在使用spring的Scheduled定时任务,担心同一任务,第一次开始未执行完就执行第二次任务,所以给加了synchronized,但是后面经过测试Scheduled定时任务会在上次任务结束时再执行第二次任务,如果第二次任务堵在哪里了,时间会顺延
package xyz.hashdog.job;
import lombok.AllArgsConstructor;
import lombok.extern.slf4j.Slf4j;
import org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.Scheduled;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
/**
* @author th
* @description: 定时任务测试
* @projectName hashdog-ds
* @date 2020/2/1223:07
*/
@Component
@Slf4j
@AllArgsConstructor
public class TestCrontab {
private static final Object KEY = new Object();
private static boolean taskFlag = false;
@Scheduled(cron = "*/5 * * * * ?")
public void pushCancel() {
System.out.println("进来了");
synchronized (KEY) {
if (TestCrontab.taskFlag) {
System.out.println("测试调度已经启动");
log.warn("测试调度已经启动");
return;
}
TestCrontab.taskFlag = true;
}
try {
for (int i =0;i<=10;i++){
System.out.println("执行:"+i);
Thread.sleep(2000);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("测试调度执行出错", e);
}
TestCrontab.taskFlag = false;
log.warn("测试调度执行完成");
}
}
注释掉synchronized,执行效果一样,并没有线程安全问题
package xyz.hashdog.job;
import lombok.AllArgsConstructor;
import lombok.extern.slf4j.Slf4j;
import org.springframework.scheduling.annotation.Scheduled;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
/**
* @author th
* @description: 定时任务测试
* @projectName hashdog-ds
* @date 2020/2/1223:07
*/
@Component
@Slf4j
@AllArgsConstructor
public class TestCrontab {
private static final Object KEY = new Object();
private static boolean taskFlag = false;
@Scheduled(cron = "*/5 * * * * ?")
public void pushCancel() throws InterruptedException {
System.out.println("进来了");
// synchronized (KEY) {
// if (TestCrontab.taskFlag) {
// System.out.println("测试调度已经启动");
// log.warn("测试调度已经启动");
// return;
// }
// TestCrontab.taskFlag = true;
// }
//
// try {
for (int i =0;i<=10;i++){
System.out.println("执行:"+i);
Thread.sleep(2000);
}
// } catch (Exception e) {
// log.error("测试调度执行出错", e);
// }
//
// TestCrontab.taskFlag = false;
log.warn("测试调度执行完成");
}
}