一、前言
在上一节中我们主要介绍了Spring声明式事务主要是准备了哪些对象，以下是XML配置以及注解配置各自引入的对象。
接一下我们就开始通过debug来一步步跟踪spring事务的运行流程是怎么做。在做这件事提前，我们需要提前了解一下Spring的传播特性。
二、Spring传播特性
Spring主要有7种传播特性，主要是：
- PROPAGATION_REQUIRED：如果不存在外层事务，就主动创建事务；否则使用外层事务；
- PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS：如果不存在外层事务，就不开启事务；否则使用外层事务；
- PROPAGATION_MANDATORY：如果不存在外层事务，就抛出异常；否则使用外层事务；
- PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW：总是主动开启事务；如果存在外层事务，就将外层事务挂起；
- PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED：总是不开启事务；如果存在外层事务，就将外层事务挂起
- PROPAGATION_NEVER：总是不开启事务；如果存在外层事务，则抛出异常；
- PROPAGATION_NESTED：如果不存在外层事务，就主动创建事务；否则创建嵌套的子事务；
其实Spring的传播特性就是解决不同的事务方法之间调用的事务处理问题，所以我们这里可以根据他内层事务是否支持外层事务来做一个大概的分类。
在看Spring事务的运行过程之中，如果对Mysql事务保存点不熟悉的还需要去补一下这块的概念，但是也没啥。
三、Spring事务源码分析
我们在了解Spring AOP的时候，我们知道在生成动态代理的时候会生成一个DynamicAdvisedInterceptor，然后就是从这里面可以调用。
首先这里获取对应的拦截器链，就有两个，一个是我们注入的TransactionInterceptor，另外一个就是ExposeInvocationInterceptor，这个拦截器只不过是通过设置一个theadlocal来控制整个链路的执行。继续往下跟着链路继续执行，
第一个执行肯定就是我们的 ExposeInvocationInterceptor，里面就是设置一个线程变量而已。
第二个执行的就是Spring事务注入的TransactionInterceptor。
接下来就是Spring事务的执行开始的地方，我们继续往下跟。
@Override
@Nullable
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
// Work out the target class: may be {@code null}.
// The TransactionAttributeSource should be passed the target class
// as well as the method, which may be from an interface.
// 获取我们的代理对象的class属性
Class<?> targetClass = (invocation.getThis() != null ? AopUtils.getTargetClass(invocation.getThis()) : null);
// Adapt to TransactionAspectSupport's invokeWithinTransaction...
/**
* 以事务的方式调用目标方法
* 在这埋了一个钩子函数 用来回调目标方法的
*/
return invokeWithinTransaction(invocation.getMethod(), targetClass, invocation::proceed);
}
@Nullable
protected Object invokeWithinTransaction(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass,
final InvocationCallback invocation) throws Throwable {
// If the transaction attribute is null, the method is non-transactional.
// 获取我们的事务属性源对象
TransactionAttributeSource tas = getTransactionAttributeSource();
// 通过事务属性源对象获取到当前方法的事务属性信息
final TransactionAttribute txAttr = (tas != null ? tas.getTransactionAttribute(method, targetClass) : null);
// 获取我们配置的事务管理器对象
final TransactionManager tm = determineTransactionManager(txAttr);
if (this.reactiveAdapterRegistry != null && tm instanceof ReactiveTransactionManager) {
ReactiveTransactionSupport txSupport = this.transactionSupportCache.computeIfAbsent(method, key -> {
if (KotlinDetector.isKotlinType(method.getDeclaringClass()) && KotlinDelegate.isSuspend(method)) {
throw new TransactionUsageException(
"Unsupported annotated transaction on suspending function detected: " + method +
". Use TransactionalOperator.transactional extensions instead.");
}
ReactiveAdapter adapter = this.reactiveAdapterRegistry.getAdapter(method.getReturnType());
if (adapter == null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot apply reactive transaction to non-reactive return type: " +
method.getReturnType());
}
return new ReactiveTransactionSupport(adapter);
});
return txSupport.invokeWithinTransaction(
method, targetClass, invocation, txAttr, (ReactiveTransactionManager) tm);
}
// 判断是否管理器的类型
PlatformTransactionManager ptm = asPlatformTransactionManager(tm);
// 获取连接点的唯一标识 类名+方法名
final String joinpointIdentification = methodIdentification(method, targetClass, txAttr);
// 声明式事务处理
if (txAttr == null || !(ptm instanceof CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager)) {
// Standard transaction demarcation with getTransaction and commit/rollback calls.
// 创建TransactionInfo
TransactionInfo txInfo = createTransactionIfNecessary(ptm, txAttr, joinpointIdentification);
Object retVal;
try {
// This is an around advice: Invoke the next interceptor in the chain.
// This will normally result in a target object being invoked.
// 执行被增强方法,调用具体的处理逻辑
retVal = invocation.proceedWithInvocation();
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
// target invocation exception
// 异常回滚
completeTransactionAfterThrowing(txInfo, ex);
throw ex;
}
finally {
//清除事务信息，恢复线程私有的老的事务信息
cleanupTransactionInfo(txInfo);
}
if (retVal != null && vavrPresent && VavrDelegate.isVavrTry(retVal)) {
// Set rollback-only in case of Vavr failure matching our rollback rules...
TransactionStatus status = txInfo.getTransactionStatus();
if (status != null && txAttr != null) {
retVal = VavrDelegate.evaluateTryFailure(retVal, txAttr, status);
}
}
//成功后提交，会进行资源储量，连接释放，恢复挂起事务等操作
commitTransactionAfterReturning(txInfo);
return retVal;
}
else {
// 编程式事务处理
Object result;
final ThrowableHolder throwableHolder = new ThrowableHolder();
// It's a CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager: pass a TransactionCallback in.
try {
result = ((CallbackPreferringPlatformTransactionManager) ptm).execute(txAttr, status -> {
TransactionInfo txInfo = prepareTransactionInfo(ptm, txAttr, joinpointIdentification, status);
try {
Object retVal = invocation.proceedWithInvocation();
if (retVal != null && vavrPresent && VavrDelegate.isVavrTry(retVal)) {
// Set rollback-only in case of Vavr failure matching our rollback rules...
retVal = VavrDelegate.evaluateTryFailure(retVal, txAttr, status);
}
return retVal;
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
if (txAttr.rollbackOn(ex)) {
// A RuntimeException: will lead to a rollback.
if (ex instanceof RuntimeException) {
throw (RuntimeException) ex;
}
else {
throw new ThrowableHolderException(ex);
}
}
else {
// A normal return value: will lead to a commit.
throwableHolder.throwable = ex;
return null;
}
}
finally {
cleanupTransactionInfo(txInfo);
}
});
}
catch (ThrowableHolderException ex) {
throw ex.getCause();
}
catch (TransactionSystemException ex2) {
if (throwableHolder.throwable != null) {
logger.error("Application exception overridden by commit exception", throwableHolder.throwable);
ex2.initApplicationException(throwableHolder.throwable);
}
throw ex2;
}
catch (Throwable ex2) {
if (throwableHolder.throwable != null) {
logger.error("Application exception overridden by commit exception", throwableHolder.throwable);
}
throw ex2;
}
// Check result state: It might indicate a Throwable to rethrow.
if (throwableHolder.throwable != null) {
throw throwableHolder.throwable;
}
return result;
}
}首先第一步就是去获取我们的事务属性源对象，在xml中不知道是否还记得，我们在解析spring事务属性的时候，注入的一个namedMatchTransactionAttributeSource对象，这里就是把创建好的那个对象拿过来。
然后就是根据这个事务属性就去获取我们当前方法的事务属性信息。
@Override
@Nullable
public TransactionAttribute getTransactionAttribute(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) {
if (!ClassUtils.isUserLevelMethod(method)) {
return null;
}
// Look for direct name match.
String methodName = method.getName();
TransactionAttribute attr = this.nameMap.get(methodName);
if (attr == null) {
// Look for most specific name match.
String bestNameMatch = null;
for (String mappedName : this.nameMap.keySet()) {
if (isMatch(methodName, mappedName) &&
(bestNameMatch == null || bestNameMatch.length() <= mappedName.length())) {
attr = this.nameMap.get(mappedName);
bestNameMatch = mappedName;
}
}
}
return attr;
}
public static boolean isUserLevelMethod(Method method) {
Assert.notNull(method, "Method must not be null");
// 桥接方法：就是说一个子类在继承（或实现）一个父类（或接口）的泛型方法时，
// 在子类中明确指定了泛型类型，那么在编译时编译器会自动生成桥接方法（当然还有其他情况会生成桥接方法，
// 这里只是列举了其中一种情况）。https://blog.csdn.net/qq_32647893/article/details/81071336
// isSynthetic:判断此字段是否为编译期间生成的合成字段，如果是则返回true; 否则返回false。
// https://www.jianshu.com/p/3f75221437a3
// 如果method是桥接方法或者(method不是编译期间生成的合成字段且method不是GroovyObject的方法时返回true
// 否则返回false
return (method.isBridge() || (!method.isSynthetic() && !isGroovyObjectMethod(method)));
/**
* 判断是否GroovyObject的方法，GroovyObject表示Groovy语言
* @param method
* @return
*/
private static boolean isGroovyObjectMethod(Method method) {
// 获取声明method的类的全类名 ，如果等于'groovy.lang.GroovyObject'就返回true；否则返回false
return method.getDeclaringClass().getName().equals("groovy.lang.GroovyObject");
}
获得得到方法的事务属性之后就会去获取我们的事务管理器，这里我在一开始就已经定义过了的。
@Nullable
protected TransactionManager determineTransactionManager(@Nullable TransactionAttribute txAttr) {
// Do not attempt to lookup tx manager if no tx attributes are set
if (txAttr == null || this.beanFactory == null) {
return getTransactionManager();
}
String qualifier = txAttr.getQualifier();
if (StringUtils.hasText(qualifier)) {
return determineQualifiedTransactionManager(this.beanFactory, qualifier);
}
else if (StringUtils.hasText(this.transactionManagerBeanName)) {
return determineQualifiedTransactionManager(this.beanFactory, this.transactionManagerBeanName);
}
else {
TransactionManager defaultTransactionManager = getTransactionManager();
if (defaultTransactionManager == null) {
defaultTransactionManager = this.transactionManagerCache.get(DEFAULT_TRANSACTION_MANAGER_KEY);
if (defaultTransactionManager == null) {
defaultTransactionManager = this.beanFactory.getBean(TransactionManager.class);
this.transactionManagerCache.putIfAbsent(
DEFAULT_TRANSACTION_MANAGER_KEY, defaultTransactionManager);
}
}
return defaultTransactionManager;
}
}接下来就是判断事务管理器的类型而已。
@Nullable
private PlatformTransactionManager asPlatformTransactionManager(@Nullable Object transactionManager) {
if (transactionManager == null || transactionManager instanceof PlatformTransactionManager) {
return (PlatformTransactionManager) transactionManager;
}
else {
throw new IllegalStateException(
"Specified transaction manager is not a PlatformTransactionManager: " + transactionManager);
}
}然后获取事务的连接点，其实就是我们是方法全限定名称。
接下来就是createTransactionIfNecessary方法中去创建我们的事务，在看这块源码之前，我们首先先看下TransactionInfo。
TransactionInfo就是事务信息，里面保存了事务的相关信息，例如：事务管理器、事务连接点、事务连接器、上一个事务信息。
protected static final class TransactionInfo {
@Nullable
private final PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager;
@Nullable
private final TransactionAttribute transactionAttribute;
private final String joinpointIdentification;
@Nullable
private TransactionStatus transactionStatus;
@Nullable
private TransactionInfo oldTransactionInfo;
public TransactionInfo(@Nullable PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager,
@Nullable TransactionAttribute transactionAttribute, String joinpointIdentification) {
this.transactionManager = transactionManager;
this.transactionAttribute = transactionAttribute;
this.joinpointIdentification = joinpointIdentification;
}然后接着继续看他如果去创建事务信息的。
protected TransactionInfo createTransactionIfNecessary(@Nullable PlatformTransactionManager tm,
@Nullable TransactionAttribute txAttr, final String joinpointIdentification) {
// If no name specified, apply method identification as transaction name.
// 如果没有名称指定则使用方法唯一标识，并使用DelegatingTransactionAttribute封装txAttr
if (txAttr != null && txAttr.getName() == null) {
txAttr = new DelegatingTransactionAttribute(txAttr) {
@Override
public String getName() {
return joinpointIdentification;
}
};
}
TransactionStatus status = null;
if (txAttr != null) {
if (tm != null) {
// 获取TransactionStatus事务状态信息
status = tm.getTransaction(txAttr);
}
else {
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Skipping transactional joinpoint [" + joinpointIdentification +
"] because no transaction manager has been configured");
}
}
}
// 根据指定的属性与status准备一个TransactionInfo，
return prepareTransactionInfo(tm, txAttr, joinpointIdentification, status);
}在继续往下看之前，我们先看下TransactionStatus，其实就是保存了相关的相关状态信息。
public interface TransactionStatus extends TransactionExecution, SavepointManager, Flushable {
/**
* 是否有保存点
*
* Return whether this transaction internally carries a savepoint,
* that is, has been created as nested transaction based on a savepoint.
* <p>This method is mainly here for diagnostic purposes, alongside
* {@link #isNewTransaction()}. For programmatic handling of custom
* savepoints, use the operations provided by {@link SavepointManager}.
* @see #isNewTransaction()
* @see #createSavepoint()
* @see #rollbackToSavepoint(Object)
* @see #releaseSavepoint(Object)
*/
boolean hasSavepoint();
/**
* 将会话刷新到数据库中
*
* Flush the underlying session to the datastore, if applicable:
* for example, all affected Hibernate/JPA sessions.
* <p>This is effectively just a hint and may be a no-op if the underlying
* transaction manager does not have a flush concept. A flush signal may
* get applied to the primary resource or to transaction synchronizations,
* depending on the underlying resource.
*/
@Override
void flush();
}
/**
* Common representation of the current state of a transaction.
* Serves as base interface for {@link TransactionStatus} as well as
* {@link ReactiveTransaction}.
*
* @author Juergen Hoeller
* @since 5.2
*/
public interface TransactionExecution {
/**
* 是否为新事务
*
* Return whether the present transaction is new; otherwise participating
* in an existing transaction, or potentially not running in an actual
* transaction in the first place.
*/
boolean isNewTransaction();
/**
* 设置为只回滚
*
* Set the transaction rollback-only. This instructs the transaction manager
* that the only possible outcome of the transaction may be a rollback, as
* alternative to throwing an exception which would in turn trigger a rollback.
*/
void setRollbackOnly();
/**
* 是否为只回滚
*
* Return whether the transaction has been marked as rollback-only
* (either by the application or by the transaction infrastructure).
*/
boolean isRollbackOnly();
/**
* 当前事务是否已经完成
*
* Return whether this transaction is completed, that is,
* whether it has already been committed or rolled back.
*/
boolean isCompleted();
}
public interface SavepointManager {
/**
* Create a new savepoint. You can roll back to a specific savepoint
* via {@code rollbackToSavepoint}, and explicitly release a savepoint
* that you don't need anymore via {@code releaseSavepoint}.
* <p>Note that most transaction managers will automatically release
* savepoints at transaction completion.
* @return a savepoint object, to be passed into
* {@link #rollbackToSavepoint} or {@link #releaseSavepoint}
* @throws NestedTransactionNotSupportedException if the underlying
* transaction does not support savepoints
* @throws TransactionException if the savepoint could not be created,
* for example because the transaction is not in an appropriate state
* @see java.sql.Connection#setSavepoint
*/
Object createSavepoint() throws TransactionException;
/**
* Roll back to the given savepoint.
* <p>The savepoint will <i>not</i> be automatically released afterwards.
* You may explicitly call {@link #releaseSavepoint(Object)} or rely on
* automatic release on transaction completion.
* @param savepoint the savepoint to roll back to
* @throws NestedTransactionNotSupportedException if the underlying
* transaction does not support savepoints
* @throws TransactionException if the rollback failed
* @see java.sql.Connection#rollback(java.sql.Savepoint)
*/
void rollbackToSavepoint(Object savepoint) throws TransactionException;
/**
* Explicitly release the given savepoint.
* <p>Note that most transaction managers will automatically release
* savepoints on transaction completion.
* <p>Implementations should fail as silently as possible if proper
* resource cleanup will eventually happen at transaction completion.
* @param savepoint the savepoint to release
* @throws NestedTransactionNotSupportedException if the underlying
* transaction does not support savepoints
* @throws TransactionException if the release failed
* @see java.sql.Connection#releaseSavepoint
*/
void releaseSavepoint(Object savepoint) throws TransactionException;
}
就是事务的一系列信息保存以及操作，我们继续接着往下看getTransaction方法。
@Override
public final TransactionStatus getTransaction(@Nullable TransactionDefinition definition)
throws TransactionException {
// Use defaults if no transaction definition given.
// 如果没有事务定义信息则使用默认的事务管理器定义信息
TransactionDefinition def = (definition != null ? definition : TransactionDefinition.withDefaults());
// 获取事务
Object transaction = doGetTransaction();
boolean debugEnabled = logger.isDebugEnabled();
// 判断当前线程是否存在事务，判断依据为当前线程记录的连接不为空且连接中的transactionActive属性不为空
if (isExistingTransaction(transaction)) {
// Existing transaction found -> check propagation behavior to find out how to behave.
// 当前线程已经存在事务
return handleExistingTransaction(def, transaction, debugEnabled);
}
// Check definition settings for new transaction.
// 事务超时设置验证
if (def.getTimeout() < TransactionDefinition.TIMEOUT_DEFAULT) {
throw new InvalidTimeoutException("Invalid transaction timeout", def.getTimeout());
}
// No existing transaction found -> check propagation behavior to find out how to proceed.
// 如果当前线程不存在事务，但是PropagationBehavior却被声明为PROPAGATION_MANDATORY抛出异常
if (def.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_MANDATORY) {
throw new IllegalTransactionStateException(
"No existing transaction found for transaction marked with propagation 'mandatory'");
}
// PROPAGATION_REQUIRED，PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW，PROPAGATION_NESTED都需要新建事务
else if (def.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRED ||
def.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW ||
def.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NESTED) {
//没有当前事务的话，REQUIRED，REQUIRES_NEW，NESTED挂起的是空事务，然后创建一个新事务
SuspendedResourcesHolder suspendedResources = suspend(null);
if (debugEnabled) {
logger.debug("Creating new transaction with name [" + def.getName() + "]: " + def);
}
try {
return startTransaction(def, transaction, debugEnabled, suspendedResources);
}
catch (RuntimeException | Error ex) {
// 恢复挂起的事务
resume(null, suspendedResources);
throw ex;
}
}
else {
// Create "empty" transaction: no actual transaction, but potentially synchronization.
// 创建一个空的事务
if (def.getIsolationLevel() != TransactionDefinition.ISOLATION_DEFAULT && logger.isWarnEnabled()) {
logger.warn("Custom isolation level specified but no actual transaction initiated; " +
"isolation level will effectively be ignored: " + def);
}
boolean newSynchronization = (getTransactionSynchronization() == SYNCHRONIZATION_ALWAYS);
return prepareTransactionStatus(def, null, true, newSynchronization, debugEnabled, null);
}
}第一步首先就会去获取事务的定义信息，还记得我们上一步传入的事务信息TransactionAttribute吗，我们来先看下这个类。
public interface TransactionAttribute extends TransactionDefinition {
/**
* Return a qualifier value associated with this transaction attribute.
* <p>This may be used for choosing a corresponding transaction manager
* to process this specific transaction.
* @since 3.0
*/
@Nullable
String getQualifier();
/**
* Should we roll back on the given exception?
* @param ex the exception to evaluate
* @return whether to perform a rollback or not
*/
boolean rollbackOn(Throwable ex);
}
public interface TransactionDefinition {
/**
* 支持当前事务，若当前没有事务就创建一个事务
*
* Support a current transaction; create a new one if none exists.
* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>This is typically the default setting of a transaction definition,
* and typically defines a transaction synchronization scope.
*/
int PROPAGATION_REQUIRED = 0;
/**
* 如果当前存在事务，则加入该事务；如果当前没有事务，则以非事务的方式运行
*
* Support a current transaction; execute non-transactionally if none exists.
* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p><b>NOTE:</b> For transaction managers with transaction synchronization,
* {@code PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS} is slightly different from no transaction
* at all, as it defines a transaction scope that synchronization might apply to.
* As a consequence, the same resources (a JDBC {@code Connection}, a
* Hibernate {@code Session}, etc) will be shared for the entire specified
* scope. Note that the exact behavior depends on the actual synchronization
* configuration of the transaction manager!
* <p>In general, use {@code PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS} with care! In particular, do
* not rely on {@code PROPAGATION_REQUIRED} or {@code PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW}
* <i>within</i> a {@code PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS} scope (which may lead to
* synchronization conflicts at runtime). If such nesting is unavoidable, make sure
* to configure your transaction manager appropriately (typically switching to
* "synchronization on actual transaction").
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager#setTransactionSynchronization
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager#SYNCHRONIZATION_ON_ACTUAL_TRANSACTION
*/
int PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS = 1;
/**
* 如果当前存在事务，则加入该事务；如果当前没有事务，则抛出异常
*
* Support a current transaction; throw an exception if no current transaction
* exists. Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>Note that transaction synchronization within a {@code PROPAGATION_MANDATORY}
* scope will always be driven by the surrounding transaction.
*/
int PROPAGATION_MANDATORY = 2;
/**
* 创建一个新的事务，如果当前存在事务，则把当前事务挂起
*
* Create a new transaction, suspending the current transaction if one exists.
* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p><b>NOTE:</b> Actual transaction suspension will not work out-of-the-box
* on all transaction managers. This in particular applies to
* {@link org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager},
* which requires the {@code javax.transaction.TransactionManager} to be
* made available it to it (which is server-specific in standard Java EE).
* <p>A {@code PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW} scope always defines its own
* transaction synchronizations. Existing synchronizations will be suspended
* and resumed appropriately.
* @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager
*/
int PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW = 3;
/**
* 以非事务方式运行，如果当前存在事务，则把当前事务挂起
*
* Do not support a current transaction; rather always execute non-transactionally.
* Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p><b>NOTE:</b> Actual transaction suspension will not work out-of-the-box
* on all transaction managers. This in particular applies to
* {@link org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager},
* which requires the {@code javax.transaction.TransactionManager} to be
* made available it to it (which is server-specific in standard Java EE).
* <p>Note that transaction synchronization is <i>not</i> available within a
* {@code PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED} scope. Existing synchronizations
* will be suspended and resumed appropriately.
* @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager
*/
int PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED = 4;
/**
* 以非事务方式运行，如果当前存在事务，则抛出异常
*
* Do not support a current transaction; throw an exception if a current transaction
* exists. Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name.
* <p>Note that transaction synchronization is <i>not</i> available within a
* {@code PROPAGATION_NEVER} scope.
*/
int PROPAGATION_NEVER = 5;
/**
* 如果外层存在事务，就以嵌套事务运行，被嵌套的事务可以独立于外层事务进行提交或者回滚(保存点)，
* 如果外层不存在事务,行为跟PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW
*
* Execute within a nested transaction if a current transaction exists,
* behave like {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED} otherwise. There is no
* analogous feature in EJB.
* <p><b>NOTE:</b> Actual creation of a nested transaction will only work on
* specific transaction managers. Out of the box, this only applies to the JDBC
* {link org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager}
* when working on a JDBC 3.0 driver. Some JTA providers might support
* nested transactions as well.
* see org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager
*/
int PROPAGATION_NESTED = 6;
/**
* 使用数据库默认的隔离级别
*
* Use the default isolation level of the underlying datastore.
* All other levels correspond to the JDBC isolation levels.
* @see java.sql.Connection
*/
int ISOLATION_DEFAULT = -1;
/**
* 读未提交
*
* Indicates that dirty reads, non-repeatable reads and phantom reads
* can occur.
* <p>This level allows a row changed by one transaction to be read by another
* transaction before any changes in that row have been committed (a "dirty read").
* If any of the changes are rolled back, the second transaction will have
* retrieved an invalid row.
* @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED
*/
int ISOLATION_READ_UNCOMMITTED = 1; // same as java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED;
/**
* 读已提交
*
* Indicates that dirty reads are prevented; non-repeatable reads and
* phantom reads can occur.
* <p>This level only prohibits a transaction from reading a row
* with uncommitted changes in it.
* @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED
*/
int ISOLATION_READ_COMMITTED = 2; // same as java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED;
/**
* 可重复读
*
* Indicates that dirty reads and non-repeatable reads are prevented;
* phantom reads can occur.
* <p>This level prohibits a transaction from reading a row with uncommitted changes
* in it, and it also prohibits the situation where one transaction reads a row,
* a second transaction alters the row, and the first transaction re-reads the row,
* getting different values the second time (a "non-repeatable read").
* @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ
*/
int ISOLATION_REPEATABLE_READ = 4; // same as java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ;
/**
* 可串行化
*
* Indicates that dirty reads, non-repeatable reads and phantom reads
* are prevented.
* <p>This level includes the prohibitions in {@link #ISOLATION_REPEATABLE_READ}
* and further prohibits the situation where one transaction reads all rows that
* satisfy a {@code WHERE} condition, a second transaction inserts a row
* that satisfies that {@code WHERE} condition, and the first transaction
* re-reads for the same condition, retrieving the additional "phantom" row
* in the second read.
* @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE
*/
int ISOLATION_SERIALIZABLE = 8; // same as java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE;
/**
* 使用默认的超时时间
*
* Use the default timeout of the underlying transaction system,
* or none if timeouts are not supported.
*/
int TIMEOUT_DEFAULT = -1;
/**
* 获取事务的传播行为
*
* Return the propagation behavior.
* <p>Must return one of the {@code PROPAGATION_XXX} constants
* defined on {@link TransactionDefinition this interface}.
* <p>The default is {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED}.
* @return the propagation behavior
* @see #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager#isActualTransactionActive()
*/
default int getPropagationBehavior() {
return PROPAGATION_REQUIRED;
}
/**
* 获取事务的隔离级别
*
* Return the isolation level.
* <p>Must return one of the {@code ISOLATION_XXX} constants defined on
* {@link TransactionDefinition this interface}. Those constants are designed
* to match the values of the same constants on {@link java.sql.Connection}.
* <p>Exclusively designed for use with {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED} or
* {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW} since it only applies to newly started
* transactions. Consider switching the "validateExistingTransactions" flag to
* "true" on your transaction manager if you'd like isolation level declarations
* to get rejected when participating in an existing transaction with a different
* isolation level.
* <p>The default is {@link #ISOLATION_DEFAULT}. Note that a transaction manager
* that does not support custom isolation levels will throw an exception when
* given any other level than {@link #ISOLATION_DEFAULT}.
* @return the isolation level
* @see #ISOLATION_DEFAULT
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager#setValidateExistingTransaction
*/
default int getIsolationLevel() {
return ISOLATION_DEFAULT;
}
/**
* 获取事务的超时时间
*
* Return the transaction timeout.
* <p>Must return a number of seconds, or {@link #TIMEOUT_DEFAULT}.
* <p>Exclusively designed for use with {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED} or
* {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW} since it only applies to newly started
* transactions.
* <p>Note that a transaction manager that does not support timeouts will throw
* an exception when given any other timeout than {@link #TIMEOUT_DEFAULT}.
* <p>The default is {@link #TIMEOUT_DEFAULT}.
* @return the transaction timeout
*/
default int getTimeout() {
return TIMEOUT_DEFAULT;
}
/**
* 是否为只读事务
*
* Return whether to optimize as a read-only transaction.
* <p>The read-only flag applies to any transaction context, whether backed
* by an actual resource transaction ({@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED}/
* {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW}) or operating non-transactionally at
* the resource level ({@link #PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS}). In the latter case,
* the flag will only apply to managed resources within the application,
* such as a Hibernate {@code Session}.
* <p>This just serves as a hint for the actual transaction subsystem;
* it will <i>not necessarily</i> cause failure of write access attempts.
* A transaction manager which cannot interpret the read-only hint will
* <i>not</i> throw an exception when asked for a read-only transaction.
* @return {@code true} if the transaction is to be optimized as read-only
* ({@code false} by default)
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronization#beforeCommit(boolean)
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager#isCurrentTransactionReadOnly()
*/
default boolean isReadOnly() {
return false;
}
/**
* 获取当前事务的名称
*
* Return the name of this transaction. Can be {@code null}.
* <p>This will be used as the transaction name to be shown in a
* transaction monitor, if applicable (for example, WebLogic's).
* <p>In case of Spring's declarative transactions, the exposed name will be
* the {@code fully-qualified class name + "." + method name} (by default).
* @return the name of this transaction ({@code null} by default}
* @see org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport
* @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager#getCurrentTransactionName()
*/
@Nullable
default String getName() {
return null;
}
// Static builder methods
/**
* Return an unmodifiable {@code TransactionDefinition} with defaults.
* <p>For customization purposes, use the modifiable
* {@link org.springframework.transaction.support.DefaultTransactionDefinition}
* instead.
* @since 5.2
*/
static TransactionDefinition withDefaults() {
return StaticTransactionDefinition.INSTANCE;
}
}
其实这里我理解就跟我们的BeanDefiniton一样代表bean的信息，这里是事务定义信息就代表事务的基本信息。
然后接着往下看doGetTransaction方法，真正去获取事务的地方。
/**
* 创建一个DataSourceTransactionObject当作事务，设置是否允许保存点，然后获取连接持有器ConnectionHolder
* 里面会存放JDBC的连接，设置给DataSourceTransactionObject,当然第一次是空的
*
* @return
*/
@Override
protected Object doGetTransaction() {
// 创建一个数据源事务对象
DataSourceTransactionObject txObject = new DataSourceTransactionObject();
// 是否允许当前事务设置保持点
txObject.setSavepointAllowed(isNestedTransactionAllowed());
/**
* TransactionSynchronizationManager 事务同步管理器对象(该类中都是局部线程变量)
* 用来保存当前事务的信息,我们第一次从这里去线程变量中获取 事务连接持有器对象 通过数据源为key去获取
* 由于第一次进来开始事务 我们的事务同步管理器中没有被存放.所以此时获取出来的conHolder为null
*/
ConnectionHolder conHolder =
(ConnectionHolder) TransactionSynchronizationManager.getResource(obtainDataSource());
// 非新创建连接则写false
txObject.setConnectionHolder(conHolder, false);
// 返回事务对象
return txObject;
}首先获取一个事务源对象，就是事务源对象的基本信息。然后我们知道开启事务肯定需要数据连接，那问大家一个问题，如果是同一个线程进来，连接能共用吗？事务状态如果处理保存？通过参数传递吗？
Spring通过一个TransactionSynchronizationManager 事务同步管理器来保存当前事务的信息，里面都是一些ThreadLocal对象。
public abstract class TransactionSynchronizationManager {
private static final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(TransactionSynchronizationManager.class);
// 线程私有事务资源
private static final ThreadLocal<Map<Object, Object>> resources =
new NamedThreadLocal<>("Transactional resources");
// 事务同步
private static final ThreadLocal<Set<TransactionSynchronization>> synchronizations =
new NamedThreadLocal<>("Transaction synchronizations");
// 当前事务的名称
private static final ThreadLocal<String> currentTransactionName =
new NamedThreadLocal<>("Current transaction name");
// 当前事务是否只读
private static final ThreadLocal<Boolean> currentTransactionReadOnly =
new NamedThreadLocal<>("Current transaction read-only status");
// 当前事务的隔离级别
private static final ThreadLocal<Integer> currentTransactionIsolationLevel =
new NamedThreadLocal<>("Current transaction isolation level");
// 实际事务是否激活
private static final ThreadLocal<Boolean> actualTransactionActive =
new NamedThreadLocal<>("Actual transaction active");那我们第一次进来肯定获取得到的都是空的。
@Nullable
public static Object getResource(Object key) {
Object actualKey = TransactionSynchronizationUtils.unwrapResourceIfNecessary(key);
Object value = doGetResource(actualKey);
if (value != null && logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Retrieved value [" + value + "] for key [" + actualKey + "] bound to thread [" +
Thread.currentThread().getName() + "]");
}
return value;
}
/**
* Actually check the value of the resource that is bound for the given key.
*/
@Nullable
private static Object doGetResource(Object actualKey) {
Map<Object, Object> map = resources.get();
if (map == null) {
return null;
}
Object value = map.get(actualKey);
// Transparently remove ResourceHolder that was marked as void...
if (value instanceof ResourceHolder && ((ResourceHolder) value).isVoid()) {
map.remove(actualKey);
// Remove entire ThreadLocal if empty...
if (map.isEmpty()) {
resources.remove();
}
value = null;
}
return value;
}此时获取了得到了事务，以及一些设置一些属性信息。
接下来就会判断当前是否存在事务。
protected boolean isExistingTransaction(Object transaction) {
DataSourceTransactionObject txObject = (DataSourceTransactionObject) transaction;
// 若第一次进来开始事务，txObject.hasConnectionHolder()返回的null那么表示不存在事务
return (txObject.hasConnectionHolder() && txObject.getConnectionHolder().isTransactionActive());
}
首先会判断我们是否有连接器，并且连接器的事务状态是激活的，很明细我们这里没有，继续往下走，然后会设置事务超市时间。
然后再接下来就出现第一个事务的隔离级别，因为当前是还没有事务状态的，如果当前线程不存在事务，但是PropagationBehavior却被声明为PROPAGATION_MANDATORY抛出异常。
我们这里配置了对应的REQUED,所以checkout继续往下走。
因为当前没有事务，所以这里会挂起来一个空事务。
protected final SuspendedResourcesHolder suspend(@Nullable Object transaction) throws TransactionException {
// 判断当前的线程变量中有没有激活的事物,有需要清空线程变量
if (TransactionSynchronizationManager.isSynchronizationActive()) {
List<TransactionSynchronization> suspendedSynchronizations = doSuspendSynchronization();
try {
Object suspendedResources = null;
if (transaction != null) {
//挂起的资源，连接持有器
suspendedResources = doSuspend(transaction);
}
// 获取当前事务名称
String name = TransactionSynchronizationManager.getCurrentTransactionName();
// 清空线程变量
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setCurrentTransactionName(null);
// 获取出只读事务的名称
boolean readOnly = TransactionSynchronizationManager.isCurrentTransactionReadOnly();
// 清空线程变量
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setCurrentTransactionReadOnly(false);
// 获取已存在事务的隔离级别
Integer isolationLevel = TransactionSynchronizationManager.getCurrentTransactionIsolationLevel();
// 清空隔离级别
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setCurrentTransactionIsolationLevel(null);
// 判断当前事务激活状态
boolean wasActive = TransactionSynchronizationManager.isActualTransactionActive();
// 清空标记
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setActualTransactionActive(false);
// 把上诉从线程变量中获取出来的存在事务属性封装为挂起的事务属性返回出去
return new SuspendedResourcesHolder(
suspendedResources, suspendedSynchronizations, name, readOnly, isolationLevel, wasActive);
}
catch (RuntimeException | Error ex) {
// doSuspend failed - original transaction is still active...
doResumeSynchronization(suspendedSynchronizations);
throw ex;
}
}
else if (transaction != null) {
// Transaction active but no synchronization active.
Object suspendedResources = doSuspend(transaction);
return new SuspendedResourcesHolder(suspendedResources);
}
else {
// Neither transaction nor synchronization active.
return null;
}
}可以看到挂起事务其实就是从我们事务同步器的那个线程变量获取出来对应的参数，然后返回挂起的对象SupendResourceHolder，后续需要恢复的，但是我们这里都没有，所以返回的是一个空对象。
接下来就会startTransaction，就会开启一个事务。
private TransactionStatus startTransaction(TransactionDefinition definition, Object transaction,
boolean debugEnabled, @Nullable SuspendedResourcesHolder suspendedResources) {
// 是否需要新同步
boolean newSynchronization = (getTransactionSynchronization() != SYNCHRONIZATION_NEVER);
// 创建新的事务
DefaultTransactionStatus status = newTransactionStatus(
definition, transaction, true, newSynchronization, debugEnabled, suspendedResources);
// 开启事务和连接
doBegin(transaction, definition);
// 新同步事务的设置，针对于当前线程的设置
prepareSynchronization(status, definition);
return status;
}
protected DefaultTransactionStatus newTransactionStatus(
TransactionDefinition definition, @Nullable Object transaction, boolean newTransaction,
boolean newSynchronization, boolean debug, @Nullable Object suspendedResources) {
// 是否需要新同步，只要有新同步且当前无同步激活事务
boolean actualNewSynchronization = newSynchronization &&
!TransactionSynchronizationManager.isSynchronizationActive();
return new DefaultTransactionStatus(
transaction, newTransaction, actualNewSynchronization,
definition.isReadOnly(), debug, suspendedResources);
}
然后继续接着往下看doBegin。
**
* 开启连接和事务
* @param transaction the transaction object returned by {@code doGetTransaction}
* @param definition a TransactionDefinition instance, describing propagation
* behavior, isolation level, read-only flag, timeout, and transaction name
*/
@Override
protected void doBegin(Object transaction, TransactionDefinition definition) {
// 强制转化事务对象
DataSourceTransactionObject txObject = (DataSourceTransactionObject) transaction;
Connection con = null;
try {
// 判断事务对象没有数据库连接持有器
if (!txObject.hasConnectionHolder() ||
txObject.getConnectionHolder().isSynchronizedWithTransaction()) {
// 通过数据源获取一个数据库连接对象
Connection newCon = obtainDataSource().getConnection();
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Acquired Connection [" + newCon + "] for JDBC transaction");
}
// 把我们的数据库连接包装成一个ConnectionHolder对象 然后设置到我们的txObject对象中去
txObject.setConnectionHolder(new ConnectionHolder(newCon), true);
}
// 标记当前的连接是一个同步事务
txObject.getConnectionHolder().setSynchronizedWithTransaction(true);
con = txObject.getConnectionHolder().getConnection();
// 为当前的事务设置隔离级别
Integer previousIsolationLevel = DataSourceUtils.prepareConnectionForTransaction(con, definition);
// 设置先前隔离级别
txObject.setPreviousIsolationLevel(previousIsolationLevel);
// 设置是否只读
txObject.setReadOnly(definition.isReadOnly());
// Switch to manual commit if necessary. This is very expensive in some JDBC drivers,
// so we don't want to do it unnecessarily (for example if we've explicitly
// configured the connection pool to set it already).
// 关闭自动提交
if (con.getAutoCommit()) {
//设置需要恢复自动提交
txObject.setMustRestoreAutoCommit(true);
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Switching JDBC Connection [" + con + "] to manual commit");
}
// 关闭自动提交
con.setAutoCommit(false);
}
// 判断事务是否需要设置为只读事务
prepareTransactionalConnection(con, definition);
// 标记激活事务
txObject.getConnectionHolder().setTransactionActive(true);
// 设置事务超时时间
int timeout = determineTimeout(definition);
if (timeout != TransactionDefinition.TIMEOUT_DEFAULT) {
txObject.getConnectionHolder().setTimeoutInSeconds(timeout);
}
// Bind the connection holder to the thread.
// 绑定我们的数据源和连接到我们的同步管理器上，把数据源作为key,数据库连接作为value 设置到线程变量中
if (txObject.isNewConnectionHolder()) {
// 将当前获取到的连接绑定到当前线程
TransactionSynchronizationManager.bindResource(obtainDataSource(), txObject.getConnectionHolder());
}
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
if (txObject.isNewConnectionHolder()) {
// 释放数据库连接
DataSourceUtils.releaseConnection(con, obtainDataSource());
txObject.setConnectionHolder(null, false);
}
throw new CannotCreateTransactionException("Could not open JDBC Connection for transaction", ex);
}
}通过数据源获取数据库链接，然后设置一系列属性，然后通过Spring的事务同步管理器把当前连接绑定到当前线程。
public static void bindResource(Object key, Object value) throws IllegalStateException {
Object actualKey = TransactionSynchronizationUtils.unwrapResourceIfNecessary(key);
Assert.notNull(value, "Value must not be null");//每次在进行获取的时候都要根据obtainDataSource()返回的数据源来获取connectionHolder,现在经过设置会后，有了
Map<Object, Object> map = resources.get();
// set ThreadLocal Map if none found
if (map == null) {
map = new HashMap<>();
resources.set(map);
}
Object oldValue = map.put(actualKey, value);
// Transparently suppress a ResourceHolder that was marked as void...
if (oldValue instanceof ResourceHolder && ((ResourceHolder) oldValue).isVoid()) {
oldValue = null;
}
if (oldValue != null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Already value [" + oldValue + "] for key [" +
actualKey + "] bound to thread [" + Thread.currentThread().getName() + "]");
}
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Bound value [" + value + "] for key [" + actualKey + "] to thread [" +
Thread.currentThread().getName() + "]");
}
}TransactionSynchronizationManager还有其他属性，然后接着就是去设置这些属性。
/**
* 设置各种线程私有变量的状态
*
* Initialize transaction synchronization as appropriate.
*/
protected void prepareSynchronization(DefaultTransactionStatus status, TransactionDefinition definition) {
if (status.isNewSynchronization()) {
// 绑定事务激活
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setActualTransactionActive(status.hasTransaction());
// 当前事务的隔离级别
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setCurrentTransactionIsolationLevel(
definition.getIsolationLevel() != TransactionDefinition.ISOLATION_DEFAULT ?
definition.getIsolationLevel() : null);
// 是否为只读事务
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setCurrentTransactionReadOnly(definition.isReadOnly());
// 事务的名称
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setCurrentTransactionName(definition.getName());
TransactionSynchronizationManager.initSynchronization();
}
}至此我们的事务就已经创建好了，但是别忘记我们需要的是一个TransactionInfo，所以此时就需要去生成我们的TransactionInfo。
protected TransactionInfo prepareTransactionInfo(@Nullable PlatformTransactionManager tm,
@Nullable TransactionAttribute txAttr, String joinpointIdentification,
@Nullable TransactionStatus status) {
// 创建事务信息
TransactionInfo txInfo = new TransactionInfo(tm, txAttr, joinpointIdentification);
if (txAttr != null) {
// We need a transaction for this method...
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Getting transaction for [" + txInfo.getJoinpointIdentification() + "]");
}
// The transaction manager will flag an error if an incompatible tx already exists.
// 设置新事务状态
txInfo.newTransactionStatus(status);
}
else {
// The TransactionInfo.hasTransaction() method will return false. We created it only
// to preserve the integrity of the ThreadLocal stack maintained in this class.
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("No need to create transaction for [" + joinpointIdentification +
"]: This method is not transactional.");
}
}
// We always bind the TransactionInfo to the thread, even if we didn't create
// a new transaction here. This guarantees that the TransactionInfo stack
// will be managed correctly even if no transaction was created by this aspect.
// 事务信息绑定到当前线程
txInfo.bindToThread();
return txInfo;
}然后将当前的事务信息绑定到当前线程。
private void bindToThread() {
// Expose current TransactionStatus, preserving any existing TransactionStatus
// for restoration after this transaction is complete.
this.oldTransactionInfo = transactionInfoHolder.get();
transactionInfoHolder.set(this);
}可以看得到，如果此时当前线程中存在事务，他会将当前事务先设置到老事务对象中，然后再存值，这样子方便后续恢复事务。很明显此时没有存在事务，所以为null.
以上都是为了开启事务，接下就是执行我们的业务逻辑。
不要忘记了我们updateStock也是一个事务方法，此时调用也会经过上面的一些列流程，首先会进入DynamicInvocationInterceptor然后获取拦截器链，然后一个个执行拦截器链路，最后还是会执行到TransactionInterceptor中，我们断点直接打在 TransactionInterceptor中。
此时已经进入到TransactionInterceptor，我们继续往下跟。然后就会进入到createTransactionIfNecessary中。
然后就会去获取一个TransactionStatus。
然后进入dogetTransaction中获取事务对象 。
因为在上一个事务中我们已经把连接器放入到 事务同步管理器中，所以当前这里的数据库连接持有器是能够拿得到值的。
然后此时isExistingTransaction返回的肯定是true，因为此时我们的连接器已经不为空，并且里面的事务状态已经设置为了激活，就会走存在事务的方法handleExistingTransaction。
private TransactionStatus handleExistingTransaction(
TransactionDefinition definition, Object transaction, boolean debugEnabled)
throws TransactionException {
/**
* 判断当前的事务行为是不是PROPAGATION_NEVER的
* 表示为不支持事务,但是当前又存在一个事务,所以抛出异常
*/
if (definition.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NEVER) {
throw new IllegalTransactionStateException(
"Existing transaction found for transaction marked with propagation 'never'");
}
/**
* 判断当前的事务属性不支持事务,PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED,所以需要先挂起已经存在的事务
*/
if (definition.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
if (debugEnabled) {
logger.debug("Suspending current transaction");
}
// 挂起当前事务
Object suspendedResources = suspend(transaction);
boolean newSynchronization = (getTransactionSynchronization() == SYNCHRONIZATION_ALWAYS);
// 创建一个新的非事务状态(保存了上一个存在事务状态的属性)
return prepareTransactionStatus(
definition, null, false, newSynchronization, debugEnabled, suspendedResources);
}
/**
* 当前的事务属性状态是PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW表示需要新开启一个事务状态
*/
if (definition.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW) {
if (debugEnabled) {
logger.debug("Suspending current transaction, creating new transaction with name [" +
definition.getName() + "]");
}
// 挂起当前事务并返回挂起的资源持有器
SuspendedResourcesHolder suspendedResources = suspend(transaction);
try {
// 创建一个新的非事务状态(保存了上一个存在事务状态的属性)
return startTransaction(definition, transaction, debugEnabled, suspendedResources);
}
catch (RuntimeException | Error beginEx) {
resumeAfterBeginException(transaction, suspendedResources, beginEx);
throw beginEx;
}
}
// 嵌套事务
if (definition.getPropagationBehavior() == TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_NESTED) {
// 不允许就报异常
if (!isNestedTransactionAllowed()) {
throw new NestedTransactionNotSupportedException(
"Transaction manager does not allow nested transactions by default - " +
"specify 'nestedTransactionAllowed' property with value 'true'");
}
if (debugEnabled) {
logger.debug("Creating nested transaction with name [" + definition.getName() + "]");
}
// 嵌套事务的处理
if (useSavepointForNestedTransaction()) {
// Create savepoint within existing Spring-managed transaction,
// through the SavepointManager API implemented by TransactionStatus.
// Usually uses JDBC 3.0 savepoints. Never activates Spring synchronization.
// 如果没有可以使用保存点的方式控制事务回滚，那么在嵌入式事务的建立初始简历保存点
DefaultTransactionStatus status =
prepareTransactionStatus(definition, transaction, false, false, debugEnabled, null);
// 为事务设置一个回退点
status.createAndHoldSavepoint();
return status;
}
else {
// Nested transaction through nested begin and commit/rollback calls.
// Usually only for JTA: Spring synchronization might get activated here
// in case of a pre-existing JTA transaction.
// 有些情况是不能使用保存点操作
return startTransaction(definition, transaction, debugEnabled, null);
}
}
// Assumably PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS or PROPAGATION_REQUIRED.
if (debugEnabled) {
logger.debug("Participating in existing transaction");
}
if (isValidateExistingTransaction()) {
if (definition.getIsolationLevel() != TransactionDefinition.ISOLATION_DEFAULT) {
Integer currentIsolationLevel = TransactionSynchronizationManager.getCurrentTransactionIsolationLevel();
if (currentIsolationLevel == null || currentIsolationLevel != definition.getIsolationLevel()) {
Constants isoConstants = DefaultTransactionDefinition.constants;
throw new IllegalTransactionStateException("Participating transaction with definition [" +
definition + "] specifies isolation level which is incompatible with existing transaction: " +
(currentIsolationLevel != null ?
isoConstants.toCode(currentIsolationLevel, DefaultTransactionDefinition.PREFIX_ISOLATION) :
"(unknown)"));
}
}
if (!definition.isReadOnly()) {
if (TransactionSynchronizationManager.isCurrentTransactionReadOnly()) {
throw new IllegalTransactionStateException("Participating transaction with definition [" +
definition + "] is not marked as read-only but existing transaction is");
}
}
}
boolean newSynchronization = (getTransactionSynchronization() != SYNCHRONIZATION_NEVER);
return prepareTransactionStatus(definition, transaction, false, newSynchronization, debugEnabled, null);
}这里就会出现第二个spring的传播特性。首先就会判断当前的事务行为是不是PROPAGATION_NEVER的，如果是则抛出异常。
然后接下来就会处理spring第三个传播特性，判断当前的事务属性不支持事务,PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED,所以需要先挂起已经存在的事务。
而我们这里设置的requed_new，表示需要一个新事物。
首先也会挂起当前已经存在的事务。然后继续调回去startTransaction，去开启一个新的事务。
然后就会通过doBegin开启一个新事务，此时因为我们在挂起事务的已经将当前的连接持有器重置为null，此时就会重新去获取一个连接。
然后此时就会返回一个新的transactionInfo对象然后执行具体的业务逻辑方法。
如果没有异常的话就会执行finally中的 cleanupTransactionInfo来清除事务信息。
protected void cleanupTransactionInfo(@Nullable TransactionInfo txInfo) {
if (txInfo != null) {
txInfo.restoreThreadLocalStatus();
}
}
private void restoreThreadLocalStatus() {
// Use stack to restore old transaction TransactionInfo.
// Will be null if none was set.
transactionInfoHolder.set(this.oldTransactionInfo);
}
可以看到只是把oldTransaction设置到当前的事务信息对象中，所以就能够把上一个事务信息给恢复。
然后方法成功后提交，会进行资源储量，连接释放，恢复挂起事务等操作，继续往下看commitTransactionAfterReturning方法。
protected void commitTransactionAfterReturning(@Nullable TransactionInfo txInfo) {
if (txInfo != null && txInfo.getTransactionStatus() != null) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Completing transaction for [" + txInfo.getJoinpointIdentification() + "]");
}
txInfo.getTransactionManager().commit(txInfo.getTransactionStatus());
}
}
@Override
public final void commit(TransactionStatus status) throws TransactionException {
if (status.isCompleted()) {
throw new IllegalTransactionStateException(
"Transaction is already completed - do not call commit or rollback more than once per transaction");
}
DefaultTransactionStatus defStatus = (DefaultTransactionStatus) status;
// 如果在事务链中已经被标记回滚，那么不会尝试提交事务，直接回滚
if (defStatus.isLocalRollbackOnly()) {
if (defStatus.isDebug()) {
logger.debug("Transactional code has requested rollback");
}
// 不可预期的回滚
processRollback(defStatus, false);
return;
}
// 设置了全局回滚
if (!shouldCommitOnGlobalRollbackOnly() && defStatus.isGlobalRollbackOnly()) {
if (defStatus.isDebug()) {
logger.debug("Global transaction is marked as rollback-only but transactional code requested commit");
}
// 可预期的回滚，可能会报异常
processRollback(defStatus, true);
return;
}
// 处理事务提交
processCommit(defStatus);
}
private void processCommit(DefaultTransactionStatus status) throws TransactionException {
try {
boolean beforeCompletionInvoked = false;
try {
boolean unexpectedRollback = false;
// 预留
prepareForCommit(status);
// 添加的TransactionSynchronization中的对应方法的调用
triggerBeforeCommit(status);
// 提交完成前回调
triggerBeforeCompletion(status);
beforeCompletionInvoked = true;
// 有保存点
if (status.hasSavepoint()) {
if (status.isDebug()) {
logger.debug("Releasing transaction savepoint");
}
//是否有全局回滚标记
unexpectedRollback = status.isGlobalRollbackOnly();
// 如果存在保存点则清除保存点信息
status.releaseHeldSavepoint();
}
//当前状态是新事务
else if (status.isNewTransaction()) {
if (status.isDebug()) {
logger.debug("Initiating transaction commit");
}
unexpectedRollback = status.isGlobalRollbackOnly();
// 如果是独立的事务则直接提交
doCommit(status);
}
else if (isFailEarlyOnGlobalRollbackOnly()) {
unexpectedRollback = status.isGlobalRollbackOnly();
}
// Throw UnexpectedRollbackException if we have a global rollback-only
// marker but still didn't get a corresponding exception from commit.
// 有全局回滚标记就报异常
if (unexpectedRollback) {
throw new UnexpectedRollbackException(
"Transaction silently rolled back because it has been marked as rollback-only");
}
}
catch (UnexpectedRollbackException ex) {
// can only be caused by doCommit
triggerAfterCompletion(status, TransactionSynchronization.STATUS_ROLLED_BACK);
throw ex;
}
catch (TransactionException ex) {
// can only be caused by doCommit
if (isRollbackOnCommitFailure()) {
doRollbackOnCommitException(status, ex);
}
else {
triggerAfterCompletion(status, TransactionSynchronization.STATUS_UNKNOWN);
}
throw ex;
}
catch (RuntimeException | Error ex) {
if (!beforeCompletionInvoked) {
triggerBeforeCompletion(status);
}
// 提交过程中出现异常则回滚
doRollbackOnCommitException(status, ex);
throw ex;
}
// Trigger afterCommit callbacks, with an exception thrown there
// propagated to callers but the transaction still considered as committed.
try {
// 提交后回调
triggerAfterCommit(status);
}
finally {
// 提交后清除线程私有同步状态
triggerAfterCompletion(status, TransactionSynchronization.STATUS_COMMITTED);
}
}
finally {
//根据条件，完成后数据清除,和线程的私有资源解绑，重置连接自动提交，隔离级别，是否只读，释放连接，恢复挂起事务等
cleanupAfterCompletion(status);
}
}
这里会判断是否是新事务，因为我们的隔离级别设置的required_new会开启一个新事务，所以内层事务会直接提交。
然后在事务提交之后会执行对应的finally中的逻辑，cleanupAfterCompletion方法。
private void cleanupAfterCompletion(DefaultTransactionStatus status) {
// 设置完成状态
status.setCompleted();
if (status.isNewSynchronization()) {
// 线程同步状态清除
TransactionSynchronizationManager.clear();
}
// 如果是新事务的话，进行数据清除，线程的私有资源解绑，重置连接自动提交，隔离级别，是否只读，释放连接等
if (status.isNewTransaction()) {
doCleanupAfterCompletion(status.getTransaction());
}
// 有挂起的事务要恢复
if (status.getSuspendedResources() != null) {
if (status.isDebug()) {
logger.debug("Resuming suspended transaction after completion of inner transaction");
}
Object transaction = (status.hasTransaction() ? status.getTransaction() : null);
// 结束之前事务的挂起状态
resume(transaction, (SuspendedResourcesHolder) status.getSuspendedResources());
}
}
public static void clear() {
synchronizations.remove();
currentTransactionName.remove();
currentTransactionReadOnly.remove();
currentTransactionIsolationLevel.remove();
actualTransactionActive.remove();
}
/**
* 此方法做清除连接相关操作，比如重置自动提交啊，只读属性啊，解绑数据源啊，释放连接啊，清除链接持有器属性
* @param transaction the transaction object returned by {@code doGetTransaction}
*/
@Override
protected void doCleanupAfterCompletion(Object transaction) {
DataSourceTransactionObject txObject = (DataSourceTransactionObject) transaction;
// Remove the connection holder from the thread, if exposed.
if (txObject.isNewConnectionHolder()) {
// 将数据库连接从当前线程中解除绑定
TransactionSynchronizationManager.unbindResource(obtainDataSource());
}
// Reset connection.
// 释放连接
Connection con = txObject.getConnectionHolder().getConnection();
try {
if (txObject.isMustRestoreAutoCommit()) {
// 恢复数据库连接的自动提交属性
con.setAutoCommit(true);
}
// 重置数据库连接
DataSourceUtils.resetConnectionAfterTransaction(
con, txObject.getPreviousIsolationLevel(), txObject.isReadOnly());
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
logger.debug("Could not reset JDBC Connection after transaction", ex);
}
if (txObject.isNewConnectionHolder()) {
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Releasing JDBC Connection [" + con + "] after transaction");
}
// 如果当前事务是独立的新创建的事务则在事务完成时释放数据库连接
DataSourceUtils.releaseConnection(con, this.dataSource);
}
// 连接持有器属性清除
txObject.getConnectionHolder().clear();
}如果是新事物，因为在上面新事务已经是直接提交了，所以这里就需要把所有信息给清除掉，然后再最后恢复挂起的事务。
protected final void resume(@Nullable Object transaction, @Nullable SuspendedResourcesHolder resourcesHolder)
throws TransactionException {
// 设置属性和状态
if (resourcesHolder != null) {
Object suspendedResources = resourcesHolder.suspendedResources;
if (suspendedResources != null) {
doResume(transaction, suspendedResources);
}
List<TransactionSynchronization> suspendedSynchronizations = resourcesHolder.suspendedSynchronizations;
//如果有挂起同步器的话要设置线程私有变量的值为挂起事务的相关属性
if (suspendedSynchronizations != null) {
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setActualTransactionActive(resourcesHolder.wasActive);
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setCurrentTransactionIsolationLevel(resourcesHolder.isolationLevel);
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setCurrentTransactionReadOnly(resourcesHolder.readOnly);
TransactionSynchronizationManager.setCurrentTransactionName(resourcesHolder.name);
doResumeSynchronization(suspendedSynchronizations);
}
}
}这里我们只是大概过了一遍事务的执行状态，并且还说明的Spring的传播特性，至于spring事务回滚的逻辑还没有介绍，在下一篇章就会注重介绍spring事务是如何回滚的，大概可以去跟一下对应不同的隔离级别，内层事务跟外层事务是如何运行的。如果回滚的
790
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
