1.测试代码
#include <iostream>
#include <string.h>
using namespace std;
#define LOOPS 10000000
void test01()
{
char buffer[80];
auto t1 = clock();
for(auto i = 0;i<LOOPS;++i)
{
memset(buffer,0,sizeof(buffer));
}
auto t2 = clock();
cout << "cost " << (t2-t1)*1.0 <<endl;
}
void test02()
{
char buffer[80];
auto t1 = clock();
for(auto i = 0;i<LOOPS;++i)
{
for(size_t j = 0;j < sizeof buffer;++j)
{
buffer[j] = 0;
}
}
auto t2 = clock();
cout << "cost " << (t2-t1)*1.0 <<endl;
}
void test03()
{
volatile char buffer[80];
auto t1 = clock();
for(auto i = 0;i<LOOPS;++i)
{
for(size_t j = 0;j < sizeof buffer;++j)
{
buffer[j] = 0;
}
}
auto t2 = clock();
cout << "cost " << (t2-t1)*1.0 <<endl;
}
int main()
{
test01();
test02();
test03();
}
2.执行结果
2.1 GCC4
2.2 GCC8
2.3 测试结果比较
gcc版本 | 编译选项 | memset时间 | 手工循环时间(bufWithoutVolatile) | 手工循环时间(bufWithVolatile) |
gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 | -O0 | 20000 | 1580000 | 1570000 |
-O1 | 80000 | 280000 | 300000 | |
-O2 | 70000 | 0 | 300000 | |
gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 | -O0 | 30000 | 1480000 | 1600000 |
-O1 | 20000 | 280000 | 470000 | |
-O2 | 10000 | 0 | 290000 |
2.4 导致手工循环在-bufWithoutVolatile在O2下的执行时间为0的原因
因为这个函数没有被调用过,对buffer的写入被优化没了.