Problem Statement
Reservoir Sampling is an algorithm for sampling elements from a stream of data. Imagine you are given a really large stream of data elements (queries on google searches in May, products bought at Walmart during the Christmas season, names in a phone book, whatever). Your goal is to efficiently return a random sample of 1,000 elements evenly distributed from the original stream. How would you do it?
The right answer is generating random integers between 0 and N-1, then retrieving the elements at those indices and you have your answer. (Update: reader Martin astutely points out that this is sampling with replacement. To make this sampling without replacement, one simply needs to note whether or not your sample already pulled that random number and if so, choose a new random number. This can make the algorithm pretty expensive if the sample size is very close to N though).
So, let me make the problem harder. [color=red]You don't know N (the size of the stream) in advance[/color] and you can't index directly into it. You can count it, but that requires making 2 passes of the data. You can do better. There are some heuristics you might try: for example to guess the length and hope to undershoot. It will either not work in one pass or will not be evenly distributed.
Simple Solution
A relatively easy and correct solution is to assign a random number to every element as you see them in the stream, and then always keep the [color=red]top 1,000 numbered elements(descendent)[/color] at all times. This is similar to how mysql does "ORDER BY RAND()" calls. This strategy works well, and only requires additionally storing the randomly generated number for each element.
Reservoir Sampling is an algorithm for sampling elements from a stream of data. Imagine you are given a really large stream of data elements (queries on google searches in May, products bought at Walmart during the Christmas season, names in a phone book, whatever). Your goal is to efficiently return a random sample of 1,000 elements evenly distributed from the original stream. How would you do it?
The right answer is generating random integers between 0 and N-1, then retrieving the elements at those indices and you have your answer. (Update: reader Martin astutely points out that this is sampling with replacement. To make this sampling without replacement, one simply needs to note whether or not your sample already pulled that random number and if so, choose a new random number. This can make the algorithm pretty expensive if the sample size is very close to N though).
So, let me make the problem harder. [color=red]You don't know N (the size of the stream) in advance[/color] and you can't index directly into it. You can count it, but that requires making 2 passes of the data. You can do better. There are some heuristics you might try: for example to guess the length and hope to undershoot. It will either not work in one pass or will not be evenly distributed.
Simple Solution
A relatively easy and correct solution is to assign a random number to every element as you see them in the stream, and then always keep the [color=red]top 1,000 numbered elements(descendent)[/color] at all times. This is similar to how mysql does "ORDER BY RAND()" calls. This strategy works well, and only requires additionally storing the randomly generated number for each element.
800
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
