Why We Serve: Combat Medic Saves Lives Using New Evacuation System

WASHINGTON, Oct. 12, 2007 – A veteran Air Force combat medic helped to transform the way wounded troops are treated and evacuated during a recent deployment to Afghanistan.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Air Force Tech. Sgt. Mark A. DeCorte is participating in the Defense Department’s “Why We Serve” public-outreach program. Photo by Gerry J. Gilmore
  

(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.
Tech Sgt. Mark A. DeCorte recalled the previous practice when unarmed battlefield medics were flown in to treat and evacuate injured servicemembers usually after an area had been cleared of the enemy.

However, DeCorte emphasized, “When you have a wounded soldier on the ground, they need help now.”

DeCorte is among a group of 10 servicemembers who served in Iraq, Afghanistan or the Horn of Africa who have been selected to tell the military’s story to the American people at community, business, veteran’s and other gatherings as part of the Defense Department’s “Why We Serve” public outreach program.

Why We Serve began last fall and was originally the idea of former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Marine Gen. Peter Pace. Representatives from all the service branches participate in the program, which is conducted in quarterly segments. DeCorte and the other nine servicemembers in his group constitute the fifth iteration since the program began.

“I think the program is awesome,” DeCorte said, noting that Americans need to hear the success stories and sacrifices of U.S. servicemembers deployed overseas in the war against terrorism.

The concept of treating and evacuating injured servicemembers during the din of battle was tested during DeCorte’s tour of duty in Afghanistan from February to June 2006, the 13-year military veteran said.

The Army had requested Air Force assistance to improve its air-ambulance capabilities in Afghanistan’s austere, mountainous terrain, DeCorte explained.

Previous doctrine was to send in medical-evacuation helicopters after the fighting had stopped, he noted, but this practice meant that some troops wouldn’t survive the trip to the hospital. That procedure would change.

In Afghanistan, DeCorte was one of several military medics embedded with aerial combat-support units. Instead of using traditional rotary- or fixed-wing aircraft marked with red crosses, the new wave combat medics carried arms as they flew directly into the maelstrom aboard armored helicopter gunships.

The idea, DeCorte explained, was to treat the wounded as quickly as possible. And, when the concept was tested on the battlefield, it contributed to achieving a previously unimagined wounded-survivability rate of 90 percent, he said.

“We can now go in embedded (with combat units) and part of the operation,” DeCorte said.

And instead of the famous but fragile UH-1 “Huey” helicopters that were used to evacuate wounded U.S. troops during the Vietnam War, DeCorte and his fellow medics today fly into action aboard HH-60-G Pave Hawk helicopters, the same aircraft favored by U.S. Special Operations troops.

“What that led to is a brand-new capability,” DeCorte pointed out, noting that the Pave Hawks’ specialized equipment enables nighttime, as well as daytime, medical evacuations.

“We can come in with weapons,” DeCorte said. “We can actually get the wounded as they’re being wounded.”

A servicemember’s odds of surviving battlefield-inflicted wounds go way up if he or she can be evacuated to a treatment center within an hour of being injured, DeCorte pointed out. In medical parlance that period of time is known as “the golden hour,” he said.

“If I can get you to surgery within an hour you most likely have a chance to survive,” DeCorte said.

The Minot, N.D.-born noncommissioned officer saved 36 lives during his 63 combat sorties in southern Afghanistan. “It’s very bad in that area,” DeCorte observed, adding that two of his fellow combat medics on other air-evacuation flights saved another 102 lives between them.

When not saving lives, the air-ambulance crews also performed aerial resupply and other support missions not traditionally performed by combat medics, DeCorte said.

DeCorte’s wife, Lorretta, also is an Air Force medic. Although family life can sometimes get hectic with four children and military deployments, DeCorte said he’s in the military for the long haul.

“I don’t want to sit in the rear. I need to put my uniform on and get there in the fight and bring those soldiers home,” he concluded.

 
  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
在信号处理领域,DOA(Direction of Arrival)估计是一项关键技术,主要用于确定多个信号源到达接收阵列的方向。本文将详细探讨三种ESPRIT(Estimation of Signal Parameters via Rotational Invariance Techniques)算法在DOA估计中的实现,以及它们在MATLAB环境中的具体应用。 ESPRIT算法是由Paul Kailath等人于1986年提出的,其核心思想是利用阵列数据的旋转不变性来估计信号源的角度。这种算法相比传统的 MUSIC(Multiple Signal Classification)算法具有较低的计算复杂度,且无需进行特征值分解,因此在实际应用中颇具优势。 1. 普通ESPRIT算法 普通ESPRIT算法分为两个主要步骤:构造等效旋转不变系统和估计角度。通过空间平移(如延时)构建两个子阵列,使得它们之间的关系具有旋转不变性。然后,通过对子阵列数据进行最小二乘拟合,可以得到信号源的角频率估计,进一步转换为DOA估计。 2. 常规ESPRIT算法实现 在描述中提到的`common_esprit_method1.m`和`common_esprit_method2.m`是两种不同的普通ESPRIT算法实现。它们可能在实现细节上略有差异,比如选择子阵列的方式、参数估计的策略等。MATLAB代码通常会包含预处理步骤(如数据归一化)、子阵列构造、旋转不变性矩阵的建立、最小二乘估计等部分。通过运行这两个文件,可以比较它们在估计精度和计算效率上的异同。 3. TLS_ESPRIT算法 TLS(Total Least Squares)ESPRIT是对普通ESPRIT的优化,它考虑了数据噪声的影响,提高了估计的稳健性。在TLS_ESPRIT算法中,不假设数据噪声是高斯白噪声,而是采用总最小二乘准则来拟合数据。这使得算法在噪声环境下表现更优。`TLS_esprit.m`文件应该包含了TLS_ESPRIT算法的完整实现,包括TLS估计的步骤和旋转不变性矩阵的改进处理。 在实际应用中,选择合适的ESPRIT变体取决于系统条件,例如噪声水平、信号质量以及计算资源。通过MATLAB实现,研究者和工程师可以方便地比较不同算法的效果,并根据需要进行调整和优化。同时,这些代码也为教学和学习DOA估计提供了一个直观的平台,有助于深入理解ESPRIT算法的工作原理。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值