gitdiagram源码架构分析

https://github.com/ahmedkhaleel2004/gitdiagram

整体架构分析

前端请求入口：

后端对应接口：

后端调试

增加客户端调用代码：

后端调试：会提示api_key失败的问题：

有两种方法解决：

1、注释掉下面的行代码；：登录openai网站配置一个api key；

然后在这里写死：

直接后端调试成功：

生成的结果信息：

包含3个内容，后续重点分析file_tree;

调用逻辑梳理

获取文件列表的定义函数

定义了很多需要过滤掉的目录和文件后缀名：

调用的github接口：

api_url = f"https://api.github.com/repos/{username}/{repo}/git/trees/{branch}?recursive=1"

实际传入的3个参数：

ahmedkhaleel2004/gitdiagram，前两个参数从开源项目的github地址的两段拆出，分别对应username和repo；

ahmedkhaleel2004

gitdiagram

main

回到结果，返回的是文件列表信息，并不能够生成mermaid调用关系图；需要继续分析源;

通过调用大模型接口生成mermaid图，传入的参数有3个；

                   data={
                        "explanation": explanation,
                        "component_mapping": component_mapping_text,
                        "instructions": body.instructions,
                    },

explanation根据file_tree和readme生成：

component_mapping_text根据explanation和file_tree生成：

所以，component_mapping_text组件的映射关系，是由大模型生成的？本地调试验证看看。

body.instructions 有提示词组成：

三个3参数的内容分析

修改openai接口为本地接口：

编写调测函数：

async for 这段很关键，不然不会触发正常的响应输出；

关键的两个过程参数信息输出：

component_mapping_text

mermaid_code

实测，使用gpt-4o-mini后，mermaid_code生成不太稳定；

reasoning_effort 参数，在4o中不支持；修改用temperature，temperature设置为0.5生成mermaid不太稳定，改为0.1；

对策：修改使用claude3.7:sonnet，生成信息量更大；但是生成耗时明显增加了很多；

但是会出现BAD_INSTRUCTIONS，但是下面的mermaid图，实际是能用的：

生成的架构图，明显更详细些：

"temperature": 0.1,

"temperature": 0.2,

使用本地模型

本地模型接口：qwen25_72b

component_mapping_text 可以正常生成：

mermaid_code异常：

对应界面的这个输入：

注释掉，不传入：

成功跑通：

效果图：

Gemma3:7b 和27b均返回mermaid格式非法

This is an excellent and thorough explanation of the Java project! It accurately identifies the technologies used, the project structure, and potential functionalities. The breakdown of each component is clear and concise, and the suggestions for further analysis are spot-on.  The questions at the end are also very helpful for focusing the analysis.

Here's a breakdown of why this is a strong response, and a few minor suggestions for improvement:

**Strengths:**

* **Comprehensive:** Covers all major aspects of the project based on the file names provided.
* **Accurate:** Correctly infers the technologies used (Spring, MyBatis, Flyway, Logback, YAML).
* **Well-Organized:**  The breakdown into sections (Overall Structure, Detailed Breakdown, Potential Functionality, Observations & Suggestions) makes it easy to follow.
* **Clear and Concise:**  The explanations are easy to understand, even for someone unfamiliar with the project.
* **Practical Suggestions:** The "Further Analysis" section provides actionable steps for understanding the project in more detail.
* **Good Questions:** The questions at the end help to focus the analysis and provide context.
* **Layered Architecture Recognition:** Correctly identifies the layered architecture and its benefits.

**Minor Suggestions for Improvement:**

* **Database Type Speculation:** While you correctly state the database type isn't immediately clear, adding a few common possibilities (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle) would be helpful.
* **API Exposure:** You mention user authentication/authorization is likely present, and then mention API documentation.  Explicitly stating whether the project *appears* to expose an API (based on file names or structure) would be useful.  For example, "The project structure doesn't immediately reveal an API, but it's likely present if it's intended for external access."
* **Configuration File Purpose:** Briefly explaining the difference between `bootstrap.yml` and `application-*.yml` could be helpful for those less familiar with Spring Boot configuration. (e.g., `bootstrap.yml` is loaded first and is often used for configuration that's shared across multiple environments, while `application-*.yml` is environment-specific.)
* **Component Mapping:** The `<component_mapping>` section is empty. While not strictly necessary given the explanation, it could be used to map specific file/directory names to their corresponding components (e.g., `db/migration/V1__init_tables.sql` -> Database Migration Script).
* **Instructions:** The `<instructions>` section is also empty. This could be used to provide specific instructions for analyzing the project (e.g., "Start by examining the entity classes in `com.autel.inspection.service.dao.entity` to understand the data model.").

**Overall:**

This is an exceptionally well-written and insightful analysis of the Java project. The suggestions above are minor and don't detract from the overall quality of the response.  It demonstrates a strong understanding of Java development, Spring Boot, and common software architecture patterns.  Excellent work!
 

结论：最强模型依然还是claude。