物理帮助仿生，逻辑数学帮助构造逻辑方程，仿生逻辑的作用在于模拟人的意识的产生和工作规律构造主观能动性结构的意识，暂时不能模拟再人工设计。

5.6事例研究

赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的方程单位生成器的任务是生成新的方程单位，这个工作可以让逻辑方程结构图具备像人的思维能力，智能的复杂度和维度关键都看方程单位生成器的复杂度，一个主观能动性结构高不高级关键就看方程单位生成器高不高级，科幻中的机器人有人的智能就是因为方程单位生成器有人的思维能力，人工智能、机器人、智能社会三大主体的智能技术发展路线图都是方程单位生成器的发展路线图，提高主观能动性结构生命活动能力和提高主观能动性结构学习能力关键都是发展方程单位生成器。

5.7提出第五个应用经典理论

这里，逻辑结构学派提出第五个应用经典理论《生命推理活动》，逻辑结构学派认为逻辑主体的意识是通过信息推理产生的，逻辑主体意识对客观结构的控制是通过结构推理产生的，信息推理和结构推理让逻辑主体产生生命活动，研究生命活动的工具是赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图对意识的表达，研究方程结构图的工具是仿生逻辑和逻辑数学，有这样几个要点：

5.7.1逻辑主体的生命活动过程

①构造并激活赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图

逻辑主体要有生命并且进行生命活动，必须首先建立自己的赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，结构图要有完整充分的地址体系，好比一个小区的所有楼房和所有单元不管住没住人都要有家庭地址，地址体系还要有良好的扩展方法。

②产生输入

逻辑主体的一次生命活动的开始是方程单位输入到激活的逻辑主体方程结构图，方程单位包括常量、变量、方程、方程组、大小规模的结构图，输入方法包括初级结构的信箱输入、中级结构的邮局输入、高级结构的感官和神经输入，初级结构的信箱输入的方程单位加入到初级结构结构图，中级结构的邮局输入的方程单位加入到中级结构结构图，高级结构的感官和神经输入的方程单位加入到高级结构结构图，这里初级结构的信箱、中级结构的邮局、高级结构的感官和神经还要给输入的方程单位寻找安放地址并且安放，同时建立输入方程单位与已有方程的变量传递的加权（加权标明次序）有向路径，好比现实生活中公司对新聘用人员的安家。

③信息推理

输入方程单位后原有的方程结构图就变成了新的结构图，方程单位生成器还要对新的结构图优化，产生新的方程单位和新的变量传递加权有向路径，加权标明次序，显然这时方程结构图的输出也产生了变化，用新的方程结构图求新的结构图输出的过程就是信息推理，输出也要加权标明次序，输出变量值的变量名是有意义的，或者说明对什么操作对象的操作，或者说明是什么批量操作合称，比如人脑输出摸耳朵三下，摸耳朵就是操作对象，人脑输出吃饭，吃饭就是一个批量操作合称，包括各种与吃饭有关的配合动作的组合。

注意，输出新的变量值的时候变量名要附上加权确定输出变量值的次序，这个次序决定后面结构推理的次序。

④信息推理对逻辑主体的控制

信息推理改变了原来的方程结构图，改变了逻辑主体的主观结构，产生了新的输出，新的输出即将改变逻辑主体的客观结构，这种信息推理对逻辑主体的改变就是信息推理对逻辑主体的控制。

初级层信息推理产生初级结构元素的主观结构改变，即逻辑方程结构图的改变，这是初级层信息推理对初级结构的改变，产生初级控制。

中级层信息推理包括初级层信息推理和中级层信息推理，中级层信息推理产生中级结构组织器官的主观结构改变，也是逻辑方程结构图的改变，这是中级层信息推理对中级结构的改变，产生中级控制，中级控制包括初级控制、中级控制、初级和中级协作控制三种。

    高级层信息推理首先包括初级层和中级层信息推理，还有高级层信息推理，高级层信息推理造成高级逻辑结构主观结构改变，即高级逻辑方程结构图的改变，这是高级层信息推理对高级结构的改变，产生高级控制，高级控制包括初级控制、中级控制、初级和中级协作控制、高级控制、高级和初级协作、高级和中级协作、三层控制协作等等。

⑤结构推理

信息推理得出的新的输出值根据自己的加权和变量名做各种先后次序的工作，改变逻辑主体的客观结构，这就是结构推理。

信息推理前和信息推理后由于结构的方程结构图改变，结构由一个状态变成另一个状态，好比信息推理前一个人站在原地，信息推理后这个人向前迈了一步，这即为结构推理，即信息推理让身体向前走了一步。结构推理对发展智能机器，发展智能控制机器的能力意义重大。

⑥修改传递

主观结构和客观结构都改变的逻辑主体向逻辑场其他逻辑主体发出修改传递。

5.7.2信息推理

信息推理有三个层次：初级推理、中级推理、高级推理：

①初级推理

    初级推理是初级结构元素的信息推理，元素有存储集、信箱和自身结构，存储集存储着与本元素有关的逻辑方程结构图，有物质方程，也有生物方程，还有有关的数据，信箱接收外界方程单位，包括赋值变量的常量，元素自身结构根据接收的常量赋值给某些变量之后解方程，得出的某些变量的解即为本元素主观结构的改变，将得出的变量解通过信箱发出即为修改传递，发出一次修改传递代表一个初级信息推理。

②中级推理。

    中级推理包括两层推理，第一层是初级信息推理，第二层是中级信息推理，这种推理用到中级结构存储器存储的逻辑方程结构图，存储器还存放着有关数据，数据逻辑类，中级结构的邮局接收各种方程单位，包括赋值变量的常量，这些常量赋值给某些变量，中级结构根据自身结构解某些变量赋值后的方程，得到的变量解即为逻辑结构的变化，得到的变量解再通过邮局发出即为修改传递，发出一次修改传递代表一次中级信息推理。

    中级结构的两层推理还要通过通讯达到协作。

③高级推理。

高级推理包括初级层推理和中级层推理，还有高级层推理，高级层推理由脑记忆中的逻辑方程结构图和有关数据、神经、高级逻辑结构的解方程能力、感官组成，首先感官得到输入赋值变量的常量，通过神经传到脑，给脑记忆方程的变量赋值，高级逻辑结构根据自身结构解方程的能力得出某些变量的值，造成高级逻辑结构的主观结构变化，再通过神经向体内邮局或信箱输出，或由神经输送给输出器官输出修改传递，产生一次修改传递，产生一次高级结构信息推理。

高级推理的初、中、高三层推理可以互相通讯，产生协作。

④当初级结构、中级结构、高级结构得到的输入不是常量，是其他方程单位，这一样改变了各级结构的方程结构图，一样会让各级结构产生新的输出和修改传递。

5.7.3逻辑主体生命活动规律

探索逻辑主体生命活动的规律需要明白这种规律是由三个过程组成的，第一个过程是信息推理过程，包括信息感知和收集，如生命的感官眼耳得到的信息，再进行方程分析，即常言说的思考，往往由高级结构进行，如人和动物的脑，低级结构由生物反应和物理反应代替大脑，信息推理得出需要的输出信息或反应信息，第二个过程是高级结构的大脑或低级结构的反应控制逻辑主体的组成部分运动产生需要的输出信息的过程，第三个过程是结构推理过程，是信息推理控制下的结构推理，最后得到需要的信息输出。

生命活动最重要的研究对象为人，举个人的例子，一个人通过感知得到饿了的信息，方程分析的结果是需要吃饱这个输出信息，这是人的一次信息推理，大脑完成的，然后为了得到吃饱这个信息输出，大脑用信息推理结果指挥身体做结构推理，包括到饭馆花钱吃饭等一系列活动，最后因为吃饱了得到信息输出饱的感觉！

低级结构也有生命活动，如一个山坡出现土石松动的信息，山坡没有脑却有物理结构，由这个物理结构根据物理规律做方程分析，得出滑坡的信息输出，这个信息推理同样用物理规律控制山坡结构推理，产生滑坡的生命活动，最后得到滑坡的信息输出。

研究逻辑主体的生命活动对智能研究意义重大。

5.7.4智能社会的生命活动

研究智能社会的生命活动，首先要用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图描述激活每个逻辑主体和他们的通讯，这样就描述了一个智能社会的逻辑场和逻辑网络，比如一个智能工厂，顶端逻辑主体是厂长，中级逻辑主体是管理人员，底层逻辑主体是主体加机器即机器人，这些逻辑主体在智能工厂这个逻辑场的逻辑网络彼此通讯，当厂长逻辑主体得到方程单位输入发生信息推理和结构推理，最后厂长逻辑主体向管理逻辑主体发出修改传递即工作安排，管理逻辑主体再信息推理和结构推理，再发出修改传递给工人机器人布置工作，工人机器人信息推理和结构推理后也发出修改传递，这个修改传递就是开展工作，当然，管理逻辑主体也会向厂长逻辑主体发出作为反馈的修改传递，工人机器人也会向管理逻辑主体发出反馈的修改传递。

    智能军队和智能统治也是这么回事，只是逻辑结构学派暂不研究军队和统治。

6.生命周期理论

6.1《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》与生命周期理论

逻辑结构学派的宗旨提出“用客观逻辑研究问题，用主观逻辑解决问题”，研究主观逻辑就要研究意识，研究意识就要研究意识的时钟即生命周期，意识存在于生命中，生命和生命活动需要规定时钟，意识和意识控制的生命活动需要规定时钟，则智能研究必须研究时钟即生命周期。

6.2《主观能动性结构》与生命周期理论

逻辑结构学派研究主观能动性结构是仿生人的逻辑的，人的逻辑必须用时钟规定，即人生有生命周期，人类社会有生命周期，所有研究主观能动性结构必须研究生命周期理论。

6.3《主观能动性结构工程》与生命周期理论

逻辑结构学派研究主观能动性结构工程要仿生人生过程的逻辑，即主观能动性结构工程的工程阶段仿照人生设定，工程目标是实现工程产品的生命周期，这个生命周期就是仿生人的各种生命周期，因为人的生命周期是最合理最科学的智能周期。

6.4《赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图》与生命周期理论

生命周期理论的研究和实现对象是赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，与逻辑主体的其他部分的结构图一样，.这种描述和实现生命周期的结构图称为时钟方程体系，注意，时钟方程体系也需要激活，规律与其他结构图的激活规律一样。

6.5《仿生逻辑》与生命周期理论

逻辑结构学派的生命周期理论是对人体和人类社会的仿生逻辑研究，生命和生命活动的时钟周期模拟人体和人类社会，意识和意识活动的时钟周期模拟人脑。

6.6事例研究

很多人认为人没有遗忘的特点该多好，那样知识看一遍就能记住，什么考试都能拿高分，但这种思想是错误的，没有遗忘就没有怀疑，没有怀疑就没有机会发挥想象力和创造力去探索，总记住火是危险的、是不能靠近的，原始人怎么研究和利用火，总记住地球是宇宙的中心，人类怎么发现地球围着太阳转，对赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图也是这样，如果结构图不可改变，方程单位生成器怎么通过工作构造新图，通过构造新图模拟思维和模拟产生新知，所有正确的遗忘对人类的生存发展是有用的，而正确的遗忘就需要意识有时钟、生命有时钟，就需要用生命周期控制意识、意识活动、生命、生命活动，让方程结构图是可变的，让方程单位生成器因为方程结构图可变而开展工作，让方程单位生成器因为工作产生思维和创造新知。

6.7提出第六个应用经典理论

这里逻辑结构学派提出第六个应用经典理论《生命周期》，有以下要点：

6.7.1为什么研究生命周期

①生命属性和生命活动属性都需要时间

生命属性需要时间，植物、动物和人类都有寿命，植物、动物和人类都有时间控制的成长过程。生命活动属性需要时间，植物受时间控制开花结果，动物受时间控制外出觅食，人类受时间控制产生生物钟就寝和工作。

②生命和生命活动的开始和结束用时间确定

生命的开始用时间确定，比如人的生日，比如植物发芽的季节，生命的结束也用时间确定，植物、动物和人类的寿命都是开始时间加寿命得出结束时间。生命活动的开始和借宿也用时间确定，比如植物授粉、开花、结果都由时间确定开始和结束，动物的受精、怀孕、生育都由时间确定开始和结束，人类更普遍，上学由时间确定开始和结束，上班由时间确定开始和结束，人类社会的组织就是用时间确定各种生命活动的开始和结束。

③意识属性需要时间，意识的开始和结束用时间确定

    意识的属性需要时间，意识的开始和结束用时间确定，逻辑结构学派研究的意识指仿生人的意识逻辑，人的意识和人类社会的意识都需要时间，应对考试的意识产生于学生时期，学生时期意识的开始和结束也由入学到毕业的时间确定，人类社会上班的意识产生于劳动力合法就业的时期，工作意识的开始和结束由上班和下班、就业和退休这些时间确定。

④意识用时间控制生命活动

仿生人的逻辑会发现，人类常用时间控制生命活动，上班搭公交车的过程，下班接小孩的过程，晚上在家睡觉的过程，人的大多数意识控制生命活动的方法和人类社会大多数意识控制生命活动的方法都是用时间。

⑤为仿生意识建立生命周期

因为生命属性和生命活动属性都需要时间，因为生命和生命活动的开始和结束用时间确定，因为意识属性需要时间，因为意识的开始和结束用时间确定，因为意识用时间控制生命活动，所以逻辑结构学派仿生人的意识逻辑的时候要建立生命周期理论，生命周期理论是智能理论的重要组成部分。

6.7.2用时钟方程体系表示生命周期和生命时间

建立生命周期理论和表示生命周期和生命时间的方法是用时钟方程体系，时钟方程体系包括常量、变量、方程、方程组、大小规模的方程单位，内部实现常量和变量传递有向路径连接方程的内部通讯，同时发出常量和变量传递有向路径连接外部方程的外部方程，用外部通讯发出的常量和变量控制生命、生命活动、意识、意识控制的生命活动的周期。

注意，时钟方程体系也有方程单位生成器，可以生成新的时钟方程，现实的意义在于人的寿命是可以延长的，人的工作年限也可以延长的，等等，诸如此类。

6.7.3时钟方程体系的传递和存储

我们知道逻辑网络的人工信道和逻辑主体的内部信道都是传递方程单位的，方程单位包括常量、变量、方程、方程组、大小规模的方程单位，时钟方程体系则以常量、变量、方程、方程组、大小规模的方程单位加入传递的方程单位里，用传递时钟常量或时钟变量的有向路径与原有方程单位的方程连接。

时钟方程体系是这样存储的，加入传递的方程单位的时钟方程体系与传递的方程单位一起存储，传递给方程变量的时钟常量或时钟变量存储在这个方程的对应变量的描述集、属性集、功能集中，描述集、属性集、功能集可以表示在一个方程结构图。

6.7.4逻辑主体的生命周期

①逻辑主体的时钟

逻辑主体有三个层次的时钟，初级层的元素中的时钟，中级层组织器官中的时钟，高级层脑中的时钟。

元素中的时钟决定元素的生命周期，这个时钟是一个逻辑方程结构图，产生生命周期这个变量的值，生命周期变量值也可以制造信息推理和结构推理。

组织器官中的时钟决定组织器官的生命周期，这个时钟仍然是一个逻辑方程结构图，仍然产生这个组织器官的生命周期的变量的值，这个生命周期的变量的值仍然可以制造信息推理和结构推理。

脑中的时钟决定脑的生命周期，这个时钟仍然是一个逻辑方程结构图，仍然产生这个脑的生命周期的变量的值，这个生命周期的变量的值仍然可以制造信息推理和结构推理。

②主观能动性结构的生命周期

逻辑结构学派研究逻辑主体的重点是主观能动性结构，以人为例，脑活着就有智能，脑失去生命就没有智能，逻辑主体的高级结构的核心是主观能动性结构，主观能动性结构形成脑，脑有时钟，这个时钟的生命周期变量由一个逻辑方程结构图决定，脑结构负责解时钟方程求生命周期变量，生命周期变量决定脑能不能生存，也决定高级逻辑主体有没有智能。主观能动性结构的生命周期变量有信息推理和结构推理能力。

7.生命数据理论

7.1《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》与生命数据理论

逻辑结构学派根据宗旨提出生命数据理论，用类数据代替裸数据，用分布于方程结构图各个变量取值集的类数据代替数据库集中的裸数据，用方程分析代替统计分析，用方程单位生成器生成逻辑方程单位代替数据库生成的统计结果。

7.2《主观能动性结构》与生命数据理论

主观能动性结构的类数据存在于初级结构方程结构图、中级结构方程结构图、高级结构方程结构图的各个变量取值集中，即数据依附于赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图。

7.3《主观能动性结构工程》与生命数据理论

主观能动性结构工程是生产主观能动性结构的工程，是生产赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的工程，这就包括构造方程单位生成器、逻辑方程、变量取值集，包括构造方程结构图的地址体系。

7.4《赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图》与生命数据理论

    生命数据理论的数据依附于赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，生命数据理论的数据库是一个个方程变量的取值集，生命数据理论的数据分析是逻辑方程分析，是一种逻辑数学分析，生命数据理论数据分析的结果不是得到统计数据，而是赋能方程单位生成器生成方程单位，创造智能机器的思维和新知。

7.5事例研究

传统的数据分析常常产生指数，比如经济指数，但生命数据理论用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图做数据分析，指数计算公式变成结构图，让经济指数分析变成经济结构图分析，用复杂分析、时钟分析、方程单位生成器分析产生方程单位代替指数，变革经济指数研究并推广到其他领域，用结构图分析实现综合分析和跨领域分析。

7.6提出第七个应用经典理论

逻辑结构学派提出第七个应用经典理论《生命数据》，有以下要点：

7.6.1用类数据代替裸数据

生命数据的数据是类数据，每个数据包括描述集、属性集、功能集，一个数据的描述集、属性集、功能集可以画在一个方程结构图里，一个变量的所有取值作为一群数据也可以画在一个方程结构图里，以此类推，一个方程结构图可以装入方程、方程的变量、变量的取值集、取值集的所有类数据，传统的数据是逻数据，只有描述，生命数据用类数据代替裸数据。

7.6.2用分布式代替库集中

生命数据的数据分布在方程结构图各种变量的取值集里，是分布式数据存放，传统数据集中在数据库，是库集中，生命数据用分布式代替库集中。

7.6.3用方程结构图分析代替数据库分析

传统的数据分析是数据库里的裸数据集中进行数学分析，生命数据的数据分析是分析方程结构图各个变量取值集的类数据的逻辑数学分析，这个逻辑数学分析就是方程分析，方程分析包括这样几个要点：

①结构图复杂度与分析，这种分析要求变量取值集里的类数据可以海量存在，而且海量类数据可以存在于方程结构图里面；

②时钟方程体系与分析，这种分析要求数据可以有生命，赋予方程生命的同时赋予数据生命，数据可以激活也可以结束；

③方程单位生成器生成新的数据代替传统的数据分析指数，即生命数据的数据分析最后由方程单位生成器完成，分析的结果是新的方程单位和新的方程单位产生的新的变量取值集以及新的变量，与传统的数据分析用函数产生指数不同，生命数据的数据分析是方程分析，方程分析用方程单位生成器做数据分析，产生新方程、新变量、新变量取值集，通过数据分析产生思维和新知。

7.6.4逻辑关系

前面论述了逻辑场、逻辑网络、修改传递这些理论，逻辑场产生相互作用的逻辑关系，逻辑网络传播逻辑关系，修改传递体现逻辑关系对逻辑主体的影响，什么是逻辑关系，就是逻辑主体的一切相互作用，这里提出逻辑关系的统一形式，逻辑关系也是一种逻辑主体，也用赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图描述和激活。

7.6.5类数据

赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图的方程变量的取值集存放类数据，这样定义类数据：

类数据=描述集+属性集+功能集；

描述集是对类数据的情况描述，属性集存放决定属性的逻辑方程，功能集存放决定功能的逻辑方程，如果省略属性集和功能集只留描述集，类数据就成了裸数据。

    类数据专指表达生命数据理论的数据，一种赋予方程逻辑意义的类，这种类包括描述集、属性集、功能集，与传统的裸数据的不同之处在于他的类形式，类数据的各种统计、运算、处理可以针对描述、属性、功能三个字段的记录的操作，类数据可以有简略形式，比如只有描述，省略属性和功能，这就和裸数据一样了，类数据是逻辑结构学派的数据。

7.6.6数据类群

    一个变量的取值集的所有类数据在一起组成数据类群，简称类群，比如一个班的各个学生档案，又比如广州全市每辆机动车的登记，数据类群是一种新型数据库或新型数据仓库，由于逻辑结构学派要创新数据学，要求废除传统数据库和传统数据学，所以这里不提数据库和数据仓库，提出数据类群的概念。

7.6.7数据类群互涉

数据类群互涉简称互涉，互涉的目的是构造逻辑方程。

互涉研究是逻辑分析和逻辑挖掘的高级阶段，逻辑结构学派称之为逻辑方程分析的高级阶段，是赋能方程单位生成构造逻辑方程器的重要工作。互涉研究需要互涉研究方法，方法怎么来，首先要将互涉双方的对象集合合成一个集合一个整体，这个整体就是未来的逻辑方程，，每个对象集对映一个变量，根据这个集合整体的规律来寻找方法，比如香港疫情和深圳疫情是两个对象数据集合，要研究两地疫情互涉则应该合并两地对象数据集合寻找共同的疫情数据属性或变化，这样可以产生两地疫情关系的逻辑方程，再比如池塘水质的数据集合与各种水产的数据集合的互涉研究，仍然两个集合合并，这个合集也是未来的逻辑方程，前面的两个数据集仍然对映两个变量，合并后的集合的元素应该是每个水产元素增加水质影响这个限制条件，互涉研究可以用各种复杂高级的技术和数学工具。

数据类群互涉研究即两个或更多的数据类群合成一个，形成未来的逻辑方程，算加法，我至少提出了两种加法，比如香港和深圳疫情互涉研究，因为两个集合数据性质一样，简单集合合并即可，一个鱼塘的水质数据类集合与水产数据类集合互涉研究，需要将水质数据类集合分别加入水产数据类集合的每个元素里，还可以探索其他加法，还可以探索数据类群之间的其他运算和这个运算的意义，互涉是逻辑分析和逻辑挖掘的高级阶段，研究过程中要结合研究对象存在的社会规律或自然规律。

对于数据类连接和数据类群互涉的研究可以充分运用离散数学的各种理论成果。研究数据类连接和数据类群互涉需要运用群论的很多理论的。

举一个社会规律的例子，有这几个数据类群，房价数据类群，菜篮子数据类群，就业数据类群，收入数据类群，股价数据类群，人民满意度数据类群，不知他们的互涉规律，建立一个数据类群连接整体集合，这个集合就是未来的逻辑方程，集合数据类用上述数据类群的某种计算得到的指数，观察这些指数的实时变化和互涉情况，找出互涉规律，再用互涉规律设计新的运算连接整体集合数据类，得出一个逻辑方程，则可以用这个逻辑方程或方程单位监控社会经济政治的发展状况了，还能研究核心逻辑变量人民满意度的改造方法。
      再举一个自然规律的例子，一样的方法，建立各种影响大气温度的数据类群的指数连接成的整体集合数据类，这个集合仍然是未来的逻辑方程，研究数据类群的互涉规律，找到规律再设计连接数据类群的运算，再建立一个新的整体集合数据类，这个整体集合就是新的逻辑方程，用这个逻辑方程观察监控互涉情况，研究改造大气温度这个核心逻辑变量的方法。

7.6.8数据类群互涉赋能方程单位生成器构造逻辑方程

数据类群互涉研究可以赋能方程单位生成器构造逻辑方程，创造逻辑主体的思维能力和新知能力，前景对人类有很重要的意义，可以引入各种高级数学工具，创造人类高级的智能机器。

数据类群的互涉运算至少有两种情况，一种情况，设计一种运算将各个数据类群连接成整体集合，通过实时变量引起的数据类群整体集合的动态变化寻找互涉规律，将互涉规律表示成逻辑方程，一种情况，知道互涉规律，根据互涉规律设计连接运算，将各个数据类群连接成一个整体集合，这个整体集合可以表示成逻辑方程，每个数据类群对映一个变量，观察监控重点逻辑变量的动态变化，掌握有关的社会或自然动态发展。

7.6.9分布式数据原生态

本学说的重要的指导思想为一种仿生逻辑学，其数据逻辑学的目标为模拟动植物和人类生命活动表现的数据学，建立有生命的、自带、依附、分布的新型数据学，将数据分析发展成对象分析和群分析，也就是逻辑方程分析，将数据监管由数据库房监管变成对法人附属数据的监管，脱离工业社会的集中统一的数据库形式，脱离机器数据的时代，发明人工智能时代的生命数据，发明更适合人的天性的数据学，数据依附于赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图而存在，数据是存在于方程结构图每个变量取值集中的类数据和数据类群。

7.6.10方程分析

    用方程分析代替数据分析，分析依据为对应的逻辑方程，方程分析包括大规模复杂分析，比如人口普查的数据分析是将每个人的数据统计起来，统一集中分析，再将新的人口政策落实到每个人，路径是对象、数据库、对象，数据逻辑学将数据库改为方程结构图，方程分析就代替了数据分析，而且方程结构图的形式可以通过研究简化成比数据库更简单，实现逻辑方程结构图的优势。

7.6.11初级结构的类数据

    初级结构的类数据存放在元素存储集，可以形成数据类群（变量）和类群互涉（逻辑方程），这种类数据是依附型和分布式，依附元素，依法元素的结构图，类数据的通讯通过元素的信箱，类数据的统计、运算、处理、编辑通过自带属性集和功能集，数据类群可以整合属性集和功能集产生逻辑方程，产生代替数据库的效果，类数据的逻辑作用通过给各种逻辑方程的变量的赋值改变元素的逻辑方程结构图。

7.6.12中级结构的类数据

    中级结构的数据逻辑分两个层次，一个层次包括初级结构的数据逻辑，另一个层次是中级结构自己的数据逻辑，类数据存储在组织器官的存储器。可以形成类群（变量）和类群互涉（逻辑方程），对组织器官有依附性、分布式，对存储器的类数据（变量取值）、类群（变量）、类群互涉（逻辑方程）的编辑可以用类数据的描述集、属性集、功能集和各自的集成，对组织器官的逻辑作用是赋值给各种逻辑方程，通过造成变量值的变化影响组织器官，组织器官的存储器可以与元素的存储集通讯，产生分布式规律。

7.6.13高级结构的类数据

    高级结构的数据逻辑分三个层次，第一层和第二层包括初级结构的数据逻辑和中级结构的数据逻辑，高级结构自己的类数据存放于脑记忆，脑记忆的规模大于组织器官的存储器，组织器官的存储器大于元素的存储集，脑记忆可以存在大规模数据类群（多变量）和大规模类群互涉（大规模逻辑方程单位），编辑方法可以用描述集、属性集、功能集大规模集成，对逻辑结构的逻辑作用也是赋值脑中的逻辑方程，可以大规模，即思想，脑记忆通过神经和感官与外界通讯，即学习，脑记忆通过神经与组织器官存储器和元素存储集都能实现通讯，实现分布式规律。

8.生命编程理论

8.1《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》与生命编程理论

逻辑结构学派的宗旨提出“用客观逻辑研究问题，用主观逻辑解决问题”，这两条都要用生命程序实现，实现的方法就是将生命程序确定为赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，注意，结构图的一个器官方程单位生成器是生命程序的核心，负责程序的思维和智能，方程单位生成器是“用客观逻辑研究问题，用主观逻辑解决问题”的能力的决定科技。

8.2《主观能动性结构》与生命编程理论

传统软件实现程序是用语句构建流程图这样的主体，生命编程实现程序是用方程结构图构建一个逻辑主体，这里有一个重点，传统软件没有自动产生程序的器官，而生命程序有方程单位生成器这个自动产生程序的器官，同时，方程单位生成器也让人工程序第一次有了思维能力，不需要传统软件用数据训练像训练低等动物那样模仿智能，人工软件向人的仿生逻辑前进了一大步，人类的程序走上了用方程单位生成器模拟人的智能的正确道路。

8.3《主观能动性结构工程》与生命编程理论

传统软件工程的对象是流程图描述的需求，好比构造一个建筑，生命软件工程的对象是方程单位生成器，用方程单位生成器实现未来可能的各种新的需求，好比构造一个大脑，好比构造一个生命。

8.4《赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图》与生命编程理论

生命编程就是设计和实现方程结构图，编程的核心是设计和实现方程单位生成器，赋予方程单位生成器生成新的方程单位的能力，编程的质量取决于方程单位生成器的质量，方程单位生成器生成新的方程单位的能力越强方程单位生成器的质量越好，也可以说方程单位生成器的智能越好，还可以因此说这个生命程序智能越好。

8.5《仿生逻辑》与生命编程理论

生命编程就是设计和实现方程结构图，设计方程和结构图都要用到仿生理论和仿生研究，仿生理论包括仿生和逻辑物理，因为生命程序是追求智能的，所有这里仿生的重点在于对人脑仿生。

8.6事例研究

现在流行的大模型通过亿级的语料或者图像进行知识抽取、学习进而生产了亿级参数的模型，这样模拟的智能有几个问题，一个耗费的数据成本和算力成本巨大，不利于人类深入研究智能，一个智能成长的路径不科学，是一种训练低级动物的方法，比如训练小狗站立，小狗听口令站起来给颗糖，小狗听口令不站起来打它一下，这样寻求的智能不可能达到人的智能水平，即庞大海量数据训练机器智能的方法很笨，是在用工业社会的技术实现智能社会的需要，是一条错误的智能发展道路，正确的智能社会发展智能的道路应该是寻找智能社会的新理论和新科技，逻辑结构学派提出了逻辑数学这个新理论和方程单位生成器这个新科技，机器的思维能力不用大模型的海量数据训练，用逻辑数学创造的方程单位生成器生成新的方程单位、新的方程、新的变量、新的变量取值集，用智能社会的科技创造智能，创造智能社会的机器思维，用人的学习培养代替训练小狗，用方程单位生成器淘汰现在流行的大模型，用智能社会的逻辑数据分析方法淘汰工业社会的数据训练。

逻辑结构学派研究智能的目标就是用方程单位生成器代替现在流行的大模型。

8.7提出第八个应用经典理论

逻辑结构学派提出第八个应用经典理论《生命编程》，有以下要点：

8.7.1生命程序的基本形式

生命程序的基本形式是赋予生命的逻辑工程结构图，有两个层次：

第一个层次：逻辑方程、逻辑方程组、逻辑方程结构图、逻辑方程文件、逻辑方程著作、逻辑方程学科著作集、逻辑方程学术体系著作集；

第二个层次：初级结构、中级结构、高级结构。

计算机软件设计有一个传统，一个复杂的任务分成两个简单的任务会降低工作量，智能编程延续这种设计思想，用简单基本的方程组成结构图，不用复杂方程，复杂方程用简单基本方程组代替，以利于方程单位生成器工作，传递变量值的路径一个方程只设计本方程到下一个方程的路径，两段以上的路径由两个以上的方程设计。

8.7.2生命程序的基本组成

①基本结构图

基本结构图由节点和路径组成，节点是简单基本方程，路径是一个方程传递给下一个方程的变量值的路径。

根据规模分为逻辑方程、逻辑方程组、逻辑方程结构图、逻辑方程文件、逻辑方程著作、逻辑方程学科著作集、逻辑方程学术体系著作集这几个层次。

根据智能结构分为初级结构、中级结构、高级结构这几个层次。

②时钟方程体系结构图

时钟方程体系结构图也由节点和路径组成，节点是简单基本的时钟方程，路径是一个时钟方程传递给下一个时钟方程的变量值的路径。

时钟方程体系结构图分为时钟方程、时钟方程组、时钟方程结构图、初级复杂时钟方程结构图、中级复杂时钟方程结构图、高级复杂时钟方程结构图、特级复杂时钟方程结构图这几个层次，时钟方程体系结构图的层次综合对映基本结构图的层次。

时钟方程体系结构图的时钟方程的变量传递路径的最后一段路径都是连接基本结构图的各种方程，规定基本结构图的各种方程的时钟或基本结构图的各种方程变量的时钟。

③通讯体系

基本结构图和时钟方程体系结构图都必须建立自己的通讯体系，通讯体系都由三个部分组成：邮局、变量值传递有向线路、时钟变量值传递有向线路。邮局的任务是输入输出所有的方程单位（逻辑信息），这里特别指出，模仿人类的集体旅行和集体返回，只要有明确的地址，各个逻辑方程结构图单位可以接收和发送本单位，变量传递有向线路和时钟变量传递有向线路指各种方程之间都要建立有关变量值的传递路线。

④方程单位生成器

方程单位生成器的任务是生成新的方程单位，这个工作可以让逻辑方程结构图具备像人的思维能力。

⑤地址体系

结合硬件、内存和外存为基本结构图、时钟方程体系结构图、通讯体系、方程单位生成器提供各自的地址体系，创造对实际地址名字的智能机器机内编码，继承传统计算机科技和传统计算机网络科技的地址体系创造的经验。

⑥多模态界面

逻辑方程结构图可以表示信息的多模态，方程、方程组、结构图可以表示不同规模的信息模态，变量是一种模态的组成部件，方程将组成部件结合成一个单位的模态，建立时钟方程体系控制和表达信息多模态显示的生命特征，用邮局、变量传递有向线路、时钟变量传递有向线路组织信息多模态的不同单位，建立多模态的通讯体系。实现了上述功能，逻辑方程结构图既可以表示主观能动性结构内部的智慧又能表示智慧的多模态，一个用于智能时代的先锋图论工具就诞生了。得到一个事物或过程的逻辑方程结构图就得到了这个事物或过程的多模态，其中的规律在于逻辑方程结构图决定变量的值、彼此关系、状态，模态又由变量的值、彼此关系、状态决定，即逻辑方程结构图可以决定模态，可以决定文本、图像、声音、视频。发明了逻辑方程结构图，当逻辑方程结构图的变量离散变化时可以表现为文本和图像，当逻辑方程结构图的变量连续变化时可以表现为声音和视频，而逻辑过程可以同时选择离散表达和连续表达，一个人由理学院跑到文学院，可以用文字和图片离散表达，也可以用声音和视频连续表达，即文本转视频可以用逻辑方程结构图这样表达，将文本的离散变化用逻辑方程结构图表达出来，找出各种变化的变量，再将变量的变化用连续表达出来，再将变量连续变化的逻辑方程结构图表达成视频，文本变化就转成了视频变化。

根据上述的原理就可以赋予生命程序多模态的界面、多模态的用户界面。

8.7.3生命程序的方程单位生成器

方程单位生成器生成方程单位的方法有这几个：

①生成新的方程单位的过程是首先确定一批输入变量，再找到需要的输出变量，找到输入变量集到输出变量集的路径，这样就得到了输入变量集和输出变量集之间的逻辑关系，就可以根据这个逻辑关系自动生成新的逻辑方程单位，新的逻辑方程单位不仅可以实现已有的输入到输出，还可以产生新的变量，这就模拟了人的思维和人的思维产生新知。

②生成新的方程单位的过程还可以首先确定一批输入变量的值，再找到需要的输出变量的值，找到两个值实现逻辑推理的路径，这样就得到了输入变量集和输出变量集之间的逻辑关系，就可以根据这个逻辑关系自动生成新的逻辑方程单位，新的逻辑方程单位不仅可以实现已有的输入到输出，还可以产生新的变量，这就仍然模拟了人的思维和人的思维产生新知。

③方程单位生成器还可以与通讯体系一起工作，用新输入的方程单位和已有方程单位合作生成新的方程单位，或者新输入的变量值造成新的输出值生成新的方程单位，创造新的自主学习方法。

④高级的方程单位生成器甚至可以根据自定的输入集和输出集创造方程单位。

⑤对类数据的方程结构图分析可以赋能方程单位生成器构造新的方程单位。

要给新的方程单位确定固定的地址、时钟方程体系、通讯体系。构造和发展方程单位生成器的方法是运用仿生逻辑。

方程单位生成器技术就成了主观能动性结构的思维器官，方程单位生成器技术越高级主观能动性结构思维能力越强，这样一来逻辑方程结构图就有了人的生命所具备的思维能力，人类第一个机器思维技术就诞生了。

8.7.4生命程序的数据分析

生命程序的数据分析淘汰了数据库数据分析，由方程单位生成器做分析，发展出逻辑数学分析，也叫方程结构图分析，这种分析有两种类型：

一种类型的分析是已知方程结构图，由已知的一个或多个变量取值集求未知的一个或多个变量取值集。

另一种类型的分析是未知方程结构图，将几个类群设为几个变量取值集，研究这几个类群的相互关系即互涉，研究结果赋能方程单位生成器构造新的方程结构图。

方程单位生成器数据分析的能力可以淘汰现在流行的大模型程序。

8.7.5生命程序的智能

生命程序的智能由这几个部分创造：基本结构图创造复杂度、时钟方程体系结构图创造智能时钟、通讯体系创造智能通讯、方程单位生成器创造思维、地址体系创造智能地址，这其中的核心是方程单位生成器创造思维。

8.7.6生命程序的基本平台：操作系统

传统软件理论研究操作系统有着长期的历史，对于多媒体网络操作系统，给出了一个磨合硬件的应用软件的硬件和网络环境，逻辑结构学派继承了传统计算机软件操作系统的思想，用操作系统构造方程结构图软件的硬件环境和网络环境，这个网络环境包括实现逻辑场和逻辑网络，让人类用操作系统使用方程结构图软件，实现各种信息推理，让方程结构图软件通过操作系统使用硬件，实现各种结构推理，继承和发展传统操作系统的理论，以操作系统作为方程结构图软件的操作平台。

8.7.7生命编程的过程

①研究硬件，因为生命程序平台是巨大规模的结构图程序，需要与硬件磨合，对于存储、通讯、地址、内存、外设、算力供给等等方面进行磨合。

②运用仿生逻辑和逻辑物理构造基本结构图和时钟方程体系结构图，运用逻辑数学构造具体的方程。

③用仿生逻辑、逻辑物理、逻辑数学以及其他智能科技研究和构造方程单位生成器。

④建造生命程序操作平台，与传统的操作系统一样磨合软件和硬件的关系，所以生命程序的操作平台也叫操作系统，操作平台有两个任务：第一构造通讯体系、地址体系、承担多模态界面的外设以及其他需要的与硬件的关系，与传统多媒体网络操作系统类似，第二将基本结构图、时钟方程体系结构图和方程单位生成器嵌入布置好的硬件环境里。

⑤激活生命程序的操作平台。

⑥使用生命程序操作平台，这种平台可以用多种模态操作，比如声控操作和声控编程，用声音控制方程单位生成器生成应用程序，再比如给出文字，让文字说明的逻辑控制方程单位生成器生成应用程序等等。

这样，人类第一个方程结构图形式的软件理论和软件开发理论就诞生了。

9.生命学习策略

9.1《逻辑结构学派的宗旨》与生命学习策略

逻辑结构学派为了自己的宗旨提出了生命程序的软件主张，生命程序的核心在于智能，宇宙中一切生命的智能都来源于学习，本能来源于结构，生命学习的最高级过程是外加学习结合自主学习，比如人上学就要背诵和记忆客观知识还要通过做题和实验锻炼主观工作能力，前者是外加学习，后者是自主学习，因此逻辑结构学派的学习策略是外加学习结合自主学习。

9.2《主观能动性结构》与生命学习策略

生命程序的核心是主观能动性结构的方程结构图，主观能动性结构的方程结构图因为方程单位生成器生成的新的方程结构反应图而改变，方程结构反应图因为学习产生，所以学习是改变主观能动性结构的方程结构图的主要方法，其中的规律和人类的教育思想一样。

9.3《主观能动性结构工程》与生命学习策略

主观能动性结构工程的核心是方程单位生成器，方程单位生成器的核心是机器学习，所以实现外加学习结合自主学习的策略的方程单位生成器的学习能力是结构工程的核心，学习能力越强的工程越高级。

9.4《赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图》与生命学习策略

逻辑结构学派的生命学习是方程结构图学习，通过学习产生新的逻辑方程和方程结构图（方程结构反应图）。

9.5《仿生逻辑》与生命学习策略

仿生逻辑是生命学习最重要的外加学习，好比人的基础教育以识字背书为主，好比人生活的基本需要是常识。

9.6事例研究

逻辑结构学派的学习理论是创造新的方程结构图（新的方程结构反应图），是结构图的学习，大模型的学习理论是创造新的流程图程序，是流程图的学习。

大模型的学习方法是海量数据训练，通过海量数据训练找出处理数据的惯性方程产生智能，需要巨大的算力资源，走的是先产生方程再应用的智能发展道路，这种道路只有外加学习，没有自主学习，是现实中低等动物的智能发展道路，逻辑结构学派的学习方法是规定方程单位生成器学习，外加学习的仿生逻辑策略和逻辑物理策略结合自主学习的逻辑数学策略和逻辑数据分析策略，与人的外加学习结合自主学习的智能成长道路一致，就语文学习而言，背课文是外加学习，写作文是自主学习，而且逻辑结构学派的学习方法不需要海量数据和巨大算力的成本，逻辑结构学派的学习方法是智能时代的正确道路，应该用方程单位生成器学习淘汰大模型学习。

9.7提出第九个应用经典理论

这里，逻辑结构学派提出第九个应用经典理论《生命学习策略》，有这样几个要点：

9.7.1学习的主体：方程单位生成器

逻辑结构学派研究的学习的主体是生命程序的方程单位生成器，分为三种类型的方程单位生成器：

①人工智能的方程单位生成器

这种方程单位生成器模拟人脑的学习，产生人脑的知识和反应，是一种学习怎么进行信息推理的知识和反应的学习。

②机器人的方程单位生成器

这种方程单位生成器模拟人体的学习，产生人体的知识和反应，人体的知识和反应是控制的知识和反应，即生命程序用方程单位生成器生成新的方程结构反应图控制生命程序连接的各种智能设备，包括信息推理的学习和结构推理的学习。

③智能社会的方程单位生成器群

这是一个模拟人类社会的方程单位生成器群，有领导群和人民群，领导群学习对社会的领导的信息推理和社会推理，人民群承受领导群的信息推理和社会推理，领导群的信息推理常常指政策的产生，领导群用法律实现社会推理，领导群机器的信息推理学习就是怎么产生机器政策和机器法律，领导群机器的社会推理学习就是怎么推行机器政策和机器法律给人民群机器。

④本文重点研究机器人的信息推理学习和结构推理学习。

9.7.2学习的形式：方程结构反应图

传统的机器学习是运用海量数据和巨大算力求出程序方程，用程序方程提供各种需求信息，这种科技诟病在三个不科学，第一个和第二个不科学在于海量数据和巨大算力需要的成本缺乏经济可行性，第三个不科学在于智能发展道路与宇宙形成的智能发展道路不一样，前途暗淡，宇宙设计的智能发展道路是人的道路，传统机器学习走的是训练低等动物的道路，受传统硬件条件的限制，传统机器学习的道路肯定是错误的，数据训练出不了高级智能。

逻辑结构学派根据智能时代的需要，展望硬件发展前景，提出了逻辑主体学习和逻辑主体社会学习的理论，本文重点研究逻辑主体学习的理论，这是一种机器人的学习理论，机器人的脑组织（方程单位生成器）接受外来信息，通过学习进行信息推理，形成学习成果方程结构反应图，用方程结构反应图做结构推理工作，控制机器人的智能机械。

方程结构反应图是逻辑结构学派提出的学习形式和学习成果，这是一种结构图学习和逻辑方程学习，学习的过程是信息推理，用策略对外来信息做信息推理，通过信息推理形成方程结构反应图，这个图就是逻辑主体学到的知识，方程结构反应图仍然是一个赋予生命的逻辑方程结构图，方程结构反应图的作用是改变逻辑主体原有的结构图，再用新的逻辑主体结构图做结构推理，控制机器人结构工作，用新的方程结构反应图改变逻辑主体原来的方程结构图，新的方程结构图不仅可以实现已有的输入到输出，还可以产生新的变量，用新图的输出控制智能机械实现新的结构推理，这就模拟了人的思维和人的思维产生新知。

9.7.3学习的策略

怎么运用外来信息构造方程结构反应图就是逻辑结构学派提出的学习的策略，主要有这几个：

9.7.3.1仿生逻辑的策略

仿生逻辑的策略，第一步是对人体仿生，用生物学、医学、心理学等等科学研究人的规律，研究人思考问题的规律和人脑控制身体的规律，包括人的感官工作的规律，第二步将各种规律做成逻辑方程，再将逻辑方程合在一起构造方程结构反应图，将方程结构反应图存储在方程单位生成器的存储器里面供需要时调用，这是仿生逻辑的信息推理也叫学习，第三步调用方程结构反应图控制机器人结构工作就是结构推理。

9.7.3.2逻辑物理的策略

逻辑物理的策略，第一步是研究宇宙的各种科学规律，第二步将各种科学规律做成逻辑方程，再将逻辑方程合在一起构造方程结构反应图，将方程结构反应图存储在方程单位生成器的存储器里面供需要时调用，这是逻辑物理的信息推理也叫学习，第三步调用方程结构反应图控制机器人结构工作就是结构推理。

9.7.3.3逻辑数学的策略

仿生逻辑的策略和逻辑物理的策略是外加学习策略，逻辑数学的策略是自主学习策略，运用逻辑数学规律创造这样几种自主学习方法：

①生成新的方程单位的过程是首先确定一批输入变量，再找到需要的输出变量，找到输入变量集到输出变量集的路径，这样就得到了输入变量集和输出变量集之间的逻辑关系，就可以根据这个逻辑关系自动生成新的逻辑方程单位，即新的方程结构反应图，用新的方程结构反应图改变逻辑主体原来的方程结构图，新的方程结构图不仅可以实现已有的输入到输出，还可以产生新的变量，用新图的输出控制智能机械实现新的结构推理，这就模拟了人的思维和人的思维产生新知。

②生成新的方程单位的过程还可以首先确定一批输入变量的值，再找到需要的输出变量的值，找到两个值实现逻辑推理的路径，这样就得到了输入变量集和输出变量集之间的逻辑关系，就可以根据这个逻辑关系自动生成新的方程结构反应图，用新的方程结构反应图改变逻辑主体原来的方程结构图，新的方程结构图不仅可以实现已有的输入到输出，还可以产生新的变量，用新图的输出控制智能机械实现新的结构推理，这就仍然模拟了人的思维和人的思维产生新知。

③方程单位生成器还可以与通讯体系一起工作，用新输入的方程单位和已有方程单位合作生成新的方程结构反应图，或者新输入的变量值造成新的输出值生成新的方程结构反应图，创造新的自主学习方法。

④高级的方程单位生成器甚至可以根据自定的输入集和输出集创造新的方程结构反应图。

9.7.3.4逻辑数据分析的策略

逻辑数据分析的策略也是自主学习策略，逻辑数据分析与现在的大模型数据训练有相似之处，都是用数据生成程序方程，但也有不同：①大模型数据训练的路径是训练、形成方程、应用方程，逻辑数据分析可以立刻形成方程；②大模型先有方程再应用，说明是外加学习策略，逻辑数据分析立刻形成方程而且立刻应用，说明是自主学习策略；③大模型的方程应用依靠流程图程序，逻辑数据分析的方程应用依靠新的方程结构反应图，两种程序存在流程图和结构图的差别；④大模型要耗费巨大的数据成本和算力成本，而且用训练低等动物的方法发展智能，是工业社会发展智能的错误方法，逻辑数据分析用的数据成本和算力成本比大模型少得多，逻辑数据分析用仿生人类的学习方法，用先学知识再通过思考形成能力的人类的学习成长方法，创造了智能社会智能机器发展自主学习的正确道路。

逻辑数据分析的策略有这几种：

一种类型的分析是已知方程结构图，由已知的一个或多个变量取值集求未知的一个或多个变量取值集。

另一种类型的分析是未知方程结构图，将几个类群设为几个变量取值集，研究这几个类群的相互关系即互涉，研究结果赋能方程单位生成器构造新的方程结构图，构造新的方程结构反应图。

9.7.3.5多模态界面选择的策略

生命程序的界面可以多模态，怎么自动做多模态界面选择的学习策略是一种外加学习策略，用仿生逻辑和逻辑物理形成多模态界面选择的新的方程结构反应图，改变逻辑主体原来的方程结构图，创造新的自选多模态界面选择。

参考文献

【1】刘海东著：《逻辑结构学派一（五个基础理论）》，2024年7月19日。

【2】刘海东著：《逻辑场软件工程学（中文）》，广州：暨南大学出版社2015年版。

【3】刘海东著：《逻辑结构与逻辑工程学（中文）》，广州：中山大学出版社2015年版。

【4】刘海东著：《逻辑场经济学（中文）》，广州：暨南大学出版社2014年版。

【5】刘海东著：《社会软结构学（中文）》，广州：暨南大学出版社2013年版。

【6】刘海东著：《三维社会工程学（中文）》，广州：暨南大学出版社2012年版。

                                       刘海东

                                   2024年8月12日

以上为我刘海东一个人原创首创的研究

Logical Structure School II (Nine Applied Theories)

By Dong H. Liu, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, China

Abstract

Based on existing logic theories, this paper proposes nine classical application theories. These consist of Logical Spacetime (which includes Logical Spacetime and Logical Mathematics and Physics), Logical Fields, Logical Networks, Life Communications, Life Reasoning Activities, Life Cycle, Life Data, Life Programming and Life Learning Strategy. The application theories describe a panoramic view of the technological development of their three main subjects (artificial intelligence, robotics and intelligent society) with the strength of one school of thought.

Keywords: Purpose, Logical Subject, Life-giving Logical Equation Structure Diagram; Bionic Logic

1. The Theory of Logical Space

Introducing the "School of Logic and Structure".

As an introduction, I will provide an overview of the Logical Structure School. It is becoming increasingly clear that intelligent technology will be the driving force behind all human endeavors in the future, and determine the development of any country. Intelligent technology will usher in a new revolution for humanity - the Intelligence Revolution - fundamentally transforming the entire foundation of human survival and development. Within this revolution, I have proposed the "Logical Structure School", a self-contained academic system of thought, featuring the following ideas:

① The invention of the "Life-giving Logical Equation Structural Diagram" and a complete theoretical framework.

This is the first revolutionary tool in the intelligent technology revolution, and is of paramount importance. It can be said that the transformation of humanity by intelligent technology will begin with the life-giving logical equation diagram.

② Serving as the foundation for next-generation software operating platforms.

③ Serving as the foundation for next-generation network software operating platforms.

④Serving as the organizational model for next-generation network structures.

⑤ Serving as the organizational model for next-generation integrated circuit chips.

For over half a century, humanity has relied on the John von Neumann architecture to design central processing units, but I now propose a new concept: While developing the software operating system using the life-giving logical equation diagram, we can simultaneously redesign the central processing units with the same structure; The software operating platform's logic equation structure diagram, including its equation unit generator, clock system, mailbox, address system, registers, and other essential components, would be integrated into the central processing unit. The equation unit generator, clock system, communication system, address manager, and registers would replace the traditional controllers and arithmetic logic units, with auxiliary facilities in diagram form, enabling a collaborative approach between hardware and software to realize the Life-giving Logical Equation Diagram; The equation generator would replace the arithmetic unit, redesigning computation methods. Instead of conventional arithmetic operations, the equation generator's ability to analyze, reason, and generate new equations would enable intelligent computation; The clock system would issue clock variables to control all equations and hardware devices, creating intelligent control in place of more traditional control mechanisms. The equation unit generator would manage the clock system, dynamically generating or eliminating clock equations as needed; The communication system would continue to utilize communication variables to manage the mailbox for all structure diagrams. However, the equation unit generator would control the communication system by generating or eliminating communication equations in a dynamic manner; The address manager would continue to issue address variables using address equations to allocate new equation units and variables sets. The equation unit generator would then control the address manager by generating or eliminating address equations. Additionally, the address manager would also oversee the management of the central processing unit's registers; Auxiliary facilities would exist in the form of logical equations, and be managed by the equation unit generator.

I will continue to refine this research! If feasible, this will mark the beginning of a revolution in software, hardware, and networks driven by the equation structure diagram, as well as the transformation of the Von Neumann architecture. This can be achieved by combining the equation diagram with quantum and biological computing.

⑥ Utilizing the equation structure diagram as the organizational framework for chips, forming the hardware infrastructure of intelligent machines and intelligent networks.

⑦ Utilizing the equation structure diagram to implement intelligent analysis, intelligent information reasoning, and intelligent structural reasoning; utilizing the equation structure diagram-based reasoning to create artificial intelligence and robotics; and utilizing the equation structure diagram-based intelligent network analysis, intelligent network information reasoning, and intelligent network structure reasoning to build an intelligent society.

⑧ Transforming traditional mathematics by replacing its research tools with equation diagrams; traditional mathematical results will be used to construct the relationships between numbers in logical equations, while new mathematical research will adopt the equation diagram as both working and descriptive languages.

⑨ Transforming traditional physics by re-framing existing physical research results using the equation diagrams; new research in the world of physics will also use the equation diagram as both working and descriptive languages.

⑩ Revolutionizing all fields of human academic research.

The equation structure diagram transforms mathematics into Logical Mathematics, and physics into Logical Physics. In turn, Logical Mathematics and Logical Physics create Logical Space-Time. The difference between Logical Space-Time and traditional space-time is that the former exists in the form of the equation structure diagram.

By revolutionizing all human academic research through equation diagrams, bionic logic, logical mathematics, logical physics, and logical space-time, six key points emerge: By re-framing existing research results using the equation structure diagram, the Logical Structure School will ensure the inheritance of established truths, guiding research towards a scientific path and avoiding pseudo-scientific approaches; New academic research will utilize the equation structure diagram as both working and descriptive languages; The life-giving logical equation diagram will be used to model all research objects; Extensive interdisciplinary collaboration and comprehensive research will be fostered across all fields; New research approaches will be created for collaboratively studying academic objects of intelligent society; Intelligent machines and intelligent networks can be extensively applied in the form of equation structure diagrams to conduct academic research.

Transforming all human industrial and agricultural practices.

There are five key points in this section: Utilizing intelligent societies in the form of equation structure diagrams to conduct industrial and agricultural production; Establishing widespread industrial and agricultural models built upon the equation structure diagram; Employing intelligent society control, intelligent society research, intelligent industrial and agricultural models, and intelligent network development to create distributed production units, with logistics organized in a logical network; Adopting a reformed academic approach based on the equation structure diagram for industrial and agricultural research; Extensive use of intelligent machines and intelligent networks, with both their logical structures based on the equation structure diagrams.

While proposing the equation structure diagram as a transformative tool, the Logical Structure School also advocates for an intelligent society order based on civil rights, human rights, and the rule of law, aiming to prevent potential disasters caused by intelligent warfare and intelligent authoritarianism.

The majority of these ideas have been addressed in the first and second papers, while the remaining parts will be developed and presented in the upcoming third paper.

The first paper introduced five foundational theories: The Purpose of the Logical Structure School, The Subjective Initiative Structure, Subjective Initiative Structure Engineering, The Life-Giving Logical Equation Structural Diagram, and Bionic Logic. These theories provide direction, methodology, and evaluation criteria for the foundational research of artificial intelligence, robotics, and intelligent societies.

The second paper introduced nine applied classical theories: Logical Spacetime and Logical Mathematics and Physics, Logical Fields, Logical Networks, Life Communication, Life Reasoning Activity, Life Cycles, Life Data, Life Programming and Life Learning Strategies. These theories, which are based upon the five foundational classical theories from the first paper, provide a comprehensive overview of the technological development of the three key subjects, namely artificial intelligence, robotics and intelligent societies, from the perspective of an entire academic school.

The third paper, The Logical Structure School III (Five Working Steps) will build upon the five foundational classical theories from the first paper and the nine applied classical theories from the second paper. It will introduce five working methods for the intelligent era, namely Hermeneutics, Development, Normativity, Intersectionality and Foundations, which are intended to serve as a starting point for further exploration. Hermeneutics will focus on the intelligent analysis of the Logical Equation Diagram; Development will explore the paths to realizing the ideals of the Logical Structure School; Normativity will examine how to establish an intelligent social order based on civil rights, human rights, and the rule of law; Intersectionality will investigate academic, industrial and agricultural intersections; and Foundations will study how to translate the theories of the Logical Structure School into practical applications.

Origin of this Research

Prior Research

Humans establish subjective order based on subjective laws; an example of this is using a government to regulate social order. Similarly, they also establish objective order based on objective rules; for instance, ancient agricultural practices scheduled farming based on the growth patterns of crops, while ancient animal herders regulated the order of their lives according to the availability of water and grass based on the growth patterns of their livestock. Early industrial civilization was governed by Newtonian mechanics, an objective set of rules which dictated the industrial order (including the order of machinery, the order of factory production, the technological order of nations and humanity, and the order of agriculture and industry). Later, the order of energy automation and industry was regulated by the objective rule of relativity. With the invention of the computer, John von Neumann proposed the von Neumann architecture, which established the objective rules and order for the composition of computers. As humanity stands on the brink of the intelligent era, we find ourselves ignorant of the objective rules and order that will govern this new age. Current intelligent technologies merely scratch the surface, still using the outdated technology of the industrial era. Without understanding the objective rules of the intelligent era, we cannot explore its new order. We will also be unable to find the most suitable path for developing artificial intelligence, robotics and intelligent society, and will thus face a number of ethical risks. In light of this, the Logical Structure School has pioneered the exploration of the objective rules and order of the intelligent era.

The published paper “The Fundamental Theory of Artificial Intelligence - Logical Structure and Logical Engineering” is the Logical Structure School’s first phase of research, exploring the objective rules of the intelligent era. The second phase then shifted its focus from general study to the structure of subjective initiative, also exploring the order of the intelligent era. Due to its extensive scope, this research is presented in three separate papers. The first paper, “Logical Structure School I (Five Fundamental Theories)”, explores the objective rules of the intelligent era, proposing five fundamental theories for research, and providing preliminary insights and examples of the basic theories. The five theories put forward are ① The Purpose of the Logical Structure School; ② Logical Structure; ③ Logical Engineering; ④ Logical Equation Structure Diagram Theory; and ⑤ Bionic Logic Theory.  The second paper, “Logical Structure School II (Nine Applied Theories)”, explores the objective order of the intelligent era, proposing the following concepts: ① Logical Space Theory; ② Logical Field Theory; ③ Logical Network Theory; ④ Life Communication Theory; ⑤ Life Reasoning Activity Theory; ⑥ Life Cycle Theory; ⑦ Life Data Theory; ⑧ Life Programming Theory; and ⑨ Life Learning Strategies. This paper engages in some applied research in the intelligent era, and preliminarily explores the main theories and example cases.  The third paper, “Logical Structure School III (Five Working Steps and Several Issues to be Explained)”, proposes five working methods, examines a basic exploration of certain theories and cases, and explains various issues. The five working methods are ① Hermeneutics; ② Development; ③ Normativity; ④ Intersectionality; and ⑤ Fundamentals.  These three pioneering works all serve as a foundation for new research into the intelligent era.

 This Paper

This paper aims to present a panoramic view of intelligent application research in the intelligent era, and is divided into nine parts: ① Logical Spacetime and Logical Mathematics and Physics, ② Logical Fields, ③ Logical Networks, ④ Life Communications, ⑤ Life Reasoning Activities, ⑥ Life Cycle, ⑦ Life Data, ⑧ Life Programming, and ⑨ Life Learning Strategy.

1.1 The Purpose of the Logical Structure School and the Theory of Logical Space

The Purpose of the Logical Structure School proposes a "new subjective logic". In short, this involves using objective logic to study issues and subjective logic to solve them, replacing the objective material world with a new objective logical world, and replacing our traditional perspective on the universe, outlook on life, and general methodology with a new perspective based on objective logic. The subjective logic here refers neither to traditional faith or religion, nor to individualism. Instead, it is a form of subjective logic constructed from civil rights beliefs, human rights beliefs, and the rule of law, all of which are essential for an intelligent society. Its greatest function lies in rejecting the individualism that harms intelligent society, as well as the evils of intelligent warfare and intelligent rule brought about by individualism.

Both the objective logic for studying issues and the subjective logic for solving them mentioned here require the universe to be logical. By replacing the material universe with a logical universe, the Logical Structure School believes that the space-time of the intelligent era should be logical rather than material. Based on this, the Theory of Logical Space is established, designed to meet the development needs of the three main bodies of the intelligent era (artificial intelligence, robots, and intelligent society).

The theory of logical space requires humans to establish a new type of mathematical and physical theory for logical mathematics, establishing the following accepted principle: all material cognition must become logical cognition, that is, matter is actually a logical subject; all material phenomena become logical phenomena, that is, material phenomena are actually logical phenomena; the relationship between matter is actually a logical relationship, and logical phenomena and logical relationships are all logical subjects. Based on this, the concept of a logical subject representing matter is established, which is then further developed to represent time and space. After this, both space-time and matter can be represented by the single concept of a logical subject. The concepts of logical phenomena and logical relationships are also established. Logical space-time, logic, logical phenomena, logical relationships, and the logical universe are used to transform and develop existing mathematical and physical theories. Just as relativity needed to be developed where Newtonian mechanics was unable to explain the physical world, the theory of logical mathematics now needs to be developed where existing natural sciences are unable to explain the latest phenomena. The development of the three main bodies of the intelligent era, namely artificial intelligence, robots and intelligent society, requires the theory of logical mathematics and physics, as well as the logical space-time and logical universe they have created.

1.2 Structure of Subjective Initiative and the Theory of Logical Space

The structure of subjective initiative is a logical structure, requiring existence in both logical space-time and in the logical universe. The external communication of the structure of subjective initiative requires a logical network to transmit logic. This logical network needs to exist in a logical environment, that is, a logical field, while the existence of a logical field requires logical space-time and the logical universe to exist.

Therefore, the existence or production and use of the structure of subjective initiative requires logical space-time, while logical space-time needs to be based on the theory of logical mathematics and physics (i.e., logical mathematics and logical physics). The theory of logical mathematics first requires the creation of a number of common sense concepts, including the following: time, space and matter are all logical subjects; the universe is a logical subject; matter phenomena are all logical phenomena; the relationships between forms of matter are all logical relations; universal connection is a universal logical relation; logical phenomena and logical relations are also logical subjects. It uses logical equation structure diagrams to describe everything in the universe and to study tantalizing questions such as "What is outside the universe?", "How did the universe come into being?" and "What existed before the universe came into being?" It uses bionic logic, as well as logical mathematics and physics, to construct the life-giving logical equation structure diagram of the logical universe. Moreover, where Newtonian mechanics is not enough, relativity is used. Where relativity is not enough is where the theory of logical mathematics and physics needs to be established. The tools for establishing the theory of logical mathematics and physics include the life-giving logical equation structure diagram and bionic logic. Mature logical mathematics and physics can then be used to construct the logical universe.

1.3 Subjective Initiative Structure Engineering and the Theory of Logical Space

Subjective initiative structure engineering is a form of logical engineering, and has two main requirements: ① The product of logical engineering is a logical structure which needs to exist in a logical environment, and the logical environment needs to exist in logical space-time; ② The process of logical engineering is the process of developing a logical structure, which also needs to exist in logical space-time. In this way, both the subjective initiative structure engineering and the subjective initiative structure require existence in logical space-time.

1.4 Bionic Logic and the Theory of Logical Space

The tool for constructing logical space-time is the life-giving logical equation structure diagram, while the tool for constructing the life-giving logical equation structure diagram is bionic logic. The word ‘bionic’ is used here as it does not only simulate life, but also refers to using logical equations to simulate all logical subjects, logical phenomena, and logical relations in the universe. Taking a star as a life with a clock cycle, and using a life-giving logical equation structure diagram to simulate the complete clock cycle of a star is also a form of bionic logic.

1.5 Case Study

There are several questions: "What is outside the universe?", "How did the universe come into being?" and "What existed before the universe came into being?" For these mysterious questions, modern humans often use conjectures as answers. However, these conjectures are no different from myths, meaning they have no practical significance. Modern humans also believe that the reason why these mysteries cannot be solved is that the existing technology and the way we observe phenomena is insufficient. However, as human cognition continues to advance, we may find that if we continue to advance along the existing path of technological development, humans will never obtain the technology needed to understand these questions, and may even be unable to further develop other technologies. What is the problem?

We need to be skeptical of the natural sciences that human industrial society regards as gods. There are problems with using natural sciences to understand the universe. Natural sciences are not enough to develop intelligent subjects! Moreover, as human technology advances into the intelligent era, humanity will find that seeking answers to the mysteries of the universe is closely related to its own destiny, while at the same time, new scientific theories must be invented to replace the existing natural sciences to develop intelligence. What should we do? The logical structure school has put forward its own point of view: "New Subjective Logic". In short, this suggests using objective logic to study problems and subjective logic to solve them, and advocates for replacing the objective material world with a new objective logical world. The universe is logical rather than material. Newtonian mechanics shall continue to be applied where it is still applicable, but where this becomes insufficient, relativity shall be used. When relativity also falls short, it will be necessary to invent a theory of logical space-time to continue the development of mankind. The theory that the universe is logical shall be used to transform and advance existing mathematical and physical theories, resulting in a new body of knowledge called the theory of logical mathematics and physics, which will help mankind progress in the intelligent era, and obtain the knowledge necessary to develop the main body of the intelligent era. The tool for exploring the profound mysteries of logical space-time is the life-giving logical equation structure diagram, while the current stagnation in natural science is merely the anticipation of the birth of logical mathematical and physical theory!

Another issue is that the original mathematical and physical research has led to the invention of the theory of multidimensional space. However, how can humanity make use of this multidimensional space with just one origin and a cluster of coordinates? It is becoming increasingly clear that such multidimensional space can only allow gods to enter higher spaces. The ideal of humans using multidimensional space is an unachievable myth that will never be realized! What should we do? The logical structure school proposes that humanity should first create high-dimensional intelligence, and then apply the theory that correlates high-dimensional intelligence with high-dimensional space to enter, understand and utilize high-dimensional space through high-dimensional intelligence. However, this path still has one important premise: the belief that the universe is logical.

1.6 Proposing the First Applied Classical Theory

The Logical Structure School proposes its first applied classical theory - Logical Space-Time; this encompasses two fundamental applied theories: Logical Space-time ,and Logical Mathematics and Physics.

There are several key points to the theory of logical space-time:

① The common sense on which logical space-time is established maintains that time, space and matter are all logical subjects, material phenomena are logical phenomena, and the universal connection between matter is a logical relationship. Logical phenomena and logical relations are also logical subjects;

② Logical subjects are explained by three sets: the description set, the attribute set, and the function set. These three sets can be unified into a life-giving logical equation structure diagram. As long as the output variable set includes the union of the three sets, then the method for identifying the logical subject is to determine whether the subject can be represented as a life-giving logical equation structure diagram, and whether the output variable set of this life-giving logical equation structure diagram contains the union of the description set, the attribute set, and the function set;

③ When using a life-giving logical equation structure diagram to describe a logical subject, three tools need to work together, namely bionic logic, the life-giving logical equation structure diagram, and logical mathematics and physics.

Bionic logic constructs a life-giving logical equation structure diagram by means of bionic processes. The word  bionic refers to identifying the structure, activity, and cycle of the logical subject. The life-giving logical equation structure diagram is then constructed based on the bionic results of the logical subject. Here, "life" refers to the activity cycle of the logical subject, including both the non-living logical subject and life itself. For subjects that cannot yet be modeled bionically, an artificial design is used. The most important work in this process is that the equation unit generator cooperates with the clock equation system to construct the activities and cycles of the logical subject.

Logical mathematics includes both logical mathematics and logical physics. Logical mathematics is a tool for establishing the equations of a life-giving logical equation structure diagram, while logical physics assists the bionic logic in identifying the structure of a life-giving logical equation structure diagram.

④ The following logical fields and logical networks are all described by life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. In this context, "life" refers to the clock cycle, while the birth and disappearance of logical units are described using the equation unit generator.

There are several key points to the theory of logical mathematics:

① The transformation of traditional mathematics to logical mathematics is reflected in two key aspects: One is to change the research of traditional mathematics into numbers to the research of logical mathematics into logical equations, and the other is to classify the research results, research methods, and research directions of traditional mathematics into the field of creating the binary and multivariate relationships of logical equations;

② The first task of logical mathematics is to express the logical equations of everything in the universe derived from bionic logic. The second task is to study how to improve the ability of the equation unit generator in the life-giving logical equation structure diagram, how to generalize the known logical paths between inputs and outputs into logical equation units, and how to create logical equation units that establish the logical relationship from input to output once the input and output values are known. The third task is to classify traditional mathematics into the research field of logical relationships, and to apply this to the construction of binary and multivariate relationships within logical equation structure diagrams.

There are several key points to the theory of logical physics:

① The transformation of traditional physics into logical physics is reflected in: transforming physical definitions and theories into logical subjects, and constructing a life-giving logical equation structure diagram; in the future, all research results within logical physics will be expressed using logical subjects and their life-giving logical equation structure diagrams;

② Logical physics has three expression and research tools: bionic logic, the life-giving logical equation structure diagram, and logical mathematics. Bionic logic imitates the space-time of the universe and everything present within space-time. The life-giving logical equation structure diagram further expresses bionic logic as a structure diagram. The birth, activity, and demise of everything is realized by the equation unit generator. Life involves simulating the clock cycle of everything. Logical equations are specifically constructed using logical mathematics, while traditional mathematics is used to construct the binary and multivariate relationships of equations;

③ The traditional physics that has now become the logical subject of the newly created logical physics discipline is used to help bionic logic identify the structure of the life-giving logical equation structure diagram;

④ The creation of logical physics is based on several fundamental concepts: Time, space, and matter are all logical subjects; material phenomena are logical phenomena; extensive connection is a logical relationship; logical phenomena and logical relations are all logical subjects; and logical physics is used to establish a logical space-time;

⑤ The study of logical space-time and the laws governing the logical subjects, logical phenomenon subjects and logical relationship subjects is conducted using the life-giving logical equation structure diagram of the logical subject theory to help bionics, while the description set, attribute set and function set of the logical subject can all be described using a life-giving logical equation structure diagram.

In this way, the logical structure school uses the life-giving logical equation structure diagram to inherit the activities of traditional mathematical, physical, and logical research. The logical structure school, in its creation and development of logical space-time and logical mathematics and physics, firmly rejects the development path of pseudoscience. However, both logical space-time and logical mathematics and physics are nascent fields that need to be further enriched and developed, and neither shall be arbitrarily denied. The development of the intelligent era will undoubtedly rely on the two fundamental applied theories of logical space-time and logical mathematics and physics.

(Citing references【1】、【2】、【3】、【4】、【5】、【6】)

2. Theory of Logical Fields

2.1 The Purpose of the Logical Structure School and the Theory of the Logical Field

The Purpose of the Logic Structure School proposes a "new subjective logic". In a nutshell, this new subjective logic uses objective logic to research issues and subjective logic to solve them. To fulfill this purpose, the Logical Structure School puts forth two foundational applied theories: 1. Logical Space-Time, and 2. Logical Mathematics and physics. The concept of logical mathematics and physics serves as the foundation for logical space-time and encompasses both logical mathematics and logical physics.

Following the establishment of these two fundamental applied theories, the Logical structure school introduces another novel applied theory: the logical environment, which they termed the logical field.

2.2 Case Study

Why use "logical field" instead of "scenario"? The concept of a "logical field" encompasses a broader range than a simple "scenario". It includes all physical fields and social fields (such as markets), as well as all natural and social environments. The reason for using the term "logical field" is that the effects produced within this field are logical effects, and the combined force of various influencing factors is a "logical force". The notion of a "scenario" obviously lacks the conceptual capacity to address the demands, control, and environmental influences associated with logical significance.

2.3 Proposing the Second Applied Classical Theory

This section introduces the second applied classical theory proposed by the Logical Structure School: The Logical Field. A logical field refers to a logical environment. The structure of a subjective initiative, as the most crucial logical subject in intelligence research, necessitates existence within a logical environment, engaging in a form of interaction that will mutually shape both entities. The logical environment, in turn, must exist within logical space-time, with both entities mutually shaping the other. Logical space-time serves as the environment for the logical environment, and both exist within the same space-time. Therefore, the Logical Structure School first established the theory of logical space-time, design to encompass both logical space-time and logical mathematics, and subsequently developed the theory of the logical environment, which they termed the "logical field".

2.3.1 What is a Logical Field?

A logical field is an environment composed of logical structures, with logical structures being equivalent to logical subjects. Interactions occur between these logical structures, and the interplay of these interactions forms the field. Logical fields can be categorized as natural fields, social fields, or integrated fields encompassing both natural and social elements. A logical field exerts a logical environmental influence on logical structures, resulting in a phenomenon of mutual shaping between the logical structure and the logical field. Logical structures engage in mutual shaping with the logical field through the perception and transmission of logic. Logic transmission occurs externally through logical networks, and internally through logical buses within the logical structure. The logic perceived by the logical structure is a form of data logic. A logical field can be represented as a life-giving logical equation structure diagram. Constructing such a diagram for a logical field involves the following key points: ① The required construction tools include bionic logic, life-giving logical equation structure diagrams, and logical mathematics and physics. These tools function similarly to their counterparts in general structure diagrams; ② Begin by creating a life-giving logical equation structure diagram for the logical subject within the logical field. The selection of the logical subject is determined based on the requirements of the research object; ③ Represent the transmission paths of equation units within the logical subjects of the logical field. Once marked, the structure diagrams of various logical subjects within the logical field form a complete diagram, representing the structure of the logical field; ④ The clock equation system and the equation unit generator of the life-giving logical equation structure diagram are distributed within the structure diagrams of their respective logical subjects. These components are distributed within the structure diagram of the logical field; ⑤ If the research object is one or several logical subjects within the logical field, then the mutual shaping between the research object and the logical field is represented by the directed paths of equation units exchanged between the research object and other logical subjects. In other words, the research object and the logical field share a single structure diagram; ⑥ Here, "equation units" refer to constants, variables, equations, systems of equations, or structure diagrams of varying scales. Different logical subjects can transmit various equation units to each other, and the directed transmission paths can be labeled with weights to indicate their order.

2.3.2 Modified Transmission

After an equation unit is transmitted from one logical subject to another, the logical subject receiving the equation unit will modify the equation unit received from the previous logical subject before transmitting its own equation unit. For instance, the Sun exerts a gravitational pull on the Earth, and the Earth, in turn, exerts a gravitational pull on the Moon. When the Sun's gravitational pull on the Earth changes, the Earth modifies its gravitational influence on the Moon due to changes in its orbit or other factors. In this case, gravity represents a logical equation structure diagram of the carrying capacity of the gravitational field. The Earth performs a form of modified transmission by modifying the equation unit transmitted to it by the Sun before transmitting it in turn to the Moon. This phenomenon of logical networks and modified transmission is ubiquitous in all interactions within physical fields and applies to social fields as well. For instance, assume that the influence of Chinese law on country A is a legal logical structure diagram carried by legal data logic. Country A's legal influence on Country B, in terms of transmitting legal logic equation units, is affected by the changes in the legal logic equation units transmitted by China to country A. Country A then performs modified transmission on the legal logic equation units received from China. Integrated fields can be studied in a similar manner. The process of modified transmission can be described as follows: One logical subject transmits an equation unit to a second logical subject, thus altering the second subject's structure diagram. As a result of this alteration, the second logical subject modifies the equation unit it transmits to a third logical subject. The change from the second to the third subject is a result of the change from the first to the second subject; hence, the transmission from the second to the third is a modified transmission of the information received from the first.

2.3.3 Natural Logical Fields

Natural logical fields correspond to what is referred to as Field Theory in traditional physics. Ultimately, natural logical fields are composed of matter, and the interactions within these fields are the interactions between different forms of matter. However, in this context, matter is treated as a logical subject, and the research tools shift from physics to logical physics.

2.3.4 Social Logical Fields

Social logical fields represent another dimension of study within human society. In essence, social logical fields are composed of people, and the function within these fields lies in the interaction between people. In this context, "people" are considered logical subjects or structures of subjective initiative.

2.3.5 Perceiving Logical Fields

For a logical subject to engage in mutual shaping with a logical field, it must first perceive the logical field. This perception encompasses the perception of logical subjects within natural logical fields, the perception of human logical subjects within social logical fields, and the combined perception of both natural and social logical fields by a logical subject. For instance, a person feeling cold is perceiving the natural logical field, while a person feeling mistreated by their superior is perceiving the social logical field. If a person feels both cold and mistreated, leading to a feeling of dejection, this represents a combined perception of both natural and social logical fields.

The perception of a logical field by a logical subject is achieved through the directed transmission of equation units.

2.3.6 Environmental Influences of Logical Fields

Mutual shaping exists between logical subjects and logical fields. The logical field influences logical subjects by either supporting or opposing their life activities or life cycles. For instance, a logical field can provide the necessary resources for a logical subject while also removing any waste produced, thereby exerting an environmental influence. Conversely, a logical subject can influence the logical field through its life activities or life cycle, resulting in the shaping of the environment. Examples include deforestation by humans for survival, and the current efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

2.3.7 Demands and Control within Logical Fields

① Demands within Logical Fields

Logical subjects and logical fields mutually shape each other, and this mutual shaping is realized through the exchange of equation units. The shaping of a logical subject by a logical field encompasses demands, which are expressed through equation units. For example, cold weather creates a demand for warmer clothes, and the desire to be accepted at a university creates a demand for studying harder.

② How to Obtain Demands within Logical Fields

Obtaining demands within a logical field involves a number of steps. First, the relevant equation units must be obtained through equation unit transmission. These obtained equation units then alter the original structure diagram, resulting in a new structure diagram with new input variables. These new input variables constitute new demands. Finally, the logical subject fulfills these new demands through its new life activity patterns.

③ Control within Logical Fields

The mutual shaping between logical subjects and logical fields includes the control exerted by the logical field on the logical subject. This control is achieved by transmitting equation units that modify the structure diagram of the research object. Examples include Earth's gravity and human laws. The control exerted by the logical field is expressed through the transmission of equation units. For instance, body weight can be transmitted through gravitational interactions, while human laws can be transmitted through education.

④ How to Obtain Control within Logical Fields

When a logical subject exists within a logical field, the logical field can exert control over that logical subject. Control is transmitted in the form of equation units within the logical field. The function of the logical field is to transmit equation units, such as the gravitational field transmitting gravity or the government network transmitting laws. The prerequisite for a logical subject to be controlled by a logical field is to be situated within that field. The logical field controls the logical subject due to the laws of mutual shaping. The expression of control is realized through the transmission of equation units and the subsequent modification of the research object's structure diagram. Control influences the life activities and life cycles of the logical subject, while the controlled logical subject can transmit such control within its own structure diagram.

It is important to note that the logical structure school emphasizes the fact that, while logical fields exchange logic, the transmission within logical subjects also involves logic. For the purposes of understanding and research, the logical structure school represents this transmitted logic as equation units, using constants, variables, equations, systems of equations, or structure diagrams of varying sizes to denote logic. For instance, when sunlight falls on the Earth, the logic is represented by "sunlight". To facilitate understanding and research, sunlight can be expressed as an equation unit.

(Citing references【2】、【3】、【4】、【5】)

3. The Theory of Logical Networks

3.1 The Purpose of the Logical Structure School and the Theory of Logical Networks

Guided by its core purposes, the Logical Structure School first established the concept of logical space-time. Building upon this foundation, they then introduced the concept of the logical field, utilizing logical space-time as its environment. Further expanding upon this framework, they developed the theory of the logical network, employing the environment of the logical field. The tools employed to describe and study logical networks include bionic logic, life-giving logical equation structure diagrams, and logical mathematics and physics.

3.2 Structure of Subjective Initiative and the Theory of Logical Networks

The logical network represents a crucial component of the structure of subjective initiative. The logical network external to the structure of subjective initiative is referred to as the "external network", while the network internal to the structure is known as the "internal network". The structure of subjective initiative utilizes both external and internal networks to facilitate logical communication with its internal and external environments. Based on bionic logic, the internal network within the subjective initiative is also referred to as the "nervous system".

3.3 Subjective Initiative Structure Engineering and the Theory of Logical Networks

Subjective initiative structure engineering refers to the engineering process involved in producing structures of subjective initiative. This process encompasses the production of internal logical networks, as well as the development of mechanisms for sending and receiving information between the subjective initiative and external logical networks, akin to postal services within commercial or societal organizations.

Constructing both internal and external logical network functions for the structure of subjective initiative is a critical task and serves as a vital foundation for the communication function of subjective initiative.

3.4 Life-giving Logical Equation Structure Diagrams and the Theory of Logical Networks

The tools for describing and studying logical networks include bionic logic, life-giving logical equation structure diagrams, and logical mathematics and physics. The network diagram within the life-giving logical equation structure diagram of a logical field represents the external network diagram. In this network diagram, each node represents a logical subject, and the weighted directed paths connecting these nodes represent the transmission paths of equation units, with weights indicating the order of transmission. Similarly, the network diagram within the life-giving logical equation structure diagram of a logical subject represents the internal network diagram of that particular logical subject. In this case, the nodes represent equations or equation structure diagrams of varying scales, and the weighted directed paths connecting these nodes depict the transmission paths of the equation units. Equation units encompass constants, variables, equations, and equation structure diagrams of various sizes, while the respective weights indicate their order of transmission.

3.5 Bionic Logic and the Theory of Logical Networks

Bionic logic works together with logical physics to create life-giving logical equation structure diagrams, while logical mathematics is employed to formulate logical equations. Both internal and external logical networks rely on the framework provided by these life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. Bionic logic therefore plays a significant role in describing and researching logical networks, and utilizes real-world logical networks as an inspiration to construct internal and external logical networks tailored to the logical communication needs of the structure of the subjective initiative.

3.6 Case Study

Currently, logical networks primarily transmit equation units, as exemplified by the internet. However, in a more advanced stage of development, logical networks could potentially transmit entire logical subjects, similar to the concept of a time machine. This remains a highly speculative and enigmatic concept, whose technological roadmap has not yet been fully grasped by the logical structure school. They can only affirm that the fantasy of a time machine is linked to the ideal of logical networks transmitting logical subjects.

3.7 Proposing the Third Applied Classical Theory

This section introduces the third applied classical theory proposed by the Logical Structure School - The Logical Network. The key points are as follows:

3.7.1 Logical Networks

A logical network refers to a network that facilitates the interaction between logical subjects. It encompasses a broader scope than the commonly understood internet or 5G networks. Natural networks within this framework transmit logical subjects, with the interactions themselves being considered logical subjects. Artificial networks currently transmit equation units but may evolve in the future to transmit entire logical subjects. Equation units include constants, variables, equations, and equation structure diagrams of varying sizes.

3.7.2 Natural Networks in the Universe

Numerous natural networks exist in the universe, such as the water network on Earth, the movement of winds and ocean currents, the transmission of crust dynamics and geocentric changes to the Earth's surface, interactions and transmissions between microscopic particles, gravitational networks in macroscopic space, transmission of light and radio waves, temporal networks, and spatial networks. Natural networks also include human social networks. There are numerous types of social networks, starting with the internet and 5G, followed by transportation networks like roads, railways, waterways and air routes, as well as urban and rural networks, all of which can be categorized as "hardware networks". In addition to these, there are also "software networks" such as political networks, legal networks, cultural networks, educational networks, and religious networks.

In short, wherever there is a phenomenon of logical propagation, there exists a logical network.

3.7.3 What is a Logical Network?

① A logical network is the attribute of a logical field, and is composed of logical structures and their interactions. This composition gives rise to a network formed by logical propagation and logical transmission phenomena, referred to as the "logical network".

② Logical networks transmit logic. As previously mentioned, there are many different logical networks, including propagation networks for radio waves, interactive networks of microscopic particles, the water network on Earth, the transmission network of forces within the Earth's crust, and human networks like the highway system or the legal framework. In addition, the propagation of radio waves, microscopic interactions, water energy, crustal dynamics, transportation of goods on highways and legal constraints - all of these involve logic. In this sense, logical networks serve the purpose of transmitting logic.

Note that the manifestation of logic is in the form of logical subjects, implying that the transmission between logical subjects is also manifested as logical subjects.

③ The carriers of logic transmission are logical subjects, and include constants, variables, equations and structure diagrams of various sizes (collectively known as equation units). In other words, logical subjects are the forms of transmission, and could be anything from a truck to a court, or even a package. However, the essence of transmission lies in the logic itself - a form of logic that influences the receiving logical subject by impacting its equation structure diagram.

④ Logic transmission involves modified transmission. The process unfolds as follows: A logical subject receives a logic transmission, which in turn influences and alters its equation structure diagram. Based on its life activity patterns, the modified logical subject then transmits its own logic to a new logical subject.

3.7.4 The Role of Logical Networks

① Logical networks constitute a crucial attribute of logical fields. Constructing a logical field necessitates the construction of a logical network. The quality of this logical network reflects the quality of the logical field, and the function of a logical network is to transmit logic; the form of transmission is that of logical subjects, including various equation units.

② The development of the intelligent age necessitates the study and construction of logical networks. This extends beyond the simple notion of the internet and 5G. Intelligent machines, just like humans, need to navigate and utilize both natural and artificial logical networks. For instance, intelligent machines are subject to the universe's gravitational network, while the regulation of intelligent machine societies also requires its own legal networks.

3.7.5 How to Construct and Utilize Logical Networks

Both the development of humanity and the advancement of intelligence require the construction and application of logical networks. The nature of logical networks, which disseminate logic, means that their construction and application encompass all network engineering projects undertaken by humanity, including aerospace and deep-sea engineering, legal and educational engineering, as well as market engineering and legal engineering.

3.7.6 The Theory of Logical Networks

① The environment of a logical network is the logical field, and the environment of the logical field is logical space-time. The tools for describing and studying logical networks include bionic logic, life-giving logical equation structure diagrams, and logical mathematics and physics. Bionic logic and logical physics work together to create life-giving logical equation structure diagrams based on bionic principles, while logical mathematics is employed to formulate equations and equation unit generators;

② A logical network is essentially the weighted directed set of paths of equation units within a life-giving logical equation structure diagram, with weights indicating the order of transmission. Equation units include constants, variables, equations, and equation structure diagrams of varying scales. A logical network is a structure diagram composed of weighted directed paths and nodes, with the weights indicating their order of transmission. For a specific logical subject, its external network is referred to as the "external network", where nodes represent individual logical subjects. Conversely, its internal network is called the "internal network", with nodes representing individual equations or equation units of varying scales;

③ The transmission paths within a logical network, comprising weighted directed paths and nodes, are referred to as "logical channels", with weights indicating their order of transmission. Logical channels can be categorized as natural channels or artificial channels. Natural channels transmit logical subjects, like the Sun shining on the Earth or a train transporting passengers between cities. Current artificial channels primarily transmit equation units, such as the internet, or signal cables within computers. The internal network of the structure of subjective initiative aims to emulate the human nervous system. At a more advanced stage, artificial channels may also be able to transmit entire logical subjects.

4. The Theory of Life Communication

4.1 The Purpose of the Logical Structure School and the Theory of Life Communication

Based on its core mission, the Logical Structure School proposes the theory of life communication. Life communication utilizes the logical field and the logical network as its logical environment. The logical field provides nodes for the external network communication structure diagram, while the logical network furnishes directed paths for the same. Both the internal and external network communication structure diagrams for life communication are directed graphs and can be studied using discrete graph theory.

4.2 Life-giving Logical Equation Structure Diagrams and the Theory of Life Communication

The life-giving logical equation structure diagram serves as a tool to describe and activate logical fields, logical networks, and logical subjects. It also plays a crucial role in depicting and activating the process of life communication.

A life-giving logical equation structure diagram comprises equations, systems of equations, structure diagrams of varying scales, clock equation systems, equation unit generators, and "post offices". These post offices act as nodes within the internal network communication structure diagram. When a logical subject transmits an equation unit to the external network, the post office also serves as a node within the logical network communication structure diagram. Both internal and external network communication structure diagrams adhere to the principles of directed graphs in discrete graph theory, and can be analyzed using this framework.

The Logical Structure School emphasizes the correspondence between the "post office" within the equation structure diagram and the following: mailboxes within the elementary structural elements of the three-tiered logical structure, post offices within the intermediate structural organs, and sensory organs and nerves within the brain tissue of the advanced structure.

4.3 Bionic Logic and the Theory of Life Communication

Bionic logic functions as a tool for constructing life-giving logical equation structure diagrams and describing life communication. It encompasses both the simulation of life and the application of logical mathematics. Studying internal network communication within a logical subject necessitates the simulation of humans. For researching external network communication within a logical network, the focus shifts to simulating human society, the Earth, galaxies, and even the entire universe. Logical mathematics is employed to create communication structure diagrams, while logical physics assists in the bionic process.

4.4 Case Study

The Logical Structure School proposes a development roadmap for life communication. Currently, artificial channels primarily transmit information in the form of equation units. In the future, these channels could potentially transmit both information and logical bodies at the same time, creating a form of hybrid transmission. Ultimately, the goal is for artificial channels to directly transmit logical subjects, similar to existing natural channels. Consider the example of the courier industry: at the moment, it relies entirely on natural channels. In the future, intercity transportation could utilize high-speed rail and air travel, with drones handling last-mile delivery, significantly improving speed and efficiency. Further down the line, high-speed autonomous drones could be deployed throughout the process, shortening delivery times even further. Eventually, high-speed versatile robots capable of seamless transportation and delivery across land, sea and air could be employed, pushing speed limits even further. As the speed of robots increases indefinitely, the speed of natural channels would asymptotically approach that of artificial channels. When the speeds become equivalent, natural channels would effectively transform into artificial channels, thus realizing the ideal of artificial channels transmitting logical subjects.

4.5 Proposing the Fourth Applied Classical Theory

This section introduces the fourth applied classical theory proposed by the Logical Structure School - Life Communication. The key points are as follows:

4.5.1 Principles of Communication

① Building upon the established theory of logical networks, which provides the concept of logical channels, the Logical Structure School has developed the theory of life communication. Logical channels are categorized as either natural or artificial. Life communication through natural channels involves the transmission of logical subjects. Currently, life communication through artificial channels is limited to transmitting information in the form of equation units. However, the ultimate goal for artificial channels is to transmit entire logical subjects. The Logical Structure School is still working towards a comprehensive technological roadmap to achieve this advanced objective. This paper focuses solely on information-based life communication through artificial channels, specifically the transmission of equation units. Using human life communication as a model for bionic logic, the study aims to understand life communication within the three main intelligent entities: artificial intelligence, robots, and intelligent societies.

② The information transmitted here, represented by equation units, still takes the form of life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. These units could be constants, variables, equations, or structure diagrams of varying scales. Depending on the specific requirements, they can be equipped with clock equation systems and equation unit generators, and also with structure diagram post offices. This means that clock equation systems, equation unit generators, and structure diagram post offices are optional components for transmitting equation units.

③ The Logical Structure School employs life-giving logical equation structure diagrams to represent logical fields, logical networks, and logical subjects. Activating these diagrams allows for the simulation of their real-world application, enabling the realization of actual life communication by mimicking human logic. Activation involves transforming the structure diagrams described in natural language into representations that will be understandable to machines using target languages. Examples include the compilation of source code into object code in traditional software engineering and the translation of human consciousness, expressed in natural language, into biological language within the brain. The Logical Structure School posits that activating life-giving logical equation structure diagrams requires developing a novel set of methods that continue and build upon the experiences of traditional software engineering, while also incorporating innovations inspired by bionic logic that mimics the human brain.

4.5.2 Communication Address

Life communication activities necessitate the establishment of comprehensive communication address systems for logical fields, logical networks, and logical subjects, similar to the postal system currently used in our daily lives. Towns are equipped with postal codes, streets and neighborhood names, as well as residences with specific addresses. This comprehensive postal system forms the foundation for efficient mail delivery. While researching the organizational methods for equation structure diagrams, the Logical Structure School stated:

"Life-giving logical equation structure diagrams are designed to describe life. The emergence of life relies on the support of a vast number of cells, cellular tissues, and organs. If each cell requires a dedicated logical equation structure diagram to describe it, then a single cellular tissue would necessitate a collection of scholarly works spanning an entire discipline, while an organ would demand the compilation of all existing academic disciplines. With an overwhelming quantity of equations, systems of equations, structure diagrams, documents, books, disciplinary compilations, and academic system compilations, the question arises: How do we organize them? First, we assign each entity a unique and descriptive name. Then, we create a character encoding system, translating these descriptive names into unique codes. The organization of equations can be modeled after the Chinese ID card encoding system, where codes are divided into segments, with segments arranged from right to left representing equations, systems of equations, structure diagrams, documents, books, disciplinary compilations, and academic system compilations, respectively. This system provides each equation with a fixed address, facilitating communication and variable transmission through these addresses."

Building upon this theory, the Logical Structure School establishes a communication address system:

① The guiding principle for constructing this address system is to build on the experiences of traditional computer science and computer network communication technologies while incorporating bionic logic principles. This will involve the simulation of the human postal and courier systems, as well as the life processes governing communication within the human brain and body.

② Establish an external network communication system: All logical subjects within the logical field are assigned subject names that reflect their meaning and position within the field. Within the logical network, all artificial channels are defined by their starting logical subject, ending logical subject, path weights (indicating order), and path descriptions.

③ Establish an internal network communication system: The "internal network" refers to the artificial channels within a single logical subject. Every equation unit within a logical subject is assigned an address, and this system extends down to the individual components within each equation unit, ensuring every equation possesses a unique address. Artificial channels within the logical subject are represented by the directed paths between equation units and within equation units themselves. Each path segment is defined by its starting equation, ending equation, weight (indicating order), and path description.

④ Emulate the postal and courier systems of natural channels, with each equation unit to be transmitted assigned a communication address consisting of "sending logical subject internal network address + logical network path diagram + receiving logical subject internal network address" to encode and activate the natural language communication address.

4.5.3 Communication Process

The life communication process mirrors the process of sending a package, and consists of three stages: transmission from the sending logical subject's internal network, transmission of information (equation unit) through the logical network, and delivery within the receiving logical subject's internal network.

① External Network Communication

External network communication refers to the transmission of equation units through the logical network. The logical network is a path structure diagram, with nodes representing logical subjects and paths depicted as weighted directed paths (indicating order). This structure adheres to the principles of directed graphs in discrete graph theory and can be studied using this framework.

② Internal Network Communication

Internal network communication consists of two parts: transmission from the sending logical subject's internal network, and delivery within the receiving logical subject's internal network. The internal network path structure diagram is provided by the life-giving logical equation structure diagram of the logical subject, with nodes representing post offices, and paths represented as weighted directed paths (indicating order). Two approaches can be used to study this process: building on the experiences of computer science and computer network communication technologies and applying bionic principles by emulating the human brain and body's communication systems, particularly the nervous system.

4.5.4 Elementary Structure Communication

In life theory, cells possess memory and the ability to communicate; here is a reference to the element set to store and send/receive information to a mailbox. The storage set of each element has a certain number of logical equation structural diagrams, while the element description set, attribute set and functional set also possess the various necessary structural diagrams of the logical equation. The element has the ability to solve logical equations, where the variables needed for logical equations are input from one element's mailbox to this element's mailbox, before being transferred to the logical equation corresponding to the storage set or corresponding logical equation of the element class. The variables generated by solving equations in this element are either used by the element itself, its other equations, or transmitted to other elements. Variables cause changes in the logical equation and the structural diagram of logical equations, resulting in changes in logical structures. This is known as information reasoning. Variables caused by information reasoning can control the state of the structure, while changes or continuous changes in the structure state lead to structural reasoning.

4.5.5 Intermediate Structure Communication

The tissues and organs of life also possess memory and the ability to communicate. In simulating the theory of life, mailboxes are set up for the intermediate logical structures of tissues and organs. In this way, each element has one or more of the following: one or more structural diagrams of the logical equation, tissue and organ memory. The intermediate structure obeys the laws for solving equations and logic transmission of the primary structure, as well as the laws for solving equations and logic transmission of tissues or organs. That is, it acts as the post office for the external tissue or organ as it transmits information to the post office of another tissue or organ. It then transmits this information to the logical equation structure diagram in the memory from the post office; tissues and organs also have the ability to solve equations, and the variable obtained is sent to its corresponding element or other tissue or organ post office. Other tissue or organ post offices are forwarded to their own element mailboxes, generating both information reasoning and structural reasoning.

4.5.6 Advanced Structure Communication

① Emulating the nervous system described in life theory, postal pathways are established and referred to as "nerves". Nerves are organs or tissues controlled by the subjective initiative organization. The subjective initiative in elementary structures operates based on physical laws, while in intermediate structures, it functions according to environmental laws. In advanced structures, the subjective initiative is directed by the brain. Advanced structures possess nerves, while intermediate structures have post offices, and elementary structures contain mailboxes.

The advanced structure features three layers of structural diagrams of the logical equation, consisting of logical equation structural diagrams for elements, for tissues or organs, and for brain memory. The variables from the internal primary or intermediate input to the brain memory are solved by the subjective initiative function located in the brain memory. The value obtained is then transmitted via nerves to the tissue or organ mailbox, which sends them on to the element mailbox, leading to information reasoning and structural reasoning. The logical equation structural diagram of the brain memory can also be transmitted to the outside through the output organs of the advanced logical structure.

② Internal networks for logical subjects are used for information reasoning

Non-living entities perform reasoning through mailboxes, by means of various elements solving equations. The sending and receiving of variables within mailboxes trigger logical and structural changes, affecting relevant scientific equations. Plants utilize "post office reasoning", where organs and tissues solve equations. Post offices within organs and tissues of intermediate structures receive and transmit variables, which are then relayed to elemental mailboxes, inducing logical and structural changes, and impacting the plant-related equations. Animals and humans employ brain-based reasoning, with nerves transmitting different variables. This involves the brain solving equations, with nerves acting as messengers, organs and tissues receiving and transmitting through their post offices, and elemental mailboxes performing similar functions. These processes result in changes within life equations.

③ Internal networks for logical subjects are used for information-based structure control

Information reasoning triggers logical changes, leading to changes in the structural diagram of the logical equation and changes in other variables. Any changes in new variables and other values may change the data of the control structure, giving rise to the formation of another control structure. For example, when a person walks and becomes anxious, they increase the variable of step frequency, which in turn changes the logical equation structure diagram related to the human body. These changes in the structural diagram results in changes to the body structure, leading to an increased pace in the person's walking speed.

④ Internal networks for logical subjects are used for structural reasoning

Based on life theory, variables within logical equations control the equations themselves, which in turn control the structure, giving rise to structural reasoning. For instance, when a person feels thirsty, the "thirst" variable within the drinking water equation changes, leading to an increase in the "drinking action" variable within that same equation. This creates a new logical equation within the individual's brain, representing the subjective initiative to drink a large amount of water. This equation is transmitted through nerves, organ and tissue post offices, and elemental mailboxes, ultimately leading to a variable group instructing the body to consume a large quantity of water, giving rise to structural reasoning. Information reasoning involves generating a goal, while structural reasoning involves generating the means and processes.

4.5.7 Artificial Intelligence Communication

Artificial intelligence communication shares similarities with both computer communication and human brain communication. Studying human brain communication is crucial for advancing artificial intelligence. This involves analyzing both internal network communication within a logical subject and external network communication through logical networks. The research object in artificial intelligence communication is the communication of the structure of subjective initiative, specifically the life communication processes within advanced logical structures.

4.5.8 Robot Communication

Robot communication also involves logical subject communication. However, instead of emulating the human brain, it draws inspiration from the entire human system, entailing communication within both internal and external networks of a logical subject composed of a structure of subjective initiative and various controlled machines. This type of life communication is a novel endeavor for humanity, demanding both imagination and a spirit of innovation.

4.5.9 Intelligent Society Communication

Communication within an intelligent society focuses on the artificial channels and external network communication within an intelligent society, essentially studying logical networks.

① Logical Network Communication

The logical network is an attribute of the logical field, and this attribute arises due to extensive interactions and widespread modifications within the logical structure of the logical field.

② Logical Network Communication within Elementary Structures Only

Logical subjects consisting solely of elementary structures are objective structures devoid of life. Logical network communication within these structures involves interactions and modified transmissions influencing elemental mailboxes to transmit logical equations. After this external transmission, internal transmission occurs, leading to structural changes resulting from the logical equations. These changes then trigger further modified transmissions externally. Information here refers to equation units.

③ Logical Network Communication within Intermediate Structures

Logical network communication within intermediate structures occurs at two levels: the previously described elementary structure logical network communication, and communication through post offices within organs and tissues driven by environmental variables. The information transmitted in both cases is in the form of equation units sent through interactions and modified transmissions. Upon receiving equation units, post offices transmit them internally to elemental mailboxes, similar to the previously described internal network. After completing communication at both levels, the logical subject transmits modified equation units externally through both post offices and mailboxes.

④ Logical Network Communication within Advanced Structures

Logical network communication within advanced structures operates at three levels, encompassing the two levels of communication present in intermediate structures and an additional layer involving the brain, nerves, and sensory organs. The communication process below the intermediate structure level functions as previously described. The third level utilizes sensory organs to receive various equation units, the brain to process them, and nerves to output modified transmissions.

5. The Theory of Life Reasoning Activities

5.1 The Purpose of the Logical Structure School and the Theory of Life Reasoning Activities

The purpose of the Logical Structure School is to "use objective logic to research problems and subjective logic to solve them". Following this principle, the school uses objective logic to construct the objective structure of a logical subject, before using subjective logic to construct its subjective structure. This subjective structure embodies consciousness. This chapter, along with the following four (The Theory of Life Cycles, The Theory of Life Data, The Theory of Life Programming, and Life Learning Strategies), delves into the study of consciousness within logical subjects, particularly focusing on the consciousness of the structure of subjective initiative, as well as that of the three main intelligent entities: artificial intelligence, robots, and intelligent society.

In traditional computer science, the objective structure is akin to hardware, while the subjective structure corresponds to software. Humanity asserts its control over computers by using software to manipulate hardware, essentially reflecting the act of human consciousness controlling the machine. Through bionic principles, we understand that if human consciousness could be translated into biological language, it could then also control the human body as an objective structure. The Logical Structure School utilizes life-giving logical equation structure diagrams to depict the subjective structure of logical subjects. This representation serves three main purposes: it enables people to induce the desired consciousness within logical subjects through their subjective structures; it allows logical subjects to develop the necessary autonomous consciousness through their subjective structures; and it enables logical subjects to be controlled using either human-induced consciousness or the logical subject's own autonomous consciousness. Regardless of its origin, the consciousness of a logical subject must possess the ability to control the subject itself; this represents the fundamental requirement for intelligence. This chapter examines how life-giving logical equation structure diagrams express consciousness within logical subjects, and how this expressed consciousness exerts control over the logical subject.

5.2 Structure of Subjective Initiative and the Theory of Life Reasoning Activities

The primary research object within intelligence research is the structure of subjective initiative, which is essentially a logical subject. Artificial intelligence represents a single structure of subjective initiative, while robots embody a structure of subjective initiative equipped with a set of machines, and intelligent societies consist of multiple structures of subjective initiative along with their communication networks. The structure of subjective initiative requires consciousness to control its objective structure. This consciousness can be either human-induced or autonomous. Life-giving logical equation structure diagrams serve as the tool for expressing consciousness. Upon activation, a structure diagram represents the consciousness of the subjective initiative and gains the ability to control its objective structure.

A life-giving logical equation structure diagram is used to control a logical subject, something which is achieved through the manipulation of variables within the diagram, enabling life activities. In essence, variable reasoning facilitates the realization of life activities.

5.3 Subjective Initiative Structure Engineering and the Theory of Life Reasoning Activities

Subjective initiative structure engineering encompasses three processes: producing artificial intelligence, producing robots, and producing intelligent societies, all of which involve the production of both objective and subjective structures. Producing subjective structures entails constructing and activating life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. These diagrams are used to express the consciousness of the structure of subjective initiative, including both human-induced and autonomous consciousness. This consciousness, in turn, governs the objective structure.

5.4 Life-giving Logical Equation Structure Diagrams and the Theory of Life Reasoning Activities

The primary tool for studying and developing the subjective structure of logical subjects is the life-giving logical equation structure diagram. When activated, this diagram embodies the subjective structure of logical subjects, logical networks and logical fields, allowing logical subjects to generate either human-induced or autonomous consciousness. Studying the consciousness and objective structure control of an intelligent machine equates to analyzing and developing its corresponding equation structure diagram.

5.5 Bionic Logic and the Theory of Life Reasoning Activities

The complete toolkit for studying consciousness within the structure of subjective initiative consists of three components: bionic logic, life-giving logical equation structure diagrams, and logical mathematics and physics. Logical physics facilitates the bionic process, logical mathematics aids in constructing logical equations, while bionic logic plays a critical role in simulating the emergence and operational principles of human consciousness to construct further consciousness within the structure of subjective initiative. If simulation proves infeasible, artificial design can be employed.

5.6 Case Study

The equation unit generator within a life-giving logical equation structure diagram is tasked with generating new equation units. This functionality endows the logical equation structure diagram with human-like thinking capabilities. The complexity and dimensionality of intelligence hinge upon the sophistication of the equation unit generator, while the advancement of a structure of subjective initiative is directly related to the advancement of its equation unit generator. In science fiction, robots exhibiting human-level intelligence possess equation unit generators capable of human-like thought processes. The technological roadmap for the development of artificial intelligence, robots and intelligent societies is essentially the roadmap for the development of their respective equation unit generators. Enhancing the life activity capabilities and learning abilities of the structure of subjective initiative relies heavily on the advancement of the equation unit generator.

5.7 Proposing the Fifth Applied Classical Theory

This section introduces the fifth applied classical theory proposed by the Logical Structure School - Life Reasoning Activities. The school posits that consciousness within logical subjects arises from information reasoning, and that the control exerted by this consciousness over the objective structure stems from structural reasoning. Both information reasoning and structural reasoning contribute to the emergence of life activities within logical subjects. The study of life activities relies on life-giving logical equation structure diagrams to represent consciousness. Analyzing these structure diagrams requires bionic logic and logical mathematics. The key points are as follows:

5.7.1 The Life Activity Process of Logical Subjects

① Constructing and Activating the Life-giving Logical Equation Structure Diagram

For a logical subject to exhibit life and engage in life activities, it must first establish its own life-giving logical equation structure diagram. This structure diagram needs a thorough and robust address system, akin to how all apartments and units within a residential complex require unique addresses, regardless of occupancy. This address system must also allow for seamless expansion.

② Generating Inputs

A single life activity cycle of a logical subject commences with the input of an equation unit into the activated logical subject's equation structure diagram. Equation units encompass constants, variables, equations, systems of equations, and structure diagrams of varying scales. Input methods include mailbox input for elementary structures, post office input for intermediate structures, and sensory organ and nerve input for advanced structures. Equation units entering through elementary structure mailboxes are incorporated into the elementary structure diagram, while those entering through intermediate structure post offices join the intermediate structure diagram, and those entering through advanced structure sensory organs and nerves are integrated into the advanced structure diagram. Crucially, the mailboxes in elementary structures, post offices in intermediate structures, and sensory organs and nerves in advanced structures must all identify suitable addresses for incoming equation units and place them accordingly. In addition, they establish weighted directed paths (with weights indicating order) for variable transmission between incoming equation units and existing equations. This process resembles a company assigning accommodation to newly hired employees.

③ Information Reasoning

The introduction of equation units gives the existing equation structure diagram a new configuration. The equation unit generator then optimizes this new diagram, generating new equation units and weighted directed paths (with weights indicating order) for variable transmission. This inevitably leads to changes in the output of the equation structure diagram. The process of utilizing this new equation structure diagram to compute the new output constitutes "information reasoning." The output also incorporates weights to indicate the order of certain variables. The variable names associated with output variables carry semantic meaning, either describing the specific operation being performed on an object, or indicating a collective term for a batch operation. For instance, the human brain outputting the instruction to "touch ear three times" involves "touching the ear" as the operation object; "eating", on the other hand, represents a collective term for a batch operation, encompassing the various coordinated actions involved in the act of eating.

Note that outputting new variables requires attaching weights to the corresponding variable names to establish their order of output, which subsequently dictates the order of structural reasoning.

④ Control Exerted by Information Reasoning on Logical Subjects

Information reasoning modifies the original equation structure diagram, altering the subjective structure of the logical subject and generating new outputs. These new outputs are then poised to change the objective structure of the logical subject. The modification brought about by information reasoning constitutes its control over the logical subject.

Elementary-level information reasoning results in changes to the subjective structure of elementary structural elements, specifically their logical equation structure diagrams. This represents the influence of elementary-level information reasoning on the elementary structure, leading to elementary control.

Intermediate-level information reasoning encompasses both elementary-level and intermediate-level reasoning processes. This leads to changes to the subjective structure of organs and tissues within intermediate structures, a fact which is also reflected in their logical equation structure diagrams. This represents the impact of intermediate-level information reasoning on the intermediate structure, resulting in intermediate control. Intermediate control can manifest as elementary control, intermediate control, or joint control involving both elementary and intermediate levels.

Advanced-level information reasoning includes both elementary and intermediate levels, along with advanced-level reasoning processes. It induces changes in the subjective structure of the advanced logical structure, specifically its advanced logical equation structure diagram. This represents the influence of advanced-level information reasoning on the advanced structure, giving rise to advanced control. Advanced control encompasses a wider range of possibilities, including elementary control, intermediate control, joint control between elementary and intermediate levels, advanced control, joint control between advanced and elementary levels, joint control between advanced and intermediate levels, and joint control involving all three levels.

⑤ Structural Reasoning

Based on their weights and variable names, the new output values obtained through information reasoning perform actions in a specific order, modifying the objective structure of the logical subject. This process constitutes "structural reasoning".

Due to the changes in the equation structure diagram before and after information reasoning, the structure transitions from one state to another. For instance, if a person initially stands still and then takes a step forward following a process of information reasoning, this movement represents structural reasoning - the act of the body moving forward as dictated by information reasoning. Structural reasoning is of great significance to the development of intelligent machines, and also to the improvement of intelligent control.

⑥ Modified Transmission

After undergoing changes in both its subjective and objective structures, the logical subject transmits modified information to other logical subjects within the logical field.

5.7.2 Information Reasoning

Information reasoning involves three levels: Primary Reasoning, Intermediate Reasoning and Advanced Reasoning:

① Elementary Reasoning

Elementary reasoning refers to information reasoning within elementary structural elements. These elements consist of storage sets, mailboxes, and their own internal structures. Storage sets contain logical equation structure diagrams relevant to the specific element, encompassing material equations, biological equations, and other related data. Mailboxes receive external equation units, including constants for assigning values to variables. Based on the received constants assigned to specific variables, the element's internal structure enables equations to be solved. The resulting solutions for certain variables represent changes within the element's subjective structure. These solutions are then transmitted through the mailbox in the form of modified information. Each transmission of modified information signifies an instance of elementary information reasoning.

② Intermediate Reasoning

Intermediate reasoning encompasses two layers of reasoning: elementary information reasoning and intermediate information reasoning. This type of reasoning utilizes logical equation structure diagrams stored within the memory of the intermediate structure. The memory also stores relevant data, particularly data logic. Post offices within the intermediate structure receive various equation units, including constants for assigning values to specific variables. Based on its internal structure, the intermediate structure solves equations using the assigned variables. The resulting variable solutions represent changes within the logical structure and are transmitted through the post office in the form of modified information. Each transmission of modified information constitutes an instance of intermediate information reasoning.

The two levels of reasoning in the intermediate structure also require communication to achieve interaction.

③ Advanced Reasoning

Advanced reasoning encompasses both elementary and intermediate levels, along with advanced-level reasoning processes. It involves logical equation structure diagrams and relevant data stored within the brain's memory, the advanced logical structure's equation-solving capabilities, and a sensory input. The process begins with sensory organs receiving input in the form of constants for assigning values to variables. This information is transmitted to the brain through nerves, assigning values to variables within equations stored inside the brain's memory. The advanced logical structure, making full use of its ability to solve equations, determines values for specific variables, resulting in changes within the advanced logical structure's subjective structure. These changes are then relayed through nerves to internal post offices or mailboxes, or directly to output organs. Each transmission of modified information signifies an instance of advanced structural information reasoning.

The three levels of advanced reasoning (primary, intermediate and advanced) can communicate with each other, thus performing a process of interaction.

④ When the input received by elementary, intermediate, or advanced structures is not a constant but another equation unit, it will still alter the equation structure diagrams of these structures, prompting them to generate new outputs and modified transmissions.

5.7.3 Laws Governing Life Activities of Logical Subjects

Exploring the laws governing the life activities of logical subjects requires the understanding that these laws are composed of three processes. The first process required is information reasoning, which includes information perception and collection; this might be the information received by sensory organs, such as eyes and ears, in living organisms. This information then undergoes equation analysis, akin to what we commonly refer to as "thinking". In humans and animals, this analysis is usually performed by advanced structures like the brain. In simpler structures, biological and physical reactions replace the role of the brain. Information reasoning produces the necessary output or response information. The second process involves the control exerted by the brain in advanced structures, or by reactions in simpler structures, over the movement of the logical subject's components to generate the required output information. The third process is structural reasoning, which refers to movement and other changes in the logical subject's objective structure driven by the results of the information reasoning. This ultimately results in the desired information output.

People serve as the most important research object when studying life activities. Consider the situation of a person feeling hungry through sensory perception. The information analysis conducted by the person’s brain concludes that they need to eat in order to satiate their hunger. This represents an instance of information reasoning performed by the brain. To achieve the output of feeling full, the brain utilizes the results of information reasoning to direct the body to engage in structural reasoning. This includes a series of actions such as going to a restaurant, paying for food, and consuming it. Ultimately, the act of eating leads to the information output of feeling full.

Life activities are also present in simpler structures. For instance, if a slope experiences loosening of soil and rocks, despite lacking a brain, its physical structure, guided by physical laws, performs equation analysis and deduces the output information of a potential landslide. This information reasoning, governed by physical laws, then controls the slope's structural reasoning, leading to the life activity of a landslide, ultimately resulting in the information output of the landslide occurring.

Studying the life activities of logical subjects is of significant importance for intelligence research.

5.7.4 Life Activities within Intelligent Societies

To study life activities within intelligent societies, we first need to employ life-giving logical equation structure diagrams to represent and activate each logical subject and their communication networks. This creates a model of the logical field and the logical network within the intelligent society. Consider the example of an intelligent factory. The top-level logical subject is the factory manager, intermediate-level logical subjects are represented by middle management personnel, and the base-level logical subjects are workers, embodied by robots (subject + machine). These logical subjects communicate with each other through the logical network within the logical field of the intelligent factory. When the factory manager (logical subject) receives an input in the form of an equation unit, they engage in information reasoning and structural reasoning. Finally, the factory manager transmits modified information (work instructions) to the management personnel (logical subjects), after which the management personnel then perform their own information reasoning and structural reasoning before relaying modified information to the worker robots, assigning them tasks. The worker robots, after conducting their own information reasoning and structural reasoning, also transmit modified information, which represents the execution of their assigned work. Of course, the management personnel also send feedback in the form of modified transmissions back to the factory manager, and the worker robots similarly provide feedback to the management personnel.

The functioning of intelligent armies and intelligent governance follows a similar pattern. However, the Logical Structure School is currently not involved in studying armies or governance.

6. The Theory of Life Cycles

6.1 Purpose of the Logical Structure School and the Theory of Life Cycles

The Logical Structure School advocates "using objective logic to study issues and subjective logic to solve them". Studying subjective logic necessitates exploring consciousness, and understanding consciousness requires examining its temporal dimension, namely, life cycles. Consciousness resides within life itself, and life and its associated life activities necessitates temporal regulation. Similarly, consciousness and the life activities governed by it require temporal frameworks. Therefore, intelligence research must delve into the study of time, specifically the study of life cycles.

6.2 Structure of Subjective Initiative and the Theory of Life Cycles

The study of the structure of subjective initiative conducted by the Logical Structure School draws heavily on the logic of emulating humans. Human logic inherently operates within temporal constraints, implying that human life unfolds within a life cycle, and even human society itself has a life cycle. Consequently, any research on the structure of subjective initiative must consider the theory of life cycles.

6.3 Subjective Initiative Structure Engineering and the Theory of Life Cycles

The Logical Structure School's approach to subjective initiative structure engineering also emphasizes bionic principles, mimicking the logic underlying human life processes. Consequently, the engineering phases within subjective initiative structure engineering are modeled after human life stages. The ultimate goal is to achieve a defined life cycle for the engineered product, inspired by various human life cycles, since human life cycles are considered to be the most rational and scientifically sound intelligent cycles.

6.4 Life-giving Logical Equation Structure Diagrams and the Theory of Life Cycles

The theory of life cycles is both studied and implemented by means of life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. Similar to other structural components within a logical subject, the specific structure diagram responsible for depicting and realizing life cycles is termed the "clock equation system". Note that the clock equation system also requires activation, following the same activation principles as other structure diagrams.

6.5 Bionic Logic and the Theory of Life Cycles

The theory of life cycles proposed by the Logical Structure School is deeply rooted in bionic logic research, drawing inspiration from the human body and human society. The temporal cycles governing life and life activities are modeled after those observed in humans and human societies, while the temporal cycles of consciousness and conscious activities are inspired by the human brain.

6.6 Case Study

Many people fantasize about having perfect memory, of never forgetting anything. This would enable them to effortlessly recall information after a single exposure, excelling in any exam. However, this notion is fundamentally flawed. Without forgetting, doubt cannot exist. Without doubt, there would be no opportunity to exercise the imagination and creativity needed for exploration. If early humans were perpetually fixated on the danger of fire, constantly reminding themselves to avoid it, how could they have studied and harnessed its power? Similarly, if humanity clung to the belief that Earth was the center of the universe, how could we have discovered that it actually revolves around the Sun? The same principle applies to life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. If these diagrams remained immutable, how could the equation unit generator exist to construct new diagrams, simulating thought processes and generating new knowledge? Forgetting, in its proper form, is essential for human survival and development. This "correct" form of forgetting things necessitates life and consciousness operating within temporal frameworks, implying the need for life cycles to regulate consciousness, conscious activities, life itself, and life activities. Life cycles ensure the adaptability of equation structure diagrams, allowing the equation unit generator to function effectively by capitalizing on this adaptability. This, in turn, enables the equation unit generator to simulate thought processes and generate new knowledge.

6.7 Introducing the Sixth Applied Classical Theory

This section introduces the sixth applied classical theory proposed by the Logical Structure School - Life Cycles. The key points are as follows:

6.7.1 Why Study Life Cycles?

① Both Life Attributes and Life Activity Attributes Require Time

Life attributes inherently necessitate time. Plants, animals and humans all possess lifespans and undergo growth processes governed by time. Life activity attributes also require time. Plants follow temporal cues for flowering and fruiting. Animals adhere to time-based patterns when foraging. Humans exhibit circadian rhythms, influencing their sleep cycles and work schedules.

② The Beginning and End of Life and Life Activities are Defined by Time

The commencement of life is marked by time, evident in events like birth dates in humans, or germination seasons in plants. Similarly, the end of life is also time-dependent, with the lifespans of plants, animals, and humans determining their time of demise. The initiation and termination of life activities are also governed by time. For instance, pollination, flowering, and fruiting in plants adhere to specific temporal windows. In the same way, fertilization, pregnancy, and birth in animals all follow time-based patterns. This is even more pronounced in humans, where education and employment are bound by specific time-frames. Even the organization of human society relies on time to define the start and end points of various life activities.

③ Consciousness Attributes Require Time, and the Beginning and End of Consciousness are Determined by Time

The attributes of consciousness are inherently time-dependent, and the emergence and cessation of consciousness are also time-bound. The Logical Structure School focuses on consciousness modeled after the logic of human consciousness. Both individual human consciousness and the collective consciousness of human society operate within temporal constraints. For instance, the consciousness associated with preparing for exams arises during a student's academic life, with its beginning and end points marked by enrollment and graduation dates. Similarly, work-related consciousness in human society emerges during an individual's period of legal employment, with its start and end points dictated by working hours, employment commencement, and retirement.

④ Consciousness Utilizes Time to Control Life Activities

Emulating human logic reveals that humans frequently employ time as a regulatory mechanism for their life activities. This is evident in activities such as commuting to work, picking up children after work, and sleeping at night. Most methods employed by individual human consciousness, and by the collective consciousness of human society to control life activities, involve temporal frameworks.

⑤ Establish Life Cycles for Bionic Consciousness

Given the inherent temporal nature of life attributes, life activity attributes, consciousness attributes, and their time-dependent beginning and end points, combined with the observation that consciousness utilizes time to regulate life activities, the Logical Structure School deems it essential to establish a theory of life cycles when emulating human consciousness logic. This idea is a crucial component of intelligence theory.

6.7.2 Representing Life Cycles and Lifetimes Using Clock Equation Systems

The method employed to establish the theory of life cycles and to represent life cycles and lifetimes is the "clock equation system". This system encompasses constants, variables, equations, systems of equations, and equation units of varying scales. Internally, it utilizes directed paths for transmitting constants and variables to facilitate communication between equations. Externally, it employs directed paths for sending constants and variables to external equations, regulating the cycles of life, life activities, consciousness, and those life activities governed by consciousness.

Note that the clock equation system also incorporates an equation unit generator, enabling the generation of new clock equations. This reflects real-world phenomena like the potential for extending human lifespans or increasing working years.

6.7.3 Transmission and Storage of Clock Equation Systems

We understand that both artificial channels within logical networks, and internal channels within logical subjects, are responsible for transmitting equation units. These units include constants, variables, equations, systems of equations, and equation units of varying scales. The clock equation system becomes part of this transmission process by attaching itself to these transmitted equation units. This is achieved by establishing directed paths for transmitting clock constants or clock variables, connecting the paths to the equations within the original equation units.

The storage of clock equation systems follows a specific mechanism: the equation system accompanying a transmitted equation unit is stored alongside the unit itself. Clock constants or clock variables transmitted to equation variables are stored within the corresponding variable's description set, attribute set, and function set. In turn, these sets can be represented within an equation structure diagram.

6.7.4 The Life Cycle of Logical Subjects

① Clocks within Logical Subjects

Logical subjects possess clocks at three levels: clocks within elementary level elements, clocks within intermediate level organs and tissues, and clocks within the advanced level brain.

The clock within the element determines the lifecycle of the element. This clock is a logical equation structure diagram that generates the value of the lifecycle variable, which can also trigger information reasoning and structural reasoning.

The clock in the tissues or organs determines their lifecycle. This clock remains as a structural diagram of a logical equation, still generating the value of the lifecycle variable of these tissues or organs, and can also trigger both information reasoning and structural reasoning.

The clock in the brain determines its lifecycle. This clock remains as a logical equation structure diagram, still generating the value of lifecycle variables for the brain, which can also trigger information and structural reasoning.

② The Life Cycle of the Structure of Subjective Initiative

The Logical Structure School primarily focuses on the structure of subjective initiative when studying logical subjects. Taking humans as an example, intelligence persists as long as the brain remains active. Once the brain ceases to function, intelligence also vanishes. The core of the advanced structure within a logical subject is the structure of subjective initiative. This structure forms the brain, which possesses a clock. The life cycle variable of this clock is determined by a logical equation structure diagram. The brain's structure is responsible for solving the clock equation to determine the value of the life cycle variable. This variable, in turn, dictates the brain's ability to survive, as well as the presence or absence of intelligence within the advanced logical subject. The life cycle variable of the structure of subjective initiative possesses both information reasoning and structural reasoning capabilities.

7. The Theory of Life Data

7.1 The Purpose of the Logical Structure School and the Theory of Life Data

Guided by its core principles, the Logical Structure School proposes a theory of life data. This theory advocates replacing raw data with class data, shifting from centralized raw data storage in databases to distributed class data within the value sets of variables across equation structure diagrams. It also advocates the substitution of statistical analysis with equation analysis, leveraging equation unit generators to create logical equation units instead of relying on databases to produce statistical results.

7.2 Structure of Subjective Initiative and the Theory of Life Data

Class data within the structure of subjective initiative resides within the value sets of variables across various equation structure diagrams, specifically those associated with elementary structures, intermediate structures, and advanced structures. This implies that data is inherently linked to and dependent upon life-giving logical equation structure diagrams.

7.3 Subjective Initiative Structure Engineering and the Theory of Life Data

Subjective initiative structure engineering encompasses the creation of structures for subjective initiative, which translates to the production of life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. This process involves constructing equation unit generators, logical equations, variable sets, and the address system required for the equation structure diagram.

7.4 Life-giving Logical Equation Structure Diagrams and the Theory of Life Data

Within the framework of life data theory, data is intrinsically linked to life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. Databases, in this context, are represented by the value sets of individual equation variables, and data analysis in life data theory is synonymous with logical equation analysis, a form of logical mathematical analysis. The results of this analysis are not statistical data but rather empower the equation unit generator to produce equation units, simulating thought processes and generating new knowledge within intelligent machines.

7.5 Case Study

Traditional data analysis often generates indices, such as economic indices. However, life data theory uses life-giving logical equation structure diagrams for data analysis. Index calculation formulas are transformed into structure diagrams, shifting economic index analysis to economic structure diagram analysis. Utilizing complex analysis, clock analysis, and analysis powered by equation unit generators, equation units are produced to replace indices. This revolutionizes economic index research and extends its applicability to other domains. Structure diagram analysis enables both comprehensive analysis and cross-domain analysis.

7.6 Introducing the Seventh Applied Classical Theory

The Logical Structure School introduces the seventh applied classical theory - Life Data. The key points are as follows:

7.6.1 Replacing Raw Data with Class Data

The data found within life data is class data. Each data point comprises a description set, an attribute set, and a function set. These sets for a single data point can be represented within an equation structure diagram. Similarly, all values of a variable, representing a group of data, can also be depicted within a single diagram. Extending this principle, an equation structure diagram can accommodate equations, variables within equations, variable sets, and all class data within those value sets. Traditional data is considered raw data, consisting only of descriptions. Life data replaces this raw data with class data.

7.6.2 Replacing Centralized Storage with Distributed Storage

Life data is distributed across the value sets of variables within equation structure diagrams, adhering to a distributed storage model. Conversely, traditional data is centralized within databases. Life data replaces centralized database storage with a distributed approach.

7.6.3 Replacing Database Analysis with Equation Structure Diagram Analysis

Traditional data analysis involves mathematical analysis of raw data that is centrally stored within databases. In contrast, data analysis within life data entails logical mathematical analysis of class data that resides within the value sets of variables across equation structure diagrams. This form of logical mathematical analysis is termed "equation analysis". Equation analysis encompasses the following key points:

① Structure Diagram Complexity and Analysis: This analysis allows for the presence of massive amounts of class data within variable sets and the storage of this data within equation structure diagrams;

② Clock Equation Systems and Analysis: This analysis assigns "life" to data, imbuing it with temporal properties, enabling data activation and termination;

③ New Data Generated by Equation Unit Generators Replacing Traditional Data Analysis Indices: Data analysis in life data is ultimately performed by the equation unit generator. The output of this analysis is not a set of statistical indices but rather new equation units, new variable sets generated by these equation units, and new variables themselves. Unlike traditional data analysis, which utilizes functions to produce indices, data analysis in life data employs equation analysis. This equation analysis leverages the equation unit generator to perform data analysis, generating new equations, new variables, and new variable sets, ultimately leading to thought processes and the generation of new knowledge through data analysis.

7.6.4 Logical Relations

Previous discussions covered theories such as logical fields, logical networks, and modified transmission. Logical fields give rise to logical relations as a result of interactions, logical networks transmit logical relations, while modified transmission reflects the influence of logical relations on logical subjects. Logical relations encompass all forms of interaction between logical subjects. This section introduces a unified representation for logical relations: they are considered to be a type of logical subject themselves, and are described and activated using life-giving logical equation structure diagrams.

7.6.5 Class Data

Class data is stored within the value sets of equation variables in life-giving logical equation structure diagrams, defined as follows:

Class Data = Description Set + Attribute Set + Function Set;

The description set provides a description of the class data, the attribute set contains  the logical equations that define attributes, while the function set houses the logical equations that determine functionality. If the attribute set and function set are omitted, leaving only the description set, the class data reverts to raw data.

Class data specifically refers to data within the framework of life data theory, representing a class endowed with logical meaning within equations. This class includes description sets, attribute sets, and function sets, distinguishing it from traditional raw data through its class structure. Statistical operations, calculations, and processing of class data can target records within the description, attribute, and function fields. Class data can also exist in simplified forms; for instance, it might contain only descriptions, omitting all attributes and functions, essentially mirroring raw data. Class data is the preferred data type within the Logical Structure School.

7.6.6 Data Class Groups

All class data within a variable's value set constitute a data class group, referred to as a "class group". Examples include student records within a class, or vehicle registration data for all motor vehicles in the city of Guangzhou. Data class groups represent a novel form of database or data storage. However, as the Logical Structure School aims to revolutionize data science and advocate the abolition of traditional databases and data science, the terms "database" and "data storage" are avoided here, replaced by the concept of "data class groups".

7.6.7 Data Class Group Interaction

Data class group interaction, referred to as "interaction", aims to construct logical equations.

Interaction research represents an advanced stage of logical analysis and logical mining, and the Logical Structure School considers it both a high-level stage of logical equation analysis and a critical step in empowering the equation unit generator to construct logical equations. Interaction research necessitates dedicated research methods. These methods emerge by first combining the object sets of both interacting entities into a unified set - the future logical equation. Each object set corresponds to a variable, and methods are then derived by analyzing the patterns within this unified set. For instance, consider the interaction between COVID-19 outbreaks in Hong Kong and Shenzhen. Each outbreak represents a data set. Studying their interaction requires merging these datasets and identifying common data attributes or trends related to the outbreaks. This can lead to the formulation of a set of logical equations describing the relationship between the two outbreaks. Similarly, when studying the interaction between water quality data and aquatic species data in a pond, both datasets are merged. This merged set represents the future logical equation. The two original datasets correspond to two variables. Elements within the merged set shall incorporate the constraint of water quality impact on each aquatic species element. Interaction research can utilize various advanced techniques and mathematical tools.

Research on data class group interaction involves combining two or more data class groups into a single entity, forming the basis for a future logical equation. This can be considered an addition operation. At least two types of addition operations have been proposed. The first type involves simple set merging, as demonstrated in the Hong Kong and Shenzhen outbreak interaction example, where both datasets share similar data properties. The second type involves embedding the water quality data class group into each element of the aquatic species data class group, as illustrated in the fish pond example. Further exploration is encouraged to discover further addition operations and other operations between data class groups, along with their associated interpretations. Interaction represents an advanced stage of logical analysis and logical mining. This research should incorporate the relevant social or natural laws that govern the research objects.

Research on data class connections and mutual interference of data class groups can make extensive use of various theoretical results from discrete mathematics. Research on data class connections and mutual interference of data class groups requires the application of many theories present in group theory.

Consider an example involving social laws. We have data class groups representing housing prices, food prices, employment, income, stock prices, and public satisfaction. Without knowledge of their patterns of interaction, we create a unified set by connecting these data class groups using indices derived from their respective datasets. This unified set represents the future logical equation. By observing the real-time fluctuations and interactions between the indices, we can identify interaction patterns and use them to design new operations connecting the data classes within the unified set. This ultimately leads to a logical equation that can monitor socioeconomic and political developments, as well as explore strategies for influencing the core logical variable of public satisfaction.

Similarly, an example involving natural laws can be constructed using the same approach. By creating a unified set from indices representing various factors that influence atmospheric temperature, again representing the future logical equation, we can study the forms of interaction between these data class groups. Once patterns are identified, we can design connecting operations and create a new unified set representing the new logical equation. This equation can then monitor interaction patterns and explore methods for modifying atmospheric temperature, the core logical variable.

7.6.8 Data Class Group Interaction Empowering Equation Unit Generator to Construct Logical Equations

Research on data class group interaction has the potential to empower the equation unit generator to construct logical equations, fostering thought processes and knowledge generation within logical subjects. This holds immense promise for humanity, with the possibility of obtaining advanced mathematical tools that are capable of creating highly intelligent machines.

Data class group interaction operations can take at least two forms. In the first form, an operation is designed to connect various data class groups into a unified set. By analyzing the dynamic changes within this set, which is driven by real-time variable fluctuations, interaction patterns are identified and represented as logical equations. In the second form, pre-existing knowledge of interaction patterns guides the design of connecting operations, merging data class groups into a unified set. This unified set can be expressed as a logical equation, with each data class group corresponding to a specific variable. Monitoring the dynamic changes of key logical variables allows us to understand the dynamic developments within relevant social or natural systems.

7.6.9 Distributed Data in its Native State

A core guiding principle within this theory is bionic logic, whose goal is to emulate the data characteristics exhibited by the life activities of plants, animals, and humans. This involves establishing a novel data science paradigm that emphasizes data as being "alive", inherently connected, distributed, and attached to its context. In this way, data analysis evolves into object analysis and group analysis, essentially becoming a form of logical equation analysis. Data regulation shifts from centralized database control to the regulation of data attached to legal entities, moving away from the centralized, unified database model of the industrial age and the era of machine data. This paves the way for the invention of life data in the age of artificial intelligence, a data science framework that is aligned more closely with human nature. Data, in this context, exists in its native state, inherently linked to life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. It resides within the value sets of variables within these diagrams, represented as class data and data class groups.

7.6.10 Equation Analysis

Equation analysis replaces traditional data analysis, with the underlying logic used being that of the corresponding logical equations. Equation analysis encompasses large-scale complex analysis. For instance, in a population census, traditional data analysis involves collecting and centralizing data taken from individuals, conducting analysis, and then implementing new population policies back onto those individuals, following a path that can be summarized as object-database-object. Data logic, on the other hand, replaces the database with an equation structure diagram, and data analysis with equation analysis. The structure of the equation structure diagram can be simplified through research, making it potentially even simpler than a database, further showcasing its advantages.

7.6.11 Class Data within Elementary Structures

Class data within elementary structures is stored within the storage set of the element. This data can form data class groups (variables) and engage in class group interaction (logical equations). The class data obtained in this way is both attached and distributed, linked to the element and its structure diagram. Communication of class data occurs through the element's mailbox. Statistical operations, calculations, processing and editing are performed through the inherent attribute and function sets. Data class groups can combine their attribute and function sets to generate logical equations, effectively replacing databases. The logical effect of class data is realized by assigning values to variables within various logical equations, thereby influencing the element's logical equation structure diagram.

7.6.12 Class Data within Intermediate Structures

Data logic within intermediate structures operates at two levels: the data logic of the elementary structure and the data logic specific to the intermediate structure. Class data is stored within the memory of organs and tissues. This data can form class groups (variables) and class group interaction (logical equations). It is both attached to and distributed among the organ or tissue. Editing class data (variables), class groups (variables), and class group interactions (logical equations) within the memory can utilize the description sets, attribute sets, and function sets of individual data points, as well as their integrated forms. The logical influence on the organ or tissue is achieved by assigning values to various logical equations, causing changes in variables and subsequently impacting the organ or tissue. The memory of the organ or tissue can communicate with the storage set of the elements, displaying a distributed nature.

7.6.13 Class Data within Advanced Structures

Data logic within advanced structures functions at three levels: the first two levels encompass the data logic of elementary and intermediate structures, while the third level is specific to the advanced structure. Class data within the advanced structure is stored in brain memory. The capacity of brain memory exceeds that of the memory in organs and tissues, which in turn surpasses the capacity of the storage set within elements. Brain memory is able to accommodate large-scale data class groups (multiple variables) and large-scale class group interactions (large-scale logical equation units). Editing involves the large-scale integration of description sets, attribute sets and function sets, while the logical effect on the logical structure remains the assignment of values to logical equations within the brain, just at a much larger scale, thus representing "thought". Brain memory communicates with the external world through nerves and sensory organs (learning) and can also communicate with the memory of organs and tissues. Through nerves, it is also able to communicate with the storage sets of elements, in a distributed nature.

8. The Theory of Life Programming

8.1 The Purpose of the Logical Structure School and the Theory of Life Programming

The Logical Structure School advocates "using objective logic to study issues and subjective logic to solve them". Life programming aims to realize both these principles, by defining life programs as life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. Note that the "equation unit generator", a key component within the structure diagram, lies at the heart of life programs, responsible for their thought processes and intelligence. The equation unit generator represents the technological breakthrough required for "using objective logic to study issues and subjective logic to solve them".

8.2 Structure of Subjective Initiative and the Theory of Life Programming

Traditional software runs programs using statements to construct flowcharts. Life programming, on the other hand, employs equation structure diagrams to build logical subjects. A key distinction here is that traditional software lacks the ability to automatically generate programs, while life programs possess the "equation unit generator" specifically for this purpose.  For the first time, this equation unit generator also endows artificial programs with thinking capabilities, eliminating the need for data-driven training, akin to training lower-level animals to mimic intelligence, as seen in traditional software. This represents a significant leap forward in bionic logic being applied to artificial software, guiding human programming towards the correct path of simulating human intelligence using equation unit generators.

8.3 Subjective Initiative Structure Engineering and the Theory of Life Programming

The focus of traditional software engineering is on fulfilling requirements expressed through flowcharts, similar to constructing a building. Life software engineering, however, concentrates on the equation unit generator, using it to realize potential future requirements. This is like building a brain, or even constructing life itself.

8.4 Life-giving Logical Equation Structure Diagrams and the Theory of Life Programming

Life programming involves designing and implementing equation structure diagrams. The core of the programming lies in designing and implementing the equation unit generator, and empowering it to generate new equation units. The quality of programming hinges upon the quality of the equation unit generator. A more capable equation unit generator signifies higher quality programming and greater intelligence within the program. This, in turn, reflects a higher level of intelligence within the life program itself.

8.5 Bionic Logic and the Theory of Life Programming

Life programming involves designing and implementing equation structure diagrams, while the design of both equations and structure diagrams necessitates bionic theory and research. Bionic theory encompasses bionic principles and logical physics. As life programs strive for intelligence, the emphasis here is on emulating the human brain through bionic principles.

8.6 Case Study

The large models currently used employ vast amounts of textual or image data for knowledge extraction and learning, generating models with billions of parameters. However, this approach to simulating intelligence suffers from several drawbacks. Firstly, the data and computational costs are exorbitant, hindering deeper research into intelligence. Secondly, the path towards intelligence development is scientifically unsound, resembling the training of animals. For instance, training a dog to stand involves rewarding it with a treat for complying with a command and punishing it for disobedience. This method is unlikely to achieve human-level intelligence. In essence, training machine intelligence using massive amounts of data is inefficient, akin to using industrial-age techniques to try to satisfy the needs of the intelligent age. This represents a misguided path. The correct path for developing intelligence in the intelligent age lies in discovering new theories and technologies specifically tailored to this era. The Logical Structure School proposes logical mathematics as a new theory, and the equation unit generator as a new technology. Machine thinking capabilities need not rely on the data-intensive training employed by large models. Instead, logical mathematics can be leveraged to create equation unit generators capable of producing new equation units, equations, variables, and variable sets. Technologies specific to the intelligent age should be used, in order to create machine thinking for the intelligent society. In this way, an approach that is more like training puppies will be replaced with human learning and development, eliminating the popular large models with equation unit generators, and replacing industrial society's data training with the logical data analysis methods of an intelligent society.

The Logical Structure School aims to replace today’s large models with equation unit generators as the cornerstone of intelligence research.

8.7 Introducing the Eighth Applied Classical Theory

The Logical Structure School introduces the eighth applied classical theory - Life Programming. The key points are as follows:

8.7.1 Basic Forms of Life Programs

The fundamental basis of life programs is the life-giving logical engineering structure diagram, which exists at two levels:

First Level: Logical equations, systems of logical equations, logical equation structure diagrams, logical equation files, logical equation books, logical equation disciplinary compilations, and logical equation academic system compilations.

Second Level: Elementary structures, intermediate structures, and advanced structures.

A common practice in computer software design involves decomposing complex tasks into simpler subtasks to reduce workload. Intelligent programming adopts this principle, using simple, fundamental equations to construct structure diagrams, replacing complex equations with sets of simple equations. This facilitates the operation of the equation unit generator. Similarly, variable transmission paths are designed to connect only consecutive equations, with longer paths achieved by chaining multiple equations together.

8.7.2 Basic Components of Life Programs

① Basic Structure Diagram

The basic structure diagram comprises nodes and paths. Nodes represent simple and fundamental equations, while paths depict the transmission routes for variables between consecutive equations.

Depending on their scale, these diagrams are categorized as logical equations, systems of logical equations, logical equation structure diagrams, logical equation files, logical equation books, logical equation disciplinary compilations, and logical equation academic system compilations.

Based on their intelligent structure, they are categorized as elementary structures, intermediate structures, and advanced structures.

② Clock Equation System Structure Diagram

The clock equation system structure diagram also consists of nodes and paths. Nodes represent simple and fundamental clock equations, while paths depict the transmission routes for variables between consecutive clock equations.

Clock equation system structure diagrams are categorized as clock equations, systems of clock equations, clock equation structure diagrams, elementary complex clock equation structure diagrams, intermediate complex clock equation structure diagrams, advanced complex clock equation structure diagrams, and special complex clock equation structure diagrams. The hierarchy of clock equation system structure diagrams fully maps to the hierarchy of basic structure diagrams.

The final path segment within the variable transmission paths of clock equations within the clock equation system structure diagram always connects to various equations within the basic structure diagram, defining the clock for these equations or their corresponding variables.

③ Communication System

Both basic structure diagrams and clock equation system structure diagrams necessitate their own communication systems. These systems are comprised of three components: post offices, directed lines for variable transmission, and directed lines for clock variable transmission. Post offices are responsible for inputting and outputting all equation units (logical information). It is important to note that, emulating collective travel and return in human societies, individual logical equation structure diagram units can receive and send themselves as long as they possess well-defined addresses. Directed lines for variable transmission and clock variable transmission refer to the establishment of transmission routes for the relevant variables between various equations.

④ Equation Unit Generator

The equation unit generator is designed to generate new equation units, and this capability endows the logical equation structure diagram with human-like thought processes.

⑤ Address Systems

Making use of hardware, memory, and external storage, dedicated address systems are provided for the basic structure diagram, clock equation system structure diagram, communication system, and equation unit generator. This involves creating internal encoding within the machine for real-world address names, drawing upon the experience of traditional computer science and computer network technology in designing address systems.

⑥ Multimodal Interface

Logical equation structure diagrams can represent information in various modalities. Equations, systems of equations, and structure diagrams can express information modalities of varying scales. Variables serve as components within a modality. Equations combine these components into unified modal units. Clock equation systems are established to control and express the temporal characteristics of multimodal information displays. Post offices, directed lines for variable transmission, and directed lines for clock variable transmission are employed to organize different units within the multimodal information, forming a comprehensive multimodal communication system. By realizing the aforementioned functionalities, logical equation structure diagrams can represent both the intelligence within the structure of subjective initiative, and the multimodal nature of this intelligence. This gives rise to a pioneering graph theory tool tailored to the intelligent age. Obtaining a logical equation structure diagram for an object or process allows for capturing its multimodal representation. The underlying principle is that the logical equation structure diagram determines the values, relationships, and states of variables, while modalities are, in turn, determined by these values, relationships, and states. This implies that the logical equation structure diagram can dictate modalities, including text, images, audio, and video. With the advent of logical equation structure diagrams, discrete changes in variables can be manifested as text and images, while continuous changes can be expressed as audio and video. Logical processes can choose between discrete and continuous representations. For instance, a person moving from the School of Science to the Faculty of Arts can be conveyed either through discrete means, like text and images, or through continuous means, like audio and video. This principle can be extended to describe text-to-video conversion using logical equation structure diagrams. The discrete changes within text are represented using a logical equation structure diagram, identifying the relevant variables undergoing these changes. These variable changes are then expressed continuously. The logical equation structure diagram representing these continuous variable changes is finally translated into video, effectively converting text changes into video changes.

Building upon this principle, it becomes possible to equip life programs with multimodal interfaces and user interfaces.

8.7.3 Equation Unit Generator in Life Programs

The equation unit generator employs the following methods to generate equation units:

① The process begins by identifying a set of input variables and the desired output variables. Then, a path connecting the input variable set to the output variable set is established, revealing the logical relationship between them. This relationship then guides the automatic generation of a new logical equation unit, which can replicate the existing input-to-output mapping and introduce new variables, effectively simulating human thought processes and the generation of new knowledge.

② Alternatively, the process can also start by determining the values of a set of input variables and the desired values of the output variables. Then, a path for logical reasoning connecting these two sets of values is determined, revealing the logical relationship between the input and output variable sets. This relationship then guides the automatic generation of a new logical equation unit, which can replicate existing input-to-output mapping and introduce new variables, again simulating human thought processes and the generation of new knowledge.

③ The equation unit generator can also work together with the communication system, using newly inputted and existing equation units to generate new ones. Alternatively, new input variables leading to new output values can trigger the creation of new equation units, fostering novel approaches to autonomous learning.

④ Advanced equation unit generators can even generate equation units based on self-defined input and output sets.

⑤ Analysis of class data within equation structure diagrams can enable the equation unit generator to construct new equation units.

It is of great importance to assign fixed addresses, clock equation systems, and communication systems to newly generated equation units. The construction and development of equation unit generators relies on the application of bionic logic principles.

Equation unit generator technology will be the "thinking organ" of the structure of subjective initiative, with a more advanced equation unit generator signifying greater thinking capabilities within the structure of subjective initiative. This endows the logical equation structure diagram with human-like thought processes, marking the birth of the first machine thinking technology.

8.7.4 Data Analysis in Life Programs

Data analysis in life programs moves away from database-centric analysis, relying on the equation unit generator to perform it in a logical mathematical way, also known as equation structure diagram analysis. This falls into two categories:

The first category involves analyzing a known equation structure diagram, and determining the values of one or more unknown variables based on the values of one or more known variables.

The second category deals with unknown equation structure diagrams. By treating several class groups as variable sets, the relationships between these groups, referred to as "interaction", are studied, and the results of this analysis is then used to guide the equation unit generator to create new equation structure diagrams.

The data analysis capabilities of the equation unit generator can potentially surpass the performance of the large models currently in use today.

8.7.5 Intelligence in Life Programs

Intelligence in life programs arises from the following components: the complexity stemming from the basic structure diagram, intelligent clocking provided by the clock equation system structure diagram, intelligent communication facilitated by the communication system, thought processes generated by the equation unit generator, and intelligent addressing enabled by the address system. The core of this intelligence lies in the thinking capabilities of the equation unit generator.

8.7.6 Basic Platform for Life Programs: The Operating System

Traditional software theory has a long history of studying operating systems. For multimedia network operating systems, the focus has been on providing a hardware and network environment for application software to interface with hardware. The Logical Structure School inherits this concept from traditional computer software operating systems, using operating systems to construct a hardware and network environment for equation structure diagram software. This network environment encompasses the realization of both logical fields and logical networks, allowing humans to use operating systems to interact with equation structure diagram software, and performing various information reasoning tasks. Similarly, equation structure diagram software uses the operating system to access hardware, carrying out structural reasoning. By applying and expanding upon traditional operating system theories, this new form of operating system serves as the operational platform for equation structure diagram software.

8.7.7 Process of Life Programming

① Studying Hardware: As life program platforms are essentially large-scale structure diagram programs, they require careful integration with hardware. This involves combining aspects such as storage, communication, addressing, memory, peripherals, and computing power supply.

② Constructing Basic Structure Diagrams and Clock Equation System Structure Diagrams: Bionic logic and logical physics are employed to create these diagrams, while logical mathematics is used to construct specific equations.

③ Researching and Constructing Equation Unit Generators: This process leverages bionic logic, logical physics, logical mathematics, and other relevant intelligence technologies.

④ Creating the Life Program Operating Platform: Similar to traditional operating systems, the operating platform aims to reconcile the relationship between software and hardware. Hence, it is also referred to as the "operating system". It has two main tasks: firstly, to establish the communication system, address system, peripheral support for the multimodal interface, and other necessary hardware interfaces, in a manner analogous to traditional multimedia network operating systems. Secondly, to embed the basic structure diagram, clock equation system structure diagram, and equation unit generator within the prepared hardware environment.

⑤ Activating the Operating Platform for Life Program

⑥ Utilizing the Life Program Operating Platform: This platform supports various interaction modalities, including voice control and voice programming, and using voice commands to instruct the equation unit generator to generate applications. Alternatively, text input describing the desired logic can guide the equation unit generator to create its own applications.

This marks the birth of the first software theory and software development theory based on equation structure diagrams.

9. Life Learning Strategies

9.1 The Purpose of the Logical Structure School and Life Learning Strategies

The Logical Structure School proposes a software approach based on life programs, with intelligence at their core. Throughout the universe, the intelligence of all life forms stems from learning, while instinct arises from structure. The most advanced learning process combines externally imposed learning with autonomous learning. For instance, when attending school, people engage in rote memorization of objective knowledge (externally imposed learning) while also developing subjective skills through problem-solving and experimentation (autonomous learning). Therefore, the Logical Structure School advocates a learning strategy that combines both externally imposed and autonomous learning.

9.2 Structure of Subjective Initiative and Life Learning Strategies

The core of a life program is the equation structure diagram representing the structure of subjective initiative. This diagram evolves as the equation unit generator produces new equation structure reaction diagrams, which are themselves generated through learning. Consequently, learning becomes the primary method for modifying the equation structure diagram within the structure of subjective initiative, mirroring the principles underlying human educational philosophies.

9.3 Subjective Initiative Structure Engineering and Life Learning Strategies

The core of subjective initiative structure engineering lies in the equation unit generator, which is fundamentally based in the concept of machine learning. Therefore, the learning capability of the equation unit generator, designed to implement the strategy of combining externally imposed and autonomous learning, becomes central to structure engineering. A higher learning capacity signifies a more advanced engineering process.

9.4 Life-giving Logical Equation Structure Diagrams and Life Learning Strategies

Life learning within the Logical Structure School framework involves learning through equation structure diagrams, resulting in the generation of new logical equations and equation structure diagrams (equation structure reaction diagrams).

9.5 Bionic Logic and Life Learning Strategies

Bionic logic serves as the most significant form of externally imposed learning within all life learning strategies. This is analogous to how basic education in humans primarily focuses on literacy and memorization, or how common sense forms the foundation for human life.

9.6 Case Study

The learning theory proposed by the Logical Structure School involves creating new equation structure diagrams (specifically, equation structure reaction diagrams) that represent learning. In contrast, the learning theory behind large models involves creating new flowchart programs, which is effectively learning by flowchart.

Large models utilize huge amounts of data for training, identifying patterns within this data to develop equations that govern data processing and generate intelligence. This process demands substantial computational resources and follows a path of intelligence development where equations are first generated and then applied. In other words, only externally imposed learning is employed, with no possibility for autonomous learning. Ultimately, this is the same as the intelligence development observed in animals. Conversely, the Logical Structure School advocates for learning through a regulated equation unit generator. The externally imposed learning strategies of bionic logic and logical physics are combined with the autonomous learning strategies of logical mathematics and logical data analysis. This is aligned with the human approach to intelligence development, which integrates both externally imposed and autonomous learning. In language learning, for instance, memorizing texts represents externally imposed learning, while essay writing embodies autonomous learning. In addition, the learning methods proposed by the Logical Structure School do not necessitate the massive data and computational costs associated with large models. These methods represent the most suitable path for intelligence development in the intelligent age. The use of equation unit generators for learning should replace our current reliance on large models.

9.7 Introducing the Ninth Applied Classical Theory

This section introduces the ninth applied classical theory proposed by the Logical Structure School - Life Learning Strategies. The key points are as follows:

9.7.1 Subject of Learning: The Equation Unit Generator

The primary subject of learning within the Logical Structure School framework is the life program equation unit generator. These generators are categorized into three types:

① Equation Unit Generators for Artificial Intelligence

These generators emulate the type of learning carried out by the human brain, producing knowledge and responses akin to those observed in humans. They focus on learning how to perform information reasoning, acquiring knowledge and reactions related to this process.

② Equation Unit Generators for Robots

These generators simulate human learning, generating knowledge and responses similar to those observed in the human body. This knowledge, and its associated response, is all related to control. In particular, it is important to understand how the life program generates new equation structure reaction diagrams through its equation unit generator to control various intelligent devices connected to the program. This encompasses both information reasoning learning and structural reasoning learning.

③ Equation Unit Generator Groups for Intelligent Societies

This category represents a simulation of human society using a group of equation unit generators, which comprises a leadership group and a populace group. The leadership group learns information and societal reasoning related to governing society, while the populace group receives and acts upon the forms of reasoning generated by the leadership group. Information reasoning from the leadership group often refers to policy development, while societal reasoning is implemented through laws. Learning within the leadership group machines involves understanding how to create machine policies and machine laws, while societal reasoning learning focuses on how to implement these policies and laws on the populace group machines.

④ This paper primarily focuses on information reasoning learning and structural reasoning learning in robots.

9.7.2 Forms of Learning: Equation Structure Reaction Diagrams

Traditional machine learning requires vast amounts of data and substantial computing power to derive program equations, which then provide information for various needs. This approach suffers from three significant flaws: Firstly and secondly, the economic feasibility of this method is questionable due to the exorbitant amounts of associated data and computational costs. Thirdly, the path towards intelligence development deviates from the natural emergence of intelligence within the universe, casting doubt on its long-term prospects. The universe designed a path for intelligence development that mirrors the human path. Traditional machine learning, constrained by current hardware limitations, follows a path that more closely resembles the training of animals. This path is inherently flawed, as data-driven training is unlikely to achieve advanced intelligence.

In response to the needs of the intelligent age, and anticipating future advancements in hardware, the Logical Structure School proposes theories for both individual logical subject learning and collective learning within logical subject societies. This paper primarily focuses on individual logical subject learning, specifically outlining a learning theory for robots. Within this framework, the brain of a robot (represented by the equation unit generator) receives external information and engages in information reasoning through learning, producing equation structure reaction diagrams as its learning outcomes. These diagrams then drive structural reasoning, controlling the intelligent machinery of the robot.

Equation structure reaction diagrams represent the form and outcome of learning within the Logical Structure School framework, embodying both structure diagram learning and logical equation learning. This learning process is synonymous with information reasoning, employing suitable strategies to analyze external information through information reasoning, and ultimately generating equation structure reaction diagrams. These diagrams represent the knowledge acquired by the logical subject. Equation structure reaction diagrams are themselves life-giving logical equation structure diagrams. Their role is to modify the existing structure diagram of the logical subject. The new logical subject structure diagram is then used for structural reasoning, controlling the robot's actions. These new equation structure reaction diagrams, when used to modify the original diagram, not only replicate existing input-to-output mappings but can also introduce new variables, using the output of the new diagram to control intelligent machinery and achieve new forms of structural reasoning. This simulates human thought processes and the generation of new knowledge.

9.7.3 Learning Strategies

The strategies employed to utilize external information and construct equation structure reaction diagrams include:

9.7.3.1 Bionic Logic Strategies

Bionic logic strategies involve three steps. The first step focuses on emulating the human body, leveraging disciplines like biology, medicine and psychology to study human patterns, particularly thought processes, brain-body control mechanisms, and the functioning of sensory organs. The second step translates these patterns into logical equations, combining them to create equation structure reaction diagrams, which are then stored within the equation unit generator's memory for later retrieval, representing information reasoning, or learning, through bionic logic. The third step involves retrieving these equation structure reaction diagrams to control the robot's actions, representing structural reasoning.

9.7.3.2 Logical Physics Strategies

Logical physics strategies also follow a three-step approach. The first step involves studying the various scientific laws that govern the universe. The second step translates these laws into logical equations, combining them to form equation structure reaction diagrams, which are then stored within the equation unit generator's memory for later retrieval. This constitutes information reasoning, or learning, based on logical physics. The third step uses retrieved equation structure reaction diagrams to control the robot's actions, representing structural reasoning.

9.7.3.3 Logical Mathematics Strategies

While bionic logic and logical physics strategies represent externally imposed learning, logical mathematics strategies embody autonomous learning, since they are able to leverage the principles of logical mathematics to create various autonomous learning methods:

① This method begins by determining a set of input variables and the desired output variables. Then, a path connecting the input variable set to the output variable set is established, revealing the logical relationship between them. This relationship then guides the automatic generation of a new logical equation unit, essentially creating a new equation structure reaction diagram. This new diagram is used to modify the original equation structure diagram of the logical subject. The resulting new structure diagram replicates existing input-to-output mappings and introduces new variables, using its output to control intelligent machinery and achieve new forms of structural reasoning. This simulates human thought processes and the generation of new knowledge.

② Alternatively, the process can be started by determining the values of a set of input variables and the desired values of the output variables. Then, a path for logical reasoning connecting these two sets of values is determined, revealing the logical relationship between the input and output variable sets. This relationship guides the automatic generation of a new equation structure reaction diagram, which is then used to modify the original equation structure diagram of the logical subject. The resulting new structure diagram replicates existing input-to-output mappings and introduces new variables, using its output to control intelligent machinery and achieve new forms of structural reasoning. This again simulates human thought processes and the generation of new knowledge.

③ The equation unit generator can also work together with the communication system, utilizing newly input equation structure reaction diagrams and existing equation units to generate new equation structure reaction diagrams. Alternatively, new input variables leading to new output values can trigger the creation of new equation units, fostering novel approaches to autonomous learning.

④ Advanced equation unit generators can even generate new equation structure reaction diagrams based on self-defined input and output sets.

9.7.3.4 Logical Data Analysis Strategies

Logical data analysis strategies also fall under the discipline of autonomous learning. They share similarities with data training using large models, since both aim to generate program equations from data. However, there are some key differences: ① Large model data training first follows a path of training, only after which equations can be generated and applied. Logical data analysis can generate equations instantly; ② The pre-generation and subsequent application of equations in large models indicate an externally imposed learning strategy. Conversely, the immediate generation and application of equations in logical data analysis point towards an autonomous learning strategy; ③ Large models rely on flowchart programs for their application, while logical data analysis uses new equation structure reaction diagrams, highlighting a difference in program structure; ④ Large models require substantial data and computational resources, employing a method akin to training animals, and thus represent a flawed approach to intelligence development from the industrial age. In contrast, logical data analysis consumes significantly fewer resources and adopts a human-like learning approach, mirroring the human process of acquiring knowledge first and then developing skills through thought. This establishes a suitable path for autonomous learning in intelligent machines in the intelligent age.

Logical data analysis strategies include the following:

The first category involves analyzing a known equation structure diagram, and then determining the values of one or more unknown variables based on the values of one or more known variables.

The second category deals with unknown equation structure diagrams. By treating several class groups as variable sets, the relationships between these groups, referred to as "interaction", can be studied. The results of this analysis then guide the equation unit generator to create new equation structure diagrams and new equation structure reaction diagrams.

9.7.3.5 Strategies for Multimodal Interface Selection

Life programs can feature multimodal interfaces. The development of autonomous learning strategies for multimodal interface selection represents an externally imposed learning strategy. This involves combining bionic logic with logical physics to generate new equation structure reaction diagrams for multimodal interface selection. In this way, it is possible to modify the original equation structure diagram of the logical subject and enable dynamic multimodal interface selection.

References

[1] Dong H. Liu: Logical Structure School I (Five Fundamental Theories), July 19, 2024.

[2] Dong H. Liu: Logical Field Software Engineering (Chinese Version), Guangzhou: Jinan University Press Edition 2015.

[3] Dong H. Liu: Logic Structure and Logic Engineering (Chinese Version), Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press Edition 2015.

[4] Dong H. Liu: Logical Field Economics (Chinese Version), Guangzhou: Jinan University Press Edition 2014.

[5] Dong H. Liu: Soft Structure of Social Science (Chinese Version), Guangzhou: Jinan University Press Edition 2013.

[6] Dong H. Liu: 3D Social Engineering (Chinese Version), Guangzhou: Jinan University Press Edition 2012.

Dong H. Liu

August 12, 2024

The above is all original research solely conducted by Dong H. Liu.