getElementByTagName 与 querySelectorAll

虽然网上有中文翻译但是还是直接看英文有感觉。getElementByTagName 与 querySelectorAll在节点查询时候在效率上区别。

Conclusion

[color=blue]The real reason why getElementsByTagName() is faster than querySelectorAll() is because of the difference between live and static NodeList objects. Although I’m sure there are way to optimize this, doing no upfront work for a live NodeList will generally always be faster than doing all of the work to create a static NodeList. Determining which method to use is highly dependent on what you’re trying to do. If you’re just searching for elements by tag name and you don’t need a snapshot, then getElementsByTagName() should be used; if you do need a snapshot of results or you’re doing a more complex CSS query, then querySelectorAll() should be used.[/color]

参考:
[url]http://mzhou.me/?p=95119[/url]
[url]http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api/#queryselectorall[/url]
[url]http://www.nczonline.net/blog/2010/09/28/why-is-getelementsbytagname-faster-that-queryselectorall/[/url]
[url]http://jsperf.com/queryselectorall-vs-getelementsbytagname[/url]
  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值