关于warning:the address of 'fun' will always evaluate as 'true'

自己定义了一个函数：

bool phead_is_merge_into_head(const IR1_INST *const pir1, FLAG_PATTERN_ITEM *item, FLAG_PATTERN_PHEAD* phead_for_tail) {
    CONDITION c = pir1->get_cond();
    uint8 phead_number = phead_for_tail->phead_number;
    bool b = true;
    switch(c) {
        case COND_EQ:
        case COND_NE:
            for (int i = 0; i < phead_number; ++i)
                b &= phead_is_same_head_under_eq_ne(item->head->get_opcode(),phead_for_tail->phead[i]->get_opcode());
            return b;
        case COND_CS:
        case COND_CC:
            for (int i = 0; i < phead_number; ++i)
                b &= phead_is_same_head_under_eq_ne(item->head->get_opcode(),phead_for_tail->phead[i]->get_opcode());
        case COND_MI:
        case COND_PL:
            for (int i = 0; i < phead_number; ++i)
                b &= phead_is_same_head_under_mi_pl(item->head->get_opcode(),phead_for_tail->phead[i]->get_opcode());
        case COND_HI:
        case COND_LS:
            for (int i = 0; i < phead_number; ++i)
                b &= phead_is_same_head_under_hi_ls(item->head->get_opcode(),phead_for_tail->phead[i]->get_opcode());
        case COND_GE:
        case COND_LT:
            for (int i = 0; i < phead_number; ++i)
                b &= phead_is_same_head_under_ge_lt(item->head->get_opcode(),phead_for_tail->phead[i]->get_opcode());
        case COND_GT:
        case COND_LE:
            for (int i = 0; i < phead_number; ++i)
                b &= phead_is_same_head_under_gt_le(item->head->get_opcode(),phead_for_tail->phead[i]->get_opcode());
        default:
            return false;
    }
}

后面这样写

if (phead_is_merge_into_head)

 

编译时会出现warning: the address of 'bool phead_is_merge_into_head(const IR1_INST*, FLAG_PATTERN_ITEM*, FLAG_PATTERN_PHEAD*)' will always evaluate as 'true。

这里没有函数参数，所以函数名作为一个指针，这样判断地址是否为true，会always true。是吧？