Reloading Java Classes 201- How do ClassLoader leaks happen?

作者:Jevgeni Kabanov日期:2009.12.10
链接:http://www.zeroturnaround.com/blog/rjc201/

</!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

For the full article series on Reloading Java Classes, see:

From ClassLoaders to Classes

If you have programmed in Java for some time you know that memory leaks do happen. Usually it’s the case of a collection somewhere with references to objects (e.g. listeners) that should have been cleared, but never were. Classloaders are a very special case of this, and unfortunately, with the current state of the Java platform, these leaks are both inevitable and costly: routinely causing OutOfMemoryError’s in production applications after just a few redeploys.

Let’s get started. Recalling RJC101: to reload a class we threw away the old classloader and created a new one, copying the object graph as best we could:

reloading-object

Every object had a reference to its class, which in turn had a reference to its classloader. However we didn’t mention that every classloader in turn has a reference to each of the classes it has loaded, each of which holds static fields defined in the class:

classloader-refs

This means that

  1.    
  2. If a classloader is leaked it will hold on to all its classes and all     their static fields. Static fields commonly hold caches, singleton objects,     and various configuration and application states. Even if your application     doesn’t have any large static caches, it doesn’t mean that the framework you     use doesn’t hold them for you (e.g. Log4J is a common culprit as it’s often     put in the server classpath). This explains why leaking a classloader can be     so expensive.    
  3. To leak a classloader it’s enough to leave a reference to any object,     created from a class, loaded by that classloader. Even if that object seems     completely harmless (e.g. doesn’t have a single field), it will still hold     on to its classloader and all the application state. A single place in the     application that survives the redeploy and doesn’t do a proper cleanup is     enough to sprout the leak. In a typical application there will be several     such places, some of them almost impossible to fix due to the way     third-party libraries are built. Leaking a classloader is therefore, quite     common.

To examine this from a different perspective let’s return to the code example from our previous article. Breeze through it to quickly catch up.

Introducing the Leak

We will use the exact same Main class as before to show what a simple leak could look like:

   
       
           
           
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
           
           
           
public class Main {
  private static IExample example1;
  private static IExample example2;
 
  public static void main(String/[/] args)  {
    example1 = ExampleFactory.newInstance().copy();
 
    while (true) {
      example2 = ExampleFactory.newInstance().copy();
 
      System.out.println("1) " +
        example1.message() + " = " + example1.plusPlus());
      System.out.println("2) " +
        example2.message() + " = " + example2.plusPlus());
      System.out.println();
 
      Thread.currentThread().sleep(3000);
    }
  }
}
           
           

The ExampleFactory class is also exactly the same, but here’s where things get leaky. Let’s introduce a new class called Leak and a corresponding interface ILeak:

   
       
           
           
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
           
           
           
interface ILeak {
}
 
public class Leak implements ILeak {
  private ILeak leak;
 
  public Leak(ILeak leak) {
    this.leak = leak;
  }
}
           
           

As you can see it’s not a terribly complicated class: it just forms a chain of objects, with each doing nothing more than holding a reference to the previous one. We will modify the Example class to include a reference to the Leak object and throw in a large array to take up memory (it represents a large cache). Let’s omit some methods shown in the previous article for brevity:

   
       
           
           
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
           
           
           
public class Example implements IExample {
  private int counter;
  private ILeak leak;
 
  private static final long/[/] cache = new long/[1000000/];
 
  //* message(), counter(), plusPlus() impls /*/
 
  public ILeak leak() {
    return new Leak(leak);
  }
 
  public IExample copy(IExample example) {
    if (example /!= null) {
      counter = example.counter();
      leak = example.leak();
    }
    return this;
  }
}
           
           

The important things to note about Example class are:

  1.    
  2. Example holds a reference to Leak, but     Leak has no references to Example.    
  3. When Example is copied (method copy() is     called) a new Leak object is created holding a reference to the     previous one.

If you try to run this code an OutOfMemoryError will be thrown after just a few iterations:

   
       
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
    at example.Example.<clinit>(Example.java:8)
   

With the right tools, we can look deeper and see how this happens.

Post Mortem

Since Java 5.0, we’ve been able to use the jmap command line tool included in the JDK distribution to dump the heap of a running application (or for that matter even extract the Java heap from a core dump). However, since our application is crashing we will need a feature that was introduced in Java 6.0: dumping the heap on OutOfMemoryError. To do that we only need to add -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError to the JVM command line:

   
       
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Dumping heap to java_pid37266.hprof ...
Heap dump file created /[57715044 bytes in 1.707 secs/]
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
    at example.Example.<clinit>(Example.java:8)
   

After we have the heap dump we can analyze it. There are a number of tools (including jhat, a small web-based analyzer included with the JDK), but here we will use the more sophisticated Eclipse Memory Analyzer (EMA).

After loading the heap dump into the EMA we can look at the Dominator Tree analysis. It is a very useful analysis that will usually reliably identify the biggest memory consumers in the heap and what objects hold a reference to them. In our case it seems quite obvious that the Leak class is the one that consumes most of the heap:

classloader-dominator-tree.png

Now let’s run a search for all of the Leak objects and see what are they holding to. To do that we run a search List objects /-> with outgoing references for “example.Leak”:

ema-search

The results include several Leak objects. Expanding the outgoing references we can see that each of them holds on to a separate instance of Example through a bunch of intermediate objects:

ema-analysis

You may notice that one of the intermediate objects is ExampleFactory$1, which refers to the anonymous subclass of URLClassLoader we created in the ExampleFactory class. In fact what is happening is exactly the situation we described in the beginning of the article:

  •    
  • Each Leak object is leaking. They are holding on to their     classloaders    
  • The classloaders are holding onto the Example class they     have loaded:

classloader-leak

Conclusions

Though this example is slightly contrived, the main idea to take away is that it’s easy to leak a single object in Java. Each leak has the potential to leak the whole classloader if the application is redeployed or otherwise a new classloader is created. Since preventing such leaks is very challenging, it’s a better idea to use Eclipse Memory Analyzer and your understanding of classloaders to hunt them down after you get an OutOfMemoryError on redeploy.

This article addressed the following questions:

  •    
  • How does reloading a class cause the classloader to leak?    
  • What are some consequences of leaking classloaders?    
  • What tools can be used to troubleshoot these memory leaks?

Check out the next articles in the series:

Resources

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值