How SQL Server deal with Null value during the sort?

Let us make a experiment .

 

Create test table

 

CREATE TABLE TEST
(
  id INT NULL
)


INSERT INTO TEST VALUES (1)
INSERT INTO TEST VALUES (2)
INSERT INTO TEST VALUES (3)
INSERT INTO TEST VALUES (4)
INSERT INTO TEST VALUES (5)
INSERT INTO TEST VALUES (NULL)

INSERT INTO TEST VALUES (-5)

 

Case 1 : Without 'ORDER BY' - order sequence is base on data physical store position

 

SELECT * FROM TEST;

Result:

1
2
3
4
5
NULL
-5

 

Case 2 : With 'ORDER BY XX ASC' - NULL always on the top

 

SELECT * FROM TEST order by id asc;

Result:

NULL
-5
1
2
3
4
5

 

Case 3 : With 'ORDER BY XX DESC' - NULL always on the bottom

 

SELECT * FROM TEST order by id desc;

Result:

5
4
3
2
1
-5
NULL

 

-http://froebe.net/blog/2007/10/19/fw-microsoft-sql-server-sort-values-ascending-but-nulls-last/

This is a frequent request in newsgroups and fora. People want to sort the column in ascending order but don’t want the NULLS at the beginning. Oracle has this syntax:

ORDER BY ColumnName NULL S LAST ;

SQL Server does not have this. But there are 2 ways to do this. The first one is by using case and the second one by using COALESCE and the maximum value for the data type in the order by clause.

 

 

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值