上一篇介绍了 关系操作符 和逻辑操作符,现在来分析下 关系操作符中的 ==
Integer i = new Integer(47);
Integer j = new Integer(47);
Integer k = i;
System.out.println("i == j " + (i==j));
System.out.println("i != j " + (i!=j));
System.out.println("k == i " + (k==i));
System.out.println("i.equals(j) " + (i.equals(j)));
输出结果
i == j false
i != j true
k == i true
i.equals(j) true
上面的例子可以知道 == != 比较是引用,而非内容,要想比较2个对象的内容是否相同,我们可以使用 equals()
这个是JDK源码
/**
* Indicates whether some other object is "equal to" this one.
* <p>
* The {@code equals} method implements an equivalence relation
* on non-null object references:
* <ul>
* <li>It is <i>reflexive</i>: for any non-null reference value
* {@code x}, {@code x.equals(x)} should return
* {@code true}.
* <li>It is <i>symmetric</i>: for any non-null reference values
* {@code x} and {@code y}, {@code x.equals(y)}
* should return {@code true} if and only if
* {@code y.equals(x)} returns {@code true}.
* <li>It is <i>transitive</i>: for any non-null reference values
* {@code x}, {@code y}, and {@code z}, if
* {@code x.equals(y)} returns {@code true} and
* {@code y.equals(z)} returns {@code true}, then
* {@code x.equals(z)} should return {@code true}.
* <li>It is <i>consistent</i>: for any non-null reference values
* {@code x} and {@code y}, multiple invocations of
* {@code x.equals(y)} consistently return {@code true}
* or consistently return {@code false}, provided no
* information used in {@code equals} comparisons on the
* objects is modified.
* <li>For any non-null reference value {@code x},
* {@code x.equals(null)} should return {@code false}.
* </ul>
* <p>
* The {@code equals} method for class {@code Object} implements
* the most discriminating possible equivalence relation on objects;
* that is, for any non-null reference values {@code x} and
* {@code y}, this method returns {@code true} if and only
* if {@code x} and {@code y} refer to the same object
* ({@code x == y} has the value {@code true}).
* <p>
* Note that it is generally necessary to override the {@code hashCode}
* method whenever this method is overridden, so as to maintain the
* general contract for the {@code hashCode} method, which states
* that equal objects must have equal hash codes.
*
* @param obj the reference object with which to compare.
* @return {@code true} if this object is the same as the obj
* argument; {@code false} otherwise.
* @see #hashCode()
* @see java.util.HashMap
*/
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
return (this == obj);
}
从源码上,可以看到 equals 也是比较的引用,我们上面的例子中
i.equals(j)
得到的是true 是因为 Integer 中 对equals 进行了覆盖
我们可以查看 intger的源码
再通过一个例子来分析equlas()
/**
* Compares this object to the specified object. The result is
* {@code true} if and only if the argument is not
* {@code null} and is an {@code Integer} object that
* contains the same {@code int} value as this object.
*
* @param obj the object to compare with.
* @return {@code true} if the objects are the same;
* {@code false} otherwise.
*/
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (obj instanceof Integer) {
return value == ((Integer)obj).intValue();
}
return false;
}
再通过一个例子来分析equlas()
public class TestYSF2 {
public static void main(String args[]){
TestA a = new TestA();
TestA b = new TestA();
a.value = b.value = 10;
System.out.println(" a.equals(b) " + (a.equals(b)));
}
}
class TestA{
int value ;
}
运行结果是
a.equals(b) false
根据JDK的源码可以知道a.equals(b) 比较的是a,b2个对象的引用是否相同