递归压缩(ZipOutputStream )与ANT的zipAPI压缩比较

  最近在一个项目里因涉及到大数据量的压缩，发现通用的递归压缩的效率比较慢，我在项目测试中对一个2G大小的文件进行压缩发现需要4个小时才能压缩完成，感觉效率比较慢，因此查找了一些资料，发现使用ant的zipAPI接口进行压缩可以大大提高压缩效率，并且代码更简洁，初步评估效率可提高15倍，下面是测试样例

 

import java.io.File;

import java.io.FileInputStream;

import java.io.FileNotFoundException;

import java.io.FileOutputStream;

import java.io.IOException;

import java.io.UnsupportedEncodingException;

 

import org.apache.tools.ant.Project;

import org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.*;

import org.apache.tools.zip.*;

 

public class ZipTest {

 

    public  void antZip(String src,String dest) {

       Zip zip = new Zip();

       try {

           zip.setBasedir(new File(src));

           Project p = new Project();

           zip.setDestFile(new File(dest));

           p.setBaseDir(new File(src));

           zip.setProject(p);

           zip.execute();

       } catch (Exception e) {

           // TODO Auto-generatedcatch block

           e.printStackTrace();

       }

    }

 

    public void commZip(String src, String dest) {

       try {

           FileOutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(new String(dest

                  .getBytes("gb2312")));

           ZipOutputStream zOut = new ZipOutputStream(out);

           zip(zOut, new File(src), "");

           zOut.close();

       } catch (FileNotFoundException e) {

           // TODO Auto-generatedcatch block

           e.printStackTrace();

       } catch (UnsupportedEncodingException e) {

           // TODO Auto-generatedcatch block

           e.printStackTrace();

       } catch (IOException e) {

           // TODO Auto-generatedcatch block

           e.printStackTrace();

       } catch (Exception e) {

           // TODO Auto-generatedcatch block

           e.printStackTrace();

       }

    }

 

    private void zip(ZipOutputStream zOut, File file, String base)

           throws Exception {

 

       if (file.isDirectory()) {

           File[] listFiles = file.listFiles();

           zOut.putNextEntry(new ZipEntry(base + "/"));

           base = (base.length() == 0 ? "" : base + "/");

           for (int i = 0; i < listFiles.length; i++) {

              zip(zOut, listFiles[i], base + listFiles[i].getName());

           }

       } else {

           if (base == "") {

              base = file.getName();

           }

           zOut.putNextEntry(new ZipEntry(base));

           FileInputStream in = new FileInputStream(file);

           int len;

           while ((len = in.read()) != -1) {

              zOut.write(len);

           }

           in.close();

       }

    }

 

    public static void main(String[] args) {

       ZipTest zip=new ZipTest();

       //ant zip

       long start = System.currentTimeMillis();

       zip.antZip("F:\\workspace\\idrs_yingji\\WebRoot\\WEB-INF\\classes",

              "F:\\test.zip");

       long end = System.currentTimeMillis();

       System.out.println("ant zip 耗时::" + (end - start) / 1000);

      

       //common zip

       long start1 = System.currentTimeMillis();

       zip.commZip("F:\\workspace\\idrs_yingji\\WebRoot\\WEB-INF\\classes",

           "F:\\test1.zip");

       long end1 = System.currentTimeMillis();

       System.out.println("common zip 耗时::" + (end1 - start1) / 1000);

    }

}

 

测试结果

 

ant zip 耗时::1

common zip 耗时::15

后面将项目的压缩方式改为ANT的接口后，对一个2G的目录进行压缩只用了不到3分钟，而之前需要4.5小时