分布视图 get 请求_博客统计令人困惑-GET，视图，用户代理，读者，眼球-CSDN博客

分布视图 get 请求

There's some discussion going on an internal MSFT mailing list about blog statistics. I don't check my web statistics more than once a month, as I'm more interested in blog comments or what's going on in the forum. If I get a lot of comments on a post I feel good. I like to get discussions going and bounce ideas back and forth.

MSFT内部邮件列表中有关于博客统计信息的讨论。我每月检查一次网络统计数据的次数不超过一次，因为我对博客评论或论坛中发生的事情更感兴趣。如果我在帖子中收到很多评论，我会感觉很好。我喜欢进行讨论并来回交流想法。

That said, some blogs at Microsoft track their statistics and need to know if a particular post or new theme brings in more readers. One particular blog (not mine) recently saw a 16x increase in "hits" which is probably a good thing. A discussion started, and here's part of an email I wrote with my ideas that I thought you might find interesting, Dear Reader. I've made a few [edits] to make things clearer.

也就是说，Microsoft的一些博客会跟踪其统计信息，并且需要知道某个特定的帖子或新主题是否吸引了更多读者。一个特定的博客(不是我的博客)最近看到“点击”增加了16倍，这可能是一件好事。讨论开始了，亲爱的读者，这是我写的一封电子邮件，其中包含我的想法，我认为您可能会觉得有趣。我进行了一些[编辑]以使情况更清楚。

I think it's killer, to be clear, so in no way do I want to take away from [that blog's] most excellent work, but the web stats [in this case] specifically "smells" wrong. Possibly a bot, spammer, something, but still, a 16x increase in web traffic [in a single] month feels exceptional. It's the ratios [of GETs to projected humans] that are confusing to me.

很明显，我认为这是杀手kill，所以我绝对不想夺走[该博客的]最出色的作品，但是网络统计数据(在这种情况下)特别是“闻到”错误。可能是僵尸程序，垃圾邮件发送者等，但仍然[单]月Web流量增加了16倍仍然令人感到异常。是[GET与预计人类的比例]令我感到困惑。

It'd be interesting to use some heuristics to turn the RSS Feed HTTP GETs into Unique users. For example, most RSS Readers poll so one individual will hit your feed (in my experience) between 8 and 16 times a day, depending on their reader and how long their computer is on. Online readers are smarter that Smart Client readers like Outlook and FeedDemon. This usually means one has fewer readers than they think, if they are looking at GETs.

使用一些启发式方法将RSS Feed HTTP GET变成唯一用户会很有趣。例如，大多数RSS读者投票这样一个人会打你的8倍和16倍之间饲料(以我的经验)，每天根据自己的阅读器和多久他们的计算机上。在线阅读器比Outlook和FeedDemon等智能客户端阅读器更聪明。这通常意味着，如果他们正在查看GET，那么他们的读者数量就会少于他们的想象。

Additionally, online readers [usually] only hit once (here's how that works) [and rather] "tunnel" your subscriber numbers in the HTTP User Agent like "NewsGatorOnline/2.0+(http://www.newsgator.com;+250+subscribers)". Meaning, you might get one hit or 10 hit, but regardless they are representative of 250 individuals. This usually means one has more readers than they think, if they are looking at GETs.

此外，在线读者通常只会点击一次(这是这样的方式)[宁可]在“ HTTP用户代理”中“订阅”您的订户号码，例如“ NewsGatorOnline / 2.0 +( http：//www.newsgator.com; +250 + subscribers )”。意思是，您可能会获得一击或十击，但无论它们代表250个人。这通常意味着，如果他们正在寻找GET，那么他们的读者就会比他们想的还要多。

Why do I mention this? I mention it because looking at HTTP GETs isn't representative of people, but of GETs. It took me a few years to figure this out, and I've been thrilled with the analysis work done by FeedBurner (my RSS Feed is hosted there, saving me over 400 gigs of bandwidth a month) to turn GETs into Humans.

我为什么要提这个？我提到它是因为查看HTTP GET并不代表人，而是代表GET。我花了几年的时间才弄清楚这一点，我对FeedBurner所做的分析工作感到非常兴奋(我的RSS Feed托管在这里，每月为我节省了400多个带宽)，从而将GET变成了人类。

Here's a real world example. FeedBurner says I have around 22,000 regular readers [as of today...it varies based on weekday/weekend]. That's aggregated across all News Readers:

这是一个真实的例子。 FeedBurner说我有大约22,000名常规读者[截至今天...根据工作日/周末的不同而有所不同]。这是所有新闻阅读器的总和：

My stats package shows about 50,000 page views a day or about 1.6 million a month. This varies, confirming [an earlier] comment about folks hanging around [a site] and reading stories, which is cool. However, if I look at "hits" I see 16.5 million. Of course, that's not [a useful stat], because that included images, css, etc. Visits, on the other hand are one individual hanging around for a period of time and reading. For example (these stats don't include RSS anywhere, including bandwidth):

我的统计数据包显示每天大约有50,000次页面浏览，或者每月大约有160万次浏览。这有所不同，确认了[较早的]评论关于人们在[站点]周围闲逛并阅读故事的信息，这很酷。但是，如果我看“点击数”，我会看到1650万。当然，这不是[有用的统计数据]，因为其中包括图像，CSS等。另一方面，访问是一个人闲逛一段时间并阅读。例如(这些统计信息不包括带宽在内的任何地方的RSS)：

Page Views - 1,596,548 Visits - 806,251 Hits - 16,500,422 Bandwidth (KB) - 209,759,564

浏览量-1,596,548 访问-806,251 命中数-16,500,422 带宽(KB)-209,759,564

For me, these stats make sense, because I have a readership of about 20,000 that show up every few days and hang out, representing [roughly] 50% of my traffic. The other 50% comes from Search Engines and [incoming] links from other blogs. So it's important that one distinguishes between hits, page views, and visitors, and tries to correlate those back to readership, IMHO.

对我来说，这些统计数据是有意义的，因为我的读者人数大约为20,000，每隔几天就会出现并进行环聊，约占我访问量的50％。其余50％来自搜索引擎和其他博客的[传入]链接。因此，重要的是要区分点击量，网页浏览量和访问者，并尝试将它们与读者群(恕我直言)相关联。

The question that we need Blog Stats to answer is that of readership. What does [a] 600,000 RSS hits number mean? 600k/30days is about 20k hits a day, so how often are these readers hitting the feed per day? Once we come up with a standard-ish formula, blogs could get a rough +/-30% idea of how many human eyeballs [are actually reading].

我们需要Blog Stats回答的问题是读者群。 [a] 600,000个RSS点击数是什么意思？ 600k / 30days每天约有2万次点击，那么这些读者每天有多久点击一次提要？一旦我们提出了一个标准的公式，博客就可以大致了解到[实际阅读]多少人的眼球。

Just my two cents, thoughts?

只是我的两分钱，想法？

Related Posts

相关文章

翻译自: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/blog-stats-are-confusing-gets-views-useragents-readers-eyeballs

分布视图 get 请求