Laravel、Yii、ThinkPHP性能测试

#主流PHP框架性能非权威测试

作为一个PHP开发者,而且是初创企业团队的技术开发者,选择开发框架是个很艰难的事情。

ThinkPHP的话,招聘一个刚从培训机构出来的开发者就可以上手了,但是性能和后期代码解耦是个让人头疼的事情。不过很多第三方功能不需要自己写,众多大牛已经给铺好路了。

Laravel的话,传说写起来很爽扩展性也够,但是学习成本有点高,总不能给初级开发者半个月的时间去学习框架吧。而且据说江湖人士透漏,Laravel性能不怎么样,文档也并不是特别丰富。

Yii的话,语法有点啰嗦,前后端代码分离有点小麻烦,不过性能是非常好的,而且已经有众多国内大公司在使用了,出现意外可以快速的找到大牛答疑解惑。

不如做个简单的性能评测,选个性能出色的总不会出错

#性能测试 测试时间: 2016年05月06日

测试工具: siege (因为MAC系统的ab总是会出现 pr_socket_recv: Connection reset by peer (54) 的错误,所以选择了siege)

测试机器: MacPro Core i5 处理器/8GB内存/256GB SSD闪存

测试环境: Apache PHP5.6

框架版本: ThinkPHP 3.2.3 Laravel 5.2 Yii2.0.5

测试原则: 每次测试循环5次,取中等数据

补充说明: 所有项目都是让在子目录中

#结果说明 Transactions: 2119 hits 处理请求总数量 Availability: 96.85 % 可用性 Elapsed time: 9.74 secs 运行时间 Data transferred: 1.31 MB 数据传输量 Response time: 0.60 secs 响应时间 Transaction rate: 217.56 trans/sec 每秒处理效率 Throughput: 0.13 MB/sec 每秒处理数据 Concurrency: 130.28 并发 Successful transactions: 2162 成功的请求 Failed transactions: 69 失败的请求 Longest transaction: 2.85 最长的单个请求 Shortest transaction: 0.01 最短的单个请求 #开始测试

##增加一个控制器,并在控制器中输入10000次HelloWorld

并发50循环10次

首先向我们走来的是ThinkPHP,看上去还行

Transactions:		         500 hits
Availability:		      100.00 %
Elapsed time:		        2.81 secs
Data transferred:	       52.45 MB
Response time:		        0.26 secs
Transaction rate:	      177.94 trans/sec
Throughput:		       18.67 MB/sec
Concurrency:		       47.10
Successful transactions:         500
Failed transactions:	           0
Longest transaction:	        0.48
Shortest transaction:	        0.03

然后是Laravle,嗯,略微有些失望

Transactions:		         500 hits
Availability:		      100.00 %
Elapsed time:		       13.33 secs
Data transferred:	       52.45 MB
Response time:		        1.27 secs
Transaction rate:	       37.51 trans/sec
Throughput:		        3.93 MB/sec
Concurrency:		       47.55
Successful transactions:         500
Failed transactions:	           0
Longest transaction:	        3.64
Shortest transaction:	        0.07

最后赛前比较看好的Yii

Transactions:		         500 hits
Availability:		      100.00 %
Elapsed time:		        4.84 secs
Data transferred:	       52.45 MB
Response time:		        0.46 secs
Transaction rate:	      103.31 trans/sec
Throughput:		       10.84 MB/sec
Concurrency:		       47.65
Successful transactions:         500
Failed transactions:	           0
Longest transaction:	        0.88
Shortest transaction:	        0.04

并发200循环10次

首先是ThinkPHP

Transactions:		        1977 hits
Availability:		       98.85 %
Elapsed time:		       10.03 secs
Data transferred:	      207.40 MB
Response time:		        0.95 secs
Transaction rate:	      197.11 trans/sec
Throughput:		       20.68 MB/sec
Concurrency:		      187.68
Successful transactions:        1977
Failed transactions:	          23
Longest transaction:	        1.22
Shortest transaction:	        0.02

然后是Laravel

Transactions:		        1890 hits
Availability:		       94.50 %
Elapsed time:		       51.85 secs
Data transferred:	      198.27 MB
Response time:		        4.88 secs
Transaction rate:	       36.45 trans/sec
Throughput:		        3.82 MB/sec
Concurrency:		      178.00
Successful transactions:        1890
Failed transactions:	         110
Longest transaction:	       26.01
Shortest transaction:	        0.07

最后是Yii

Transactions:		        1996 hits
Availability:		       99.80 %
Elapsed time:		       18.95 secs
Data transferred:	      209.39 MB
Response time:		        1.79 secs
Transaction rate:	      105.33 trans/sec
Throughput:		       11.05 MB/sec
Concurrency:		      188.57
Successful transactions:        1996
Failed transactions:	           4
Longest transaction:	        3.29
Shortest transaction:	        0.10

没想到在没有优化的情况下,ThinkPHP的速度是最快的,Yii略微多一些,Laravel步履蹒跚的跑完了测试。结果是有些出人意料的,不过上述的测试只代表了开发环境,下面会对框架进行优化,模拟线上环境。

##优化框架 ThinkPHP:

APP_DEBUG改为false

Laravel:

APP_DEBUG改为false
php artisan route:cache
php artisan optimize
php artisan config:cache
composer dumpautoload -o

Yii:

YII_DEBUG改为false
composer dumpautoload -o

并发200循环10次

ThinkPHP

Transactions:		        1655 hits
Availability:		       82.75 %
Elapsed time:		        8.21 secs
Data transferred:	      173.62 MB
Response time:		        0.69 secs
Transaction rate:	      201.58 trans/sec
Throughput:		       21.15 MB/sec
Concurrency:		      139.29
Successful transactions:        1655
Failed transactions:	         345
Longest transaction:	        7.83
Shortest transaction:	        0.00

Laravel:

Transactions:		        1520 hits
Availability:		       76.00 %
Elapsed time:		       34.95 secs
Data transferred:	      159.45 MB
Response time:		        3.15 secs
Transaction rate:	       43.49 trans/sec
Throughput:		        4.56 MB/sec
Concurrency:		      136.84
Successful transactions:        1520
Failed transactions:	         480
Longest transaction:	       19.18
Shortest transaction:	        0.00

Yii:

Transactions:		        1704 hits
Availability:		       85.20 %
Elapsed time:		       15.16 secs
Data transferred:	      178.76 MB
Response time:		        1.46 secs
Transaction rate:	      112.40 trans/sec
Throughput:		       11.79 MB/sec
Concurrency:		      164.21
Successful transactions:        1704
Failed transactions:	         296
Longest transaction:	        9.04
Shortest transaction:	        0.00

###比较奇怪的一点,当框架关掉调试模式后都出现了较多失败的情况。不过明显的看到,Laravel进行简单的优化后,性能大大的提升了,但还是低于其他两个框架。

#结论

在测试的过程中,其他我的心情是沮丧的,感觉自己的三观世界已经崩塌了,崩塌至渣。

ThinkPHP的性能比Yii高出一倍,比Laravel高出近四倍 Yii的性能比较中庸,但是在测试中会明显发现请求失败的情况比其他两个框架要少 Laravel依旧优雅,不过性能堪忧,用网友的话形容比较好 学之者生用之者死

#最后

我的项目最后使用了自建框架进行开发,得益于composer的强大,开发的过程非常顺利,最后附上自有框架在200并发10次循环的数据,框架开源但是更新比较忙,欢迎在github上搜索PPPHP,和我一起搭建框架。

Transactions:		        1672 hits
Availability:		       83.60 %
Elapsed time:		        6.18 secs
Data transferred:	      175.40 MB
Response time:		        0.57 secs
Transaction rate:	      270.55 trans/sec
Throughput:		       28.38 MB/sec
Concurrency:		      153.16
Successful transactions:        1672
Failed transactions:	         328
Longest transaction:	        4.57
Shortest transaction:	        0.01

转载于:https://my.oschina.net/u/572087/blog/672981

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值