TR-69 Vs OMA-DM

TR-069 is standard from DSLForum to remotely manage networking devices. OMA-DM is standard from "Open Mobile Alliance' to manage smart phones remotely. Though the target market segment is different, I don't see any major difference between both of them as far as their functionality is concerned. I believe that both the standards are suitable for both kinds of market segments.

Similarities:

  • Remote configuration and monitoring of devices
    • TR-069 is meant for managing networking devices.
    • OMA-DM is meant for managing Mobile devices.
  • Firmware upgrade.
  • HTTP based access - OMA-DM support other transports too.
  • SSL for security.
  • Both use XML for exchanging messages.
  • Both support configuration parameters in hierarchical fashion (Tree form).
  • Both expect devices to make connection to the central configuration server.
  • Both support mutual authentication.
  • Both have mechanism for central configuration server to notify devices of different events.
    • OMA-DM uses WAP-Push and SMS.
    • TR-069 connects to device embedded HTTP Server.


I don't see many differences though. I will post new entry once I find more information.

Both of these standards have become very popular in their market segments and IMO both will be surviving for a long time.

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值