mbr分区与gpt分区_与基于MBR的分区相比，GPT分区的损坏可能性较小吗？

mbr分区与gpt分区

There are few things as frustrating as experiencing trouble with your computer’s hard drive, but is there a partitioning scheme that works better than an MBR-based one? Today’s SuperUser Q&A post has the answer to a curious reader’s question.

几乎没有什么比在您的计算机的硬盘驱动器上遇到麻烦更令人沮丧的了，但是有没有一种分区方案比基于MBR的分区方案更好？ 今天的“超级用户问答”帖子回答了一个好奇的读者的问题。

Today’s Question & Answer session comes to us courtesy of SuperUser—a subdivision of Stack Exchange, a community-driven grouping of Q&A web sites.

今天的“问答”环节由SuperUser提供，它是Stack Exchange的一个分支，该社区是由社区驱动的Q＆A网站分组。

问题 (The Question)

SuperUser reader Clay Nichols wants to know if GPT partitions are less likely to corrupt compared to MBR-based ones:

超级用户读者Clay Nichols想知道与基于MBR的分区相比，GPT分区是否更不容易损坏：

I know that GPT (GUID Partition Table) partitioning has some benefits over MBR (Master Boot Record), including support for:

我知道GPT(GUID分区表)分区比MBR(主启动记录)分区有一些好处，包括对以下方面的支持：

• More partitions (128)
  更多分区(128)
• Hard drives larger than 2TB
  大于2TB的硬盘

Are there any other benefits like less potential for corruption or are you just playing whack-a-mole where GPT can also  become corrupted in the same way as MBR? The two hard drive failures I have experienced were due to corrupted MBRs.

是否还有其他好处，例如腐败的可能性较小，或者您只是在捣蛋，GPT也可能与MBR一样被破坏？ 我遇到的两个硬盘故障是由于MBR损坏。

Are GPT partitions less likely to corrupt compared to MBR-based ones?

与基于MBR的分区相比，GPT分区损坏的可能性较小吗？

答案 (The Answer)

SuperUser contributor mtak has the answer for us:

超级用户贡献者mtak为我们提供了答案：

According to the Wikipedia article on GUID Partition Tables, there is redundancy built into the GPT partition scheme. The GPT header is written at the beginning as well as at the end of the disk (see graphic below). In addition, the partition table header also contains a CRC32 checksum for itself and for the partition table.

根据Wikipedia关于GUID分区表的文章 ，GPT分区方案中内置了冗余。 GPT标头写入磁盘的开头和结尾(请参见下图)。 此外，分区表标头还包含其自身和分区表的CRC32校验和。

The redundancy is not available in the MBR partition scheme, which only occupies the first 512 bytes of a disk. The extra redundancy would allow for more resilience against corruption. The CRC32 checksum allows the system to detect which of the two headers is the correct, uncorrupted one if a problem arises so that it can be used to repair the other one.

冗余在MBR分区方案中不可用，MBR分区方案仅占用磁盘的前512字节。 额外的冗余将允许更多的抵御腐败能力。 CRC32校验和允许系统检测到两个标头中的哪个是正确的，未损坏的标头(如果出现问题)，以便可以用来修复另一个标头。

---

---

Have something to add to the explanation? Sound off in the comments. Want to read more answers from other tech-savvy Stack Exchange users? Check out the full discussion thread here (URL of the original question/thread in this last sentence).

有什么补充说明吗？ 在评论中听起来不错。 是否想从其他精通Stack Exchange的用户那里获得更多答案？ 在此处查看完整的讨论线程(最后一句中原始问题/线程的URL)。

Image Credit: GUID Partition Table Scheme by Kbolino (Wikipedia)

图片来源： Kbolino的GUID分区表方案 (维基百科)

翻译自: https://www.howtogeek.com/269085/are-gpt-partitions-less-likely-to-corrupt-compared-to-mbr-based-ones/

mbr分区与gpt分区