34. 避免在索引列上使用NOT
通常, 我们要避免在索引列上使用NOT, NOT会产生在和在索引列上使用函数相同的
影响. 当ORACLE”遇到”NOT,他就会停止使用索引转而执行全表扫描.
举例:
低效: (这里,不使用索引)
SELECT …
FROM DEPT
WHERE DEPT_CODE NOT = 0;
高效: (这里,使用了索引)
SELECT …
FROM DEPT
WHERE DEPT_CODE > 0;
需要注意的是,在某些时候, ORACLE优化器会自动将NOT转化成相对应的关系操作符.
NOT > to <=
NOT >= to <
NOT < to >=
NOT <= to >
在这个例子中,作者犯了一些错误. 例子中的低效率SQL是不能被执行的.
我做了一些测试:
SQL> select * from emp where NOT empno > 1;
no rows selected
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'EMP'
2 1 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'EMPNO' (UNIQUE)
SQL> select * from emp where empno <= 1;
no rows selected
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'EMP'
2 1 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'EMPNO' (UNIQUE)
两者的效率完全一样,也许这符合作者关于” 在某些时候, ORACLE优化器会自动将NOT转化成相对应的关系操作符” 的观点.
35. 用>=替代>
如果DEPTNO上有一个索引,
高效:
SELECT *
FROM EMP
WHERE DEPTNO >=4
低效:
SELECT *
FROM EMP
WHERE DEPTNO >3
两者的区别在于, 前者DBMS将直接跳到第一个DEPT等于4的记录而后者将首先定位到DEPTNO=3的记录并且向前扫描到第一个DEPT大于3的记录.
36. 用UNION替换OR (适用于索引列)
通常情况下, 用UNION替换WHERE子句中的OR将会起到较好的效果. 对索引列使用OR将造成全表扫描. 注意, 以上规则只针对多个索引列有效. 如果有column没有被索引, 查询效率可能会因为你没有选择OR而降低.
在下面的例子中, LOC_ID 和REGION上都建有索引.
高效:
SELECT LOC_ID , LOC_DESC , REGION
FROM LOCATION
WHERE LOC_ID = 10
UNION
SELECT LOC_ID , LOC_DESC , REGION
FROM LOCATION
WHERE REGION = “MELBOURNE”
低效:
SELECT LOC_ID , LOC_DESC , REGION
FROM LOCATION
WHERE LOC_ID = 10 OR REGION = “MELBOURNE”
如果你坚持要用OR, 那就需要返回记录最少的索引列写在最前面.
注意:
WHERE KEY1 = 10 (返回最少记录)
OR KEY2 = 20 (返回最多记录)
ORACLE 内部将以上转换为
WHERE KEY1 = 10 AND
((NOT KEY1 = 10) AND KEY2 = 20)
下面的测试数据仅供参考: (a = 1003 返回一条记录 , b = 1 返回1003条记录)
SQL> select * from unionvsor /*1st test*/
2 where a = 1003 or b = 1;
1003 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
1 0 CONCATENATION
2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'UNIONVSOR'
3 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'UB' (NON-UNIQUE)
4 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'UNIONVSOR'
5 4 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'UA' (NON-UNIQUE)
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
144 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
63749 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
7751 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
68 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1003 rows processed
SQL> select * from unionvsor /*2nd test*/
2 where b = 1 or a = 1003 ;
1003 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
1 0 CONCATENATION
2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'UNIONVSOR'
3 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'UA' (NON-UNIQUE)
4 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'UNIONVSOR'
5 4 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'UB' (NON-UNIQUE)
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
143 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
63749 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
7751 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
68 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1003 rows processed
SQL> select * from unionvsor /*3rd test*/
2 where a = 1003
3 union
4 select * from unionvsor
5 where b = 1;
1003 rows selected.
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
1 0 SORT (UNIQUE)
2 1 UNION-ALL
3 2 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'UNIONVSOR'
4 3 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'UA' (NON-UNIQUE)
5 2 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'UNIONVSOR'
6 5 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'UB' (NON-UNIQUE)
Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
10 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
63735 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
7751 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
68 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1003 rows processed
用UNION的效果可以从consistent gets和 SQL*NET的数据交换量的减少看出