Stata连享会:分享一大堆资料

这是一份汇集Stata连享会关于影响评价方法的综合资源,包括随机分配、预分析计划、倾向评分匹配、差异-in-差异等主题,涵盖了实验经济学的重要概念和技术。此外,还涉及了实证研究的外部有效性、统计功率计算以及Stata实用技巧。
摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

Source: A Curated List of Our Postings on Technical Topics – Your One-Stop Shop for Methodology

This is a curated list of our technical postings, to serve as a one-stop shop for your technical reading. I’ve focused here on our posts on methodological issues in impact evaluation – we also have a whole lot of posts on how to conduct surveys and measure certain concepts curated here. In lieu of our regular links this week, it is u**pdated up to October 25, 2018

General

IEanalytics: introducing the Development Impact Evaluation wiki

Random Assignment

Allocating treatment and control with multiple applications per applicant and ranked choices
Is optimization just re-randomization redux? Thoughts on the “don’t randomize, optimize” papers
Be an optimista, not a randomista, when you have small samples
Tips for randomization in the wild: adding a waitlist
How to randomize in the field
Stratified randomization and the FIFA world cup
Doing stratified randomization with uneven numbers in the Strata
How to randomize using many baseline variables
Public randomization ceremonies
Designing experiments to measure spillover effects
Mechanism experiments and opening up the black box
Sample weights and RCT design
Response to the policymaker complaint that randomized experiments take too much time
Have RCTs taken over development economics?
Definitions in RCTs with interference
What does a game-theoretic model with belief-dependent preferences teach us about how to randomize?
Incorporating participant welfare and ethics into RCTs
Are we over-investing in baselines?
Most good you can do, but for whom? (on spillovers)

Pre-analysis plans and reporting

Pre-registration of studies to avoid fishing and allow transparent discovery
A joint test of orthogonality when testing for baseline balance
A pre-analysis plan check-list
The New Trial Registries
What isn’t reported in impact evaluations but maybe should be
Randomization checks: testing for joint orthogonality
An addendum to pre-analysis plans: pre-specifying when not to use data
A pre-analysis plan is the only way to take your p-values seriously
Trouble with pre-analysis plans? try these 3 weird tricks
Should we require balance t-tests on observables with randomized experiments?
Registered r

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值