[MSSQL]Select count(*)与Select count(字段)的效率分析

本文分析了在SQL Server中使用COUNT(*)和COUNT(columnname)进行行计数的效率,揭示了COUNT(*)并不一定比COUNT(columnname)慢的误解,并解释了SQL Server内部数据处理原理。通过实例展示了在不同情况下两者的表现,强调在某些场景下,COUNT(*)甚至能利用索引来提高性能。同时提醒开发者,根据实际需求选择合适的计数方式,防止因列值允许NULL导致的错误结果。
摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

原文:

     

Advice on using COUNT( )
In the SQL Server community, one thing that I sometimes encounter is the question on whether you should use COUNT(*) or COUNT(columnname), where columnname is a column in the table that you want to count the rows for. Often the advice given to people in forums and mailing lists is that COUNT(columnname) will perform better than COUNT(*). This is not always the correct advice though, in many cases it is even entirely wrong. Although there are situations where you can (or even should) use COUNT(columnname), you definitely shouldn't always use it. This incorrect piece of advice is probably based on a lack of understanding of how SQL Server handles data internally. 

Description of COUNT( )
The first thing tha

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值