GSOAP:添加FAULT的处理

GSOAP:添加FAULT的处理

2009-09-30 16:30

不知道是WSDL描述还是GSOAP自身的问题，有其生成的代码中在不支持Header的情况下，一样不支持对FAULT处理，于是，照着处理Header的过程，添加了对FAULT的处理。
     为处理FAULT，需要事先知道SOAP报文中将FAULT信息放在哪里，当然了，一般自定义扩充都放在DETAIL里面。只是开始不太确定，于是还特意发了个错误报文给对端，收到如下回复，从而确认猜测是对的，这样就可以修改了。

<? xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?> < soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv ="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" >< soapenv:Header />< soapenv:Body >< soapenv:Fault >< faultcode > soapenv:Client </ faultcode >< faultstring > Authentication Failed AccessCfgHelper.getProductInfor(productId) is empty or is null.. </ faultstring >< detail >< ns2:ServiceException xmlns:ns2 ="http://www.chinatelecom.com.cn/schema/ctcc/common/v2_1" >< messageId > SVC0901 </ messageId >< text > CP/SP authenticate access failed:Authentication Failed AccessCfgHelper.getProductInfor(productId) is empty or is null.. </ text ></ ns2:ServiceException ></ detail ></ soapenv:Fault ></ soapenv:Body ></ soapenv:Envelope >

    首先在Detail结构里面添加所需要的Fault类型：

#ifndef SOAP_TYPE_SOAP_ENV__Detail
#define SOAP_TYPE_SOAP_ENV__Detail (90)
/* SOAP-ENV:Detail */
struct SOAP_ENV__Detail
{
public :
     // int __type;     /* any type of element <fault> (defined below) */
     // void *fault;     /* transient */
     // char *__any;

     sms2__ServiceException * serviceException;
     sms2__PolicyException * policyException;
};
#endif

    然后就是一样修改Detail的in和out函数了：

SOAP_FMAC3 int SOAP_FMAC4 soap_out_SOAP_ENV__Detail( struct soap * soap, const char * tag, int id, const struct SOAP_ENV__Detail * a, const char * type)
{
     if (soap_element_begin_out(soap, tag, soap_embedded_id(soap, id, a, SOAP_TYPE_SOAP_ENV__Detail), type))
         return soap -> error;
     // if (soap_putelement(soap, a->fault, "fault", -1, a->__type))
     //      return soap->error;
     // soap_outliteral(soap, "-any", &a->__any, NULL);

     if (a != NULL)
     {
         if (a -> serviceException != NULL)
             a -> serviceException -> soap_out(soap, " sms2:ServiceException " , - 1 , "" );
         else if (a -> policyException != NULL)
             a -> policyException -> soap_out(soap, " sms2:PolicyException " , - 1 , "" );
     }

     return soap_element_end_out(soap, tag);
}

 

SOAP_FMAC3 struct SOAP_ENV__Detail * SOAP_FMAC4 soap_in_SOAP_ENV__Detail( struct soap * soap, const char * tag, struct SOAP_ENV__Detail * a, const char * type)
{
     // size_t soap_flag_fault = 1;
     // size_t soap_flag___any = 1;
     if (soap_element_begin_in(soap, tag, 0 , type))
         return NULL;
     a = ( struct SOAP_ENV__Detail * )soap_id_enter(soap, soap -> id, a, SOAP_TYPE_SOAP_ENV__Detail, sizeof ( struct SOAP_ENV__Detail), 0 , NULL, NULL, NULL);
     if ( ! a)
         return NULL;
     soap_default_SOAP_ENV__Detail(soap, a);

     int service = 1 ;
     int policy = 1 ;

     if (soap -> body && !* soap -> href)
     {
         for (;;)
         {     soap -> error = SOAP_TAG_MISMATCH;
             // if (soap_flag_fault && soap->error == SOAP_TAG_MISMATCH)
             //      if ((a->fault = soap_getelement(soap, &a->__type)))
             //      {     soap_flag_fault = 0;
             //          continue;
             //      }
             // if (soap_flag___any && (soap->error == SOAP_TAG_MISMATCH || soap->error == SOAP_NO_TAG))
             //      if (soap_inliteral(soap, "-any", &a->__any))
             //      {     soap_flag___any--;
             //          continue;
             //      }
            
             if (soap -> error == SOAP_TAG_MISMATCH)
             {
                 if (service == 1 )
                 {
                     a -> serviceException = soap_in_sms2__ServiceException(soap, " sms2:ServiceException " , a -> serviceException, "" );
                     if (a -> serviceException)
                     {
                         service = 0 ;
                         continue ;
                     }
                 }
                 else if (policy == 1 )
                 {
                     a -> policyException = soap_in_sms2__PolicyException(soap, " sms2:PolicyException " , a -> policyException, "" );
                     if (a -> policyException)
                     {
                         policy = 0 ;
                         continue ;
                     }
                 }
                 soap -> error = soap_ignore_element(soap);
             }
             if (soap -> error == SOAP_NO_TAG)
                 break ;
             if (soap -> error)
                 return NULL;
         }
         if (soap_element_end_in(soap, tag))
             return NULL;
     }
     else
     {     a = ( struct SOAP_ENV__Detail * )soap_id_forward(soap, soap -> href, ( void * )a, 0 , SOAP_TYPE_SOAP_ENV__Detail, 0 , sizeof ( struct SOAP_ENV__Detail), 0 , NULL);
         if (soap -> body && soap_element_end_in(soap, tag))
             return NULL;
     }
     return a;
}

    由此，SOAP接口的主要问题除了“附件”还没有处理外，就都解决了，其他都是业务应用的问题了，处理起来就有底了～