我不知道我的方法为啥会超时,然后照着官方题解写了一通hhh,再埋个坑吧
class Solution {
public:
void can_Cross(vector<int>&stones, int current, map<int, set<int>>&mymap) {
for (set<int>::iterator it = mymap[current].begin(); it != mymap[current].end(); it++) {
for (int step = *it - 1; step <= *it + 1; step++)
if (step > 0 && mymap.find(current + step) != mymap.end())
mymap[current + step].insert(step);
}
}
bool canCross(vector<int>& stones) {
if (stones[1] >= 2)
return false;
map<int, set<int>>mymap;
int N = stones.size();
for (int i = 0; i < N ; i++) {
set<int>myset = {};
mymap.insert(pair<int, set<int>>(stones[i],myset));
}
mymap[0].insert(1);
for (int i = 0; i < N-1; i++) {
//cout << i << endl;
can_Cross(stones, stones[i], mymap);
}
if (mymap[stones[N-1]].size()!=0)
return true;
return false;
}
};
其实下面这种解法快而且内存消耗少,也是递归,更准确地说是深搜dfs,对比于官方题解中的第一种解法,其实在思路上非常非常相似(很有对比分析的价值)但是,在官方题解第一种解法中,每次都要从前面计算到后面。------我再好好想想吧
上面解法应该是在插入时消耗了很多时间。。。其实没有必要插入,而是深搜啊
class Solution {
private:
set<int>SetStones;
public:
bool recall(int nowNum, int step, int target) {
if (nowNum + step + 1 == target || nowNum + step == target || nowNum + step - 1 == target)
return true;
for (int i = 1; i >= -1; i--) {
if (step+i>0&&SetStones.find(nowNum + step + i) != SetStones.end() && recall(nowNum + step + i, step + i, target))
return true;
}
return false;
}
bool canCross(vector<int>& stones) {
if (stones.size()<2)
return true;
if (stones[1] != 1)
return false;
for (int i = 1; i<stones.size(); i++) {
if (i > 3 && stones[i - 1] * 2 < stones[i]) {
return false;
}
SetStones.insert(stones[i]);
}
return recall(1, 1, stones.back());
}
};