StringBuffer 内容清空效率比较（纠正误传：setLength(0)最快的错误言论）

总结

3种方法均无感清空，效率相同，setLength(0)依然是最优解。（内存消耗最低）

结论表

1.设置3个StringBuffer，50万个元素，每个元素为随机UUID，以下是测试结果，

• 通常：3个方法无差别
• 执行万级别：没有绝对快慢

方法	描述	执行1-1000次	1万次	50万次	5000万次
setLength(0)	设置StringBuffer 为0	0ms	1ms	16ms	535ms
delete(int start, int end)	清空索引 start到end数据	0ms	1ms	14ms	602ms
new StringBuffer	新建StringBuffer	0ms	0ms	26ms	2246ms

执行结果

执行各方法次数为：1
StringBuffer-setLength:0
StringBuffer--delete:0
StringBuffer--new StringBuffer:0
执行各方法次数为：1000
StringBuffer-setLength:0
StringBuffer--delete:0
StringBuffer--new StringBuffer:0
执行各方法次数为：500000
StringBuffer-setLength:16
StringBuffer--delete:14
StringBuffer--new StringBuffer:26
执行各方法次数为：50000000
StringBuffer-setLength:535
StringBuffer--delete:602
StringBuffer--new StringBuffer:2246

测试代码

   private static void testStringBufferclear(int times) {
        StringBuffer sbf = new  StringBuffer();
        StringBuffer sbi = new  StringBuffer();
        StringBuffer sbj = new  StringBuffer();
        for (int i = 0; i < 500000; i++) {
            sbf.append(UUID.randomUUID());
            sbi.append(UUID.randomUUID());
            sbj.append(UUID.randomUUID());
        }
        System.out.println("执行各方法次数为："+times);
        long s1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < times; i++) {
            sbi.setLength(0);
        }
        long s11 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("StringBuffer-setLength:" + (s11 - s1));

        s1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < times; i++) {
            sbf.delete(0, sbf.length());
        }
        s11 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("StringBuffer--delete:" + (s11 - s1));
        s1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < times; i++) {
            sbf = new StringBuffer("");
        }
        s11 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        System.out.println("StringBuffer--new StringBuffer:" + (s11 - s1));
    }


    public static void main(String args[]) {

        testStringBufferclear(1);
        testStringBufferclear(1000);
        testStringBufferclear(500000);
        testStringBufferclear(50000000);
    }