两种代理模式的区别:
1、jdk动态代理生成的代理类和委托类实现了相同的接口;
2、cglib动态代理中生成的字节码更加复杂,生成的代理类是委托类的子类,且不能处理被final关键字修饰的方法;
3、jdk采用反射机制调用委托类的方法,cglib采用类似索引的方式直接调用委托类方法;
代码有待测试。。。
在spring加载bean时的使用:其中通过判断是否有带lookup-method和replace-method,如果有就用cglib,比如lookup-method常用于一个单例beanA引用一个非单例的prototype beanB时。否则就使用jdk的反射机制生成。
在spring的aop功能中:由AopProxyFactory根据AdvisedSupport对象的配置来决定。默认的策略是如果目标类是接口,则使用JDK动态代理技术,否则使用Cglib来生成代理。比如JdkDynamicAopProxy为例:
/**
* <ol>
* <li>获取代理类要实现的接口,除了Advised对象中配置的,还会加上SpringProxy, Advised(opaque=false)
* <li>检查上面得到的接口中有没有定义 equals或者hashcode的接口
* <li>调用Proxy.newProxyInstance创建代理对象
* </ol>
*/
public Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader) {
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Creating JDK dynamic proxy: target source is " +this.advised.getTargetSource());
}
Class[] proxiedInterfaces =AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised);
findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(proxiedInterfaces);
return Proxy.newProxyInstance(classLoader, proxiedInterfaces, this);
}
InvocationHandler是JDK动态代理的核心,生成的代理对象的方法调用都会委托到InvocationHandler.invoke()方法。而通过JdkDynamicAopProxy的签名我们可以看到这个类其实也实现了InvocationHandler,下面我们就通过分析这个类中实现的invoke()方法来具体看下Spring AOP是如何织入切面的:
publicObject invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throwsThrowable {
MethodInvocation invocation = null;
Object oldProxy = null;
boolean setProxyContext = false;
TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.targetSource;
Class targetClass = null;
Object target = null;
try {
//eqauls()方法,具目标对象未实现此方法
if (!this.equalsDefined && AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)){
return (equals(args[0])? Boolean.TRUE : Boolean.FALSE);
}
//hashCode()方法,具目标对象未实现此方法
if (!this.hashCodeDefined && AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)){
return newInteger(hashCode());
}
//Advised接口或者其父接口中定义的方法,直接反射调用,不应用通知
if (!this.advised.opaque &&method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface()
&&method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) {
// Service invocations onProxyConfig with the proxy config...
return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.advised,method, args);
}
Object retVal = null;
if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
// Make invocation available ifnecessary.
oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
setProxyContext = true;
}
//获得目标对象的类
target = targetSource.getTarget();
if (target != null) {
targetClass = target.getClass();
}
//获取可以应用到此方法上的Interceptor列表
List chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method,targetClass);
//如果没有可以应用到此方法的通知(Interceptor),此直接反射调用 method.invoke(target, args)
if (chain.isEmpty()) {
retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target,method, args);
} else {
//创建MethodInvocation
invocation = newReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain);
retVal = invocation.proceed();
}
// Massage return value if necessary.
if (retVal != null && retVal == target &&method.getReturnType().isInstance(proxy)
&&!RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) {
// Special case: it returned"this" and the return type of the method
// is type-compatible. Notethat we can't help if the target sets
// a reference to itself inanother returned object.
retVal = proxy;
}
return retVal;
} finally {
if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) {
// Must have come fromTargetSource.
targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
}
if (setProxyContext) {
// Restore old proxy.
AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
}
}
}
拓展,以下四个方法的使用情况:
factory-method
factory-bean
lookup-method
replace-method